Which has stronger valuation & earnings, SRC or MSLH?

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio SigmaRoc £1.04B 1.32 -£226.13M £6.75 18.22 Marshalls £632.10M 0.63 £21.50M £5.60 28.25

Is SRC or MSLH more profitable?

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets SigmaRoc 7.68% 10.11% 2.05% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media favor SRC or MSLH?

In the previous week, SigmaRoc and SigmaRoc both had 1 articles in the media. SigmaRoc's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Marshalls' score of 0.00 indicating that SigmaRoc is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SigmaRoc 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer PLP or MSLH?

Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 265, indicating a potential upside of 67.51%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Genuit Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Genuit Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Marshalls 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.50

Which has better valuation and earnings, PLP or MSLH?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Genuit Group. Genuit Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Genuit Group £398.60M 0.00 N/A £8.40 N/A Marshalls £632.10M 0.63 £21.50M £5.60 28.25

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MSLH or BREE?

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.63 £21.50M £5.60 28.25 Breedon Group £1.71B 0.66 £96.41M £24.20 13.53

Is MSLH or BREE more profitable?

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64% Breedon Group 4.89% 7.14% 4.82%

Does the media refer more to MSLH or BREE?

In the previous week, Breedon Group had 9 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Breedon Group and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Breedon Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Marshalls' score of 0.00 indicating that Breedon Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Breedon Group 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, MSLH or CRH?

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.63 £21.50M £5.60 28.25 CRH £38.06B 0.02 £4.69B £551.00 0.21

Is MSLH or CRH more profitable?

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.85% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64% CRH 8.86% 10.85% 6.20%

Does the media prefer MSLH or CRH?

In the previous week, CRH had 2 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CRH'saverage media sentiment score. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral CRH 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MSLH or IBST?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.63 £21.50M £5.60 28.25 Ibstock £372.10M 1.00 £7.28M £0.80 117.56

Is MSLH or IBST more profitable?

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64% Ibstock 0.83% 0.79% 3.33%

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors

GBX 158.20 +3.70 (+2.39%)

As of 12:13 PM Eastern

Compare

MSLH vs. SRC, PLP, BREE, CRH, and IBST

Should you buy Marshalls stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marshalls with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marshalls include SigmaRoc (SRC), Genuit Group (PLP), Breedon Group (BREE), CRH (CRH), and Ibstock (IBST). These companies are all part of the "building materials" industry.

How does Marshalls compare to SigmaRoc?

SigmaRoc (LON:SRC) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SigmaRoc	£1.04B	1.32	-£226.13M	£6.75	18.22
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.63	£21.50M	£5.60	28.25

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SigmaRoc	7.68%	10.11%	2.05%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

SigmaRoc has a beta of 1.253, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

SigmaRoc currently has a consensus target price of GBX 165.33, indicating a potential upside of 34.46%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 265, indicating a potential upside of 67.51%. Given Marshalls' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than SigmaRoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SigmaRoc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, SigmaRoc and SigmaRoc both had 1 articles in the media. SigmaRoc's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Marshalls' score of 0.00 indicating that SigmaRoc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SigmaRoc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

52.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SigmaRoc beats Marshalls on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Genuit Group?

Genuit Group (LON:PLP) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings and risk.

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Genuit Group's net margin of 0.00%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Genuit Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Genuit Group	N/A	N/A	N/A
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 265, indicating a potential upside of 67.51%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Genuit Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Genuit Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Genuit Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Genuit Group. Genuit Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Marshalls'average media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Genuit Group	Neutral
Marshalls	Neutral

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Genuit Group. Genuit Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Genuit Group	£398.60M	0.00	N/A	£8.40	N/A
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.63	£21.50M	£5.60	28.25

63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Marshalls beats Genuit Group on 10 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Breedon Group?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Breedon Group (LON:BREE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, media sentiment, risk, dividends, earnings and institutional ownership.

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Breedon Group	4.89%	7.14%	4.82%

63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Breedon Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Breedon Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Breedon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.5%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Breedon Group pays out 61.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Breedon Group has a beta of 1.062, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Breedon Group had 9 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Breedon Group and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Breedon Group's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Marshalls' score of 0.00 indicating that Breedon Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Breedon Group	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.63	£21.50M	£5.60	28.25
Breedon Group	£1.71B	0.66	£96.41M	£24.20	13.53

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 265, indicating a potential upside of 67.51%. Breedon Group has a consensus target price of GBX 448.33, indicating a potential upside of 36.94%. Given Marshalls' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Breedon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Breedon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

Summary

Breedon Group beats Marshalls on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to CRH?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and CRH (LON:CRH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Marshalls presently has a consensus price target of GBX 265, suggesting a potential upside of 67.51%. CRH has a consensus price target of £105.22, suggesting a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
CRH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.63	£21.50M	£5.60	28.25
CRH	£38.06B	0.02	£4.69B	£551.00	0.21

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.85% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
CRH	8.86%	10.85%	6.20%

63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CRH had 2 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled CRH'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
CRH	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

CRH beats Marshalls on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Ibstock?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Ibstock (LON:IBST) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.63	£21.50M	£5.60	28.25
Ibstock	£372.10M	1.00	£7.28M	£0.80	117.56

Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ibstock has a beta of 0.856, meaning that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market.

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Ibstock	0.83%	0.79%	3.33%

Marshalls currently has a consensus target price of GBX 265, suggesting a potential upside of 67.51%. Ibstock has a consensus target price of GBX 121.75, suggesting a potential upside of 29.45%. Given Marshalls' higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Ibstock	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50

In the previous week, Marshalls and Marshalls both had 1 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ibstock'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	Neutral
Ibstock	Neutral

63.4% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Ibstock shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Ibstock shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ibstock pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Marshalls beats Ibstock on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marshalls News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSLH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MSLH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marshalls	Building Materials Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£400.07M	£6.48B	£4.60B	£2.83B
Dividend Yield	4.44%	2.94%	5.02%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	28.25	16.21	21.13	367.89
Price / Sales	0.63	76.01	5,744.12	84,333.40
Price / Cash	7.82	8.40	26.28	27.89
Price / Book	0.60	1.05	8.53	7.03
Net Income	£21.50M	£708.86M	£156.37M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	6.10%	0.16%	-0.13%	0.58%
1 Month Performance	4.61%	-0.49%	-1.16%	0.72%
1 Year Performance	-22.06%	-2.27%	39.94%	67.26%

Marshalls Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MSLH Marshalls	4.0427 of 5 stars	GBX 158.20 +2.4%	GBX 265 +67.5%	-23.9%	£400.07M	£632.10M	28.25	2,726	News Coverage Gap Up
SRC SigmaRoc	2.9259 of 5 stars	GBX 127.50 +5.5%	GBX 165.33 +29.7%	+2.1%	£1.41B	£1.04B	18.89	2,000
PLP Genuit Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.40B	£398.60M	67.50	3,139	Gap Up
BREE Breedon Group	4.7472 of 5 stars	GBX 319.14 +2.0%	GBX 1,001 +213.7%	-12.1%	£1.11B	£1.71B	13.19	3,900	Trending News Earnings Report Analyst Forecast
CRH CRH	2.6769 of 5 stars	GBX 114.91 +2.1%	£105.22 +9,056.7%	-98.4%	£768.04M	£38.06B	0.21	77,400	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MSLH) was last updated on 7/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors