Free Trial
The Market Does Not Wait. MarketBeat All Access for Just $149
Get the Deal
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Portman Ridge Finance (BCIC) Competitors

Portman Ridge Finance logo
$7.53 -0.09 (-1.18%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.75 +0.22 (+2.92%)
As of 07:01 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BCIC vs. SAR, KTF, MCI, SSSS, and MIY

Should you buy Portman Ridge Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Portman Ridge Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Portman Ridge Finance include Saratoga Investment (SAR), DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF), Barings Corporate Investors (MCI), SURO Capital (SSSS), and BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Saratoga Investment?

Saratoga Investment (NYSE:SAR) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Saratoga Investment currently has a consensus price target of $23.63, indicating a potential upside of 6.72%. Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.52%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Saratoga Investment.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Saratoga Investment
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Saratoga Investment has higher revenue and earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. Portman Ridge Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Saratoga Investment, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Saratoga Investment$125.71M2.87$36.60M$2.339.50
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A

19.1% of Saratoga Investment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 10.0% of Saratoga Investment shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Saratoga Investment pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 13.6%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Saratoga Investment pays out 128.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Portman Ridge Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Saratoga Investment has a net margin of 29.12% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 2.10%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Saratoga Investment's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Saratoga Investment29.12% 9.29% 3.17%
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Saratoga Investment. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for Saratoga Investment. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Saratoga Investment's score of 1.21 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Saratoga Investment Positive
Portman Ridge Finance Very Positive

Saratoga Investment has a beta of 0.55, indicating that its share price is 45% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Saratoga Investment beats Portman Ridge Finance on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to DWS Municipal Income Trust?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and DWS Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:KTF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
DWS Municipal Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.52%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
DWS Municipal Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, DWS Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.53, meaning that its stock price is 47% less volatile than the broader market.

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. DWS Municipal Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than DWS Municipal Income Trust. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for DWS Municipal Income Trust. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat DWS Municipal Income Trust's score of 1.41 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Very Positive
DWS Municipal Income Trust Positive

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to DWS Municipal Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat DWS Municipal Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
DWS Municipal Income Trust N/A N/A N/A

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats DWS Municipal Income Trust on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Barings Corporate Investors?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Barings Corporate Investors (NYSE:MCI) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, media sentiment, dividends and risk.

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.52%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Barings Corporate Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Barings Corporate Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Corporate Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
Barings Corporate InvestorsN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Barings Corporate Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Barings Corporate Investors had 1 more articles in the media than Portman Ridge Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Barings Corporate Investors and 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat Barings Corporate Investors' score of 0.69 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Very Positive
Barings Corporate Investors Positive

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Barings Corporate Investors' net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Barings Corporate Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
Barings Corporate Investors N/A N/A N/A

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.51, suggesting that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Barings Corporate Investors has a beta of 0.33, suggesting that its share price is 67% less volatile than the broader market.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Barings Corporate Investors shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Barings Corporate Investors on 12 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to SURO Capital?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and SURO Capital (NASDAQ:SSSS) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, risk, dividends and valuation.

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. SURO Capital pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. SURO Capital pays out 7.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Portman Ridge Finance is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 13.0% of SURO Capital shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.3% of SURO Capital shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 19.52%. SURO Capital has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 18.76%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than SURO Capital.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
SURO Capital
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

In the previous week, SURO Capital had 1 more articles in the media than Portman Ridge Finance. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for SURO Capital and 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat SURO Capital's score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance Very Positive
SURO Capital Neutral

SURO Capital has a net margin of 10,695.73% compared to Portman Ridge Finance's net margin of 2.10%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat SURO Capital's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
SURO Capital 10,695.73%-6.61%-5.13%

SURO Capital has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Portman Ridge Finance. Portman Ridge Finance is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SURO Capital, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A
SURO Capital$1.69M194.83$48.81M$6.981.81

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.51, meaning that its stock price is 49% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SURO Capital has a beta of 1.4, meaning that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SURO Capital beats Portman Ridge Finance on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (NYSE:MIY) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 1.93 beat BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's score of 0.00 indicating that Portman Ridge Finance is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund Neutral
Portman Ridge Finance Very Positive

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.49 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 14.3%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 19.52%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund has a beta of 0.48, indicating that its share price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.51, indicating that its share price is 49% less volatile than the broader market.

24.2% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.52$11.49M-$0.24N/A

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund on 13 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portman Ridge Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BCIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BCIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BCIC vs. The Competition

MetricPortman Ridge FinanceDiversified Investments IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$94.32M$94.32M$13.46B$12.23B
Dividend Yield14.17%14.17%5.85%5.27%
P/E Ratio3.303.3024.4222.48
Price / Sales1.521.52161.7972.17
Price / Cash3.733.7319.9554.25
Price / Book0.480.482.126.83
Net Income$11.49M$11.49M$1.13B$335.69M
7 Day Performance-6.34%-6.34%-1.01%-2.03%
1 Month Performance-7.27%-7.27%-1.57%-1.90%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A8.85%27.36%

Portman Ridge Finance Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BCIC
Portman Ridge Finance
4.5065 of 5 stars
$7.53
-1.2%
$9.00
+19.5%
N/A$94.32M$61.15M3.3025
SAR
Saratoga Investment
2.2938 of 5 stars
$22.13
+0.0%
$23.63
+6.7%
-8.7%$359.89M$125.71M9.493,211
KTF
DWS Municipal Income Trust
N/A$9.08
flat
N/A-2.7%$355.22M-$5.42MN/AN/A
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
N/A$17.10
+0.7%
N/A-9.0%$351.58MN/AN/AN/A
SSSS
SURO Capital
4.4237 of 5 stars
$13.48
+0.1%
$15.00
+11.3%
+122.0%$351.42M$1.69M1.939

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BCIC) was last updated on 5/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners