Free Trial

Portman Ridge Finance (BCIC) Competitors

Portman Ridge Finance logo
$7.53 +0.16 (+2.12%)
As of 03:35 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BCIC vs. SAR, MCI, KTF, EMF, and MIY

Should you buy Portman Ridge Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Portman Ridge Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Portman Ridge Finance include Saratoga Investment (SAR), Barings Corporate Investors (MCI), DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF), Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (EMF), and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Saratoga Investment?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Saratoga Investment (NYSE:SAR) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment and profitability.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.1% of Saratoga Investment shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.0% of Saratoga Investment shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Saratoga Investment has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its stock price is 45% less volatile than the broader market.

Saratoga Investment has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 2.10%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Saratoga Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
Saratoga Investment 29.12%9.29%3.17%

Saratoga Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. Portman Ridge Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saratoga Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
Saratoga Investment$125.71M2.90$36.60M$2.339.61

Portman Ridge Finance currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.59%. Saratoga Investment has a consensus target price of $23.00, suggesting a potential upside of 2.69%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Saratoga Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Saratoga Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance and Portman Ridge Finance both had 1 articles in the media. Saratoga Investment's average media sentiment score of 0.67 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Saratoga Investment is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral
Saratoga Investment Positive

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Saratoga Investment pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Saratoga Investment pays out 128.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Summary

Saratoga Investment beats Portman Ridge Finance on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Barings Corporate Investors?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Barings Corporate Investors (NYSE:MCI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Corporate Investors. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for Barings Corporate Investors. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Barings Corporate Investors' score of -0.03 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral
Barings Corporate Investors Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Corporate Investors has a beta of 0.33, indicating that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Barings Corporate Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.59%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Barings Corporate Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Barings Corporate Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Barings Corporate Investors' net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Barings Corporate Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
Barings Corporate Investors N/A N/A N/A

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Corporate Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
Barings Corporate InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Barings Corporate Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Barings Corporate Investors on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to DWS Municipal Income Trust?

DWS Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:KTF) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, earnings and valuation.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DWS Municipal Income Trust-$5.42M-65.94N/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A

DWS Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.52, suggesting that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to DWS Municipal Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat DWS Municipal Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DWS Municipal Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.59%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DWS Municipal Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

In the previous week, DWS Municipal Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Portman Ridge Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for DWS Municipal Income Trust and 1 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance. DWS Municipal Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that DWS Municipal Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
DWS Municipal Income Trust Positive
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral

57.7% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

DWS Municipal Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats DWS Municipal Income Trust on 10 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Templeton Emerging Markets Fund?

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund (NYSE:EMF) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Templeton Emerging Markets FundN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

49.9% of Templeton Emerging Markets Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Templeton Emerging Markets FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A

In the previous week, Templeton Emerging Markets Fund and Templeton Emerging Markets Fund both had 1 articles in the media. Templeton Emerging Markets Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Portman Ridge Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund Neutral
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.59%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Templeton Emerging Markets Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Templeton Emerging Markets Fund has a beta of 0.94, suggesting that its stock price is 6% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Templeton Emerging Markets Fund on 9 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (NYSE:MIY) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends and institutional ownership.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund N/A N/A N/A

Portman Ridge Finance currently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.59%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 24.2% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

In the previous week, BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund had 2 more articles in the media than Portman Ridge Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund and 1 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance. BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund Positive

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.4%. BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.5, indicating that its stock price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portman Ridge Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BCIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BCIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BCIC vs. The Competition

MetricPortman Ridge FinanceDiversified Investments IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$93.17M$93.33M$13.60B$11.92B
Dividend Yield14.60%14.60%5.80%5.58%
P/E Ratio-31.36N/A20.0123.72
Price / Sales1.521.53134.69116.36
Price / Cash3.623.6219.1537.25
Price / Book0.470.472.216.75
Net Income$11.49M$11.49M$1.13B$337.25M
7 Day Performance-2.76%-2.58%0.78%-2.31%
1 Month Performance-9.87%-9.70%0.70%1.62%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A11.77%24.64%

Portman Ridge Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BCIC
Portman Ridge Finance
3.5687 of 5 stars
$7.53
+2.1%
$9.00
+19.6%
N/A$93.17M$61.15MN/A25
SAR
Saratoga Investment
1.7576 of 5 stars
$22.42
-2.0%
$23.63
+5.4%
-8.6%$364.58M$125.71M9.623,211
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
N/A$17.47
-1.7%
N/A-12.9%$359.02MN/AN/AN/A
KTF
DWS Municipal Income Trust
N/A$9.13
-0.3%
N/A+3.1%$357.18M-$5.42MN/AN/A
EMF
Templeton Emerging Markets Fund
N/A$23.82
-1.6%
N/A+60.5%$356.26MN/AN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BCIC) was last updated on 6/9/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners