Waterdrop (WDH) Competitors

In the previous week, Clover Health Investments had 8 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Clover Health Investments and 0 mentions for Waterdrop. Clover Health Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.00 indicating that Clover Health Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.05%. Clover Health Investments has a consensus price target of $2.90, suggesting a potential downside of 20.55%. Given Waterdrop's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than Clover Health Investments.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Clover Health Investments' net margin of -2.58%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 11.34% beat Clover Health Investments' return on equity.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clover Health Investments has a beta of 2.54, meaning that its stock price is 154% more volatile than the broader market.

Waterdrop has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Clover Health Investments. Clover Health Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waterdrop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of Clover Health Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Clover Health Investments shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Slide Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $24.80, suggesting a potential upside of 53.18%. Waterdrop has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.05%. Given Slide Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Slide Insurance is more favorable than Waterdrop.

Slide Insurance has higher revenue and earnings than Waterdrop. Slide Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waterdrop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Slide Insurance had 20 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for Slide Insurance and 0 mentions for Waterdrop. Slide Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.36 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.00 indicating that Slide Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. 50.8% of Slide Insurance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Slide Insurance has a net margin of 38.86% compared to Waterdrop's net margin of 14.28%. Slide Insurance's return on equity of 48.38% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

Fidelis Insurance currently has a consensus target price of $24.33, indicating a potential upside of 15.27%. Waterdrop has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 36.05%. Given Waterdrop's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Waterdrop shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Fidelis Insurance has higher revenue and earnings than Waterdrop. Fidelis Insurance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waterdrop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Waterdrop pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Fidelis Insurance pays out 16.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Waterdrop pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Fidelis Insurance had 7 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Fidelis Insurance and 0 mentions for Waterdrop. Fidelis Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.00 indicating that Fidelis Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its share price is 118% less volatile than the broader market.

Fidelis Insurance has a net margin of 15.33% compared to Waterdrop's net margin of 14.28%. Fidelis Insurance's return on equity of 14.44% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Waterdrop. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 11.36%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 18.24% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.8% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.5% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Waterdrop presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 36.05%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a consensus target price of $65.75, suggesting a potential upside of 53.87%. Given Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more favorable than Waterdrop.

In the previous week, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group had 6 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group and 0 mentions for Waterdrop. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.00 indicating that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.