Avingtrans (AVG) Competitors

Renold has a net margin of 6.16% compared to Avingtrans' net margin of 4.54%. Renold's return on equity of 25.68% beat Avingtrans' return on equity.

48.7% of Renold shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Renold shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Renold has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Renold is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 2 more articles in the media than Renold. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Avingtrans and 0 mentions for Renold. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Renold's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Renold pays an annual dividend of GBX 0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.6%. Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Renold pays out 7.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Renold has a beta of 0.76, indicating that its share price is 24% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, indicating that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Crestchic has a beta of 0.89, meaning that its stock price is 11% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Crestchic's net margin of -4.95%. Crestchic's return on equity of 18.18% beat Avingtrans' return on equity.

Crestchic has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Avingtrans. Crestchic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 2 more articles in the media than Crestchic. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Avingtrans and 0 mentions for Crestchic. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Crestchic's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the media.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.3% of Crestchic shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.5% of Crestchic shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Crestchic pays an annual dividend of GBX 2 per share. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Crestchic pays out 1,176.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Avingtrans is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

10.4% of Avingtrans shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 46.8% of Castings shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Castings shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Castings has a consensus target price of GBX 335, suggesting a potential upside of 25.44%. Given Castings' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Castings is more favorable than Avingtrans.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Castings' net margin of 2.75%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Castings' return on equity.

Castings has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Castings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Avingtrans pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. Castings pays an annual dividend of GBX 18.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.9%. Avingtrans pays out 23.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Castings pays out 166.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 1 more articles in the media than Castings. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Avingtrans and 1 mentions for Castings. Castings' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Avingtrans' score of 0.14 indicating that Castings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, meaning that its stock price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Castings has a beta of 0.361, meaning that its stock price is 64% less volatile than the S&P 500.

29.7% of Mpac Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.4% of Avingtrans shares are held by institutional investors. 2.9% of Mpac Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 14.8% of Avingtrans shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Avingtrans has a net margin of 4.54% compared to Mpac Group's net margin of -5.46%. Avingtrans' return on equity of 6.13% beat Mpac Group's return on equity.

Mpac Group has higher revenue and earnings than Avingtrans. Mpac Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Avingtrans, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Avingtrans had 2 more articles in the media than Mpac Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Avingtrans and 0 mentions for Mpac Group. Avingtrans' average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Mpac Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Avingtrans is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Mpac Group has a beta of 0.497, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Avingtrans has a beta of 0.472, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the S&P 500.