Wolfram Resources (WFR) Competitors

WFR vs. FRG, CRTX, THR, URU, and JAY

Should you buy Wolfram Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wolfram Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wolfram Resources include Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), Thor Energy (THR), URU Metals (URU), and Bluejay Mining (JAY). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Firering Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral
Wolfram Resources Positive

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Firering Strategic MineralsN/A -35.24% -16.22%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings and valuation.

3.7% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are owned by institutional investors. 73.8% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wolfram Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CRISM Therapeutics. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CRISM Therapeutics£25K238.63-£792.20K-£4.40N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CRISM TherapeuticsN/A -109.55% -26.77%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than CRISM Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for CRISM Therapeutics. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat CRISM Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral
Wolfram Resources Positive

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats CRISM Therapeutics on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Thor Energy (LON:THR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Thor Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Thor Energy. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Thor Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
Thor Energy Neutral

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Thor Energy N/A -94.46%-11.48%

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to URU Metals?

URU Metals (LON:URU) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment and dividends.

Wolfram Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.85
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

0.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by institutional investors. 65.0% of URU Metals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
URU MetalsN/A -42.52% -16.40%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than URU Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for URU Metals. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat URU Metals' score of 0.75 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
URU Metals Positive
Wolfram Resources Positive

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats URU Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Bluejay Mining?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Bluejay Mining (LON:JAY) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Wolfram Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Bluejay Mining.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Bluejay Mining-£1.05K0.00-£1.81MN/AN/A

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Bluejay Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Bluejay Mining N/A -4.56%-8.07%

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Bluejay Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Bluejay Mining. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Bluejay Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
Bluejay Mining Neutral

5.0% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.3% of Bluejay Mining shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Bluejay Mining on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wolfram Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WFR vs. The Competition

MetricWolfram ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.64M£1.57B£4.77B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.99%6.15%
P/E Ratio-4.3528.5423.42366.85
Price / SalesN/A49,528.106,011.9686,443.43
Price / CashN/A24.6326.9727.85
Price / BookN/A5.569.238.01
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£156.93M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.51%0.30%0.08%
1 Month Performance42.86%-1.94%-1.91%1.15%
1 Year PerformanceN/A96.70%57.33%72.12%

Wolfram Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WFR
Wolfram Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.64MN/AN/AN/A
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 0.95
-0.5%
N/A-62.0%£6.44MN/AN/AN/A
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 11
+4.8%
N/A-53.2%£5.97M£25KN/A4
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.57
-0.9%
N/A+21.6%£5.87MN/AN/A1,083
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 5.20
-3.6%
N/A+15.1%£5.05MN/A2.60N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WFR) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners