Baozun (BZUN) Competitors

Dingdong (Cayman) has a net margin of 0.91% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Dingdong (Cayman)'s return on equity of 23.14% beat Baozun's return on equity.

Dingdong (Cayman) has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baozun. Baozun is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dingdong (Cayman), indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

24.7% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Baozun shares are owned by institutional investors. 29.8% of Dingdong (Cayman) shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 59.2% of Baozun shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dingdong (Cayman) has a beta of 0.44, indicating that its stock price is 56% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baozun has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Dingdong (Cayman) and Dingdong (Cayman) both had 1 articles in the media. Baozun's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Dingdong (Cayman)'s score of 0.00 indicating that Baozun is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Baozun has a net margin of -2.43% compared to ThredUp's net margin of -6.50%. Baozun's return on equity of 0.50% beat ThredUp's return on equity.

ThredUp has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baozun. ThredUp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baozun, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

47.3% of Baozun shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of ThredUp shares are held by institutional investors. 59.2% of Baozun shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.1% of ThredUp shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Baozun has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ThredUp has a beta of 2.07, meaning that its share price is 107% more volatile than the S&P 500.

ThredUp has a consensus price target of $9.14, suggesting a potential upside of 81.75%. Given ThredUp's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ThredUp is more favorable than Baozun.

In the previous week, ThredUp had 17 more articles in the media than Baozun. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for ThredUp and 1 mentions for Baozun. Baozun's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat ThredUp's score of 0.32 indicating that Baozun is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Stitch Fix has a consensus price target of $5.00, suggesting a potential upside of 33.16%. Given Stitch Fix's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Stitch Fix is more favorable than Baozun.

Stitch Fix has a net margin of -1.89% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Baozun's return on equity of 0.50% beat Stitch Fix's return on equity.

Stitch Fix has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Baozun. Stitch Fix is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Baozun, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Baozun has a beta of 0.52, meaning that its share price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Stitch Fix has a beta of 2.33, meaning that its share price is 133% more volatile than the S&P 500.

47.3% of Baozun shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.0% of Stitch Fix shares are held by institutional investors. 59.2% of Baozun shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 16.1% of Stitch Fix shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Stitch Fix had 1 more articles in the media than Baozun. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Stitch Fix and 1 mentions for Baozun. Stitch Fix's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Baozun's score of 0.75 indicating that Stitch Fix is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, Build-A-Bear Workshop and Build-A-Bear Workshop both had 1 articles in the media. Build-A-Bear Workshop's average media sentiment score of 1.56 beat Baozun's score of 0.75 indicating that Build-A-Bear Workshop is being referred to more favorably in the media.

79.3% of Build-A-Bear Workshop shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Baozun shares are held by institutional investors. 5.8% of Build-A-Bear Workshop shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 59.2% of Baozun shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a beta of 1.06, indicating that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Baozun has a beta of 0.52, indicating that its stock price is 48% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Build-A-Bear Workshop currently has a consensus target price of $64.75, suggesting a potential upside of 76.70%. Given Build-A-Bear Workshop's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Build-A-Bear Workshop is more favorable than Baozun.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has a net margin of 9.85% compared to Baozun's net margin of -2.43%. Build-A-Bear Workshop's return on equity of 34.25% beat Baozun's return on equity.

Build-A-Bear Workshop has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Baozun. Baozun is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Build-A-Bear Workshop, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.