Go Pro

N-able (NABL) Competitors

N-able logo
$4.01 -0.16 (-3.72%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$4.07 +0.05 (+1.25%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

NABL vs. TDC, ATEN, PRGS, RDWR, and RPD

Should you buy N-able stock or one of its competitors? N-able's main competitors and comparable companies include Teradata (TDC), A10 Networks (ATEN), Progress Software (PRGS), Radware (RDWR), and Rapid7 (RPD). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "systems software" industry.

How does N-able compare to Teradata?

Teradata (NYSE:TDC) and N-able (NYSE:NABL) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Teradata has a beta of 0.58, suggesting that its share price is 42% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, N-able has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Teradata presently has a consensus target price of $34.78, suggesting a potential upside of 18.29%. N-able has a consensus target price of $5.08, suggesting a potential upside of 26.53%. Given N-able's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe N-able is more favorable than Teradata.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Teradata
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20
N-able
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

90.3% of Teradata shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Teradata shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of N-able shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Teradata has a net margin of 27.08% compared to N-able's net margin of -0.88%. Teradata's return on equity of 47.25% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Teradata27.08% 47.25% 10.29%
N-able -0.88%3.55%2.04%

In the previous week, Teradata had 4 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Teradata and 3 mentions for N-able. Teradata's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat N-able's score of 0.40 indicating that Teradata is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Teradata
4 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
N-able
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Teradata has higher revenue and earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Teradata, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Teradata$1.66B1.64$130M$4.756.19
N-able$511.43M1.48-$18.82M-$0.02N/A

Summary

Teradata beats N-able on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to A10 Networks?

A10 Networks (NYSE:ATEN) and N-able (NYSE:NABL) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

A10 Networks currently has a consensus price target of $30.88, suggesting a potential upside of 15.87%. N-able has a consensus price target of $5.08, suggesting a potential upside of 26.53%. Given N-able's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than A10 Networks.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
A10 Networks
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
N-able
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, A10 Networks had 1 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for A10 Networks and 3 mentions for N-able. A10 Networks' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat N-able's score of 0.40 indicating that A10 Networks is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
A10 Networks
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
N-able
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

A10 Networks has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, N-able has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

A10 Networks has higher earnings, but lower revenue than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than A10 Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
A10 Networks$290.56M6.66$42.14M$0.6044.41
N-able$511.43M1.48-$18.82M-$0.02N/A

A10 Networks has a net margin of 13.85% compared to N-able's net margin of -0.88%. A10 Networks' return on equity of 23.63% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
A10 Networks13.85% 23.63% 8.09%
N-able -0.88%3.55%2.04%

98.6% of A10 Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.4% of N-able shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of A10 Networks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of N-able shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

A10 Networks beats N-able on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Progress Software?

Progress Software (NASDAQ:PRGS) and N-able (NYSE:NABL) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Progress Software has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, N-able has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Progress Software has a net margin of 8.87% compared to N-able's net margin of -0.88%. Progress Software's return on equity of 43.07% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Progress Software8.87% 43.07% 8.78%
N-able -0.88%3.55%2.04%

Progress Software has higher revenue and earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Progress Software, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Progress Software$977.83M1.83$73.13M$2.0621.15
N-able$511.43M1.48-$18.82M-$0.02N/A

Progress Software currently has a consensus price target of $52.17, indicating a potential upside of 19.76%. N-able has a consensus price target of $5.08, indicating a potential upside of 26.53%. Given N-able's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe N-able is more favorable than Progress Software.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Progress Software
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
N-able
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Progress Software had 4 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Progress Software and 3 mentions for N-able. Progress Software's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat N-able's score of 0.40 indicating that Progress Software is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Progress Software
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
N-able
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

96.4% of N-able shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Progress Software shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of N-able shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Progress Software beats N-able on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Radware?

N-able (NYSE:NABL) and Radware (NASDAQ:RDWR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

N-able has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Radware has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

Radware has lower revenue, but higher earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Radware, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
N-able$511.43M1.48-$18.82M-$0.02N/A
Radware$301.85M4.15$20.26M$0.3878.34

N-able currently has a consensus target price of $5.08, indicating a potential upside of 26.53%. Radware has a consensus target price of $25.00, indicating a potential downside of 16.02%. Given N-able's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe N-able is more favorable than Radware.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
N-able
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Radware
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.50

In the previous week, N-able had 1 more articles in the media than Radware. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for N-able and 2 mentions for Radware. N-able's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Radware's score of 0.33 indicating that N-able is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
N-able
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Radware
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.1% of Radware shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of N-able shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 21.6% of Radware shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Radware has a net margin of 5.34% compared to N-able's net margin of -0.88%. Radware's return on equity of 7.47% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
N-able-0.88% 3.55% 2.04%
Radware 5.34%7.47%4.26%

Summary

Radware beats N-able on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does N-able compare to Rapid7?

N-able (NYSE:NABL) and Rapid7 (NASDAQ:RPD) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

96.4% of N-able shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.7% of Rapid7 shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of N-able shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Rapid7 shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Rapid7 has higher revenue and earnings than N-able. N-able is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Rapid7, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
N-able$511.43M1.48-$18.82M-$0.02N/A
Rapid7$859.79M0.98$23.38M$0.3140.19

N-able currently has a consensus target price of $5.08, indicating a potential upside of 26.53%. Rapid7 has a consensus target price of $11.98, indicating a potential downside of 3.84%. Given N-able's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe N-able is more favorable than Rapid7.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
N-able
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Rapid7
5 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

Rapid7 has a net margin of 2.35% compared to N-able's net margin of -0.88%. Rapid7's return on equity of 27.89% beat N-able's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
N-able-0.88% 3.55% 2.04%
Rapid7 2.35%27.89%2.66%

N-able has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Rapid7 has a beta of 1.01, suggesting that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Rapid7 had 9 more articles in the media than N-able. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Rapid7 and 3 mentions for N-able. Rapid7's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat N-able's score of 0.40 indicating that Rapid7 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
N-able
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Rapid7
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Rapid7 beats N-able on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get N-able News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for NABL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding NABL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

NABL vs. The Competition

MetricN-ableSoftware IndustryTechnology SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$787.74M$15.93B$29.45B$23.26B
Dividend YieldN/A3.43%2.75%3.58%
P/E Ratio-200.75141.1276.2728.40
Price / Sales1.481,286.97589.4020.31
Price / Cash10.5146.6547.4834.34
Price / Book0.938.657.674.69
Net Income-$18.82M$435.49M$705.00M$1.07B
7 Day Performance4.97%-1.19%-1.90%-2.41%
1 Month Performance16.04%-1.31%-4.79%-4.27%
1 Year Performance-51.19%-0.40%176.50%8.87%

N-able Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
NABL
N-able
4.3762 of 5 stars
$4.02
-3.7%
$5.08
+26.5%
-49.3%$787.74M$511.43MN/A1,852
TDC
Teradata
4.019 of 5 stars
$27.88
-0.6%
$34.78
+24.8%
+39.1%$2.59B$1.66B5.865,100
ATEN
A10 Networks
3.4699 of 5 stars
$24.74
+0.6%
$30.88
+24.8%
+46.9%$1.80B$310.17M41.22580
PRGS
Progress Software
3.2332 of 5 stars
$42.68
-3.1%
$52.17
+22.2%
+2.8%$1.75B$977.83M20.732,801
RDWR
Radware
0.7311 of 5 stars
$28.02
-0.9%
$25.00
-10.8%
+14.6%$1.18B$301.85M73.801,296

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:NABL) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners