Go Pro

Total Return Securities (SWZ) Competitors

Total Return Securities logo
$5.94 +0.01 (+0.19%)
Closing price 03:54 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$5.94 0.00 (-0.02%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SWZ vs. DSM, SAR, KF, MIN, and TDF

Should you buy Total Return Securities stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Total Return Securities with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Total Return Securities include BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (DSM), Saratoga Investment (SAR), The Korea Fund (KF), MFS Intermediate Income Trust (MIN), and Templeton Dragon Fund (TDF). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Total Return Securities compare to BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund?

Total Return Securities (NYSE:SWZ) and BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund (NYSE:DSM) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and risk.

BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Total Return Securities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Total Return Securities$3.34M23.07-$3.74MN/AN/A
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Total Return Securities has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Total Return SecuritiesN/A N/A N/A
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund N/A N/A N/A

41.1% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Total Return Securities had 1 more articles in the media than BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Total Return Securities and 1 mentions for BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund. BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Total Return Securities' score of 1.03 indicating that BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Total Return Securities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Total Return Securities beats BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Total Return Securities compare to Saratoga Investment?

Total Return Securities (NYSE:SWZ) and Saratoga Investment (NYSE:SAR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Saratoga Investment had 2 more articles in the media than Total Return Securities. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Saratoga Investment and 2 mentions for Total Return Securities. Total Return Securities' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat Saratoga Investment's score of -0.28 indicating that Total Return Securities is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Total Return Securities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Saratoga Investment
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Saratoga Investment has a net margin of 12.70% compared to Total Return Securities' net margin of 0.00%. Saratoga Investment's return on equity of 8.76% beat Total Return Securities' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Total Return SecuritiesN/A N/A N/A
Saratoga Investment 12.70%8.76%2.95%

Saratoga Investment has a consensus target price of $21.50, indicating a potential upside of 9.54%. Given Saratoga Investment's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Saratoga Investment is more favorable than Total Return Securities.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Total Return Securities
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Saratoga Investment
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

41.1% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Saratoga Investment shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Saratoga Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Total Return Securities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Total Return Securities$3.34M23.07-$3.74MN/AN/A
Saratoga Investment$125.71M2.55$36.60M$1.0019.63

Total Return Securities has a beta of 0.67, indicating that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saratoga Investment has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Saratoga Investment beats Total Return Securities on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Total Return Securities compare to The Korea Fund?

The Korea Fund (NYSE:KF) and Total Return Securities (NYSE:SWZ) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, The Korea Fund and The Korea Fund both had 2 articles in the media. Total Return Securities' average media sentiment score of 1.03 beat The Korea Fund's score of 0.64 indicating that Total Return Securities is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
The Korea Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Total Return Securities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

The Korea Fund has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Total Return Securities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The Korea FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Total Return Securities$3.34M23.07-$3.74MN/AN/A

70.0% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.1% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by institutional investors. 59.5% of The Korea Fund shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of Total Return Securities shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
The Korea FundN/A N/A N/A
Total Return Securities N/A N/A N/A

The Korea Fund has a beta of 1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 55% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Total Return Securities has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

The Korea Fund beats Total Return Securities on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Total Return Securities compare to MFS Intermediate Income Trust?

Total Return Securities (NYSE:SWZ) and MFS Intermediate Income Trust (NYSE:MIN) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and risk.

MFS Intermediate Income Trust has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Total Return Securities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Total Return Securities$3.34M23.07-$3.74MN/AN/A
MFS Intermediate Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Total Return Securities had 1 more articles in the media than MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Total Return Securities and 1 mentions for MFS Intermediate Income Trust. MFS Intermediate Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 2.00 beat Total Return Securities' score of 1.03 indicating that MFS Intermediate Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Total Return Securities Positive
MFS Intermediate Income Trust Very Positive

Total Return Securities has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its stock price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, MFS Intermediate Income Trust has a beta of 0.27, suggesting that its stock price is 73% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Total Return SecuritiesN/A N/A N/A
MFS Intermediate Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

41.1% of Total Return Securities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.9% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Total Return Securities shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.0% of MFS Intermediate Income Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Total Return Securities beats MFS Intermediate Income Trust on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Total Return Securities compare to Templeton Dragon Fund?

Total Return Securities (NYSE:SWZ) and Templeton Dragon Fund (NYSE:TDF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk and media sentiment.

Total Return Securities has a beta of 0.67, suggesting that its share price is 33% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Templeton Dragon Fund has a beta of 0.4, suggesting that its share price is 60% less volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Total Return SecuritiesN/A N/A N/A
Templeton Dragon Fund N/A N/A N/A

Templeton Dragon Fund has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Total Return Securities.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Total Return Securities$3.34M23.07-$3.74MN/AN/A
Templeton Dragon FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Total Return Securities had 1 more articles in the media than Templeton Dragon Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Total Return Securities and 1 mentions for Templeton Dragon Fund. Templeton Dragon Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Total Return Securities' score of 1.03 indicating that Templeton Dragon Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Total Return Securities
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Templeton Dragon Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

41.1% of Total Return Securities shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.2% of Templeton Dragon Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Total Return Securities shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Total Return Securities beats Templeton Dragon Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Total Return Securities News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SWZ and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SWZ and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SWZ vs. The Competition

MetricTotal Return SecuritiesFIN IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$76.97M$4.80B$14.42B$23.50B
Dividend YieldN/A6.79%5.64%4.15%
P/E RatioN/A0.0220.6630.91
Price / Sales23.0717.0344.5719.87
Price / CashN/A4.9819.3632.65
Price / Book0.663.132.264.75
Net Income-$3.74M$388.27M$1.14B$1.07B
7 Day Performance-0.15%-1.11%0.37%-0.01%
1 Month Performance0.44%-0.02%2.12%1.62%
1 Year Performance-4.64%10.70%13.30%16.41%

Total Return Securities Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SWZ
Total Return Securities
2.4911 of 5 stars
$5.94
+0.2%
N/A-5.0%$76.97M$3.34MN/AN/A
DSM
BNY Mellon Strategic Municipal Bond Fund
N/A$6.06
-0.2%
N/A+9.1%$299.30MN/AN/A20,786
SAR
Saratoga Investment
3.0005 of 5 stars
$17.98
-14.1%
$23.00
+27.9%
-23.1%$292.43M$49.92M7.723,211
KF
The Korea Fund
N/A$68.36
+0.5%
N/A+119.4%$284.38MN/AN/AN/A
MIN
MFS Intermediate Income Trust
N/A$2.45
-0.2%
N/A-7.9%$278.24MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:SWZ) was last updated on 7/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners