Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MPE or CWK?

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio M.P. Evans Group £371.00M 3.02 £80.16M £211.80 10.17 Cranswick £2.98B 0.91 £113.74M £290.20 17.54

Is MPE or CWK more profitable?

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 5.31%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Cranswick's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets M.P. Evans Group 29.97% 19.40% 10.06% Cranswick 5.31% 14.99% 8.26%

Does the media refer more to MPE or CWK?

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Cranswick. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Cranswick. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Cranswick's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment M.P. Evans Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Cranswick 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TATE or MPE?

Tate & Lyle has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tate & Lyle £2.01B 1.23 £206.63M £21.70 25.72 M.P. Evans Group £371.00M 3.02 £80.16M £211.80 10.17

Is TATE or MPE more profitable?

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Tate & Lyle's net margin of 4.84%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Tate & Lyle's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Tate & Lyle 4.84% 6.17% 6.03% M.P. Evans Group 29.97% 19.40% 10.06%

Does the media prefer TATE or MPE?

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Tate & Lyle's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.21 indicating that Tate & Lyle is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tate & Lyle 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive M.P. Evans Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPE or PFD?

Premier Foods has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio M.P. Evans Group £371.00M 3.02 £80.16M £211.80 10.17 Premier Foods £1.18B 1.40 £112.38M £15.50 12.34

Does the media favor MPE or PFD?

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Premier Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Premier Foods. Premier Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.21 indicating that Premier Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment M.P. Evans Group 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Premier Foods 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate BAKK or MPE?

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus target price of GBX 2,500, suggesting a potential upside of 16.03%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Bakkavor Group. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Bakkavor Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00 M.P. Evans Group 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 3.00

M.P. Evans Group (MPE) Competitors

GBX 2,154.58 +109.58 (+5.36%)

As of 06:04 AM Eastern

Compare

MPE vs. CWK, TATE, GNC, PFD, and BAKK

Should you buy M.P. Evans Group stock or one of its competitors? M.P. Evans Group's main competitors and comparable companies include Cranswick (CWK), Tate & Lyle (TATE), Greencore Group (GNC), Premier Foods (PFD), and Bakkavor Group (BAKK). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "food products" industry.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Cranswick?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Cranswick (LON:CWK) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.328, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cranswick has a beta of 0.552, suggesting that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Cranswick's net margin of 5.31%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Cranswick's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group	29.97%	19.40%	10.06%
Cranswick	5.31%	14.99%	8.26%

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Cranswick. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Cranswick. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Cranswick's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Cranswick	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

9.3% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of Cranswick shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.6% of Cranswick shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Cranswick pays an annual dividend of GBX 103 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Cranswick pays out 35.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. M.P. Evans Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M.P. Evans Group presently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,500, indicating a potential upside of 16.03%. Cranswick has a consensus target price of GBX 5,974, indicating a potential upside of 17.37%. Given Cranswick's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Cranswick is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Cranswick	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

Cranswick has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cranswick, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group	£371.00M	3.02	£80.16M	£211.80	10.17
Cranswick	£2.98B	0.91	£113.74M	£290.20	17.54

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Cranswick on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Tate & Lyle?

Tate & Lyle (LON:TATE) and M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, risk, media sentiment, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and profitability.

61.5% of Tate & Lyle shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.4% of Tate & Lyle shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Tate & Lyle pays an annual dividend of GBX 20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Tate & Lyle pays out 92.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Tate & Lyle's net margin of 4.84%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Tate & Lyle's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tate & Lyle	4.84%	6.17%	6.03%
M.P. Evans Group	29.97%	19.40%	10.06%

Tate & Lyle has a beta of 0.346, meaning that its share price is 65% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.328, meaning that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Tate & Lyle. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Tate & Lyle. Tate & Lyle's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.21 indicating that Tate & Lyle is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tate & Lyle	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
M.P. Evans Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Tate & Lyle has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Tate & Lyle, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tate & Lyle	£2.01B	1.23	£206.63M	£21.70	25.72
M.P. Evans Group	£371.00M	3.02	£80.16M	£211.80	10.17

Tate & Lyle presently has a consensus price target of GBX 516, suggesting a potential downside of 7.54%. M.P. Evans Group has a consensus price target of GBX 2,500, suggesting a potential upside of 16.03%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Tate & Lyle.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tate & Lyle	0 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
M.P. Evans Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Tate & Lyle on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Greencore Group?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Greencore Group (LON:GNC) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk and analyst recommendations.

M.P. Evans Group currently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,500, suggesting a potential upside of 16.03%. Greencore Group has a consensus price target of GBX 301.50, suggesting a potential upside of 20.41%. Given Greencore Group's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Greencore Group is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Greencore Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Greencore Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Greencore Group pays out 92.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. M.P. Evans Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

M.P. Evans Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Greencore Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Greencore Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group	£371.00M	3.02	£80.16M	£211.80	10.17
Greencore Group	£2.34B	0.85	£48.48M	£2.80	89.43

9.3% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.5% of Greencore Group shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Greencore Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 4 more articles in the media than Greencore Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Greencore Group. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Greencore Group's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group	Neutral
Greencore Group	Neutral

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Greencore Group's net margin of 0.30%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Greencore Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group	29.97%	19.40%	10.06%
Greencore Group	0.30%	0.73%	4.43%

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.328, suggesting that its stock price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Greencore Group has a beta of 0.84, suggesting that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Greencore Group on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Premier Foods?

M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) and Premier Foods (LON:PFD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Premier Foods has higher revenue and earnings than M.P. Evans Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Premier Foods, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
M.P. Evans Group	£371.00M	3.02	£80.16M	£211.80	10.17
Premier Foods	£1.18B	1.40	£112.38M	£15.50	12.34

M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.328, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Premier Foods has a beta of 0.592, suggesting that its share price is 41% less volatile than the broader market.

M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Premier Foods pays an annual dividend of GBX 2.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Premier Foods pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 3 more articles in the media than Premier Foods. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 1 mentions for Premier Foods. Premier Foods' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat M.P. Evans Group's score of 0.21 indicating that Premier Foods is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
M.P. Evans Group	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Premier Foods	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Premier Foods' net margin of 11.62%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Premier Foods' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
M.P. Evans Group	29.97%	19.40%	10.06%
Premier Foods	11.62%	9.74%	4.78%

M.P. Evans Group currently has a consensus target price of GBX 2,500, indicating a potential upside of 16.03%. Premier Foods has a consensus target price of GBX 242, indicating a potential upside of 26.57%. Given Premier Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Premier Foods is more favorable than M.P. Evans Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
M.P. Evans Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00
Premier Foods	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

9.3% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 39.0% of Premier Foods shares are held by institutional investors. 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.7% of Premier Foods shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

M.P. Evans Group and Premier Foods tied by winning 9 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Bakkavor Group?

Bakkavor Group (LON:BAKK) and M.P. Evans Group (LON:MPE) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

M.P. Evans Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Bakkavor Group. M.P. Evans Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bakkavor Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Bakkavor Group	£2.30B	0.63	£64.74M	£6.30	40.00
M.P. Evans Group	£371.00M	3.02	£80.16M	£211.80	10.17

In the previous week, M.P. Evans Group had 4 more articles in the media than Bakkavor Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for M.P. Evans Group and 0 mentions for Bakkavor Group. M.P. Evans Group's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Bakkavor Group's score of 0.00 indicating that M.P. Evans Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Bakkavor Group	Neutral
M.P. Evans Group	Neutral

Bakkavor Group has a beta of 0.63, indicating that its share price is 37% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, M.P. Evans Group has a beta of 0.328, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

M.P. Evans Group has a net margin of 29.97% compared to Bakkavor Group's net margin of 2.43%. M.P. Evans Group's return on equity of 19.40% beat Bakkavor Group's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Bakkavor Group	2.43%	9.10%	4.54%
M.P. Evans Group	29.97%	19.40%	10.06%

Bakkavor Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 8 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. M.P. Evans Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 73.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.4%. Bakkavor Group pays out 127.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. M.P. Evans Group pays out 34.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. M.P. Evans Group is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

13.4% of Bakkavor Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 9.3% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by institutional investors. 48.9% of Bakkavor Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 8.7% of M.P. Evans Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

M.P. Evans Group has a consensus target price of GBX 2,500, suggesting a potential upside of 16.03%. Given M.P. Evans Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe M.P. Evans Group is more favorable than Bakkavor Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Bakkavor Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
M.P. Evans Group	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Summary

M.P. Evans Group beats Bakkavor Group on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get M.P. Evans Group News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MPE and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MPE vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	M.P. Evans Group	Food Products Industry	Consumer Staples Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£1.12B	£5.54B	£15.61B	£2.84B
Dividend Yield	3.18%	3.18%	3.26%	6.26%
P/E Ratio	10.17	13.61	14.15	367.08
Price / Sales	3.02	83.52	262,279.82	89,799.46
Price / Cash	6.22	113.08	55.98	27.89
Price / Book	2.32	3.83	4.81	6.32
Net Income	£80.16M	£765.60M	£834.43M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	21.04%	-1.19%	-0.81%	-0.88%
1 Month Performance	25.56%	-1.53%	-1.82%	-0.82%
1 Year Performance	62.00%	39.59%	11.62%	19.02%

M.P. Evans Group Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MPE M.P. Evans Group	2.7993 of 5 stars	GBX 2,154.58 +5.4%	GBX 2,500 +16.0%	+57.9%	£1.12B	£371.00M	10.17	12,800	Analyst Forecast
CWK Cranswick	2.6647 of 5 stars	GBX 5,074.98 +0.3%	GBX 5,974 +17.7%	-1.9%	£2.72B	£2.98B	17.49	13,114	High Trading Volume
TATE Tate & Lyle	0.7642 of 5 stars	GBX 558 +0.2%	GBX 516 -7.5%	+8.5%	£2.47B	£2.01B	25.71	4,840
GNC Greencore Group	N/A	GBX 248.60 +0.3%	GBX 301.50 +21.3%	+2.7%	£1.97B	£2.34B	88.79	28,000	High Trading Volume
PFD Premier Foods	4.0858 of 5 stars	GBX 191.12 +0.5%	GBX 242 +26.6%	+2.2%	£1.65B	£1.18B	12.33	4,000

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MPE) was last updated on 9/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

M.P. Evans Group (MPE) Competitors

MPE vs. CWK, TATE, GNC, PFD, and BAKK

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Cranswick?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Tate & Lyle?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Greencore Group?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Premier Foods?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Bakkavor Group?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPE vs. The Competition

M.P. Evans Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

M.P. Evans Group (MPE) Competitors

MPE vs. CWK, TATE, GNC, PFD, and BAKK

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Cranswick?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPE or CWK?

Is MPE or CWK more profitable?

Does the media refer more to MPE or CWK?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in MPE or CWK?

Is MPE or CWK a better dividend stock?

Do analysts rate MPE or CWK?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, MPE or CWK?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Tate & Lyle?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in TATE or MPE?

Is TATE or MPE a better dividend stock?

Is TATE or MPE more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, TATE or MPE?

Does the media prefer TATE or MPE?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, TATE or MPE?

Do analysts recommend TATE or MPE?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Greencore Group?

Do analysts rate MPE or GNC?

Is MPE or GNC a better dividend stock?

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, MPE or GNC?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in MPE or GNC?

Does the media refer more to MPE or GNC?

Is MPE or GNC more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, MPE or GNC?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Premier Foods?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, MPE or PFD?

Which has more volatility and risk, MPE or PFD?

Is MPE or PFD a better dividend stock?

Does the media favor MPE or PFD?

Is MPE or PFD more profitable?

Do analysts rate MPE or PFD?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in MPE or PFD?

Summary

How does M.P. Evans Group compare to Bakkavor Group?

Which has preferable earnings & valuation, BAKK or MPE?

Does the media refer more to BAKK or MPE?

Which has more risk & volatility, BAKK or MPE?

Is BAKK or MPE more profitable?

Is BAKK or MPE a better dividend stock?

Do institutionals and insiders believe in BAKK or MPE?

Do analysts rate BAKK or MPE?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

MPE vs. The Competition

M.P. Evans Group Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools