Costamare (CMRE) Competitors

58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Costamare has a net margin of 39.93% compared to Genco Shipping & Trading's net margin of 4.38%. Costamare's return on equity of 16.42% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Genco Shipping & Trading presently has a consensus price target of $23.67, indicating a potential downside of 5.58%. Costamare has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.62%. Given Genco Shipping & Trading's higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more favorable than Costamare.

Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.6%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 368.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend.

In the previous week, Costamare had 3 more articles in the media than Genco Shipping & Trading. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Costamare and 2 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading. Costamare's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Genco Shipping & Trading's score of -0.07 indicating that Costamare is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Costamare and Costamare both had 5 articles in the media. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat Costamare's score of 0.00 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Costamare has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Costamare currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.62%. Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.76%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Costamare.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Costamare's net margin of 39.93%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Costamare's return on equity.

Global Ship Lease has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Costamare. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Costamare has higher revenue and earnings than Safe Bulkers. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Costamare had 4 more articles in the media than Safe Bulkers. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Costamare and 1 mentions for Safe Bulkers. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Costamare'saverage media sentiment score.

21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Safe Bulkers pays out 44.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Costamare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Safe Bulkers currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 5.73%. Costamare has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 15.62%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Costamare.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.85, meaning that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

Costamare has a net margin of 39.93% compared to Safe Bulkers' net margin of 18.73%. Costamare's return on equity of 16.42% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Schneider National currently has a consensus target price of $32.69, indicating a potential downside of 11.86%. Costamare has a consensus target price of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 15.62%. Given Schneider National's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Schneider National is more favorable than Costamare.

Schneider National has a beta of 1.17, meaning that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Costamare has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market.

28.5% of Schneider National shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.6% of Schneider National shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Schneider National pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Schneider National pays out 71.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Schneider National has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Costamare is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Costamare has a net margin of 39.93% compared to Schneider National's net margin of 1.73%. Costamare's return on equity of 16.42% beat Schneider National's return on equity.

Costamare has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Schneider National. Costamare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Schneider National, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Schneider National had 1 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Schneider National and 5 mentions for Costamare. Schneider National's average media sentiment score of 0.33 beat Costamare's score of 0.00 indicating that Schneider National is being referred to more favorably in the media.