Forterra (FORT) Competitors

68.4% of Forterra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Forterra shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, CRH had 2 more articles in the media than Forterra. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CRH and 0 mentions for Forterra. CRH's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Forterra's score of 0.00 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Forterra presently has a consensus target price of GBX 234, suggesting a potential upside of 65.72%. CRH has a consensus target price of £105.22, suggesting a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Forterra.

Forterra has a beta of 0.767, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Forterra. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forterra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CRH has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Forterra's net margin of 4.40%. CRH's return on equity of 20.14% beat Forterra's return on equity.

Forterra has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ibstock had 1 more articles in the media than Forterra. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ibstock and 0 mentions for Forterra. Forterra's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ibstock'saverage media sentiment score.

68.4% of Forterra shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Ibstock shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Forterra shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Ibstock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Forterra currently has a consensus target price of GBX 234, suggesting a potential upside of 65.72%. Ibstock has a consensus target price of GBX 135.50, suggesting a potential upside of 40.93%. Given Forterra's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Forterra is more favorable than Ibstock.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ibstock pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Forterra has a beta of 0.767, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ibstock has a beta of 0.862, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Forterra has a net margin of 4.40% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Forterra. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 6 more articles in the media than Forterra. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Forterra. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Forterra's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Forterra has a beta of 0.767, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

68.4% of Forterra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Forterra shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Forterra has a net margin of 4.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Forterra presently has a consensus price target of GBX 234, suggesting a potential upside of 65.72%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 135.03%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Forterra.

Michelmersh Brick has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Forterra. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Michelmersh Brick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Michelmersh Brick has a net margin of 5.30% compared to Forterra's net margin of 4.40%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Michelmersh Brick's return on equity.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Michelmersh Brick pays an annual dividend of GBX 4.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.4%. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Michelmersh Brick pays out 116.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

In the previous week, Michelmersh Brick had 1 more articles in the media than Forterra. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Michelmersh Brick and 0 mentions for Forterra. Michelmersh Brick's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Forterra's score of 0.00 indicating that Michelmersh Brick is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

68.4% of Forterra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 5.5% of Michelmersh Brick shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Forterra shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 35.6% of Michelmersh Brick shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Forterra has a beta of 0.767, indicating that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Michelmersh Brick has a beta of 0.784, indicating that its share price is 22% less volatile than the broader market.

Forterra currently has a consensus target price of GBX 234, indicating a potential upside of 65.72%. Michelmersh Brick has a consensus target price of GBX 125, indicating a potential upside of 73.75%. Given Michelmersh Brick's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Michelmersh Brick is more favorable than Forterra.