Go Pro

Global Ship Lease (GSL) Competitors

Global Ship Lease logo
$45.77 +0.23 (+0.50%)
Closing price 09/11/2026 03:58 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$46.05 +0.28 (+0.61%)
As of 09/11/2026 07:53 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

GSL vs. CMRE, DAC, GNK, SB, and CMBT

Should you buy Global Ship Lease stock or one of its competitors? Global Ship Lease's main competitors and comparable companies include Costamare (CMRE), Danaos (DAC), Genco Shipping & Trading (GNK), Safe Bulkers (SB), and CMB.TECH (CMBT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Global Ship Lease compare to Costamare?

Costamare (NYSE:CMRE) and Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, earnings and media sentiment.

58.1% of Costamare shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 23.2% of Costamare shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 49.10% compared to Costamare's net margin of 39.66%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 19.92% beat Costamare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Costamare39.66% 15.11% 8.47%
Global Ship Lease 49.10%19.92%12.81%

Costamare currently has a consensus price target of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 21.41%. Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.43%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Costamare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Costamare
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Global Ship Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Global Ship Lease has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Costamare. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Costamare$877.90M2.10$364.58M$2.635.81
Global Ship Lease$760.76M2.16$416.45M$10.404.40

Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.3%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Costamare pays out 19.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Costamare has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease had 1 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Global Ship Lease and 2 mentions for Costamare. Costamare's average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.77 indicating that Costamare is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Costamare
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Ship Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Costamare on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Ship Lease compare to Danaos?

Danaos (NYSE:DAC) and Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Danaos had 1 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Danaos and 3 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.77 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Danaos
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Ship Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Global Ship Lease has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.43%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Danaos.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Danaos
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
4.00
Global Ship Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Danaos has a net margin of 51.26% compared to Global Ship Lease's net margin of 49.10%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 19.92% beat Danaos' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Danaos51.26% 13.20% 10.08%
Global Ship Lease 49.10%19.92%12.81%

Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.3%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Danaos pays out 12.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Danaos has a beta of 0.87, suggesting that its share price is 13% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.88, suggesting that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Danaos$1.04B2.77$494.61M$29.555.37
Global Ship Lease$760.76M2.16$416.45M$10.404.40

19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Danaos beats Global Ship Lease on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Ship Lease compare to Genco Shipping & Trading?

Genco Shipping & Trading (NYSE:GNK) and Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends and earnings.

In the previous week, Genco Shipping & Trading and Genco Shipping & Trading both had 3 articles in the media. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat Genco Shipping & Trading's score of 0.66 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Genco Shipping & Trading
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Global Ship Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 11.9%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 351.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Ship Lease pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 49.10% compared to Genco Shipping & Trading's net margin of 9.15%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 19.92% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Genco Shipping & Trading9.15% 6.46% 4.83%
Global Ship Lease 49.10%19.92%12.81%

58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Global Ship Lease has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Genco Shipping & Trading$342.05M3.42-$4.37M$0.9129.47
Global Ship Lease$760.76M2.16$416.45M$10.404.40

Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Genco Shipping & Trading presently has a consensus target price of $26.00, suggesting a potential downside of 3.05%. Global Ship Lease has a consensus target price of $51.00, suggesting a potential upside of 11.43%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Genco Shipping & Trading.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Genco Shipping & Trading
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Global Ship Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Genco Shipping & Trading on 13 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Ship Lease compare to Safe Bulkers?

Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) and Safe Bulkers (NYSE:SB) are both small-cap industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, profitability, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.30 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.5%. Global Ship Lease pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safe Bulkers pays out 38.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its stock price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ship Lease has higher revenue and earnings than Safe Bulkers. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ship Lease$760.76M2.16$416.45M$10.404.40
Safe Bulkers$307.50M2.81$38.56M$0.7810.89

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 3 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 3 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 0.94 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.77 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Ship Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Safe Bulkers
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 49.10% compared to Safe Bulkers' net margin of 28.29%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 19.92% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ship Lease49.10% 19.92% 12.81%
Safe Bulkers 28.29%9.63%5.77%

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.43%. Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $6.00, indicating a potential downside of 29.36%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Safe Bulkers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Ship Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Safe Bulkers
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats Safe Bulkers on 15 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Global Ship Lease compare to CMB.TECH?

Global Ship Lease (NYSE:GSL) and CMB.TECH (NYSE:CMBT) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $51.00, indicating a potential upside of 11.43%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than CMB.TECH.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Global Ship Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
CMB.TECH
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

Global Ship Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than CMB.TECH. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMB.TECH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Global Ship Lease$760.76M2.16$416.45M$10.404.40
CMB.TECH$1.67B2.33$160.70M$2.916.69

In the previous week, CMB.TECH had 2 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for CMB.TECH and 3 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.77 beat CMB.TECH's score of 0.19 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Global Ship Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
CMB.TECH
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.88, meaning that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, CMB.TECH has a beta of 0.14, meaning that its share price is 86% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 49.10% compared to CMB.TECH's net margin of 37.19%. CMB.TECH's return on equity of 30.02% beat Global Ship Lease's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Global Ship Lease49.10% 19.92% 12.81%
CMB.TECH 37.19%30.02%9.90%

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. CMB.TECH pays an annual dividend of $0.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.2%. Global Ship Lease pays out 24.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. CMB.TECH pays out 21.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Summary

Global Ship Lease beats CMB.TECH on 12 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Global Ship Lease News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GSL and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GSL and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GSL vs. The Competition

MetricGlobal Ship LeaseMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$1.64B$5.51B$10.20B$23.17B
Dividend Yield5.55%3.58%97.05%3.56%
P/E Ratio4.4013.5525.7928.71
Price / Sales2.1647.85432.6894.44
Price / Cash3.336.6423.7133.82
Price / Book0.911.244.844.74
Net Income$416.45M$367.90M$613.14M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-1.55%0.51%-1.55%-2.00%
1 Month Performance10.71%7.61%-3.84%-2.69%
1 Year Performance43.21%43.39%6.40%10.45%

Global Ship Lease Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GSL
Global Ship Lease
4.5076 of 5 stars
$45.77
+0.5%
$51.00
+11.4%
+43.3%$1.64B$760.76M4.407
CMRE
Costamare
2.2045 of 5 stars
$15.33
-0.5%
$12.00
-21.7%
+24.6%$1.86B$877.90M5.832,870
DAC
Danaos
1.2097 of 5 stars
$151.74
+0.7%
N/A+67.2%$2.74B$1.04B5.144,116
GNK
Genco Shipping & Trading
1.7861 of 5 stars
$26.27
+1.5%
$26.00
-1.0%
+50.9%$1.13B$342.05M28.871,010
SB
Safe Bulkers
2.0054 of 5 stars
$8.65
+1.5%
$6.00
-30.6%
+89.6%$867.62M$275.74M11.09920

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:GSL) was last updated on 9/12/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners