Euroseas (ESEA) Competitors

62.5% of Dorian LPG shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Euroseas shares are held by institutional investors. 13.6% of Dorian LPG shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.9% of Euroseas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dorian LPG has higher revenue and earnings than Euroseas. Euroseas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dorian LPG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Dorian LPG had 3 more articles in the media than Euroseas. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Dorian LPG and 4 mentions for Euroseas. Dorian LPG's average media sentiment score of 0.61 beat Euroseas' score of 0.41 indicating that Dorian LPG is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Dorian LPG has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Dorian LPG's net margin of 40.22%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Dorian LPG's return on equity.

Dorian LPG presently has a consensus price target of $55.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.52%. Given Dorian LPG's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Dorian LPG is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Costamare's net margin of 39.66%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Costamare's return on equity.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Euroseas. Euroseas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 22.63%. Given Costamare's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Costamare is more favorable than Euroseas.

6.3% of Euroseas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.9% of Euroseas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Costamare shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Costamare had 8 more articles in the media than Euroseas. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Costamare and 4 mentions for Euroseas. Costamare's average media sentiment score of 0.64 beat Euroseas' score of 0.41 indicating that Costamare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Euroseas pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Euroseas pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Euroseas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Euroseas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.06, suggesting that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Euroseas pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.1%. Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Euroseas pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genesis Energy pays out -378.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Euroseas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Genesis Energy has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Genesis Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 2.11%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Genesis Energy's return on equity.

6.3% of Euroseas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 55.9% of Euroseas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genesis Energy has a consensus target price of $18.00, suggesting a potential upside of 17.96%. Given Genesis Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.62, suggesting that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market.

Euroseas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Euroseas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Euroseas had 2 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Euroseas and 2 mentions for Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Euroseas' score of 0.41 indicating that Genesis Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Euroseas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Lindblad Expeditions. Lindblad Expeditions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Euroseas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Lindblad Expeditions currently has a consensus price target of $29.20, suggesting a potential downside of 1.28%. Given Lindblad Expeditions' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Lindblad Expeditions is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Lindblad Expeditions' net margin of -2.86%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Lindblad Expeditions' return on equity.

75.9% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Euroseas shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.1% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.9% of Euroseas shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lindblad Expeditions has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Lindblad Expeditions had 8 more articles in the media than Euroseas. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Lindblad Expeditions and 4 mentions for Euroseas. Euroseas' average media sentiment score of 0.41 beat Lindblad Expeditions' score of 0.25 indicating that Euroseas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.