S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
S&P 500   3,768.47
DOW   30,924.14
QQQ   304.10
Log in
NYSE:NUS

Nu Skin Enterprises Competitors

$49.68
-0.95 (-1.88 %)
(As of 03/4/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$48.88
Now: $49.68
$50.97
50-Day Range
$48.31
MA: $54.87
$62.89
52-Week Range
$12.31
Now: $49.68
$63.85
Volume601,084 shs
Average Volume577,636 shs
Market Capitalization$2.53 billion
P/E Ratio16.73
Dividend Yield3.00%
Beta1.37

Competitors

Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) Vs. TAP, KOF, BYND, NYT, ACI, and USFD

Should you be buying NUS stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to Nu Skin Enterprises, including Molson Coors Beverage (TAP), Coca-Cola FEMSA (KOF), Beyond Meat (BYND), The New York Times (NYT), Albertsons Companies (ACI), and US Foods (USFD).

Molson Coors Beverage (NYSE:TAP) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings and valuation.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

40.0% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 2.4% of Molson Coors Beverage shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Molson Coors Beverage and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Molson Coors Beverage4.86%7.35%3.44%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings and recommmendations for Molson Coors Beverage and Nu Skin Enterprises, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Molson Coors Beverage26602.29
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

Molson Coors Beverage presently has a consensus target price of $48.5385, indicating a potential upside of 6.94%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, indicating a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than Molson Coors Beverage.

Risk and Volatility

Molson Coors Beverage has a beta of 1.14, meaning that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.37, meaning that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Molson Coors Beverage and Nu Skin Enterprises' revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Molson Coors Beverage$13.01 billion0.76$241.70 million$4.5410.00
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

Molson Coors Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than Nu Skin Enterprises. Molson Coors Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nu Skin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats Molson Coors Beverage on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Coca-Cola FEMSA (NYSE:KOF) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Dividends

Coca-Cola FEMSA pays an annual dividend of $2.31 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.1%. Nu Skin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Coca-Cola FEMSA pays out 77.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Nu Skin Enterprises pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nu Skin Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

8.4% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Coca-Cola FEMSA shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares Coca-Cola FEMSA and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Coca-Cola FEMSA4.86%8.04%3.74%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Coca-Cola FEMSA and Nu Skin Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Coca-Cola FEMSA02002.00
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

Coca-Cola FEMSA currently has a consensus target price of $50.00, suggesting a potential upside of 10.06%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than Coca-Cola FEMSA.

Volatility & Risk

Coca-Cola FEMSA has a beta of 0.81, indicating that its stock price is 19% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Coca-Cola FEMSA and Nu Skin Enterprises' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Coca-Cola FEMSA$10.11 billion0.94$642 million$2.9915.19
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

Coca-Cola FEMSA has higher revenue and earnings than Nu Skin Enterprises. Coca-Cola FEMSA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nu Skin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats Coca-Cola FEMSA on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Beyond Meat (NASDAQ:BYND) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

42.1% of Beyond Meat shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 11.0% of Beyond Meat shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Beyond Meat and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Beyond Meat-6.97%-4.49%-3.56%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for Beyond Meat and Nu Skin Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Beyond Meat88201.67
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

Beyond Meat currently has a consensus target price of $117.2353, suggesting a potential downside of 14.06%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than Beyond Meat.

Risk & Volatility

Beyond Meat has a beta of 1.96, suggesting that its share price is 96% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its share price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Beyond Meat and Nu Skin Enterprises' gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Beyond Meat$297.90 million28.82$-12,440,000.00($0.04)-3,410.50
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

Nu Skin Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than Beyond Meat. Beyond Meat is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nu Skin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats Beyond Meat on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

The New York Times (NYSE:NYT) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares The New York Times and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
The New York Times8.88%13.73%8.02%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Volatility & Risk

The New York Times has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

93.4% of The New York Times shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by institutional investors. 2.6% of The New York Times shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for The New York Times and Nu Skin Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
The New York Times10502.67
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

The New York Times currently has a consensus target price of $45.8333, suggesting a potential downside of 9.17%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than The New York Times.

Dividends

The New York Times pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Nu Skin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. The New York Times pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nu Skin Enterprises pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. The New York Times has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Nu Skin Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares The New York Times and Nu Skin Enterprises' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
The New York Times$1.81 billion4.66$139.97 million$0.9254.85
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

Nu Skin Enterprises has higher revenue and earnings than The New York Times. Nu Skin Enterprises is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than The New York Times, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats The New York Times on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Albertsons Companies (NYSE:ACI) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares Albertsons Companies and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Albertsons Companies1.53%99.45%6.10%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

40.6% of Albertsons Companies shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Albertsons Companies and Nu Skin Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Albertsons Companies231302.61
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

Albertsons Companies presently has a consensus target price of $19.75, suggesting a potential upside of 10.15%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than Albertsons Companies.

Dividends

Albertsons Companies pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. Nu Skin Enterprises pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Nu Skin Enterprises pays out 49.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Nu Skin Enterprises has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Nu Skin Enterprises is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Albertsons Companies and Nu Skin Enterprises' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Albertsons Companies$62.46 billion0.13$466.40 millionN/AN/A
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

Albertsons Companies has higher revenue and earnings than Nu Skin Enterprises.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats Albertsons Companies on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

US Foods (NYSE:USFD) and Nu Skin Enterprises (NYSE:NUS) are both mid-cap consumer staples companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, analyst recommendations, earnings, risk, institutional ownership, profitability and dividends.

Profitability

This table compares US Foods and Nu Skin Enterprises' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
US Foods-0.52%4.39%1.27%
Nu Skin Enterprises6.54%19.18%8.87%

Volatility & Risk

US Foods has a beta of 1.8, suggesting that its stock price is 80% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Nu Skin Enterprises has a beta of 1.37, suggesting that its stock price is 37% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

88.8% of US Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.8% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of US Foods shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Nu Skin Enterprises shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for US Foods and Nu Skin Enterprises, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
US Foods03702.70
Nu Skin Enterprises05202.29

US Foods presently has a consensus target price of $35.80, suggesting a potential downside of 4.20%. Nu Skin Enterprises has a consensus target price of $55.8333, suggesting a potential upside of 12.39%. Given Nu Skin Enterprises' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Nu Skin Enterprises is more favorable than US Foods.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares US Foods and Nu Skin Enterprises' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
US Foods$25.94 billion0.32$385 million$2.3815.70
Nu Skin Enterprises$2.42 billion1.04$173.55 million$3.1016.03

US Foods has higher revenue and earnings than Nu Skin Enterprises. US Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nu Skin Enterprises, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nu Skin Enterprises beats US Foods on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


Nu Skin Enterprises Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Molson Coors Beverage logo
TAP
Molson Coors Beverage
1.3$45.39-1.0%$9.84 billion$13.01 billion16.87Increase in Short Interest
Coca-Cola FEMSA logo
KOF
Coca-Cola FEMSA
1.8$45.43-2.3%$9.54 billion$10.11 billion21.95Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
Decrease in Short Interest
Beyond Meat logo
BYND
Beyond Meat
1.1$136.42-2.3%$8.59 billion$297.90 million-303.16Analyst Upgrade
The New York Times logo
NYT
The New York Times
1.8$50.46-3.3%$8.44 billion$1.81 billion53.12
Albertsons Companies logo
ACI
Albertsons Companies
2.1$17.93-1.2%$8.35 billion$62.46 billion0.00Analyst Downgrade
US Foods logo
USFD
US Foods
1.5$37.37-2.7%$8.26 billion$25.94 billion-59.32
Service Co. International logo
SCI
Service Co. International
1.9$46.19-1.8%$7.83 billion$3.23 billion18.11
Post logo
POST
Post
1.5$100.88-2.2%$6.49 billion$5.70 billion-3,361.55Insider Selling
Freshpet logo
FRPT
Freshpet
1.7$140.07-5.2%$6.04 billion$245.86 million1,273.48Analyst Report
Coty logo
COTY
Coty
1.3$7.82-4.2%$6.00 billion$4.72 billion-6.74Increase in Short Interest
Ingredion logo
INGR
Ingredion
2.1$89.11-1.7%$5.98 billion$6.21 billion17.61
Pilgrim's Pride logo
PPC
Pilgrim's Pride
1.7$23.75-0.9%$5.78 billion$11.41 billion31.25Analyst Upgrade
Helen of Troy logo
HELE
Helen of Troy
1.5$220.52-1.2%$5.38 billion$1.71 billion24.48Analyst Downgrade
Ollie's Bargain Outlet logo
OLLI
Ollie's Bargain Outlet
1.2$82.16-4.3%$5.37 billion$1.41 billion23.75News Coverage
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$175.24-0.6%$4.83 billion$1.33 billion36.21
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.3$22.40-0.9%$4.74 billion$4.12 billion48.70
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$48.88-1.0%$4.56 billion$1.00 billion14.21Decrease in Short Interest
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.67-2.0%$4.43 billion$574.57 million30.98
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.95-0.4%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.90
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$24.70-2.3%$4.25 billion$2.60 billion20.58
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$41.94-0.1%$4.19 billion$2.05 billion161.31
Leslie's logo
LESL
Leslie's
1.7$20.93-6.4%$3.91 billion$1.11 billion49.83
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$53.04-8.9%$3.85 billion$75.15 million757.82Upcoming Earnings
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$159.87-0.8%$3.57 billion$3.56 billion126.88Analyst Report
Insider Selling
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.2$47.40-2.1%$3.56 billion$2.52 billion-58.52Analyst Revision
Grocery Outlet logo
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.4$35.45-0.5%$3.34 billion$2.56 billion37.32Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.5$4.04-3.7%$3.28 billion$8.13 billion13.03Analyst Upgrade
Decrease in Short Interest
Gap Down
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.74-2.3%$3.28 billion$2.41 billion26.09
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$155.23-2.2%$2.95 billion$1.02 billion163.40News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.8$42.84-1.1%$2.93 billion$2.74 billion-27.11Insider Buying
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$51.62-2.8%$2.89 billion$4.29 billion-516.20
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$51.06-4.7%$2.86 billion$1.83 billion-74.00Gap Up
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$239.76-6.1%$2.82 billion$713.67 million30.01Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
Utz Brands logo
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$23.23-4.7%$2.80 billionN/A0.00
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$28.94-0.1%$2.77 billion$816.64 million45.94
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$257.54-1.0%$2.41 billion$4.83 billion25.32
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.4$69.99-3.9%$2.21 billion$713.51 million69.99Earnings Announcement
Dividend Cut
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$32.11-1.3%$2.13 billion$523.62 million36.76Decrease in Short Interest
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.6$13.41-3.8%$2.06 billion$1.90 billion30.48Dividend Announcement
Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$39.30-2.6%$1.97 billion$3.26 billion14.56Decrease in Short Interest
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.59-0.5%$1.91 billion$907.67 million29.18
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.7$28.20-0.0%$1.81 billion$1.66 billion13.96Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Report
Decrease in Short Interest
Analyst Revision
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$29.90-5.0%$1.68 billion$26.51 billion15.74Upcoming Earnings
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Down
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
2.2$29.99-1.6%$1.63 billion$1.95 billion24.19
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.0$30.70-3.2%$1.51 billion$1.80 billion95.94Upcoming Earnings
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
2.5$24.37-48.3%$1.50 billion$428.36 million-78.61Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Gap Up
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.3$32.11-3.2%$1.47 billion$2.85 billion-3.49Analyst Downgrade
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.7$45.82-3.7%$1.44 billion$1.02 billion16.25Decrease in Short Interest
Mission Produce logo
AVO
Mission Produce
1.6$19.76-7.6%$1.39 billionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
Increase in Short Interest
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$78.36-1.9%$1.39 billion$1.06 billion-100.46Upcoming Earnings
This page was last updated on 3/5/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.