Ibstock (IBST) Competitors

Ibstock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Acacia Mining. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Acacia Mining, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Ibstock had 1 more articles in the media than Acacia Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Ibstock and 0 mentions for Acacia Mining. Acacia Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Ibstock's score of -0.98 indicating that Acacia Mining is being referred to more favorably in the media.

57.7% of Ibstock shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Ibstock shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Acacia Mining has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. Acacia Mining's return on equity of 0.00% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Ibstock has a consensus price target of GBX 113, suggesting a potential upside of 34.17%. Given Ibstock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Ibstock is more favorable than Acacia Mining.

CRH has a net margin of 8.86% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. CRH's return on equity of 10.79% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CRH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CRH has a beta of 1.241, meaning that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ibstock has a beta of 0.848, meaning that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ibstock pays out -52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

CRH currently has a consensus target price of £105.22, indicating a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Ibstock has a consensus target price of GBX 113, indicating a potential upside of 34.17%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe CRH is more favorable than Ibstock.

In the previous week, CRH and CRH both had 1 articles in the media. CRH's average media sentiment score of 0.29 beat Ibstock's score of -0.98 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the media.

59.2% of CRH shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Ibstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.3% of CRH shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Ibstock shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

57.7% of Ibstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 63.3% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Ibstock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Ibstock presently has a consensus price target of GBX 113, indicating a potential upside of 34.17%. Marshalls has a consensus price target of GBX 255.75, indicating a potential upside of 54.66%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.70 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Ibstock pays out -52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Marshalls pays out 83.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future.

Marshalls has a net margin of 3.18% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. Marshalls' return on equity of 3.79% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Ibstock has a beta of 0.848, indicating that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.274, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Ibstock and Ibstock both had 1 articles in the media. Marshalls' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Ibstock's score of -0.98 indicating that Marshalls is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Forterra had 2 more articles in the media than Ibstock. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Forterra and 1 mentions for Ibstock. Forterra's average media sentiment score of 0.35 beat Ibstock's score of -0.98 indicating that Forterra is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 6.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 3 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Forterra pays out 68.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Ibstock pays out -52.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Forterra has a net margin of 5.09% compared to Ibstock's net margin of -6.67%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.98% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Forterra has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Ibstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Forterra, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Forterra currently has a consensus target price of GBX 202.20, suggesting a potential upside of 42.39%. Ibstock has a consensus target price of GBX 113, suggesting a potential upside of 34.17%. Given Forterra's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Forterra is more favorable than Ibstock.

Forterra has a beta of 0.726, suggesting that its stock price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Ibstock has a beta of 0.848, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.

80.4% of Forterra shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Ibstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.5% of Forterra shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of Ibstock shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.