Which has stronger valuation & earnings, MSLH or SRC?

Marshalls has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £630.40M 0.69 £21.50M £8.00 21.39 SigmaRoc £1.05B 1.36 -£226.13M £6.75 19.00

Is MSLH or SRC more profitable?

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 8.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.54% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 3.18% 3.79% 2.64% SigmaRoc 8.40% 10.54% 2.05%

Does the media prefer MSLH or SRC?

In the previous week, SigmaRoc had 2 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SigmaRoc and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat SigmaRoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SigmaRoc 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has better earnings and valuation, MSLH or BREE?

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £630.40M 0.69 £21.50M £8.00 21.39 Breedon Group £1.76B 0.62 £96.41M £23.60 13.38

Is MSLH or BREE more profitable?

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 6.73% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 3.18% 3.79% 2.64% Breedon Group 4.66% 6.73% 4.82%

Does the media favor MSLH or BREE?

In the previous week, Breedon Group had 8 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Breedon Group and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.03 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Breedon Group 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 2 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer ACA or MSLH?

Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 255.75, indicating a potential upside of 49.47%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Acacia Mining. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Acacia Mining 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 Marshalls 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has higher valuation and earnings, MSLH or CRH?

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £630.40M 0.69 £21.50M £8.00 21.39 CRH £38.06B 0.02 £4.69B £551.00 0.21

Is MSLH or CRH more profitable?

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. CRH's return on equity of 10.79% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 3.18% 3.79% 2.64% CRH 8.86% 10.79% 6.20%

Does the media refer more to MSLH or CRH?

In the previous week, CRH had 1 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CRH's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive CRH 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher earnings and valuation, MSLH or IBST?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £630.40M 0.69 £21.50M £8.00 21.39 Ibstock £342.88M 0.93 £7.28M -£5.70 N/A

Is MSLH or IBST more profitable?

Marshalls has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. Marshalls' return on equity of 3.79% beat Ibstock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 3.18% 3.79% 2.64% Ibstock -6.67% -6.19% 3.33%

Does the media refer more to MSLH or IBST?

In the previous week, Marshalls and Marshalls both had 1 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ibstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Ibstock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors

GBX 171.10 +0.90 (+0.53%)

As of 07:40 AM Eastern

Compare

MSLH vs. SRC, BREE, ACA, CRH, and IBST

Should you buy Marshalls stock or one of its competitors? Marshalls's main competitors and comparable companies include SigmaRoc (SRC), Breedon Group (BREE), Acacia Mining (ACA), CRH (CRH), and Ibstock (IBST). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "construction materials" industry.

How does Marshalls compare to SigmaRoc?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and SigmaRoc (LON:SRC) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 8.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.54% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	3.18%	3.79%	2.64%
SigmaRoc	8.40%	10.54%	2.05%

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 255.75, suggesting a potential upside of 49.47%. SigmaRoc has a consensus target price of GBX 165.33, suggesting a potential upside of 28.91%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than SigmaRoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
SigmaRoc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

In the previous week, SigmaRoc had 2 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SigmaRoc and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat SigmaRoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SigmaRoc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

63.3% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.4% of SigmaRoc shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marshalls has a beta of 1.277, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SigmaRoc has a beta of 1.236, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

Marshalls has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£630.40M	0.69	£21.50M	£8.00	21.39
SigmaRoc	£1.05B	1.36	-£226.13M	£6.75	19.00

Summary

Marshalls beats SigmaRoc on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Breedon Group?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Breedon Group (LON:BREE) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Breedon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 15 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Marshalls pays out 83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Breedon Group pays out 63.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Breedon Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marshalls has a beta of 1.277, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Breedon Group has a beta of 1.083, suggesting that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market.

Marshalls presently has a consensus price target of GBX 255.75, indicating a potential upside of 49.47%. Breedon Group has a consensus price target of GBX 451.67, indicating a potential upside of 43.02%. Given Marshalls' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Breedon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Breedon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.83

63.3% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 61.7% of Breedon Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Breedon Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.66% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 6.73% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	3.18%	3.79%	2.64%
Breedon Group	4.66%	6.73%	4.82%

In the previous week, Breedon Group had 8 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Breedon Group and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.03 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Breedon Group	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	2 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£630.40M	0.69	£21.50M	£8.00	21.39
Breedon Group	£1.76B	0.62	£96.41M	£23.60	13.38

Summary

Breedon Group beats Marshalls on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Acacia Mining?

Acacia Mining (LON:ACA) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Acacia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Acacia Mining. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Acacia Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Acacia Mining	Neutral
Marshalls	Positive

63.3% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 255.75, indicating a potential upside of 49.47%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Acacia Mining.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Acacia Mining	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Marshalls has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Acacia Mining's net margin of 0.00%. Marshalls' return on equity of 3.79% beat Acacia Mining's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Acacia Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A
Marshalls	3.18%	3.79%	2.64%

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Acacia Mining. Acacia Mining is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Acacia Mining	£645.41M	0.00	N/A	£0.50	N/A
Marshalls	£630.40M	0.69	£21.50M	£8.00	21.39

Summary

Marshalls beats Acacia Mining on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to CRH?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and CRH (LON:CRH) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, risk and profitability.

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Marshalls pays out 83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£630.40M	0.69	£21.50M	£8.00	21.39
CRH	£38.06B	0.02	£4.69B	£551.00	0.21

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 255.75, suggesting a potential upside of 49.47%. CRH has a consensus target price of £105.90, suggesting a potential upside of 9,115.91%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
CRH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

In the previous week, CRH had 1 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for CRH and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat CRH's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
CRH	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Marshalls has a beta of 1.277, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

63.3% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 3.18%. CRH's return on equity of 10.79% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	3.18%	3.79%	2.64%
CRH	8.86%	10.79%	6.20%

Summary

CRH beats Marshalls on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Ibstock?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Ibstock (LON:IBST) are both small-cap materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Marshalls currently has a consensus target price of GBX 255.75, suggesting a potential upside of 49.47%. Ibstock has a consensus target price of GBX 113, suggesting a potential upside of 39.51%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Ibstock	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

63.3% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Ibstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Ibstock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Marshalls and Marshalls both had 1 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Ibstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Ibstock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£630.40M	0.69	£21.50M	£8.00	21.39
Ibstock	£342.88M	0.93	£7.28M	-£5.70	N/A

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.7%. Marshalls pays out 83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Ibstock pays out -52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Marshalls has a beta of 1.277, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ibstock has a beta of 0.844, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Marshalls has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. Marshalls' return on equity of 3.79% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	3.18%	3.79%	2.64%
Ibstock	-6.67%	-6.19%	3.33%

Summary

Marshalls beats Ibstock on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marshalls News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSLH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MSLH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marshalls	Construction Materials Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£432.69M	£7.64B	£4.71B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	3.95%	2.43%	4.75%	6.18%
P/E Ratio	21.39	13.67	25.10	366.18
Price / Sales	0.69	39.06	16,580.98	89,426.61
Price / Cash	7.82	30.30	24.99	27.89
Price / Book	0.65	1.72	10.19	6.69
Net Income	£21.50M	£631.92M	£158.44M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	11.10%	-0.34%	-2.75%	-0.58%
1 Month Performance	7.21%	-3.97%	-4.42%	17.03%
1 Year Performance	-3.33%	-4.00%	17.72%	16.64%

Marshalls Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MSLH Marshalls	4.9383 of 5 stars	GBX 171.10 +0.5%	GBX 255.75 +49.5%	-4.8%	£432.69M	£630.40M	21.39	2,726	Gap Down
SRC SigmaRoc	2.2707 of 5 stars	GBX 130 +2.2%	GBX 165.33 +27.2%	+3.5%	£1.44B	£1.05B	19.26	3,000	Gap Up
BREE Breedon Group	4.3579 of 5 stars	GBX 313 -0.4%	GBX 451.67 +44.3%	-11.8%	£1.09B	£1.76B	13.26	3,900	Trending News
ACA Acacia Mining	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A	£959.60M	£645.41M	468.00	5,230	High Trading Volume
CRH CRH	2.4818 of 5 stars	GBX 114.91 +2.1%	£105.22 +9,056.7%	-98.7%	£768.04M	£38.06B	0.21	77,400	Gap Up High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MSLH) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors