Waterdrop (WDH) Competitors

In the previous week, Fidelis Insurance had 5 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Fidelis Insurance and 4 mentions for Waterdrop. Fidelis Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.18 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.03 indicating that Fidelis Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Fidelis Insurance's net margin of 9.02%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 11.34% beat Fidelis Insurance's return on equity.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.16, indicating that its share price is 116% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Fidelis Insurance has a beta of 0.36, indicating that its share price is 64% less volatile than the broader market.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 82.0% of Fidelis Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Fidelis Insurance has higher revenue and earnings than Waterdrop. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Fidelis Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waterdrop pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Fidelis Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.0%. Waterdrop pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Fidelis Insurance pays out 27.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Waterdrop is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Waterdrop presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 26.18%. Fidelis Insurance has a consensus target price of $22.64, indicating a potential upside of 11.87%. Given Waterdrop's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than Fidelis Insurance.

In the previous week, Skyward Specialty Insurance Group had 17 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Skyward Specialty Insurance Group and 4 mentions for Waterdrop. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.53 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.03 indicating that Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group presently has a consensus target price of $65.75, suggesting a potential upside of 45.21%. Waterdrop has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.18%. Given Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Skyward Specialty Insurance Group is more favorable than Waterdrop.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's net margin of 11.36%. Skyward Specialty Insurance Group's return on equity of 18.24% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

94.8% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. 8.5% of Skyward Specialty Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Waterdrop. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Skyward Specialty Insurance Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Skyward Specialty Insurance Group has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waterdrop has a beta of -0.16, meaning that its share price is 116% less volatile than the broader market.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.8% of Clover Health Investments shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.5% of Clover Health Investments shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Clover Health Investments had 1 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Clover Health Investments and 4 mentions for Waterdrop. Clover Health Investments' average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.03 indicating that Clover Health Investments is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.16, meaning that its stock price is 116% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clover Health Investments has a beta of 2.44, meaning that its stock price is 144% more volatile than the broader market.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Clover Health Investments' net margin of -2.58%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 11.34% beat Clover Health Investments' return on equity.

Waterdrop has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Clover Health Investments. Clover Health Investments is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waterdrop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waterdrop currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.18%. Clover Health Investments has a consensus target price of $2.90, suggesting a potential downside of 16.91%. Given Waterdrop's higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than Clover Health Investments.

In the previous week, Goosehead Insurance had 3 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Goosehead Insurance and 4 mentions for Waterdrop. Goosehead Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Waterdrop's score of 0.03 indicating that Goosehead Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop has higher revenue and earnings than Goosehead Insurance. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Goosehead Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.1% of Goosehead Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 14.28% compared to Goosehead Insurance's net margin of 7.94%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 11.34% beat Goosehead Insurance's return on equity.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.16, suggesting that its share price is 116% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Goosehead Insurance has a beta of 1.62, suggesting that its share price is 62% more volatile than the broader market.

Waterdrop currently has a consensus target price of $2.00, suggesting a potential upside of 26.18%. Goosehead Insurance has a consensus target price of $67.45, suggesting a potential upside of 83.05%. Given Goosehead Insurance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Goosehead Insurance is more favorable than Waterdrop.

Waterdrop pays an annual dividend of $0.05 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Goosehead Insurance pays an annual dividend of $4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 12.5%. Waterdrop pays out 23.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Goosehead Insurance pays out 403.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.