Free Trial

Wolfram Resources (WFR) Competitors

WFR vs. IRON, FRG, ALBA, ATN, and TYM

Should you buy Wolfram Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wolfram Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wolfram Resources include Ironveld (IRON), Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), Alba Mineral Resources (ALBA), Aterian (ATN), and Tertiary Minerals (TYM). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Ironveld?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Ironveld (LON:IRON) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability and analyst recommendations.

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ironveld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Ironveld -526.22%-7.17%-1.97%

Ironveld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Ironveld£4K1,139.59N/A-£0.00N/A

6.2% of Ironveld shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of Ironveld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Ironveld'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Ironveld Neutral

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Ironveld on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Firering Strategic Minerals had 1 more articles in the media than Wolfram Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals and 0 mentions for Wolfram Resources. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Firering Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral

13.3% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Firering Strategic Minerals N/A -32.39%-16.22%

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 4 of the 7 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Alba Mineral Resources?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Alba Mineral Resources (LON:ALBA) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Alba Mineral Resources' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Alba Mineral Resources N/A -28.14%-4.17%

Alba Mineral Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Alba Mineral ResourcesN/AN/A-£2.94M-£0.04N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Alba Mineral Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Alba Mineral Resources Neutral

Summary

Wolfram Resources and Alba Mineral Resources tied by winning 2 of the 4 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Aterian?

Aterian (LON:ATN) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

12.4% of Aterian shares are owned by institutional investors. 13.6% of Aterian shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Aterian's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wolfram Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Aterian Neutral
Wolfram Resources Neutral

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Aterian's net margin of -1,832.73%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Aterian's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Aterian-1,832.73% -125.18% -14.49%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

Wolfram Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Aterian. Aterian is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Aterian£110K37.74-£2.26K-£15.14N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Aterian on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Tertiary Minerals?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals had 2 more articles in the media than Wolfram Resources. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Tertiary Minerals and 0 mentions for Wolfram Resources. Tertiary Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Wolfram Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Tertiary Minerals is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Tertiary Minerals Neutral

Wolfram Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Tertiary Minerals. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Tertiary Minerals£200.57K18.50-£947.19K-£0.01N/A

0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tertiary Minerals' net margin of -291.13%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Tertiary Minerals -291.13%-42.89%-34.97%

Summary

Wolfram Resources and Tertiary Minerals tied by winning 5 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wolfram Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WFR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WFR vs. The Competition

MetricWolfram ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.48M£1.64B£4.96B£2.80B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%4.96%6.06%
P/E Ratio-3.9130.3023.63365.74
Price / SalesN/A55,533.966,553.5887,758.72
Price / CashN/A24.6327.3627.89
Price / BookN/A5.859.627.79
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£157.24M£5.89B
7 Day Performance28.57%1.68%2.38%0.82%
1 Month Performance13.21%2.59%2.30%10.96%
1 Year PerformanceN/A125.06%77.81%78.71%

Wolfram Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WFR
Wolfram Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.48MN/AN/AN/A
IRON
Ironveld
N/AGBX 0.02
flat
N/A-56.9%£4.56M£4KN/A30
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 1.05
flat
N/A-70.5%£4.53MN/AN/AN/A
ALBA
Alba Mineral Resources
N/AGBX 0.02
flat
N/A-23.8%£4.45MN/AN/A11
ATN
Aterian
N/AGBX 24.90
flat
N/A-38.6%£4.26M£110KN/A22

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WFR) was last updated on 5/30/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners