Go Pro
→ Buy this stock today (From Chaikin Analytics) (Ad)tc pixel Free BCIC Stock Alerts

Portman Ridge Finance (BCIC) Competitors

Portman Ridge Finance logo
$7.15 -0.16 (-2.19%)
Closing price 07/20/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.13 -0.02 (-0.28%)
As of 07/20/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

BCIC vs. AEF, MIY, KTF, MCI, and ASG

Should you buy Portman Ridge Finance stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Portman Ridge Finance with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Portman Ridge Finance include Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (AEF), BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (MIY), DWS Municipal Income Trust (KTF), Barings Corporate Investors (MCI), and Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (ASG). These companies are all part of the "financial services" industry.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund?

Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) and Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund (NYSE:AEF) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, earnings and media sentiment.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.9% of Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.7% of Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Portman Ridge Finance2.10% 13.87% 5.37%
Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund. Portman Ridge Finance's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Portman Ridge Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.79 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.3%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.49, indicating that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund has a beta of 0.99, indicating that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the broader market.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.45$11.49M-$0.24N/A
Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund$96.44M3.59N/AN/AN/A

Portman Ridge Finance presently has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.87%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75
Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund?

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund (NYSE:MIY) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and risk.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 2 more articles in the media than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 0 mentions for BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund. BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Portman Ridge Finance'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund Neutral
Portman Ridge Finance Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.87%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.45$11.49M-$0.24N/A

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund has a beta of 0.48, meaning that its stock price is 52% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

24.2% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality FundN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund on 12 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to DWS Municipal Income Trust?

DWS Municipal Income Trust (NYSE:KTF) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, valuation and risk.

DWS Municipal Income Trust has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, DWS Municipal Income Trust had 2 more articles in the media than Portman Ridge Finance. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for DWS Municipal Income Trust and 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance. DWS Municipal Income Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that DWS Municipal Income Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
DWS Municipal Income Trust
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Portman Ridge Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to DWS Municipal Income Trust's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat DWS Municipal Income Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
DWS Municipal Income TrustN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.87%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
DWS Municipal Income Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

57.7% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of DWS Municipal Income Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

DWS Municipal Income Trust pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than DWS Municipal Income Trust.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
DWS Municipal Income TrustN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.45$11.49M-$0.24N/A

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats DWS Municipal Income Trust on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Barings Corporate Investors?

Barings Corporate Investors (NYSE:MCI) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, valuation, media sentiment, risk, analyst recommendations, profitability and institutional ownership.

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Barings Corporate Investors.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Barings Corporate Investors$30.18M11.53N/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.45$11.49M-$0.24N/A

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus price target of $9.00, suggesting a potential upside of 25.87%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Barings Corporate Investors.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Barings Corporate Investors
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Barings Corporate Investors pays an annual dividend of $1.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 9.5%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of Barings Corporate Investors shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Barings Corporate Investors. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for Barings Corporate Investors. Barings Corporate Investors' average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Barings Corporate Investors is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Barings Corporate Investors
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Portman Ridge Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Barings Corporate Investors' net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Barings Corporate Investors' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Barings Corporate InvestorsN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Barings Corporate Investors has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its stock price is 66% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.49, meaning that its stock price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Barings Corporate Investors on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Portman Ridge Finance compare to Liberty All-Star Growth Fund?

Liberty All-Star Growth Fund (NYSE:ASG) and Portman Ridge Finance (NASDAQ:BCIC) are both small-cap finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, risk, media sentiment, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and valuation.

Liberty All-Star Growth Fund has a beta of 1.18, suggesting that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Portman Ridge Finance has a beta of 0.49, suggesting that its share price is 51% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Portman Ridge Finance had 1 more articles in the media than Liberty All-Star Growth Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Portman Ridge Finance and 1 mentions for Liberty All-Star Growth Fund. Liberty All-Star Growth Fund's average media sentiment score of 1.97 beat Portman Ridge Finance's score of 0.00 indicating that Liberty All-Star Growth Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Liberty All-Star Growth Fund
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Portman Ridge Finance
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Portman Ridge Finance has higher revenue and earnings than Liberty All-Star Growth Fund.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Liberty All-Star Growth FundN/AN/AN/AN/AN/A
Portman Ridge Finance$61.15M1.45$11.49M-$0.24N/A

Portman Ridge Finance has a net margin of 2.10% compared to Liberty All-Star Growth Fund's net margin of 0.00%. Portman Ridge Finance's return on equity of 13.87% beat Liberty All-Star Growth Fund's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Liberty All-Star Growth FundN/A N/A N/A
Portman Ridge Finance 2.10%13.87%5.37%

Portman Ridge Finance has a consensus target price of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 25.87%. Given Portman Ridge Finance's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Portman Ridge Finance is more favorable than Liberty All-Star Growth Fund.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Liberty All-Star Growth Fund
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Portman Ridge Finance
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.75

Liberty All-Star Growth Fund pays an annual dividend of $0.59 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.5%. Portman Ridge Finance pays an annual dividend of $1.08 per share and has a dividend yield of 15.1%. Portman Ridge Finance pays out -450.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

21.6% of Liberty All-Star Growth Fund shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 30.1% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.4% of Liberty All-Star Growth Fund shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Portman Ridge Finance shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Portman Ridge Finance beats Liberty All-Star Growth Fund on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Portman Ridge Finance News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BCIC and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BCIC and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BCIC vs. The Competition

Export
MetricPortman Ridge FinanceDiversified Investments IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$90.48M$90.48M$14.38B$12.28B
Dividend Yield14.77%14.77%5.67%9.39%
P/E Ratio-29.79N/A20.5523.95
Price / Sales1.451.4544.7690.33
Price / Cash3.583.5819.2447.25
Price / Book0.450.452.266.14
Net Income$11.49M$11.49M$1.14B$331.74M
7 Day Performance-2.05%-2.05%0.20%-1.82%
1 Month Performance-1.52%-1.52%1.38%-1.45%
1 Year PerformanceN/AN/A13.19%16.32%

Portman Ridge Finance Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BCIC
Portman Ridge Finance
3.1281 of 5 stars		$7.15
-2.2%		$9.00
+25.9%		N/A$90.48M$61.15MN/A25
AEF
Abrdn Emerging Markets Equity Income Fund
N/A$8.96
-1.1%		N/A+40.3%$363.79M$96.44MN/AN/A
MIY
BlackRock MuniYield Michigan Quality Fund
N/A$12.42
+0.2%		N/A+15.5%$359.93MN/AN/AN/A
KTF
DWS Municipal Income Trust
N/A$9.20
-0.3%		N/A+5.7%$359.71MN/AN/AN/A
MCI
Barings Corporate Investors
N/A$16.93
+0.5%		N/A-21.7%$348.03M$30.18MN/AN/A

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:BCIC) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
Your $29.97 book is free today
Why Some Traders Skip Stocks Entirely You don't need a big account to trade options. In fact, options ca...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
SPCX Warning - and Worst News for Stocks in 50 Years
Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley are now predicting what could be the worst news for the U.S. stock market in ...
TradeSmith | Sponsoredtc pixel
Ready to give options a try? Your first trade (Ticker included) -INSIDE
Tired of trying tactic after tactic when it comes to options trades... only to be met with market noise and st...
Base Camp Trading | Sponsoredtc pixel
CODE RED: AI Meltdown Imminent?
After correctly predicting the 2008 and 2020 stock market meltdowns, I believe this AI company is about to tri...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
The end may be near for these iconic stocks
Marc Chaikin, founder of Chaikin Analytics, says two forces - AI disruption and fracturing global trade - are ...
Chaikin Analytics | Sponsoredtc pixel
Elon’s new "tollbooth"
The SpaceX IPO was valued at $1.75 trillion. But one analyst says fighting over those shares may be the wrong ...
Weiss Ratings | Sponsoredtc pixel
They proved it worked in '76. Then buried it.
In 1976, Chevron tapped an energy source with no fuel costs, no carbon, and no supply chain - then killed the ...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel
BlackRock, JPMorgan, and Goldman are all stock piling the same asset… are you?
BlackRock, JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, Fidelity, ARK Invest and Andreessen Horowitz are all buying the same asset...
Awesomely | Sponsoredtc pixel