Go Pro

BioHarvest Sciences (BHST) Competitors

BioHarvest Sciences logo
$2.07 0.00 (0.00%)
Closing price 08/14/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$2.09 +0.02 (+0.97%)
As of 08/14/2026 07:34 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BHST vs. MED, FTLF, SKIN, LFVN, and SLSN

Should you buy BioHarvest Sciences stock or one of its competitors? BioHarvest Sciences's main competitors and comparable companies include Medifast (MED), FitLife Brands (FTLF), Beauty Health (SKIN), Lifevantage (LFVN), and Solesence (SLSN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "personal care products" industry.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Medifast?

BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) and Medifast (NYSE:MED) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, profitability, valuation, earnings, risk and dividends.

BioHarvest Sciences currently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 214.01%. Medifast has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 4.90%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Medifast.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Medifast
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67

95.5% of Medifast shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Medifast shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Medifast has a net margin of -8.08% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Medifast's return on equity of -6.69% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioHarvest Sciences-31.21% -58.30% -25.60%
Medifast -8.08%-6.69%-5.25%

BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Medifast has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 17 more articles in the media than Medifast. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 3 mentions for Medifast. Medifast's average media sentiment score of 0.27 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of -0.05 indicating that Medifast is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Medifast
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

BioHarvest Sciences has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Medifast. Medifast is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than BioHarvest Sciences, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.18-$11.14M-$0.52N/A
Medifast$385.79M0.33-$18.67M-$2.33N/A

Summary

BioHarvest Sciences beats Medifast on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to FitLife Brands?

BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) and FitLife Brands (NASDAQ:FTLF) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, dividends, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.97, indicating that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FitLife Brands has a beta of 0.01, indicating that its share price is 99% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 14 more articles in the media than FitLife Brands. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 6 mentions for FitLife Brands. FitLife Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of -0.05 indicating that FitLife Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
FitLife Brands
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

2.3% of FitLife Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 61.7% of FitLife Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

BioHarvest Sciences presently has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 214.01%. FitLife Brands has a consensus target price of $21.50, suggesting a potential upside of 99.07%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than FitLife Brands.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
FitLife Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

FitLife Brands has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FitLife Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.18-$11.14M-$0.52N/A
FitLife Brands$81.46M1.24$6.33M$0.6018.00

FitLife Brands has a net margin of 6.15% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. FitLife Brands' return on equity of 18.49% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioHarvest Sciences-31.21% -58.30% -25.60%
FitLife Brands 6.15%18.49%7.55%

Summary

FitLife Brands beats BioHarvest Sciences on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Beauty Health?

Beauty Health (NASDAQ:SKIN) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, valuation, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Beauty Health has a net margin of -9.79% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Beauty Health's return on equity of -47.83% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Beauty Health-9.79% -47.83% -5.79%
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

93.3% of Beauty Health shares are held by institutional investors. 40.3% of Beauty Health shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Beauty Health presently has a consensus price target of $1.38, suggesting a potential upside of 106.15%. BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 214.01%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Beauty Health.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Beauty Health
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 7 more articles in the media than Beauty Health. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 13 mentions for Beauty Health. Beauty Health's average media sentiment score of 0.78 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of -0.05 indicating that Beauty Health is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Beauty Health
7 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Beauty Health has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beauty Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beauty Health$300.80M0.29-$9.52M-$0.22N/A
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.18-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

Beauty Health has a beta of 1.07, meaning that its stock price is 7% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.97, meaning that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Beauty Health beats BioHarvest Sciences on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Lifevantage?

BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) and Lifevantage (NASDAQ:LFVN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability and dividends.

BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its share price is 3% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lifevantage has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 17 more articles in the media than Lifevantage. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 3 mentions for Lifevantage. Lifevantage's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of -0.05 indicating that Lifevantage is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Lifevantage
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

35.3% of Lifevantage shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Lifevantage shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifevantage has a net margin of 2.94% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 23.89% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
BioHarvest Sciences-31.21% -58.30% -25.60%
Lifevantage 2.94%23.89%12.47%

BioHarvest Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 214.01%. Lifevantage has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential downside of 23.90%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Lifevantage.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Lifevantage
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

Lifevantage has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifevantage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.18-$11.14M-$0.52N/A
Lifevantage$228.53M0.36$9.81M$0.4514.60

Summary

Lifevantage beats BioHarvest Sciences on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does BioHarvest Sciences compare to Solesence?

Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) and BioHarvest Sciences (NASDAQ:BHST) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

In the previous week, BioHarvest Sciences had 17 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for BioHarvest Sciences and 3 mentions for Solesence. Solesence's average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat BioHarvest Sciences' score of -0.05 indicating that Solesence is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Solesence
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Solesence has higher revenue and earnings than BioHarvest Sciences. BioHarvest Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solesence, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solesence$62.06M1.16$1.79M$0.01102.00
BioHarvest Sciences$34.51M1.18-$11.14M-$0.52N/A

BioHarvest Sciences has a consensus target price of $6.50, suggesting a potential upside of 214.01%. Given BioHarvest Sciences' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe BioHarvest Sciences is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
BioHarvest Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Solesence has a net margin of 1.56% compared to BioHarvest Sciences' net margin of -31.21%. Solesence's return on equity of 5.39% beat BioHarvest Sciences' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solesence1.56% 5.39% 1.78%
BioHarvest Sciences -31.21%-58.30%-25.60%

Solesence has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, BioHarvest Sciences has a beta of 0.97, suggesting that its stock price is 3% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Solesence beats BioHarvest Sciences on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get BioHarvest Sciences News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BHST and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BHST and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BHST vs. The Competition

MetricBioHarvest SciencesPersonal Care Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$40.61M$22.60B$16.13B$13.10B
Dividend YieldN/A4.29%3.20%10.45%
P/E Ratio-3.9815.4613.3025.28
Price / Sales1.1812.56262,280.3791.31
Price / CashN/A29.7357.6050.90
Price / Book2.052.805.066.24
Net Income-$11.14M$1.08B$831.83M$347.60M
7 Day Performance-19.14%-0.93%0.59%1.06%
1 Month Performance-27.37%-0.42%1.48%0.81%
1 Year Performance-77.79%-13.80%13.68%20.90%

BioHarvest Sciences Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BHST
BioHarvest Sciences
2.973 of 5 stars
$2.07
flat
$6.50
+214.0%
-77.5%$40.61M$34.51MN/AN/A
MED
Medifast
1.3956 of 5 stars
$9.83
-0.9%
$12.00
+22.1%
-12.3%$109.30M$385.79MN/A870
FTLF
FitLife Brands
3.6923 of 5 stars
$9.91
+0.2%
$21.50
+117.0%
-33.1%$93.07M$81.46M16.4120
SKIN
Beauty Health
3.2058 of 5 stars
$0.69
+1.4%
$1.53
+122.5%
-69.3%$88.84M$300.80MN/A1,030
LFVN
Lifevantage
1.7951 of 5 stars
$6.43
+2.2%
$5.00
-22.2%
-52.0%$81.12M$228.53M14.29260

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:BHST) was last updated on 8/15/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners