Free Trial

Wolfram Resources (WFR) Competitors

GBX 1.20 -0.10 (-7.69%)
As of 10:54 AM Eastern

WFR vs. JAY, IRON, FRG, AFP, and TYM

Should you be buying Wolfram Resources stock or one of its competitors? The main competitors of Wolfram Resources include Bluejay Mining (JAY), Ironveld (IRON), Firering Strategic Minerals (FRG), African Pioneer (AFP), and Tertiary Minerals (TYM). These companies are all part of the "other industrial metals & mining" industry.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Bluejay Mining?

Bluejay Mining (LON:JAY) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and media sentiment.

5.0% of Bluejay Mining shares are owned by institutional investors. 42.3% of Bluejay Mining shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources has higher revenue and earnings than Bluejay Mining.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Bluejay Mining-£1.05K0.00-£1.81MN/AN/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

In the previous week, Bluejay Mining's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wolfram Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Bluejay Mining Neutral
Wolfram Resources Neutral

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Bluejay Mining's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Bluejay MiningN/A -4.56% -8.07%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Bluejay Mining on 5 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Ironveld?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Ironveld (LON:IRON) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Ironveld's net margin of -526.22%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Ironveld's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Ironveld -526.22%-7.17%-1.97%

8.1% of Ironveld shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 25.3% of Ironveld shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Ironveld is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Ironveld£4K910.28N/A-£0.00N/A

In the previous week, Ironveld's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Wolfram Resources' score of 0.00 indicating that Ironveld is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Ironveld Positive

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Ironveld on 5 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Firering Strategic Minerals?

Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) and Firering Strategic Minerals (LON:FRG) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, media sentiment and dividends.

Wolfram Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Firering Strategic Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A
Firering Strategic MineralsN/AN/A-£3.09M-£1.00N/A

In the previous week, Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Firering Strategic Minerals'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Wolfram Resources Neutral
Firering Strategic Minerals Neutral

8.6% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 12.7% of Firering Strategic Minerals shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Firering Strategic Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolfram ResourcesN/A N/A N/A
Firering Strategic Minerals N/A -32.39%-16.22%

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Firering Strategic Minerals on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to African Pioneer?

African Pioneer (LON:AFP) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, profitability, institutional ownership and earnings.

4.6% of African Pioneer shares are held by institutional investors. 21.4% of African Pioneer shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to African Pioneer's net margin of -2,039.11%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat African Pioneer's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
African Pioneer-2,039.11% -16.55% -7.36%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

African Pioneer is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
African PioneerN/AN/A-£711.79K-£0.28N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

In the previous week, African Pioneer had 1 more articles in the media than Wolfram Resources. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for African Pioneer and 0 mentions for Wolfram Resources. Wolfram Resources' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat African Pioneer's score of -1.29 indicating that Wolfram Resources is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
African Pioneer Negative
Wolfram Resources Neutral

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats African Pioneer on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wolfram Resources compare to Tertiary Minerals?

Tertiary Minerals (LON:TYM) and Wolfram Resources (LON:WFR) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and earnings.

0.4% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.2% of Tertiary Minerals shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 76.6% of Wolfram Resources shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Tertiary Minerals' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wolfram Resources'average media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Tertiary Minerals Neutral
Wolfram Resources Neutral

Wolfram Resources has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tertiary Minerals' net margin of -291.13%. Wolfram Resources' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tertiary Minerals' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Tertiary Minerals-291.13% -42.89% -34.97%
Wolfram Resources N/A N/A N/A

Wolfram Resources has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Tertiary Minerals. Tertiary Minerals is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Wolfram Resources, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Tertiary Minerals£200.57K21.84-£947.19K-£0.01N/A
Wolfram ResourcesN/AN/AN/A-£0.46N/A

Summary

Wolfram Resources beats Tertiary Minerals on 5 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wolfram Resources News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for WFR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of LON and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

WFR vs. The Competition

MetricWolfram ResourcesOther Industrial Metals & Mining IndustryMaterials SectorLON Exchange
Market Cap£984K£1.50B£4.71B£2.73B
Dividend YieldN/A6.56%4.98%6.11%
P/E Ratio-2.6125.4121.28365.28
Price / SalesN/A61,460.687,361.3887,989.37
Price / CashN/A24.6327.2827.89
Price / BookN/A9.697.707.39
Net IncomeN/A£70.60M£159.29M£5.89B
7 Day Performance-24.53%-0.46%0.01%0.88%
1 Month Performance-24.53%4.30%2.58%5.27%
1 Year PerformanceN/A110.49%76.05%80.43%

Wolfram Resources Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
WFR
Wolfram Resources
N/AGBX 1.20
-7.7%
N/AN/A£984KN/AN/AN/A
JAY
Bluejay Mining
N/AN/AN/AN/A£4.98M-£1.05KN/A13
IRON
Ironveld
N/AGBX 0.02
-4.2%
N/AN/A£4.97M£4KN/A30
FRG
Firering Strategic Minerals
N/AGBX 1.15
flat
N/AN/A£4.96MN/AN/AN/A
AFP
African Pioneer
N/AGBX 0.90
+2.6%
N/AN/A£4.70MN/AN/A5

Related Companies and Tools


This page (LON:WFR) was last updated on 5/5/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners