Go Pro

Solesence (SLSN) Competitors

Solesence logo
$0.80 -0.02 (-2.35%)
Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.82 +0.02 (+2.66%)
As of 09/18/2026 07:58 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

SLSN vs. WALD, MED, SKIN, FTLF, and LFVN

Should you buy Solesence stock or one of its competitors? Solesence's main competitors and comparable companies include Waldencast (WALD), Medifast (MED), Beauty Health (SKIN), FitLife Brands (FTLF), and Lifevantage (LFVN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "personal care products" industry.

How does Solesence compare to Waldencast?

Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) and Waldencast (NASDAQ:WALD) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Waldencast has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Solesence's net margin of -3.40%. Waldencast's return on equity of 0.00% beat Solesence's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solesence-3.40% -11.58% -3.79%
Waldencast N/A N/A N/A

Solesence has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waldencast has a beta of -0.15, meaning that its share price is 115% less volatile than the broader market.

70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 42.0% of Waldencast shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.9% of Waldencast shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Solesence has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Waldencast.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solesence$62.06M0.91$1.79M-$0.03N/A
Waldencast$272.07M0.55-$229.75MN/AN/A

Waldencast has a consensus target price of $2.33, suggesting a potential upside of 101.15%. Given Waldencast's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Waldencast is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Waldencast
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

In the previous week, Waldencast had 2 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Waldencast and 0 mentions for Solesence. Solesence's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Waldencast'saverage media sentiment score.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solesence Neutral
Waldencast Neutral

Summary

Waldencast beats Solesence on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solesence compare to Medifast?

Medifast (NYSE:MED) and Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, dividends, risk, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, Medifast had 2 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Medifast and 0 mentions for Solesence. Medifast's average media sentiment score of 0.34 beat Solesence's score of 0.00 indicating that Medifast is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Medifast Neutral
Solesence Neutral

Medifast currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential upside of 1.76%. Given Medifast's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Medifast is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Medifast
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.67
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Medifast has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solesence has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Solesence has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Medifast. Solesence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Medifast, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Medifast$385.79M0.34-$18.67M-$2.33N/A
Solesence$62.06M0.91$1.79M-$0.03N/A

95.5% of Medifast shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.7% of Medifast shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Solesence has a net margin of -3.40% compared to Medifast's net margin of -8.08%. Medifast's return on equity of -6.69% beat Solesence's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Medifast-8.08% -6.69% -5.25%
Solesence -3.40%-11.58%-3.79%

Summary

Medifast beats Solesence on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solesence compare to Beauty Health?

Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) and Beauty Health (NASDAQ:SKIN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, profitability and valuation.

70.2% of Solesence shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 93.3% of Beauty Health shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.8% of Solesence shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 35.5% of Beauty Health shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Solesence has a net margin of -3.40% compared to Beauty Health's net margin of -9.79%. Solesence's return on equity of -11.58% beat Beauty Health's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Solesence-3.40% -11.58% -3.79%
Beauty Health -9.79%-47.83%-5.79%

Beauty Health has a consensus price target of $1.38, indicating a potential upside of 103.70%. Given Beauty Health's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Beauty Health is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00
Beauty Health
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00

In the previous week, Beauty Health had 4 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Beauty Health and 0 mentions for Solesence. Beauty Health's average media sentiment score of 0.84 beat Solesence's score of 0.00 indicating that Beauty Health is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Solesence Neutral
Beauty Health Positive

Solesence has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Beauty Health has a beta of 1, indicating that its share price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Solesence has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Beauty Health. Solesence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Beauty Health, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Solesence$62.06M0.91$1.79M-$0.03N/A
Beauty Health$300.80M0.29-$9.52M-$0.22N/A

Summary

Beauty Health beats Solesence on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solesence compare to FitLife Brands?

FitLife Brands (NASDAQ:FTLF) and Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

FitLife Brands has a net margin of 6.15% compared to Solesence's net margin of -3.40%. FitLife Brands' return on equity of 18.10% beat Solesence's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FitLife Brands6.15% 18.10% 7.63%
Solesence -3.40%-11.58%-3.79%

2.3% of FitLife Brands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.2% of Solesence shares are held by institutional investors. 61.7% of FitLife Brands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Solesence shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, FitLife Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Solesence's score of 0.00 indicating that FitLife Brands is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
FitLife Brands Positive
Solesence Neutral

FitLife Brands has higher revenue and earnings than Solesence. Solesence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FitLife Brands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FitLife Brands$81.46M1.07$6.33M$0.6215.03
Solesence$62.06M0.91$1.79M-$0.03N/A

FitLife Brands presently has a consensus target price of $18.00, indicating a potential upside of 93.13%. Given FitLife Brands' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe FitLife Brands is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FitLife Brands
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

FitLife Brands beats Solesence on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Solesence compare to Lifevantage?

Lifevantage (NASDAQ:LFVN) and Solesence (NASDAQ:SLSN) are both small-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

35.3% of Lifevantage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 70.2% of Solesence shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Lifevantage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.8% of Solesence shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Lifevantage has a beta of 0.73, indicating that its share price is 27% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solesence has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

Lifevantage has higher revenue and earnings than Solesence. Solesence is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lifevantage, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lifevantage$182.59M0.44$5.07M$0.4015.88
Solesence$62.06M0.91$1.79M-$0.03N/A

Lifevantage has a net margin of 2.78% compared to Solesence's net margin of -3.40%. Lifevantage's return on equity of 21.56% beat Solesence's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Lifevantage2.78% 21.56% 11.62%
Solesence -3.40%-11.58%-3.79%

In the previous week, Lifevantage had 6 more articles in the media than Solesence. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Lifevantage and 0 mentions for Solesence. Lifevantage's average media sentiment score of 0.21 beat Solesence's score of 0.00 indicating that Lifevantage is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Lifevantage Neutral
Solesence Neutral

Lifevantage currently has a consensus price target of $5.50, suggesting a potential downside of 13.39%. Given Lifevantage's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Lifevantage is more favorable than Solesence.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Lifevantage
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.00
Solesence
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.00

Summary

Lifevantage beats Solesence on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Solesence News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for SLSN and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SLSN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

SLSN vs. The Competition

MetricSolesencePersonal Care Products IndustryConsumer Staples SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$58.13M$22.99B$15.67B$13.14B
Dividend YieldN/A4.64%3.23%12.30%
P/E Ratio-26.7920.0814.1825.40
Price / Sales0.9112.66262,949.00114.47
Price / Cash21.6026.8356.6951.66
Price / Book3.212.884.696.33
Net Income$1.79M$1.13B$836.60M$358.33M
7 Day Performance-0.62%-2.39%-0.95%1.12%
1 Month Performance-14.56%-2.92%-2.96%-2.67%
1 Year Performance-76.77%-14.84%10.36%6.01%

Solesence Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
SLSN
Solesence
0.1285 of 5 stars
$0.80
-2.3%
N/A-76.6%$58.13M$62.06MN/A115
WALD
Waldencast
2.2818 of 5 stars
$1.31
-1.5%
$2.33
+78.1%
-44.2%$168.47M$272.07MN/A272
MED
Medifast
1.1221 of 5 stars
$12.04
-0.1%
$12.00
-0.3%
-19.1%$134.62M$316.93MN/A870
SKIN
Beauty Health
1.9765 of 5 stars
$0.70
+1.4%
$1.38
+96.4%
-71.5%$89.80M$290.05MN/A1,030
FTLF
FitLife Brands
4.3501 of 5 stars
$9.21
-0.1%
$18.00
+95.4%
-51.3%$86.59M$101.27M14.7620

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:SLSN) was last updated on 9/19/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners