Which has preferable earnings & valuation, SRC or MSLH?

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio SigmaRoc £1.04B 1.32 -£226.13M £6.75 18.24 Marshalls £632.10M 0.58 £21.50M £5.60 25.89

Is SRC or MSLH more profitable?

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets SigmaRoc 7.68% 10.11% 2.05% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Do analysts prefer MSLH or PLP?

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 113.79%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Genuit Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Marshalls 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75 Genuit Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has higher valuation & earnings, MSLH or PLP?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Genuit Group. Genuit Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.58 £21.50M £5.60 25.89 Genuit Group £398.60M 0.00 N/A £8.40 N/A

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, BREE or MSLH?

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Breedon Group £1.71B 0.60 £96.41M £24.20 12.16 Marshalls £632.10M 0.58 £21.50M £5.60 25.89

Is BREE or MSLH more profitable?

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Breedon Group 4.89% 7.14% 4.82% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media prefer BREE or MSLH?

In the previous week, Marshalls had 4 more articles in the media than Breedon Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Breedon Group. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Breedon Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marshalls 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation & earnings, CRH or MSLH?

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CRH £38.06B 0.02 £4.69B £551.00 0.21 Marshalls £632.10M 0.58 £21.50M £5.60 25.89

Is CRH or MSLH more profitable?

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.85% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CRH 8.86% 10.85% 6.20% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media refer more to CRH or MSLH?

In the previous week, Marshalls had 4 more articles in the media than CRH. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for CRH. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat CRH's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CRH 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marshalls 3 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, IBST or MSLH?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ibstock £372.10M 0.97 £7.28M £0.80 114.75 Marshalls £632.10M 0.58 £21.50M £5.60 25.89

Is IBST or MSLH more profitable?

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ibstock 0.83% 0.79% 3.33% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors

GBX 145 +2.70 (+1.90%)

As of 08:30 AM Eastern

Compare

MSLH vs. SRC, PLP, BREE, CRH, and IBST

Should you buy Marshalls stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marshalls with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marshalls include SigmaRoc (SRC), Genuit Group (PLP), Breedon Group (BREE), CRH (CRH), and Ibstock (IBST). These companies are all part of the "building materials" industry.

How does Marshalls compare to SigmaRoc?

SigmaRoc (LON:SRC) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

SigmaRoc has a beta of 1.253, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SigmaRoc	£1.04B	1.32	-£226.13M	£6.75	18.24
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.58	£21.50M	£5.60	25.89

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SigmaRoc	7.68%	10.11%	2.05%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

In the previous week, Marshalls had 5 more articles in the media than SigmaRoc. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for SigmaRoc. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat SigmaRoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
SigmaRoc	Neutral
Marshalls	Positive

52.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

SigmaRoc currently has a consensus price target of GBX 165.33, suggesting a potential upside of 34.31%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 113.79%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than SigmaRoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SigmaRoc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Marshalls beats SigmaRoc on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Genuit Group?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Genuit Group (LON:PLP) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment and profitability.

63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 5 more articles in the media than Genuit Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Genuit Group. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Genuit Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	Positive
Genuit Group	Neutral

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Genuit Group's net margin of 0.00%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Genuit Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Genuit Group	N/A	N/A	N/A

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 113.79%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Genuit Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Genuit Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Genuit Group. Genuit Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.58	£21.50M	£5.60	25.89
Genuit Group	£398.60M	0.00	N/A	£8.40	N/A

Summary

Marshalls beats Genuit Group on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Breedon Group?

Breedon Group (LON:BREE) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 4 more articles in the media than Breedon Group. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Breedon Group. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Breedon Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marshalls	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Breedon Group has a beta of 1.062, suggesting that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Breedon Group	4.89%	7.14%	4.82%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Breedon Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,001, indicating a potential upside of 240.24%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 113.79%. Given Breedon Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Breedon Group is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Breedon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Breedon Group	£1.71B	0.60	£96.41M	£24.20	12.16
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.58	£21.50M	£5.60	25.89

61.7% of Breedon Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.3% of Breedon Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Breedon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Breedon Group pays out 61.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Summary

Breedon Group beats Marshalls on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to CRH?

CRH (LON:CRH) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CRH	£38.06B	0.02	£4.69B	£551.00	0.21
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.58	£21.50M	£5.60	25.89

59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 4 more articles in the media than CRH. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for CRH. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat CRH's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CRH	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marshalls	3 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CRH currently has a consensus price target of £105.22, suggesting a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 113.79%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CRH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

CRH has a beta of 1.241, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.85% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CRH	8.86%	10.85%	6.20%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Summary

CRH beats Marshalls on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Ibstock?

Ibstock (LON:IBST) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, valuation and profitability.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ibstock	£372.10M	0.97	£7.28M	£0.80	114.75
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.58	£21.50M	£5.60	25.89

In the previous week, Marshalls had 5 more articles in the media than Ibstock. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Ibstock. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Ibstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Ibstock	Neutral
Marshalls	Positive

Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.2%. Ibstock pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ibstock	0.83%	0.79%	3.33%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

57.7% of Ibstock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.4% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Ibstock shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ibstock has a beta of 0.856, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Ibstock presently has a consensus target price of GBX 131.75, indicating a potential upside of 43.52%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 113.79%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ibstock	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Summary

Marshalls beats Ibstock on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marshalls News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSLH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MSLH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marshalls	Building Materials Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£366.69M	£6.43B	£4.50B	£2.77B
Dividend Yield	4.41%	2.96%	5.03%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	25.89	16.01	20.88	368.07
Price / Sales	0.58	77.58	5,835.60	84,576.59
Price / Cash	7.82	8.37	26.61	27.87
Price / Book	0.55	1.04	8.75	7.72
Net Income	£21.50M	£708.86M	£157.11M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	-4.47%	-2.09%	-1.78%	-0.52%
1 Month Performance	11.50%	-1.43%	-0.60%	-0.08%
1 Year Performance	-44.97%	-2.77%	40.60%	61.67%

Marshalls Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MSLH Marshalls	4.8191 of 5 stars	GBX 145 +1.9%	GBX 310 +113.8%	-45.7%	£366.69M	£632.10M	25.89	2,726	News Coverage Positive News
SRC SigmaRoc	N/A	GBX 125.63 -1.8%	GBX 165.33 +31.6%	+7.0%	£1.42B	£1.04B	18.61	2,000
PLP Genuit Group	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£1.40B	£398.60M	67.50	3,139	Gap Up
BREE Breedon Group	4.263 of 5 stars	GBX 298.60 +1.0%	GBX 1,001 +235.2%	-24.7%	£1.03B	£1.71B	12.34	3,900	News Coverage Negative News
CRH CRH	3.1189 of 5 stars	GBX 114.91 +2.1%	£105.22 +9,056.7%	-98.4%	£768.04M	£38.06B	0.21	77,400	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MSLH) was last updated on 7/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors