Go Pro

N-able (NABL) Competitors

N-able logo
$5.12 +0.07 (+1.28%)
As of 11:21 AM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NABL vs. WK, FSLY, FRSH, KC, and KD

Should you buy N-able stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares N-able with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with N-able include Workiva (WK), Fastly (FSLY), Freshworks (FRSH), Kingsoft Cloud (KC), and Kyndryl (KD).

How does N-able compare to Workiva?

Workiva (NYSE:WK) and N-able (NYSE:NABL) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Workiva had 5 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Workiva and 2 mentions for N-able. Workiva's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat N-able's score of 0.00 indicating that Workiva is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Workiva
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
N-able
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Workiva has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, N-able has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

92.2% of Workiva shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of N-able shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Workiva shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of N-able shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Workiva has a net margin of 1.53% compared to N-able's net margin of -1.99%. N-able's return on equity of 3.40% beat Workiva's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Workiva1.53% -68.43% 1.47%
N-able -1.99%3.40%1.96%

N-able has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Workiva. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Workiva, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Workiva$884.57M3.89-$26.17M$0.23266.57
N-able$511.43M1.89-$17.03M-$0.05N/A

Workiva presently has a consensus price target of $88.50, indicating a potential upside of 44.35%. N-able has a consensus price target of $7.55, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Given N-able's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than Workiva.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Workiva
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
N-able
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Summary

Workiva beats N-able on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Fastly?

N-able (NYSE:NABL) and Fastly (NYSE:FSLY) are both technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk and institutional ownership.

N-able has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fastly has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Fastly had 5 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fastly and 2 mentions for N-able. Fastly's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat N-able's score of 0.00 indicating that Fastly is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
N-able
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Fastly
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

N-able presently has a consensus price target of $7.55, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Fastly has a consensus price target of $23.11, indicating a potential downside of 4.74%. Given N-able's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than Fastly.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
N-able
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Fastly
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.46

N-able has a net margin of -1.99% compared to Fastly's net margin of -23.49%. N-able's return on equity of 3.40% beat Fastly's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
N-able-1.99% 3.40% 1.96%
Fastly -23.49%-12.02%-7.83%

96.4% of N-able shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.7% of Fastly shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of N-able shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Fastly shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

N-able has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Fastly. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fastly, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
N-able$511.43M1.89-$17.03M-$0.05N/A
Fastly$652.57M5.82-$158.06M-$0.69N/A

Summary

Fastly beats N-able on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Freshworks?

N-able (NYSE:NABL) and Freshworks (NASDAQ:FRSH) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

N-able has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Freshworks has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Freshworks has higher revenue and earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Freshworks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
N-able$511.43M1.89-$17.03M-$0.05N/A
Freshworks$838.81M3.93$183.72M$0.6219.23

In the previous week, Freshworks had 7 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Freshworks and 2 mentions for N-able. Freshworks' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat N-able's score of 0.00 indicating that Freshworks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
N-able
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Freshworks
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.6% of Freshworks shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of N-able shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Freshworks shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Freshworks has a net margin of 20.69% compared to N-able's net margin of -1.99%. Freshworks' return on equity of 4.27% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
N-able-1.99% 3.40% 1.96%
Freshworks 20.69%4.27%2.74%

N-able presently has a consensus price target of $7.55, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Freshworks has a consensus price target of $13.25, indicating a potential upside of 11.11%. Given N-able's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe N-able is more favorable than Freshworks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
N-able
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Freshworks
1 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Freshworks beats N-able on 15 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Kingsoft Cloud?

N-able (NYSE:NABL) and Kingsoft Cloud (NASDAQ:KC) are both technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.4% of Kingsoft Cloud shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of N-able shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.2% of Kingsoft Cloud shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

N-able has a net margin of -1.99% compared to Kingsoft Cloud's net margin of -9.38%. N-able's return on equity of 3.40% beat Kingsoft Cloud's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
N-able-1.99% 3.40% 1.96%
Kingsoft Cloud -9.38%-11.67%-3.59%

N-able currently has a consensus target price of $7.55, indicating a potential upside of 47.32%. Kingsoft Cloud has a consensus target price of $17.15, indicating a potential upside of 33.41%. Given N-able's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than Kingsoft Cloud.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
N-able
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Kingsoft Cloud
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

In the previous week, Kingsoft Cloud had 5 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Kingsoft Cloud and 2 mentions for N-able. Kingsoft Cloud's average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat N-able's score of 0.00 indicating that Kingsoft Cloud is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
N-able
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Kingsoft Cloud
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

N-able has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Kingsoft Cloud has a beta of 1.99, meaning that its share price is 99% more volatile than the broader market.

N-able has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Kingsoft Cloud. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kingsoft Cloud, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
N-able$511.43M1.89-$17.03M-$0.05N/A
Kingsoft Cloud$1.37B2.84-$133.88M-$0.47N/A

Summary

Kingsoft Cloud beats N-able on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Kyndryl?

Kyndryl (NYSE:KD) and N-able (NYSE:NABL) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

71.5% of Kyndryl shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Kyndryl shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of N-able shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kyndryl has higher revenue and earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kyndryl, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kyndryl$15.09B0.21$199M$0.8516.75
N-able$511.43M1.89-$17.03M-$0.05N/A

Kyndryl has a net margin of 1.31% compared to N-able's net margin of -1.99%. Kyndryl's return on equity of 20.43% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kyndryl1.31% 20.43% 2.32%
N-able -1.99%3.40%1.96%

Kyndryl presently has a consensus target price of $16.67, suggesting a potential upside of 17.07%. N-able has a consensus target price of $7.55, suggesting a potential upside of 47.32%. Given N-able's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than Kyndryl.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kyndryl
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.78
N-able
3 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Kyndryl has a beta of 1.64, meaning that its stock price is 64% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, N-able has a beta of 0.5, meaning that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Kyndryl had 5 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Kyndryl and 2 mentions for N-able. Kyndryl's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat N-able's score of 0.00 indicating that Kyndryl is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Kyndryl
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
N-able
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Kyndryl beats N-able on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get N-able News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NABL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NABL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NABL vs. The Competition

MetricN-ableSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$967.33M$15.43B$29.33B$23.98B
Dividend YieldN/A3.45%2.76%4.21%
P/E Ratio-102.70131.0481.4931.93
Price / Sales1.891,289.78597.5214.85
Price / Cash11.8440.6645.0418.72
Price / Book1.198.248.004.87
Net Income-$17.03M$437.13M$663.37M$1.07B
7 Day Performance17.95%1.79%4.19%1.09%
1 Month Performance24.54%-0.52%-1.81%1.26%
1 Year Performance-35.70%7.51%151.09%19.84%

N-able Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NABL
N-able
3.3496 of 5 stars
$5.13
+1.3%
$7.55
+47.3%
-34.9%$967.33M$511.43MN/A1,852
WK
Workiva
4.0526 of 5 stars
$58.31
+4.6%
$88.50
+51.8%
-27.6%$3.27B$925.59M253.562,860
FSLY
Fastly
1.5397 of 5 stars
$20.44
+2.0%
$23.11
+13.1%
+261.0%$3.19B$652.57MN/A1,100
FRSH
Freshworks
4.0992 of 5 stars
$11.12
+2.7%
$13.25
+19.2%
-7.2%$3.06B$838.81M17.884,500
KC
Kingsoft Cloud
3.6983 of 5 stars
$9.99
+0.6%
$17.15
+71.6%
-11.6%$3.02B$10.29BN/A15,225

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:NABL) was last updated on 8/4/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners