Waterdrop (WDH) Competitors

Waterdrop has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Exzeo Group's net margin of 0.00%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 10.87% beat Exzeo Group's return on equity.

Waterdrop presently has a consensus target price of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.97%. Exzeo Group has a consensus target price of $26.00, indicating a potential upside of 91.70%. Given Exzeo Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Exzeo Group is more favorable than Waterdrop.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.0% of Exzeo Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Exzeo Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Waterdrop. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Exzeo Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Waterdrop had 3 more articles in the media than Exzeo Group. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Waterdrop and 0 mentions for Exzeo Group. Exzeo Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Waterdrop's score of -0.18 indicating that Exzeo Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 12.47% compared to TWFG's net margin of 3.04%. TWFG's return on equity of 15.96% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.4% of TWFG shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Waterdrop has higher revenue and earnings than TWFG. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TWFG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

TWFG has a beta of 0.46, suggesting that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TWFG and TWFG both had 3 articles in the media. TWFG's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Waterdrop's score of -0.18 indicating that TWFG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

TWFG presently has a consensus price target of $24.86, indicating a potential upside of 16.99%. Waterdrop has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.97%. Given Waterdrop's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than TWFG.

In the previous week, Waterdrop had 3 more articles in the media than International General Insurance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Waterdrop and 0 mentions for International General Insurance. International General Insurance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Waterdrop's score of -0.18 indicating that International General Insurance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. International General Insurance pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Waterdrop pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. International General Insurance pays out 10.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. International General Insurance has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Waterdrop presently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.97%. International General Insurance has a consensus price target of $28.00, indicating a potential upside of 8.72%. Given Waterdrop's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Waterdrop is more favorable than International General Insurance.

International General Insurance has a net margin of 23.68% compared to Waterdrop's net margin of 12.47%. International General Insurance's return on equity of 17.68% beat Waterdrop's return on equity.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.2% of International General Insurance shares are held by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.1% of International General Insurance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, suggesting that its stock price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, International General Insurance has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

International General Insurance has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Waterdrop. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than International General Insurance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Waterdrop has a net margin of 12.47% compared to Trupanion's net margin of 1.74%. Waterdrop's return on equity of 10.87% beat Trupanion's return on equity.

Waterdrop has higher revenue and earnings than Trupanion. Waterdrop is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trupanion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Trupanion had 1 more articles in the media than Waterdrop. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Trupanion and 3 mentions for Waterdrop. Trupanion's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Waterdrop's score of -0.18 indicating that Trupanion is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Waterdrop has a beta of -0.18, meaning that its share price is 118% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trupanion has a beta of 1.45, meaning that its share price is 45% more volatile than the broader market.

Waterdrop currently has a consensus price target of $2.00, indicating a potential upside of 71.97%. Trupanion has a consensus price target of $42.25, indicating a potential upside of 79.63%. Given Trupanion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Trupanion is more favorable than Waterdrop.

2.0% of Waterdrop shares are owned by institutional investors. 24.6% of Waterdrop shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 5.6% of Trupanion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.