Go Pro

Bowhead Specialty (BOW) Competitors

Bowhead Specialty logo
$31.38 -0.19 (-0.60%)
As of 01:45 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BOW vs. BWIN, PLMR, FG, BHF, and HG

Should you buy Bowhead Specialty stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Bowhead Specialty with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Bowhead Specialty include Baldwin Insurance Group (BWIN), Palomar (PLMR), F&G Annuities & Life (FG), Brighthouse Financial (BHF), and Hamilton Insurance Group (HG). These companies are all part of the "insurance" industry.

How does Bowhead Specialty compare to Baldwin Insurance Group?

Baldwin Insurance Group (NASDAQ:BWIN) and Bowhead Specialty (NYSE:BOW) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and valuation.

Baldwin Insurance Group currently has a consensus price target of $30.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.02%. Bowhead Specialty has a consensus price target of $33.14, indicating a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Baldwin Insurance Group's higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Baldwin Insurance Group is more favorable than Bowhead Specialty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Baldwin Insurance Group
1 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.55
Bowhead Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

In the previous week, Baldwin Insurance Group had 7 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Baldwin Insurance Group and 5 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Baldwin Insurance Group's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Bowhead Specialty's score of 0.62 indicating that Baldwin Insurance Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Baldwin Insurance Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Bowhead Specialty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Baldwin Insurance Group has a beta of 1.08, suggesting that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

77.5% of Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 15.8% of Baldwin Insurance Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Bowhead Specialty has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baldwin Insurance Group. Baldwin Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Baldwin Insurance Group$1.50B2.51-$33.81M-$0.67N/A
Bowhead Specialty$551.59M1.87$53.79M$1.7318.14

Bowhead Specialty has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Baldwin Insurance Group's net margin of -2.80%. Bowhead Specialty's return on equity of 13.80% beat Baldwin Insurance Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Baldwin Insurance Group-2.80% 12.35% 3.43%
Bowhead Specialty 9.99%13.80%2.71%

Summary

Baldwin Insurance Group beats Bowhead Specialty on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowhead Specialty compare to Palomar?

Bowhead Specialty (NYSE:BOW) and Palomar (NASDAQ:PLMR) are both finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

Palomar has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palomar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bowhead Specialty$551.59M1.87$53.79M$1.7318.14
Palomar$875.97M4.13$197.07M$7.1819.02

Palomar has a net margin of 20.11% compared to Bowhead Specialty's net margin of 9.99%. Palomar's return on equity of 22.62% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bowhead Specialty9.99% 13.80% 2.71%
Palomar 20.11%22.62%6.60%

90.3% of Palomar shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.7% of Palomar shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Palomar had 13 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Palomar and 5 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Palomar's score of 0.60 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bowhead Specialty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Palomar
6 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Palomar has a beta of 0.41, suggesting that its share price is 59% less volatile than the broader market.

Bowhead Specialty presently has a consensus price target of $33.14, indicating a potential upside of 5.62%. Palomar has a consensus price target of $150.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.84%. Given Palomar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Palomar is more favorable than Bowhead Specialty.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bowhead Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Palomar
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

Summary

Palomar beats Bowhead Specialty on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowhead Specialty compare to F&G Annuities & Life?

Bowhead Specialty (NYSE:BOW) and F&G Annuities & Life (NYSE:FG) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and risk.

Bowhead Specialty presently has a consensus price target of $33.14, suggesting a potential upside of 5.62%. F&G Annuities & Life has a consensus price target of $30.00, suggesting a potential downside of 1.45%. Given Bowhead Specialty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than F&G Annuities & Life.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bowhead Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
F&G Annuities & Life
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, F&G Annuities & Life has a beta of 1.23, meaning that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

F&G Annuities & Life has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. F&G Annuities & Life is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bowhead Specialty$551.59M1.87$53.79M$1.7318.14
F&G Annuities & Life$5.73B0.70$265M$3.817.99

Bowhead Specialty has a net margin of 9.99% compared to F&G Annuities & Life's net margin of 8.89%. Bowhead Specialty's return on equity of 13.80% beat F&G Annuities & Life's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bowhead Specialty9.99% 13.80% 2.71%
F&G Annuities & Life 8.89%10.73%0.53%

95.9% of F&G Annuities & Life shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of F&G Annuities & Life shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Bowhead Specialty had 4 more articles in the media than F&G Annuities & Life. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Bowhead Specialty and 1 mentions for F&G Annuities & Life. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat F&G Annuities & Life's score of 0.00 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bowhead Specialty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
F&G Annuities & Life
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

Bowhead Specialty beats F&G Annuities & Life on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowhead Specialty compare to Brighthouse Financial?

Bowhead Specialty (NYSE:BOW) and Brighthouse Financial (NASDAQ:BHF) are both finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Bowhead Specialty has a net margin of 9.99% compared to Brighthouse Financial's net margin of -1.10%. Brighthouse Financial's return on equity of 16.88% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bowhead Specialty9.99% 13.80% 2.71%
Brighthouse Financial -1.10%16.88%0.43%

Bowhead Specialty presently has a consensus target price of $33.14, suggesting a potential upside of 5.62%. Brighthouse Financial has a consensus target price of $60.50, suggesting a potential downside of 7.46%. Given Bowhead Specialty's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than Brighthouse Financial.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Bowhead Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56
Brighthouse Financial
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.80

In the previous week, Bowhead Specialty had 1 more articles in the media than Brighthouse Financial. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Bowhead Specialty and 4 mentions for Brighthouse Financial. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Brighthouse Financial's score of 0.39 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Bowhead Specialty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Brighthouse Financial
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

81.2% of Brighthouse Financial shares are held by institutional investors. 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Brighthouse Financial shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, indicating that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Brighthouse Financial has a beta of 0.86, indicating that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Brighthouse Financial has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Brighthouse Financial is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bowhead Specialty$551.59M1.87$53.79M$1.7318.14
Brighthouse Financial$6.77B0.56$433M-$2.98N/A

Summary

Bowhead Specialty beats Brighthouse Financial on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Bowhead Specialty compare to Hamilton Insurance Group?

Hamilton Insurance Group (NYSE:HG) and Bowhead Specialty (NYSE:BOW) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and profitability.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a beta of 0.35, suggesting that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bowhead Specialty has a beta of -0.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% less volatile than the broader market.

Hamilton Insurance Group presently has a consensus target price of $35.38, suggesting a potential upside of 1.67%. Bowhead Specialty has a consensus target price of $33.14, suggesting a potential upside of 5.62%. Given Bowhead Specialty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Bowhead Specialty is more favorable than Hamilton Insurance Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hamilton Insurance Group
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67
Bowhead Specialty
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

29.2% of Hamilton Insurance Group shares are held by institutional investors. 3.0% of Hamilton Insurance Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Bowhead Specialty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hamilton Insurance Group has a net margin of 21.73% compared to Bowhead Specialty's net margin of 9.99%. Hamilton Insurance Group's return on equity of 23.19% beat Bowhead Specialty's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hamilton Insurance Group21.73% 23.19% 6.74%
Bowhead Specialty 9.99%13.80%2.71%

In the previous week, Hamilton Insurance Group had 10 more articles in the media than Bowhead Specialty. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Hamilton Insurance Group and 5 mentions for Bowhead Specialty. Bowhead Specialty's average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Hamilton Insurance Group's score of 0.46 indicating that Bowhead Specialty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hamilton Insurance Group
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Bowhead Specialty
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Hamilton Insurance Group has higher revenue and earnings than Bowhead Specialty. Hamilton Insurance Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bowhead Specialty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hamilton Insurance Group$2.91B1.19$576.67M$6.115.69
Bowhead Specialty$551.59M1.87$53.79M$1.7318.14

Summary

Hamilton Insurance Group beats Bowhead Specialty on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Bowhead Specialty News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BOW and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BOW and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BOW vs. The Competition

MetricBowhead SpecialtyINS IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.03B$60.52B$14.33B$23.38B
Dividend YieldN/A1.77%5.70%4.02%
P/E Ratio18.1411.7620.5631.19
Price / Sales1.871.8044.9020.23
Price / Cash18.3413.4019.3418.64
Price / Book2.302.162.254.78
Net Income$53.79M$4.24B$1.13B$1.06B
7 Day Performance-1.90%-0.72%0.28%-0.05%
1 Month Performance14.65%8.80%1.12%0.07%
1 Year Performance-7.31%17.31%12.15%16.84%

Bowhead Specialty Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BOW
Bowhead Specialty
4.1494 of 5 stars
$31.38
-0.6%
$33.14
+5.6%
-5.1%$1.03B$551.59M18.14193
BWIN
Baldwin Insurance Group
4.3499 of 5 stars
$27.30
+0.8%
$28.89
+5.8%
-33.0%$3.86B$1.50BN/A5,020
PLMR
Palomar
3.7462 of 5 stars
$145.29
+2.2%
$147.75
+1.7%
+3.4%$3.77B$875.97M20.24150
FG
F&G Annuities & Life
3.2956 of 5 stars
$28.74
+1.3%
$30.00
+4.4%
+0.1%$3.76B$5.73B7.541,173
BHF
Brighthouse Financial
0.6513 of 5 stars
$65.27
+0.6%
$60.50
-7.3%
+36.5%$3.73B$6.77BN/A1,400

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BOW) was last updated on 7/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners