Zenova Group (ZED) Competitors

Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Applied Graphene Materials has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Zenova Group's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Applied Graphene Materials'average media sentiment score.

Zenova Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Applied Graphene Materials. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Graphene Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Applied Graphene Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,062.00%. Applied Graphene Materials' return on equity of -66.04% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 41.7% of Applied Graphene Materials shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 9.8% of Applied Graphene Materials shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Versarien has a beta of 1.13, suggesting that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Versarien's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zenova Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Zenova Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Versarien. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Versarien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Versarien has a net margin of -225.06% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,062.00%. Zenova Group's return on equity of -72.15% beat Versarien's return on equity.

0.3% of Versarien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Versarien shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Croda International has a beta of 0.904, meaning that its stock price is 10% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Croda International had 2 more articles in the media than Zenova Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Croda International and 0 mentions for Zenova Group. Croda International's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Zenova Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Croda International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

53.8% of Croda International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Croda International shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Croda International currently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,140, suggesting a potential upside of 14.33%. Given Croda International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Croda International is more favorable than Zenova Group.

Croda International has higher revenue and earnings than Zenova Group. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Croda International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Croda International has a net margin of 3.65% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,062.00%. Croda International's return on equity of 2.82% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, meaning that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Johnson Matthey has a beta of 0.912, meaning that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Johnson Matthey has higher revenue and earnings than Zenova Group. Johnson Matthey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zenova Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Johnson Matthey has a consensus price target of GBX 2,222, suggesting a potential upside of 5.01%. Given Johnson Matthey's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Johnson Matthey is more favorable than Zenova Group.

14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 56.8% of Johnson Matthey shares are held by institutional investors. 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Johnson Matthey shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Johnson Matthey has a net margin of -1.13% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,062.00%. Johnson Matthey's return on equity of -5.87% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

In the previous week, Johnson Matthey had 4 more articles in the media than Zenova Group. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Johnson Matthey and 0 mentions for Zenova Group. Johnson Matthey's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat Zenova Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Johnson Matthey is being referred to more favorably in the news media.