Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (BNC) Competitors

C$42.48 +0.16 (+0.38%)
As of 06/19/2026 03:15 PM Eastern

BNC vs. HUT, KEY, BITF, SII, and BLX

Should you buy Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF include Hut 8 (HUT), Keyera (KEY), Bitfarms (BITF), Sprott (SII), and Boralex (BLX). These companies are all part of the "banking" industry.

How does Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF compare to Hut 8?

Hut 8 (TSE:HUT) and Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (TSE:BNC) are both banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, dividends and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Hut 8 had 1 more articles in the media than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hut 8 and 0 mentions for Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. Hut 8's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hut 8 Neutral
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Neutral

37.2% of Hut 8 shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF shares are held by institutional investors. 60.2% of Hut 8 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Hut 8 has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hut 8C$284.32M68.76C$193.22M-C$2.82N/A
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Hut 8's net margin of -109.77%. Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hut 8's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hut 8-109.77% -20.57% -4.25%
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF N/A N/A N/A

Hut 8 has a beta of 4.581835, suggesting that its share price is 358% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its share price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hut 8
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.67
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Hut 8 beats Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF compare to Keyera?

Keyera (TSE:KEY) and Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (TSE:BNC) are both banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, risk and dividends.

59.2% of Keyera shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Keyera shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Keyera has a net margin of 2.73% compared to Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's net margin of 0.00%. Keyera's return on equity of 6.59% beat Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Keyera2.73% 6.59% 6.15%
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF N/A N/A N/A

Keyera pays an annual dividend of C$2.14 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF pays an annual dividend of C$1.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Keyera pays out 270.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Keyera has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
KeyeraC$6.39B2.49C$449.23MC$0.7971.47
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, Keyera had 15 more articles in the media than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Keyera and 0 mentions for Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. Keyera's average media sentiment score of 0.43 beat Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's score of 0.00 indicating that Keyera is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Keyera Neutral
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Neutral

Keyera has a beta of 0.466346, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Keyera presently has a consensus price target of C$60.64, indicating a potential upside of 7.41%. Given Keyera's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Keyera is more favorable than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Keyera
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.87
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Keyera beats Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF on 13 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF compare to Bitfarms?

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (TSE:BNC) and Bitfarms (TSE:BITF) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and media sentiment.

0.0% of Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 11.7% of Bitfarms shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.4% of Bitfarms shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Bitfarms' net margin of -160.41%. Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Bitfarms' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/A N/A N/A
Bitfarms -160.41%-56.78%-10.66%

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bitfarms has a beta of 3.414688, meaning that its stock price is 241% more volatile than the broader market.

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Bitfarms.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
BitfarmsC$229.28M21.67-C$110.66M-C$0.52N/A

In the previous week, Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Bitfarms'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Neutral
Bitfarms Neutral

Summary

Bitfarms beats Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF compare to Sprott?

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (TSE:BNC) and Sprott (TSE:SII) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and dividends.

Sprott has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
SprottC$368.97M11.59C$32.26MC$3.2850.54

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF pays an annual dividend of C$1.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Sprott pays an annual dividend of C$1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Sprott pays out 42.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

0.0% of Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.4% of Sprott shares are owned by institutional investors. 17.7% of Sprott shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a beta of 1.11, meaning that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Sprott has a beta of 1.474419, meaning that its stock price is 47% more volatile than the broader market.

Sprott has a consensus price target of C$211.00, suggesting a potential upside of 27.28%. Given Sprott's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Sprott is more favorable than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Sprott
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60

Sprott has a net margin of 22.40% compared to Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's net margin of 0.00%. Sprott's return on equity of 23.54% beat Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/A N/A N/A
Sprott 22.40%23.54%10.25%

In the previous week, Sprott had 2 more articles in the media than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Sprott and 0 mentions for Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. Sprott's average media sentiment score of 0.51 beat Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's score of 0.00 indicating that Sprott is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Neutral
Sprott Positive

Summary

Sprott beats Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF compare to Boralex?

Boralex (TSE:BLX) and Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF (TSE:BNC) are both mid-cap banking companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Boralex had 1 more articles in the media than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Boralex and 0 mentions for Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF. Boralex's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's score of 0.00 indicating that Boralex is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Boralex Positive
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Neutral

Boralex has higher revenue and earnings than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BoralexC$898M4.18C$71.91M-C$0.31N/A
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Boralex currently has a consensus target price of C$38.39, suggesting a potential upside of 4.98%. Given Boralex's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Boralex is more favorable than Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Boralex
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Boralex pays an annual dividend of C$0.66 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF pays an annual dividend of C$1.07 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Boralex pays out -212.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Boralex has a beta of 0.184176, suggesting that its stock price is 82% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a beta of 1.11, suggesting that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market.

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Boralex's net margin of -3.56%. Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF's return on equity of 0.00% beat Boralex's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Boralex-3.56% -2.08% 2.54%
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF N/A N/A N/A

43.4% of Boralex shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.0% of Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Boralex shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Boralex beats Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BNC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BNC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of TSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BNC vs. The Competition

MetricPurpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETFMisc. Commercial Banks IndustryFinance SectorTSE Exchange
Market CapC$6.07BC$1.80BC$13.97BC$12.40B
Dividend Yield9.26%3.09%5.74%6.19%
P/E RatioN/A11.8220.2035.97
Price / SalesN/A0.17144.2310.78
Price / CashN/AN/A19.5782.29
Price / BookN/AN/A2.254.50
Net IncomeN/AN/AC$1.14BC$299.09M
7 Day Performance3.51%-0.04%-0.37%0.09%
1 Month Performance8.17%1.28%0.85%-0.20%
1 Year Performance48.53%3.32%22.83%41.57%

Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BNC
Purpose Canadian Financial Income Fund Series ETF
N/AC$42.48
+0.4%
N/A+48.5%C$6.07BN/AN/A206,500
HUT
Hut 8
0.5946 of 5 stars
C$170.02
+1.1%
N/A+654.2%C$19.14BC$284.32MN/A219
KEY
Keyera
2.2851 of 5 stars
C$56.68
-0.9%
C$60.64
+7.0%
+27.5%C$13.00BC$6.39B71.7517,500
BITF
Bitfarms
N/AC$8.24
flat
N/A+677.4%C$4.97BC$229.28MN/A110
SII
Sprott
2.8442 of 5 stars
C$183.27
+2.0%
C$211.00
+15.1%
+84.4%C$4.73BC$368.97M55.88170

Related Companies and Tools


This page (TSE:BNC) was last updated on 6/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners