Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, community ranking, dividends, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Is HILS or GFRD a better dividend stock?

Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 45 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 16 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Hill & Smith pays out 47.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 46.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hill & Smith	£834.58M	1.65	£77.07M	£95.13	17.94
Galliford Try	£1.69B	0.24	£34.53M	£34.46	11.90

Do analysts rate HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,500, suggesting a potential upside of 46.50%. Given Hill & Smith's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Hill & Smith is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hill & Smith	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Galliford Try	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of HILS or GFRD?

78.9% of Hill & Smith shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.1% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. 1.9% of Hill & Smith shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Galliford Try shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Which has more risk and volatility, HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.31, suggesting that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 1.12, suggesting that its stock price is 12% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Does the MarketBeat Community prefer HILS or GFRD?

Hill & Smith received 15 more outperform votes than Galliford Try when rated by MarketBeat users. However, 71.33% of users gave Galliford Try an outperform vote while only 70.41% of users gave Hill & Smith an outperform vote.

Company	Underperform	Outperform
Hill & Smith	Outperform Votes 326 70.41%	Underperform Votes 137 29.59%
Galliford Try	Outperform Votes 311 71.33%	Underperform Votes 125 28.67%

Is HILS or GFRD more profitable?

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.23% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 2.04%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 32.22% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hill & Smith	9.23%	17.39%	10.01%
Galliford Try	2.04%	32.22%	2.22%

Does the media refer more to HILS or GFRD?

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 1 more articles in the media than Hill & Smith. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Hill & Smith. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Hill & Smith	Neutral
Galliford Try	Positive

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Galliford Try on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.