Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Competitors

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and HDFC Bank (NYSE:HDB) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and HDFC Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, HDFC Bank has a beta of 0.89, suggesting that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and HDFC Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.8% of HDFC Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of HDFC Bank shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and HDFC Bank's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than HDFC Bank. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than HDFC Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

HDFC Bank beats Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE:RY) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Royal Bank of Canada's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Bank of Canada has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Royal Bank of Canada pays an annual dividend of $3.39 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Royal Bank of Canada pays out 57.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Royal Bank of Canada has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Royal Bank of Canada, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Royal Bank of Canada has a consensus price target of $113.8275, indicating a potential upside of 31.06%. Given Royal Bank of Canada's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Royal Bank of Canada is more favorable than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.8% of Royal Bank of Canada shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Royal Bank of Canada's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Royal Bank of Canada has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Bank of Canada, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Royal Bank of Canada beats Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and The Toronto-Dominion Bank (NYSE:TD) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and The Toronto-Dominion Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, The Toronto-Dominion Bank has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. The Toronto-Dominion Bank pays an annual dividend of $2.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. The Toronto-Dominion Bank pays out 62.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and The Toronto-Dominion Bank has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and The Toronto-Dominion Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has a consensus price target of $75.25, indicating a potential upside of 21.04%. Given The Toronto-Dominion Bank's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe The Toronto-Dominion Bank is more favorable than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 48.0% of The Toronto-Dominion Bank shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and The Toronto-Dominion Bank's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

The Toronto-Dominion Bank has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The Toronto-Dominion Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

The Toronto-Dominion Bank beats Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and Westpac Banking (NYSE:WBK) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Westpac Banking's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk and Volatility

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Westpac Banking has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dividends

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Westpac Banking pays an annual dividend of $0.45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group pays out 29.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Westpac Banking pays out 33.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Westpac Banking, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.5% of Westpac Banking shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Westpac Banking's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than Westpac Banking. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Westpac Banking, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group beats Westpac Banking on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and Banco Santander (NYSE:SAN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Banco Santander's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility & Risk

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Banco Santander has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Banco Santander, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 1.4% of Banco Santander shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of Banco Santander shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and Banco Santander's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Banco Santander has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group. Banco Santander is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Banco Santander beats Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group (NYSE:MUFG) and ICICI Bank (NYSE:IBN) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and ICICI Bank's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has higher revenue and earnings than ICICI Bank. Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ICICI Bank, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and ICICI Bank, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Volatility & Risk

Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ICICI Bank has a beta of 1.29, suggesting that its stock price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

1.2% of Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.6% of ICICI Bank shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group and ICICI Bank's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

ICICI Bank beats Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.