Zenova Group (ZED) Competitors

Applied Graphene Materials has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Applied Graphene Materials' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zenova Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Applied Graphene Materials has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Applied Graphene Materials' return on equity of -66.04% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

41.7% of Applied Graphene Materials shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.8% of Applied Graphene Materials shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Zenova Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Applied Graphene Materials. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Applied Graphene Materials, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Versarien's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zenova Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Versarien has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its share price is 13% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, indicating that its share price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Versarien has a net margin of -225.06% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Zenova Group's return on equity of -69.63% beat Versarien's return on equity.

Zenova Group has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Versarien. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Versarien, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

0.3% of Versarien shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Versarien shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Croda International has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

Croda International has higher revenue and earnings than Zenova Group. Zenova Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Croda International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Croda International had 2 more articles in the media than Zenova Group. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Croda International and 0 mentions for Zenova Group. Croda International's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Zenova Group'saverage media sentiment score.

Croda International presently has a consensus price target of GBX 3,140, indicating a potential upside of 7.20%. Given Croda International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Croda International is more favorable than Zenova Group.

55.7% of Croda International shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Croda International shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Croda International has a net margin of 3.65% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Croda International's return on equity of 2.82% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

Johnson Matthey has a net margin of -0.76% compared to Zenova Group's net margin of -1,820.59%. Johnson Matthey's return on equity of -4.66% beat Zenova Group's return on equity.

Johnson Matthey has higher revenue and earnings than Zenova Group. Johnson Matthey is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Zenova Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Johnson Matthey has a beta of 0.912, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Zenova Group has a beta of -0.39, suggesting that its stock price is 139% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Johnson Matthey had 6 more articles in the media than Zenova Group. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Johnson Matthey and 0 mentions for Zenova Group. Johnson Matthey's average media sentiment score of 1.07 beat Zenova Group's score of 0.00 indicating that Johnson Matthey is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Johnson Matthey presently has a consensus price target of GBX 2,298.33, suggesting a potential upside of 11.35%. Given Johnson Matthey's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Johnson Matthey is more favorable than Zenova Group.

56.4% of Johnson Matthey shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.5% of Zenova Group shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Johnson Matthey shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.6% of Zenova Group shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.