CrowdStrike (CRWD) Competitors

Meta Platforms has higher revenue and earnings than CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Meta Platforms, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Meta Platforms had 159 more articles in the media than CrowdStrike. MarketBeat recorded 194 mentions for Meta Platforms and 35 mentions for CrowdStrike. Meta Platforms' average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat CrowdStrike's score of 0.14 indicating that Meta Platforms is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Meta Platforms has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its share price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Meta Platforms currently has a consensus price target of $840.31, indicating a potential upside of 36.23%. CrowdStrike has a consensus price target of $506.82, indicating a potential upside of 0.17%. Given Meta Platforms' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Meta Platforms is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

79.9% of Meta Platforms shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of CrowdStrike shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Meta Platforms shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of CrowdStrike shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Meta Platforms has a net margin of 32.84% compared to CrowdStrike's net margin of -3.81%. Meta Platforms' return on equity of 36.93% beat CrowdStrike's return on equity.

Microsoft has higher revenue and earnings than CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Microsoft, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Microsoft had 255 more articles in the media than CrowdStrike. MarketBeat recorded 290 mentions for Microsoft and 35 mentions for CrowdStrike. Microsoft's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat CrowdStrike's score of 0.14 indicating that Microsoft is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Microsoft has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Microsoft presently has a consensus price target of $562.44, indicating a potential upside of 33.62%. CrowdStrike has a consensus price target of $506.82, indicating a potential upside of 0.17%. Given Microsoft's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Microsoft is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

71.1% of Microsoft shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of CrowdStrike shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Microsoft shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of CrowdStrike shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Microsoft has a net margin of 39.34% compared to CrowdStrike's net margin of -3.81%. Microsoft's return on equity of 31.94% beat CrowdStrike's return on equity.

In the previous week, CrowdStrike had 14 more articles in the media than Okta. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for CrowdStrike and 21 mentions for Okta. Okta's average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat CrowdStrike's score of 0.14 indicating that Okta is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Okta presently has a consensus price target of $100.89, indicating a potential upside of 24.74%. CrowdStrike has a consensus price target of $506.82, indicating a potential upside of 0.17%. Given Okta's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Okta is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

Okta has a net margin of 8.05% compared to CrowdStrike's net margin of -3.81%. Okta's return on equity of 4.18% beat CrowdStrike's return on equity.

Okta has a beta of 0.59, meaning that its stock price is 41% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Okta has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Okta, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

86.6% of Okta shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 71.2% of CrowdStrike shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of Okta shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 3.3% of CrowdStrike shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, CrowdStrike had 3 more articles in the media than Palo Alto Networks. MarketBeat recorded 35 mentions for CrowdStrike and 32 mentions for Palo Alto Networks. Palo Alto Networks' average media sentiment score of 1.17 beat CrowdStrike's score of 0.14 indicating that Palo Alto Networks is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

CrowdStrike currently has a consensus price target of $506.82, suggesting a potential upside of 0.17%. Palo Alto Networks has a consensus price target of $211.64, suggesting a potential upside of 7.69%. Given Palo Alto Networks' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Palo Alto Networks is more favorable than CrowdStrike.

Palo Alto Networks has a net margin of 12.96% compared to CrowdStrike's net margin of -3.81%. Palo Alto Networks' return on equity of 17.60% beat CrowdStrike's return on equity.

CrowdStrike has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Palo Alto Networks has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Palo Alto Networks has higher revenue and earnings than CrowdStrike. CrowdStrike is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Palo Alto Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

71.2% of CrowdStrike shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.8% of Palo Alto Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.3% of CrowdStrike shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.4% of Palo Alto Networks shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.