Which has better earnings and valuation, MSLH or SRC?

Marshalls has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.57 £21.50M £5.60 25.50 SigmaRoc £1.04B 1.31 -£226.13M £6.75 18.12

Is MSLH or SRC more profitable?

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64% SigmaRoc 7.68% 10.11% 2.05%

Does the media prefer MSLH or SRC?

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than SigmaRoc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for SigmaRoc. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat SigmaRoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SigmaRoc 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MSLH or BREE?

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Marshalls £632.10M 0.57 £21.50M £5.60 25.50 Breedon Group £1.71B 0.62 £96.41M £24.20 12.66

Is MSLH or BREE more profitable?

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64% Breedon Group 4.89% 7.14% 4.82%

Does the media prefer MSLH or BREE?

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Breedon Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Breedon Group. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Marshalls 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Breedon Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, CRH or MSLH?

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio CRH £38.06B 0.02 £4.69B £551.00 0.21 Marshalls £632.10M 0.57 £21.50M £5.60 25.50

Is CRH or MSLH more profitable?

CRH has a net margin of 5.02% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.43% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets CRH 5.02% 10.43% 6.20% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media prefer CRH or MSLH?

In the previous week, CRH and CRH both had 2 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat CRH's score of 0.60 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment CRH 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Marshalls 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, IBST or MSLH?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Ibstock £372.10M 1.01 £7.28M £0.80 119.38 Marshalls £632.10M 0.57 £21.50M £5.60 25.50

Is IBST or MSLH more profitable?

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Ibstock 0.83% 0.79% 3.33% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media refer more to IBST or MSLH?

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Ibstock. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Ibstock. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Ibstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Ibstock 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Marshalls 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, FORT or MSLH?

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Forterra. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Forterra £386M 0.72 £7.82M £8.00 16.73 Marshalls £632.10M 0.57 £21.50M £5.60 25.50

Is FORT or MSLH more profitable?

Forterra has a net margin of 4.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Marshalls' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Forterra 4.40% 7.33% 4.97% Marshalls 2.28% 2.17% 2.64%

Does the media refer more to FORT or MSLH?

In the previous week, Forterra had 3 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Forterra and 2 mentions for Marshalls. Forterra's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Marshalls' score of 0.92 indicating that Forterra is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Forterra 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Marshalls 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors

GBX 142.80 +0.30 (+0.21%)

As of 12:10 PM Eastern

Compare

MSLH vs. SRC, BREE, CRH, IBST, and FORT

Should you buy Marshalls stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Marshalls with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Marshalls include SigmaRoc (SRC), Breedon Group (BREE), CRH (CRH), Ibstock (IBST), and Forterra (FORT). These companies are all part of the "building materials" industry.

How does Marshalls compare to SigmaRoc?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and SigmaRoc (LON:SRC) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than SigmaRoc. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for SigmaRoc. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat SigmaRoc's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SigmaRoc	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Marshalls has higher earnings, but lower revenue than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.57	£21.50M	£5.60	25.50
SigmaRoc	£1.04B	1.31	-£226.13M	£6.75	18.12

63.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.8% of SigmaRoc shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of SigmaRoc shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marshalls currently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 117.09%. SigmaRoc has a consensus target price of GBX 165.33, indicating a potential upside of 35.17%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than SigmaRoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
SigmaRoc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
SigmaRoc	7.68%	10.11%	2.05%

Marshalls has a beta of 1.283, indicating that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SigmaRoc has a beta of 1.234, indicating that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marshalls beats SigmaRoc on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Breedon Group?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Breedon Group (LON:BREE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Breedon Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Breedon Group. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Breedon Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Breedon Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Marshalls currently has a consensus price target of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 117.09%. Breedon Group has a consensus price target of GBX 449, suggesting a potential upside of 46.54%. Given Marshalls' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Breedon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Breedon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Breedon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Breedon Group pays out 61.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

63.1% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 51.7% of Breedon Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.3% of Breedon Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.57	£21.50M	£5.60	25.50
Breedon Group	£1.71B	0.62	£96.41M	£24.20	12.66

Marshalls has a beta of 1.283, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Breedon Group has a beta of 1.061, indicating that its share price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Breedon Group	4.89%	7.14%	4.82%

Summary

Breedon Group beats Marshalls on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to CRH?

CRH (LON:CRH) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

CRH presently has a consensus target price of £105.22, suggesting a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 117.09%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
CRH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, CRH and CRH both had 2 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat CRH's score of 0.60 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
CRH	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marshalls	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

CRH has a beta of 1.241, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.283, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
CRH	£38.06B	0.02	£4.69B	£551.00	0.21
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.57	£21.50M	£5.60	25.50

CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

CRH has a net margin of 5.02% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 10.43% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
CRH	5.02%	10.43%	6.20%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

CRH beats Marshalls on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Ibstock?

Ibstock (LON:IBST) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

57.7% of Ibstock shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.3% of Ibstock shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ibstock	0.83%	0.79%	3.33%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Ibstock pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ibstock	£372.10M	1.01	£7.28M	£0.80	119.38
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.57	£21.50M	£5.60	25.50

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Ibstock. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Marshalls and 1 mentions for Ibstock. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Ibstock's score of 0.00 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ibstock	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Marshalls	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Ibstock currently has a consensus price target of GBX 131.75, indicating a potential upside of 37.96%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 117.09%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ibstock	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Ibstock has a beta of 0.858, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.283, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Marshalls beats Ibstock on 14 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Forterra?

Forterra (LON:FORT) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

Forterra has a beta of 0.734, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.283, suggesting that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Forterra shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.1% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Forterra shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Forterra. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Forterra	£386M	0.72	£7.82M	£8.00	16.73
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.57	£21.50M	£5.60	25.50

Forterra has a net margin of 4.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Forterra	4.40%	7.33%	4.97%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Forterra presently has a consensus target price of GBX 209.83, indicating a potential upside of 56.83%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 117.09%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Forterra.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Forterra	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Forterra had 3 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Forterra and 2 mentions for Marshalls. Forterra's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Marshalls' score of 0.92 indicating that Forterra is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Forterra	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Marshalls	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Forterra beats Marshalls on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marshalls News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSLH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MSLH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marshalls	Building Materials Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£361.13M	£7.09B	£4.87B	£2.80B
Dividend Yield	4.97%	3.00%	4.99%	6.16%
P/E Ratio	25.50	16.67	22.91	367.11
Price / Sales	0.57	76.41	5,900.02	86,377.90
Price / Cash	7.82	8.55	27.04	27.85
Price / Book	0.55	1.10	9.26	7.95
Net Income	£21.50M	£708.86M	£156.93M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	9.68%	2.90%	2.17%	1.38%
1 Month Performance	8.43%	1.12%	-2.79%	1.63%
1 Year Performance	-47.21%	0.37%	56.97%	73.73%

Marshalls Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MSLH Marshalls	4.718 of 5 stars	GBX 142.80 +0.2%	GBX 310 +117.1%	-48.1%	£361.13M	£632.10M	25.50	2,726
SRC SigmaRoc	3.9451 of 5 stars	GBX 115.59 +0.9%	GBX 165.33 +43.0%	+16.3%	£1.28B	£1.04B	17.12	2,000
BREE Breedon Group	4.0179 of 5 stars	GBX 284.29 +0.0%	GBX 449 +57.9%	-29.1%	£985.58M	£1.71B	11.75	3,900
CRH CRH	3.7545 of 5 stars	GBX 114.91 +2.1%	£105.22 +9,056.7%	-98.3%	£768.04M	£38.06B	0.21	77,400	News Coverage Gap Up High Trading Volume
IBST Ibstock	3.4239 of 5 stars	GBX 93.40 -1.5%	GBX 131.75 +41.1%	-40.0%	£368.94M	£372.10M	116.75	1,943

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MSLH) was last updated on 6/18/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors