Free Trial

Galliford Try (GFRD) Competitors

Galliford Try logo
GBX 539 -3.50 (-0.65%)
As of 05:07 AM Eastern

GFRD vs. HILS, KLR, KIE, KINO, and RNWH

Should you be buying Galliford Try stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Galliford Try include Hill & Smith (HILS), Keller Group (KLR), Kier Group (KIE), Kinovo (KINO), and Renew (RNWH). These companies are all part of the "engineering & construction" industry.

How does Galliford Try compare to Hill & Smith?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Hill & Smith (LON:HILS) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.447, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Hill & Smith has a beta of 1.288, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.4% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Hill & Smith shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Hill & Smith had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Hill & Smith and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Hill & Smith's score of 0.55 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Hill & Smith
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Galliford Try presently has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 11.32%. Hill & Smith has a consensus price target of GBX 2,813.33, suggesting a potential upside of 8.83%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Hill & Smith.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galliford Try
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Hill & Smith
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75

Hill & Smith has a net margin of 9.50% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Hill & Smith's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galliford Try1.93% 30.23% 2.22%
Hill & Smith 9.50%17.34%10.01%

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Hill & Smith pays an annual dividend of GBX 50.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hill & Smith pays out 49.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Hill & Smith has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hill & Smith, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try£1.89B0.28£34.53M£35.1015.36
Hill & Smith£868.80M2.34£77.07M£101.6025.44

Summary

Hill & Smith beats Galliford Try on 11 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Keller Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Keller Group (LON:KLR) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, risk, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

Keller Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Keller Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try£1.89B0.28£34.53M£35.1015.36
Keller Group£3.09B0.54£126.69M£198.7012.09

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.447, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Keller Group has a beta of 0.985, indicating that its share price is 2% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Keller Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 51.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Keller Group pays out 25.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Keller Group had 2 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Keller Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Keller Group's score of 0.60 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Keller Group
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Keller Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of Keller Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Galliford Try presently has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 11.32%. Keller Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,155, suggesting a potential downside of 10.28%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Keller Group.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galliford Try
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Keller Group
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Keller Group has a net margin of 4.62% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Keller Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galliford Try1.93% 30.23% 2.22%
Keller Group 4.62%23.46%7.80%

Summary

Keller Group beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kier Group?

Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) and Kier Group (LON:KIE) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

In the previous week, Kier Group had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Kier Group and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Kier Group's average media sentiment score of 1.37 beat Galliford Try's score of 1.11 indicating that Kier Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Galliford Try
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Kier Group
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Galliford Try has a beta of 0.447, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Kier Group has a beta of 0.906, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Galliford Try presently has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 11.32%. Kier Group has a consensus price target of GBX 253.33, suggesting a potential upside of 18.49%. Given Kier Group's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Kier Group is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Galliford Try
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Kier Group
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Kier Group has higher revenue and earnings than Galliford Try. Galliford Try is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kier Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Galliford Try£1.89B0.28£34.53M£35.1015.36
Kier Group£4.12B0.23£42.84M£13.1016.32

Galliford Try has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Kier Group's net margin of 1.47%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Kier Group's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Galliford Try1.93% 30.23% 2.22%
Kier Group 1.47%11.69%2.18%

Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Kier Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kier Group pays out 55.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Galliford Try is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 29.8% of Kier Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.2% of Kier Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kier Group on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Kinovo?

Kinovo (LON:KINO) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

In the previous week, Galliford Try had 1 more articles in the media than Kinovo. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Galliford Try and 0 mentions for Kinovo. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Kinovo's score of 0.00 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kinovo Neutral
Galliford Try Positive

Kinovo has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its share price is 4% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.447, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 11.32%. Given Galliford Try's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Galliford Try is more favorable than Kinovo.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kinovo
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Galliford Try
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Galliford Try has higher revenue and earnings than Kinovo. Kinovo is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kinovo£63.37M11.95-£614.82K-£0.00N/A
Galliford Try£1.89B0.28£34.53M£35.1015.36

Galliford Try has a net margin of 1.93% compared to Kinovo's net margin of -0.95%. Kinovo's return on equity of 70.28% beat Galliford Try's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kinovo-0.95% 70.28% 17.21%
Galliford Try 1.93%30.23%2.22%

6.1% of Kinovo shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are held by institutional investors. 14.2% of Kinovo shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Galliford Try beats Kinovo on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Galliford Try compare to Renew?

Renew (LON:RNWH) and Galliford Try (LON:GFRD) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings and profitability.

30.3% of Renew shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Galliford Try shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.0% of Renew shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of Galliford Try shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Renew has a beta of 0.776, meaning that its stock price is 22% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Galliford Try has a beta of 0.447, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Renew had 1 more articles in the media than Galliford Try. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Renew and 1 mentions for Galliford Try. Galliford Try's average media sentiment score of 1.11 beat Renew's score of 0.40 indicating that Galliford Try is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Renew
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Galliford Try
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Renew pays an annual dividend of GBX 19.34 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Galliford Try pays an annual dividend of GBX 19 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Renew pays out 31.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Galliford Try pays out 54.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Renew has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Galliford Try. Renew is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Galliford Try, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Renew£1.08B0.68£48.95M£61.6615.07
Galliford Try£1.89B0.28£34.53M£35.1015.36

Renew has a net margin of 4.52% compared to Galliford Try's net margin of 1.93%. Galliford Try's return on equity of 30.23% beat Renew's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Renew4.52% 21.11% 9.20%
Galliford Try 1.93%30.23%2.22%

Renew currently has a consensus price target of GBX 1,172.50, suggesting a potential upside of 26.21%. Galliford Try has a consensus price target of GBX 600, suggesting a potential upside of 11.32%. Given Renew's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Renew is more favorable than Galliford Try.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Renew
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Galliford Try
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Renew beats Galliford Try on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Galliford Try News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GFRD and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GFRD and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GFRD vs. The Competition

MetricGalliford TryEngineering & Construction IndustryIndustrials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£529.31M£3.45B£9.51B£2.78B
Dividend Yield3.88%3.12%3.55%6.15%
P/E Ratio15.3627.2125.41366.13
Price / Sales0.2880.615,532.0188,453.19
Price / Cash0.7814.6127.5527.89
Price / Book4.583.404.757.59
Net Income£34.53M£82.90M£792.42M£5.89B
1 Month Performance2.71%6.50%5.90%3.92%
1 Year Performance30.51%80.81%40.44%89.46%

Galliford Try Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GFRD
Galliford Try
3.9324 of 5 stars
GBX 539
-0.6%
GBX 600
+11.3%
+33.0%£529.31M£1.89B15.363,922
HILS
Hill & Smith
1.7554 of 5 stars
GBX 2,599.77
-0.4%
GBX 2,813.33
+8.2%
+43.5%£2.04B£868.80M25.594,336
KLR
Keller Group
1.526 of 5 stars
GBX 2,384
+2.1%
GBX 2,155
-9.6%
+59.6%£1.64B£3.09B12.009,500
KIE
Kier Group
4.4006 of 5 stars
GBX 212.80
+0.6%
GBX 253.33
+19.0%
+36.6%£929.34M£4.12B16.2410,286
KINO
Kinovo
N/AGBX 1,195
flat
N/A+1,938.9%£757.16M£63.37MN/A203

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:GFRD) was last updated on 5/8/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners