Wolfram Resources (WFR) Competitors

WFR vs. FRG, CRTX, THR, URU, and JAY

Should you buy Wolfram Resources stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wolfram Resources with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wolfram Resources include Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), CRISM Therapeutics (CRTX), Thor Energy (THR), URU Metals (URU), and Bluejay Mining (JAY). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Firering Strategic Minerals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Firering Strategic Minerals. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Firering Strategic Minerals' score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral

Firering Strategic Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Firering Strategic Minerals N/A -35.24%-16.22%

8.4% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.0% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to CRISM Therapeutics?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and CRISM Therapeutics (LON:CRTX) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, profitability, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than CRISM Therapeutics. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for CRISM Therapeutics. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat CRISM Therapeutics' score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
CRISM Therapeutics Neutral

Wolfram Resources has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CRISM Therapeutics. CRISM Therapeutics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
CRISM Therapeutics£25K238.63-£792.20K-£4.40N/A

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat CRISM Therapeutics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
CRISM Therapeutics N/A -109.55%-26.77%

3.7% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 73.8% of CRISM Therapeutics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats CRISM Therapeutics on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Thor Energy?

Thor Energy (LON:THR) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability and media sentiment.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Thor Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Thor EnergyN/A -94.46% -11.48%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

0.0% of Thor Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 12.7% of Thor Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Thor Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Thor EnergyN/AN/A-£3.12M-£0.92N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Thor Energy. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Thor Energy. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Thor Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Thor Energy Neutral
Wolfram Resources Positive

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Thor Energy on 6 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to URU Metals?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and URU Metals (LON:URU) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations and valuation.

0.0% of URU Metals shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 65.0% of URU Metals shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat URU Metals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
URU Metals N/A -42.52%-16.40%

Wolfram Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than URU Metals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
URU MetalsN/AN/A-£4.64M£2.002.85

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than URU Metals. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for URU Metals. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat URU Metals' score of 0.75 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
URU Metals Positive

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats URU Metals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Bluejay Mining?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Bluejay Mining (LON:JAY) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources had 1 more articles in the media than Bluejay Mining. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Wolfram Resources and 0 mentions for Bluejay Mining. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Bluejay Mining's score of 0.00 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Positive
Bluejay Mining Neutral

5.0% of Bluejay Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 42.3% of Bluejay Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Bluejay Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Bluejay Mining N/A -4.56%-8.07%

Wolfram Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Bluejay Mining.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Bluejay Mining-£1.05K0.00-£1.81MN/AN/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Bluejay Mining on 7 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wolfram Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WFR vs. The Competition

MetricWolfram ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£1.64M£1.57B£4.77B£2.88B
Dividend YieldN/A6.55%4.99%6.15%
P/E Ratio-4.3528.5423.42366.85
Price / SalesN/A49,528.106,011.8386,443.43
Price / CashN/A24.6326.9727.85
Price / BookN/A5.569.238.01
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£156.93M£5.89B
7 Day PerformanceN/A0.51%0.30%0.08%
1 Month Performance42.86%-1.94%-1.91%1.15%
1 Year PerformanceN/A96.70%57.33%72.12%

Wolfram Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WFR
Wolfram Resources
N/AN/AN/AN/A£1.64MN/AN/AN/A
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 0.95
-0.5%
N/A-62.0%£6.44MN/AN/AN/A
CRTX
CRISM Therapeutics
N/AGBX 11
+4.8%
N/A-53.2%£5.97M£25KN/A4
THR
Thor Energy
N/AGBX 0.57
-0.9%
N/A+21.6%£5.87MN/AN/A1,083
URU
URU Metals
N/AGBX 5.20
-3.6%
N/A+15.1%£5.05MN/A2.60N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WFR) was last updated on 6/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners