Global Ship Lease (GSL) Competitors

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Danaos' net margin of 49.85%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Danaos' return on equity.

19.0% of Danaos shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Danaos pays out 12.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Global Ship Lease has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Danaos currently has a consensus price target of $105.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.71%. Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Danaos.

Danaos has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Danaos and Danaos both had 1 articles in the media. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Danaos' score of 0.00 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Genco Shipping & Trading's net margin of 4.38%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.1% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus target price of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Genco Shipping & Trading has a consensus target price of $23.67, indicating a potential downside of 1.35%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Genco Shipping & Trading.

In the previous week, Genco Shipping & Trading had 6 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading and 1 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Genco Shipping & Trading's score of 0.60 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Global Ship Lease has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 368.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 23.82%. Navios Maritime Partners has a consensus price target of $85.00, indicating a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Navios Maritime Partners.

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 62.7% of Navios Maritime Partners shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Navios Maritime Partners has a beta of 1.01, meaning that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Navios Maritime Partners had 10 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Navios Maritime Partners and 1 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Navios Maritime Partners' average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Global Ship Lease's score of 0.88 indicating that Navios Maritime Partners is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Navios Maritime Partners' net margin of 25.05%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Navios Maritime Partners' return on equity.

Global Ship Lease has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Navios Maritime Partners. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Navios Maritime Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Navios Maritime Partners pays an annual dividend of $0.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Navios Maritime Partners pays out 2.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Ship Lease presently has a consensus price target of $46.50, suggesting a potential upside of 23.82%. Safe Bulkers has a consensus price target of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 6.47%. Given Global Ship Lease's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Safe Bulkers.

Global Ship Lease has higher revenue and earnings than Safe Bulkers. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 2 more articles in the media than Global Ship Lease. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 1 mentions for Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease's average media sentiment score of 0.88 beat Safe Bulkers' score of 0.68 indicating that Global Ship Lease is being referred to more favorably in the media.

50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Safe Bulkers pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Global Ship Lease is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Safe Bulkers' net margin of 13.99%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, suggesting that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market.