Go Pro

Portman Ridge Finance (BCIC) Competitors

Portman Ridge Finance logo
$7.52 +0.02 (+0.27%)
As of 02:37 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BCIC vs. CCII, KCHV, MCI, CUB, and CEPV

Should you buy Portman Ridge Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Portman Ridge Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Portman Ridge Finance include Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II (CCII), Kochav Defense Acquisition (KCHV), Barings Corporate Investors (MCI), Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares (CUB), and Cantor Equity Partners V (CEPV). These companies are all part of the "asset management & custody banks" industry.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II (NASDAQ:CCII) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, profitability and institutional ownership.

Portman Ridge Finance currently has a consensus target price of $7.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.27%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of -5.72%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.56% beat Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance-5.72% 13.56% 5.25%
Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 8 more articles in the media than Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II's score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral
Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.55N/A
Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. IIN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Kochav Defense Acquisition?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Kochav Defense Acquisition (NASDAQ:KCHV) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, valuation, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Kochav Defense Acquisition.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.55N/A
Kochav Defense AcquisitionN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Kochav Defense Acquisition has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of -5.72%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.56% beat Kochav Defense Acquisition's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance-5.72% 13.56% 5.25%
Kochav Defense Acquisition N/A N/A N/A

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $7.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.27%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Kochav Defense Acquisition.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Kochav Defense Acquisition
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 8 more articles in the media than Kochav Defense Acquisition. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for Kochav Defense Acquisition. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Kochav Defense Acquisition's score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral
Kochav Defense Acquisition Neutral

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Kochav Defense Acquisition on 9 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Barings Corporate Investors?

Barings Corporate Investors (NYSE:MCI) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, risk and earnings.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 8 more articles in the media than Barings Corporate Investors. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for Barings Corporate Investors. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Barings Corporate Investors' score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Barings Corporate Investors Neutral
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral

Barings Corporate Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.6%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -196.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $7.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.27%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Barings Corporate Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Corporate Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Barings Corporate Investors has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of -5.72%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.56% beat Barings Corporate Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Corporate InvestorsN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance -5.72%13.56%5.25%

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Barings Corporate Investors shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Barings Corporate Investors has a beta of 0.34, suggesting that its share price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Corporate Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Corporate InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.55N/A

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Barings Corporate Investors on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares?

Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares (NASDAQ:CUB) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, institutional ownership and valuation.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares. Portman Ridge Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary SharesN/AN/A$8.95M$0.2838.75
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.55N/A

Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of -5.72%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.56% beat Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary SharesN/A -89.39% 3.54%
Portman Ridge Finance -5.72%13.56%5.25%

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 25.0% of Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares has a beta of 0.01, suggesting that its stock price is 99% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 7 more articles in the media than Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares. Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares' average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.14 indicating that Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Portman Ridge Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $7.50, suggesting a potential downside of 0.27%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Cantor Equity Partners V?

Cantor Equity Partners V (NASDAQ:CEPV) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and valuation.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Cantor Equity Partners V. Portman Ridge Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Cantor Equity Partners V, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Cantor Equity Partners VN/AN/A$1.23M$0.07148.71
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.55N/A

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $7.50, indicating a potential downside of 0.27%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Cantor Equity Partners V.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Cantor Equity Partners V
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Cantor Equity Partners V has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of -5.72%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.56% beat Cantor Equity Partners V's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Cantor Equity Partners VN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance -5.72%13.56%5.25%

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 8 more articles in the media than Cantor Equity Partners V. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for Cantor Equity Partners V. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Cantor Equity Partners V's score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Cantor Equity Partners V Neutral
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Cantor Equity Partners V on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portman Ridge Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BCIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BCIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BCIC vs. The Competition

MetricPortman Ridge FinanceCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$93.10M$5.59B$14.03B$12.92B
Dividend Yield14.40%7.40%5.89%10.20%
P/E Ratio-13.6738.1429.1324.78
Price / Sales1.521,200.69503.49107.95
Price / Cash3.6748.3030.2237.44
Price / Book0.473.733.716.43
Net Income$11.49M$417.15M$1.31B$347.27M
7 Day Performance1.90%0.78%0.26%2.53%
1 Month Performance2.04%0.24%0.71%-1.03%
1 Year PerformanceN/A6.45%12.52%23.28%

Portman Ridge Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BCIC
Portman Ridge Finance
1.6233 of 5 stars
$7.52
+0.3%
$7.50
-0.3%
N/A$93.10M$61.15MN/A25
CCII
Cohen Circle Acquisition Corp. II
N/A$10.33
+0.1%
N/AN/A$358.35MN/AN/A2
KCHV
Kochav Defense Acquisition
N/A$10.42
+0.2%
N/AN/A$356.99MN/AN/A2
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
N/A$16.40
+0.6%
N/A-17.6%$337.12M$30.18MN/AN/A
CUB
Lionheart Holdings Class A Ordinary Shares
0.7247 of 5 stars
$10.86
+0.2%
N/AN/A$333.08MN/A38.79N/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BCIC) was last updated on 8/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners