Euroseas (ESEA) Competitors

66.8% of Genesis Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.3% of Euroseas shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Genesis Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 55.9% of Euroseas shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Genesis Energy's net margin of 2.11%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Genesis Energy's return on equity.

Genesis Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Euroseas pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Genesis Energy pays out -378.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Euroseas pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Genesis Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Euroseas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Genesis Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Genesis Energy currently has a consensus price target of $19.00, suggesting a potential upside of 30.47%. Given Genesis Energy's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Genesis Energy is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Genesis Energy. Genesis Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Euroseas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Euroseas had 3 more articles in the media than Genesis Energy. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Euroseas and 0 mentions for Genesis Energy. Euroseas' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Genesis Energy's score of 0.00 indicating that Euroseas is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Genesis Energy has a beta of 0.62, meaning that its stock price is 38% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

Euroseas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Lindblad Expeditions. Lindblad Expeditions is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Euroseas, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lindblad Expeditions had 2 more articles in the media than Euroseas. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Lindblad Expeditions and 3 mentions for Euroseas. Lindblad Expeditions' average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Euroseas' score of 0.62 indicating that Lindblad Expeditions is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Lindblad Expeditions has a consensus price target of $30.50, indicating a potential upside of 15.01%. Given Lindblad Expeditions' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Lindblad Expeditions is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Lindblad Expeditions' net margin of -2.86%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Lindblad Expeditions' return on equity.

6.3% of Euroseas shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 75.9% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.9% of Euroseas shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.1% of Lindblad Expeditions shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lindblad Expeditions has a beta of 2.22, suggesting that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market.

6.3% of Euroseas shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. 55.9% of Euroseas shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.2% of Costamare shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Euroseas. Euroseas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Euroseas had 3 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Euroseas and 0 mentions for Costamare. Euroseas' average media sentiment score of 0.62 beat Costamare's score of 0.00 indicating that Euroseas is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Euroseas pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Euroseas pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Euroseas has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Euroseas is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, meaning that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.06, meaning that its stock price is 6% more volatile than the broader market.

Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.65%. Given Costamare's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Costamare is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Costamare's net margin of 39.93%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Costamare's return on equity.

In the previous week, Euroseas had 1 more articles in the media than Flex LNG. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Euroseas and 2 mentions for Flex LNG. Flex LNG's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat Euroseas' score of 0.62 indicating that Flex LNG is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Euroseas has a beta of 0.45, suggesting that its share price is 55% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flex LNG has a beta of 0.2, suggesting that its share price is 80% less volatile than the broader market.

6.3% of Euroseas shares are owned by institutional investors. 55.9% of Euroseas shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Flex LNG shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Euroseas pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Flex LNG pays an annual dividend of $3.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 10.0%. Euroseas pays out 16.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flex LNG pays out 214.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Euroseas has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Flex LNG has a consensus target price of $24.00, suggesting a potential downside of 20.17%. Given Flex LNG's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flex LNG is more favorable than Euroseas.

Euroseas has a net margin of 58.31% compared to Flex LNG's net margin of 22.26%. Euroseas' return on equity of 27.55% beat Flex LNG's return on equity.

Euroseas has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Flex LNG. Euroseas is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flex LNG, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.