Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors

GBX 133.50 -2.40 (-1.77%)

As of 05/8/2026 12:44 PM Eastern

MSLH vs. SRC, BREE, CRH, IBST, and FORT

Should you be buying Marshalls stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Marshalls include SigmaRoc (SRC), Breedon Group (BREE), CRH (CRH), Ibstock (IBST), and Forterra (FORT). These companies are all part of the "building materials" industry.

How does Marshalls compare to SigmaRoc?

SigmaRoc (LON:SRC) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership and dividends.

SigmaRoc has a beta of 1.232, suggesting that its stock price is 23% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, suggesting that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

51.8% of SigmaRoc shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of SigmaRoc shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SigmaRoc has a net margin of 7.68% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. SigmaRoc's return on equity of 10.11% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SigmaRoc	7.68%	10.11%	2.05%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

Marshalls has lower revenue, but higher earnings than SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SigmaRoc	£1.04B	1.28	-£226.13M	£6.75	17.78
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.53	£21.50M	£5.60	23.84

SigmaRoc currently has a consensus target price of GBX 165.33, suggesting a potential upside of 37.78%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 132.21%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than SigmaRoc.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SigmaRoc	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than SigmaRoc. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for SigmaRoc. SigmaRoc's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Marshalls' score of -1.10 indicating that SigmaRoc is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
SigmaRoc	Neutral
Marshalls	Negative

Summary

Marshalls beats SigmaRoc on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Breedon Group?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Breedon Group (LON:BREE) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, valuation and institutional ownership.

Marshalls currently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 132.21%. Breedon Group has a consensus target price of GBX 449, suggesting a potential upside of 48.58%. Given Marshalls' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Breedon Group.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Breedon Group	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80

In the previous week, Marshalls had 1 more articles in the media than Breedon Group. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Marshalls and 0 mentions for Breedon Group. Breedon Group's average media sentiment score of 0.40 beat Marshalls' score of -1.10 indicating that Breedon Group is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	Negative
Breedon Group	Neutral

Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Breedon Group has a beta of 1.081, meaning that its stock price is 8% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Breedon Group has a net margin of 4.89% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Breedon Group's return on equity of 7.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Breedon Group	4.89%	7.14%	4.82%

64.0% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Breedon Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Marshalls shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 42.7% of Breedon Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Breedon Group pays an annual dividend of GBX 14.75 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Breedon Group pays out 61.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Breedon Group has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. Breedon Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.53	£21.50M	£5.60	23.84
Breedon Group	£1.71B	0.61	£96.41M	£24.20	12.49

Summary

Breedon Group beats Marshalls on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to CRH?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and CRH (LON:CRH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership and dividends.

Marshalls presently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, indicating a potential upside of 132.21%. CRH has a consensus target price of £105.22, indicating a potential upside of 9,056.73%. Given CRH's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe CRH is more favorable than Marshalls.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
CRH	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	3.00

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. CRH pays an annual dividend of GBX 148 per share and has a dividend yield of 128.8%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. CRH pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CRH is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CRH has a beta of 1.241, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the S&P 500.

CRH has a net margin of 9.69% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. CRH's return on equity of 20.14% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
CRH	9.69%	20.14%	6.20%

64.0% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.2% of CRH shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of CRH shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Marshalls and Marshalls both had 1 articles in the media. CRH's average media sentiment score of 0.11 beat Marshalls' score of -1.10 indicating that CRH is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
CRH	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

CRH has higher revenue and earnings than Marshalls. CRH is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.53	£21.50M	£5.60	23.84
CRH	£38.06B	0.02	£4.69B	£551.00	0.21

Summary

CRH beats Marshalls on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Ibstock?

Ibstock (LON:IBST) and Marshalls (LON:MSLH) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Ibstock. Marshalls is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Ibstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Ibstock	£372.10M	1.07	£7.28M	£0.80	126.54
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.53	£21.50M	£5.60	23.84

Ibstock presently has a consensus target price of GBX 135.50, suggesting a potential upside of 33.86%. Marshalls has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 132.21%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Ibstock.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Ibstock	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.50
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

Marshalls has a net margin of 2.28% compared to Ibstock's net margin of 0.83%. Marshalls' return on equity of 2.17% beat Ibstock's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Ibstock	0.83%	0.79%	3.33%
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%

57.7% of Ibstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.0% of Marshalls shares are held by institutional investors. 2.3% of Ibstock shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Marshalls shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Ibstock had 1 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Ibstock and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Ibstock's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Marshalls' score of -1.10 indicating that Ibstock is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Ibstock	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative

Ibstock has a beta of 0.862, suggesting that its share price is 14% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, suggesting that its share price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Ibstock pays an annual dividend of GBX 4 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Ibstock pays out 500.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Marshalls is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Marshalls beats Ibstock on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Marshalls compare to Forterra?

Marshalls (LON:MSLH) and Forterra (LON:FORT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Forterra had 1 more articles in the media than Marshalls. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Forterra and 1 mentions for Marshalls. Forterra's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Marshalls' score of -1.10 indicating that Forterra is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Marshalls	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Negative
Forterra	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Marshalls pays an annual dividend of GBX 7.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Forterra pays an annual dividend of GBX 3.90 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.5%. Marshalls pays out 135.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Forterra pays out 48.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

64.0% of Marshalls shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.4% of Forterra shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Marshalls shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.4% of Forterra shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marshalls has higher revenue and earnings than Forterra. Forterra is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marshalls, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Marshalls	£632.10M	0.53	£21.50M	£5.60	23.84
Forterra	£386M	0.84	£7.82M	£8.00	19.50

Marshalls has a beta of 1.272, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Forterra has a beta of 0.767, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Forterra has a net margin of 4.40% compared to Marshalls' net margin of 2.28%. Forterra's return on equity of 7.33% beat Marshalls' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Marshalls	2.28%	2.17%	2.64%
Forterra	4.40%	7.33%	4.97%

Marshalls currently has a consensus target price of GBX 310, suggesting a potential upside of 132.21%. Forterra has a consensus target price of GBX 234, suggesting a potential upside of 50.00%. Given Marshalls' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Marshalls is more favorable than Forterra.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Marshalls	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75
Forterra	0 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.67

Summary

Forterra beats Marshalls on 10 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Marshalls News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding MSLH and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

MSLH vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Marshalls	Building Materials Industry	Materials Sector	LON Exchange
Market Cap	£337.61M	£7.10B	£4.87B	£2.76B
Dividend Yield	5.23%	3.07%	4.96%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	23.84	17.20	22.53	366.07
Price / Sales	0.53	74.72	7,615.07	88,619.84
Price / Cash	7.82	8.53	27.56	27.89
Price / Book	0.51	1.10	6.96	7.72
Net Income	£21.50M	£708.86M	£159.29M	£5.89B
7 Day Performance	2.24%	-0.14%	2.71%	63.97%
1 Month Performance	-8.31%	-3.59%	4.01%	4.04%
1 Year Performance	-53.95%	0.19%	79.07%	87.38%

Marshalls Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
MSLH Marshalls	4.2651 of 5 stars	GBX 133.50 -1.8%	GBX 310 +132.2%	N/A	£337.61M	£632.10M	23.84	2,726	Negative News
SRC SigmaRoc	N/A	GBX 118.80 +4.2%	GBX 165.33 +39.2%	N/A	£1.32B	£1.04B	17.60	2,000
BREE Breedon Group	4.1826 of 5 stars	GBX 306.80 +3.0%	GBX 449 +46.3%	N/A	£1.06B	£1.71B	12.68	3,900
CRH CRH	3.6439 of 5 stars	GBX 110.80 -4.0%	£105.22 +9,396.4%	N/A	£740.57M	£38.06B	0.20	77,400	Gap Up High Trading Volume
IBST Ibstock	3.8122 of 5 stars	GBX 105 +2.5%	GBX 135.50 +29.0%	N/A	£414.64M	£372.10M	131.25	1,943

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (LON:MSLH) was last updated on 5/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Marshalls (MSLH) Competitors