Go Pro
→ The REAL Reason Trump is Invading Iran (From Banyan Hill Publishing) (Ad)tc pixel Free SITC Stock Alerts

Site Centers (SITC) Competitors

Site Centers logo
$3.03 +0.08 (+2.71%)
As of 03:58 PM Eastern
Compare

SITC vs. BRX, VINP, EVAC, NCDL, and MSIF

Should you buy Site Centers stock or one of its competitors? Site Centers's main competitors and comparable companies include Brixmor Property Group (BRX), Vinci Compass Investments (VINP), EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (EVAC), Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NCDL), and MSC Income Fund (MSIF). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does Site Centers compare to Brixmor Property Group?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and Brixmor Property Group (NYSE:BRX) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to Brixmor Property Group's net margin of 30.82%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat Brixmor Property Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Site Centers219.18% 40.56% 27.81%
Brixmor Property Group 30.82%14.38%4.77%

88.7% of Site Centers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.4% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Brixmor Property Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brixmor Property Group has higher revenue and earnings than Site Centers. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brixmor Property Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers$113.49M1.40$177.86M$2.411.26
Brixmor Property Group$1.37B6.28$386.23M$1.4020.06

Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brixmor Property Group has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Brixmor Property Group had 3 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brixmor Property Group and 1 mentions for Site Centers. Brixmor Property Group's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Site Centers' score of 0.00 indicating that Brixmor Property Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Site Centers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Brixmor Property Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Site Centers currently has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.51%. Brixmor Property Group has a consensus target price of $34.80, suggesting a potential upside of 23.93%. Given Brixmor Property Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Brixmor Property Group is more favorable than Site Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Site Centers
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Brixmor Property Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.92

Summary

Brixmor Property Group beats Site Centers on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Site Centers compare to Vinci Compass Investments?

Vinci Compass Investments (NASDAQ:VINP) and Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Vinci Compass Investments has a beta of 0.29, meaning that its share price is 71% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market.

34.1% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Site Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.3% of Vinci Compass Investments shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Site Centers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Site Centers has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Vinci Compass Investments. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Vinci Compass Investments, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Vinci Compass Investments$175.01M3.54$38.97M$0.7013.54
Site Centers$113.49M1.40$177.86M$2.411.26

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to Vinci Compass Investments' net margin of 23.77%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat Vinci Compass Investments' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Vinci Compass Investments23.77% 12.65% 6.67%
Site Centers 219.18%40.56%27.81%

Vinci Compass Investments presently has a consensus price target of $13.50, suggesting a potential upside of 42.41%. Site Centers has a consensus price target of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.51%. Given Vinci Compass Investments' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Vinci Compass Investments is more favorable than Site Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Vinci Compass Investments
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
Site Centers
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

In the previous week, Vinci Compass Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Vinci Compass Investments and 1 mentions for Site Centers. Vinci Compass Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.06 beat Site Centers' score of 0.00 indicating that Vinci Compass Investments is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Vinci Compass Investments
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Site Centers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Vinci Compass Investments beats Site Centers on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Site Centers compare to EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II (NYSE:EVAC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and risk.

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers$113.49M1.40$177.86M$2.411.26
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/A$8.92M$0.1473.54

88.7% of Site Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Site Centers had 1 more articles in the media than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Site Centers and 0 mentions for EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II. Site Centers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Site Centers Neutral
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II Neutral

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's net margin of 0.00%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Site Centers219.18% 40.56% 27.81%
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II N/A -102.93%3.57%

Site Centers currently has a consensus price target of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.51%. Given Site Centers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Site Centers
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Site Centers beats EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II on 11 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Site Centers compare to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending?

Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) and Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending (NYSE:NCDL) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Site Centers has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending. Site Centers is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Site Centers$113.49M1.40$177.86M$2.411.26
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending$207.86M2.87$65.61M$0.9512.71

Site Centers has a beta of 0.98, meaning that its share price is 2% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market.

88.7% of Site Centers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending had 3 more articles in the media than Site Centers. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending and 1 mentions for Site Centers. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Site Centers' score of 0.00 indicating that Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Site Centers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's net margin of 24.44%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Site Centers219.18% 40.56% 27.81%
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending 24.44%9.60%4.10%

Site Centers presently has a consensus target price of $3.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.51%. Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending has a consensus target price of $13.63, indicating a potential upside of 12.88%. Given Site Centers' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Site Centers is more favorable than Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Site Centers
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.20

Summary

Site Centers and Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Site Centers compare to MSC Income Fund?

MSC Income Fund (NYSE:MSIF) and Site Centers (NYSE:SITC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment, risk, profitability, earnings and institutional ownership.

Site Centers has higher revenue and earnings than MSC Income Fund. MSC Income Fund is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Site Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
MSC Income Fund$110.26M5.37-$155.54K-$0.00N/A
Site Centers$113.49M1.40$177.86M$2.411.26

Site Centers has a net margin of 219.18% compared to MSC Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Site Centers' return on equity of 40.56% beat MSC Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
MSC Income FundN/A N/A N/A
Site Centers 219.18%40.56%27.81%

88.7% of Site Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Site Centers shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

MSC Income Fund presently has a consensus target price of $13.88, suggesting a potential upside of 10.56%. Site Centers has a consensus target price of $3.50, suggesting a potential upside of 15.51%. Given Site Centers' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Site Centers is more favorable than MSC Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
MSC Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Site Centers
2 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.33

In the previous week, MSC Income Fund and MSC Income Fund both had 1 articles in the media. MSC Income Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Site Centers'average media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
MSC Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Site Centers
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Site Centers beats MSC Income Fund on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Site Centers News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SITC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SITC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SITC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricSite CentersCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$154.80M$5.36B$13.79B$23.07B
Dividend YieldN/A7.50%5.95%3.62%
P/E Ratio1.2629.9525.3428.31
Price / Sales1.401,270.63522.4920.67
Price / Cash0.6647.8530.0819.33
Price / Book0.473.542.744.73
Net Income$177.86M$417.39M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.95%0.59%0.18%-0.96%
1 Month Performance-0.98%-1.15%0.14%-4.02%
1 Year Performance-65.09%1.92%8.08%8.68%

Site Centers Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SITC
Site Centers
1.4654 of 5 stars		$3.03
+2.7%		$3.50
+15.5%		-66.0%$154.80M$113.49M1.26155
BRX
Brixmor Property Group
4.6372 of 5 stars		$27.98
-0.3%		$34.80
+24.4%		+1.3%$8.58B$1.37B19.98464
VINP
Vinci Compass Investments
4.4317 of 5 stars		$9.30
-0.1%		$13.50
+45.2%		-10.8%$608.43M$1.06B13.29594
EVAC
EQV Ventures Acquisition Corp. II
N/A$10.30
0.0%		N/AN/A$601.72MN/A73.547
NCDL
Nuveen Churchill Direct Lending
3.988 of 5 stars		$12.03
-2.0%		$13.63
+13.3%		-19.9%$594.16M$207.86M12.66N/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SITC) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
ALERT: Drop these 5 stocks before the market opens tomorrow!
The Wall Street Journal is already raising the alarm about a potential market crash, and Weiss Ratings researc...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
Small Colorado Company (Backed by Sam Altman) Could Save U.S. Power Grid
A small Colorado company has secured rights to technology that could prevent the U.S. public power grid from c...
Altimetry | Sponsoredtc pixel
Louis Navellier: My #1 AI stock for 2026 (name & ticker inside)
Louis Navellier's Stock Grader system helped him flag Nvidia before its 82,000% run and has identified the top...
InvestorPlace | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s the stock symbol I’ve promised
Whitney Tilson of Stansberry Research has long recommended Berkshire Hathaway as a core retirement holding - b...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
Here’s Why Trump Won’t End The Iran War
Trump has called an Iran deal close 38 times since the war began, yet the fighting keeps flaring back up. O...
Banyan Hill Publishing | Sponsoredtc pixel
These gold assets are priced for $1,800 gold [it's over $4,000]
Gold's major miners are generating record free cash flow, with margins as high as 75 percent even after gold's...
Golden Portfolio | Sponsoredtc pixel
Bank of America: 'Digital Dollar Inevitable'
Bank of America just revealed your expiration date. In their Bloomberg interview, they didn't just predict the...
Decentralized Masters | Sponsoredtc pixel