Free Trial

BioHarvest Sciences (BHST) Competitors

BioHarvest Sciences logo
$1.74 -0.08 (-4.12%)
Closing price 03:55 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.71 -0.04 (-2.01%)
As of 06:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BHST vs. MED, WALD, FTLF, LFVN, and SLSN

Should you buy BioHarvest Sciences stock or one of its competitors? BioHarvest Sciences's main competitors and comparable companies include Medifast (MED), Waldencast (WALD), FitLife Brands (FTLF), Lifevantage (LFVN), and Solesence (SLSN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "personal care products" industry.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Medifast?

Medifast (NYSE:MED) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, risk, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Medifast has a net margin of -8.08% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Medifast's return on equity of -6.69% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medifast-8.08% -6.69% -5.25%
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

BioHarvest Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Medifast. Medifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BioHarvest Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medifast$385.79M0.34-$18.67M-$2.33N/A
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.03-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

Medifast has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

95.5% of Medifast shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Medifast shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Medifast had 1 more articles in the media than BioHarvest Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Medifast and 3 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Medifast's score of 0.57 indicating that BioHarvest Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Medifast
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioHarvest Sciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Medifast currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential upside of 2.54%. BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 257.14%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Medifast.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medifast
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

BioHarvest Sciences beats Medifast on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Waldencast?

Waldencast (NASDAQ:WALD) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and profitability.

Waldencast has a net margin of 0.00% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Waldencast's return on equity of 0.00% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
WaldencastN/A N/A N/A
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

BioHarvest Sciences has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Waldencast.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Waldencast$272.07M0.41-$229.75MN/AN/A
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.03-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

42.0% of Waldencast shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 2 more articles in the media than Waldencast. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 1 mentions for Waldencast. Waldencast's average media sentiment score of 1.82 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of 0.76 indicating that Waldencast is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Waldencast Very Positive
BioHarvest Sciences Positive

Waldencast presently has a consensus target price of $2.33, suggesting a potential upside of 168.51%. BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 257.14%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Waldencast.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Waldencast
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Waldencast has a beta of -0.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Waldencast and BioHarvest Sciences tied by winning 6 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to FitLife Brands?

BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) and FitLife Brands (NASDAQ:FTLF) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.04, meaning that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FitLife Brands has a beta of 0.06, meaning that its share price is 94% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FitLife Brands had 1 more articles in the media than BioHarvest Sciences. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for FitLife Brands and 3 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences. FitLife Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of 0.76 indicating that FitLife Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioHarvest Sciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FitLife Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FitLife Brands has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FitLife Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.03-$11.14M-$0.52N/A
FitLife Brands$81.46M1.05$6.33M$0.6214.63

BioHarvest Sciences currently has a consensus target price of $6.50, indicating a potential upside of 257.14%. FitLife Brands has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 98.46%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than FitLife Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
FitLife Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

2.3% of FitLife Brands shares are owned by institutional investors. 61.7% of FitLife Brands shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FitLife Brands has a net margin of 6.15% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. FitLife Brands' return on equity of 18.10% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioHarvest Sciences-31.21% -58.30% -25.60%
FitLife Brands 6.15%18.10%7.63%

Summary

FitLife Brands beats BioHarvest Sciences on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Lifevantage?

Lifevantage (NASDAQ:LFVN) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than Lifevantage. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 2 mentions for Lifevantage. Lifevantage's average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of 0.76 indicating that Lifevantage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Lifevantage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioHarvest Sciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Lifevantage currently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential downside of 7.56%. BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 257.14%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Lifevantage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lifevantage
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

35.3% of Lifevantage shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Lifevantage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.04, indicating that its stock price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

Lifevantage has a net margin of 2.78% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 21.56% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lifevantage2.78% 21.56% 11.62%
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

Lifevantage has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifevantage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lifevantage$182.59M0.41$5.07M$0.4014.88
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.03-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

Summary

Lifevantage beats BioHarvest Sciences on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Solesence?

Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, risk, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Solesence has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 1.04, suggesting that its share price is 4% more volatile than the broader market.

BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 257.14%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Solesence has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. Solesence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BioHarvest Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solesence$62.06M1.13$1.79M-$0.03N/A
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.03-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

Solesence has a net margin of -3.40% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Solesence's return on equity of -11.58% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solesence-3.40% -11.58% -3.79%
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 1 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 2 mentions for Solesence. BioHarvest Sciences' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Solesence's score of 0.54 indicating that BioHarvest Sciences is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solesence
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioHarvest Sciences
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Solesence beats BioHarvest Sciences on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BioHarvest Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BHST and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BHST and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BHST vs. The Competition

MetricBioHarvest SciencesPersonal Care Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$34.24M$23.92B$16.31B$12.93B
Dividend YieldN/A5.37%3.29%22.89%
P/E Ratio-3.3622.2213.9625.30
Price / Sales0.9913.37264,297.1676.39
Price / CashN/A26.7157.2153.04
Price / Book1.343.484.455.92
Net Income-$11.14M$1.13B$844.17M$381.04M
7 Day Performance17.11%-0.01%0.87%-4.39%
1 Month Performance-3.06%-6.00%-2.51%-7.26%
1 Year Performance-85.49%-21.10%9.66%-4.95%

BioHarvest Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
3.2318 of 5 stars
$1.75
-4.1%
$6.50
+272.5%
-85.4%$34.24M$34.51MN/A89
MED
Medifast
1.9829 of 5 stars
$11.61
+1.6%
$12.00
+3.4%
-11.8%$129.81M$385.79MN/A380
WALD
Waldencast
2.3425 of 5 stars
$0.87
-1.2%
$2.33
+168.5%
-53.8%$111.75M$272.07MN/A367
FTLF
FitLife Brands
4.8392 of 5 stars
$9.21
+5.9%
$18.00
+95.4%
-55.0%$86.49M$81.46M14.7681
LFVN
Lifevantage
2.352 of 5 stars
$6.00
+0.2%
$5.50
-8.3%
-34.3%$75.53M$182.59M15.00223

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BHST) was last updated on 10/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners