Bowhead Specialty (BOW) Competitors

77.5% of Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 15.8% of Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bowhead Specialty has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -2.80%. Bowhead Specialty's return on equity of 13.80% beat Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Bowhead Specialty currently has a consensus target price of $33.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.77%. Baldwin Insurance Group has a consensus target price of $30.00, suggesting a potential upside of 9.09%. Given Bowhead Specialty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than Baldwin Insurance Group.

Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Baldwin Insurance Group had 2 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Baldwin Insurance Group and 2 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Baldwin Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat Bowhead Specialty's score of 0.69 indicating that Baldwin Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Bowhead Specialty has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baldwin Insurance Group. Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Brighthouse Financial had 2 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Brighthouse Financial and 2 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Brighthouse Financial's score of 0.63 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

81.2% of Brighthouse Financial shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Brighthouse Financial shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Brighthouse Financial presently has a consensus price target of $60.50, suggesting a potential downside of 7.62%. Bowhead Specialty has a consensus price target of $33.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.77%. Given Bowhead Specialty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than Brighthouse Financial.

Bowhead Specialty has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -1.10%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 16.88% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Brighthouse Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Brighthouse Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Palomar has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its stock price is 59% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Palomar has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Palomar had 7 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Palomar and 2 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Palomar's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Bowhead Specialty's score of 0.69 indicating that Palomar is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Palomar currently has a consensus target price of $158.25, suggesting a potential upside of 17.89%. Bowhead Specialty has a consensus target price of $33.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.77%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than Bowhead Specialty.

90.3% of Palomar shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Palomar shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Palomar has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Bowhead Specialty's net margin of 9.99%. Palomar's return on equity of 22.62% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 21.73% compared to Bowhead Specialty's net margin of 9.99%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 23.19% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.35, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Hamilton Insurance Group had 3 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Hamilton Insurance Group and 2 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat Hamilton Insurance Group's score of 0.51 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Hamilton Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Hamilton Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Hamilton Insurance Group presently has a consensus price target of $35.38, suggesting a potential upside of 2.83%. Bowhead Specialty has a consensus price target of $33.71, suggesting a potential upside of 10.77%. Given Bowhead Specialty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than Hamilton Insurance Group.

29.2% of Hamilton Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Hamilton Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.