Danaos (DAC) Competitors

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Costamare. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Costamare, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Danaos has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Costamare's net margin of 39.93%. Costamare's return on equity of 16.42% beat Danaos' return on equity.

58.1% of Costamare shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. 23.2% of Costamare shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Costamare pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Costamare pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaos pays out 12.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Costamare presently has a consensus target price of $12.00, suggesting a potential downside of 24.88%. Danaos has a consensus target price of $105.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.69%. Given Danaos' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Danaos is more favorable than Costamare.

Costamare has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Danaos had 1 more articles in the media than Costamare. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Danaos and 0 mentions for Costamare. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Costamare's score of -0.44 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

58.6% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Genco Shipping & Trading shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Genco Shipping & Trading has a beta of 0.95, suggesting that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Genco Shipping & Trading had 12 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Genco Shipping & Trading and 1 mentions for Danaos. Genco Shipping & Trading's average media sentiment score of 0.52 beat Danaos' score of 0.00 indicating that Genco Shipping & Trading is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Genco Shipping & Trading pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Genco Shipping & Trading pays out 368.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Danaos pays out 12.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaos has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

Genco Shipping & Trading currently has a consensus price target of $23.67, suggesting a potential downside of 4.28%. Danaos has a consensus price target of $105.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.69%. Given Genco Shipping & Trading's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Genco Shipping & Trading is more favorable than Danaos.

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Genco Shipping & Trading. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Genco Shipping & Trading, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Danaos has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Genco Shipping & Trading's net margin of 4.38%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.18% beat Genco Shipping & Trading's return on equity.

Global Ship Lease has a net margin of 50.01% compared to Danaos' net margin of 49.85%. Global Ship Lease's return on equity of 21.11% beat Danaos' return on equity.

19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.1% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.4% of Global Ship Lease shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Global Ship Lease pays an annual dividend of $2.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Danaos pays out 12.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Global Ship Lease pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years and Global Ship Lease has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Global Ship Lease. Global Ship Lease is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Danaos, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Danaos currently has a consensus price target of $105.00, indicating a potential downside of 18.69%. Global Ship Lease has a consensus price target of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 21.95%. Given Global Ship Lease's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Global Ship Lease is more favorable than Danaos.

In the previous week, Global Ship Lease had 3 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Global Ship Lease and 1 mentions for Danaos. Danaos' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Global Ship Lease's score of -0.50 indicating that Danaos is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Danaos has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Global Ship Lease has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Safe Bulkers had 3 more articles in the media than Danaos. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Safe Bulkers and 1 mentions for Danaos. Safe Bulkers' average media sentiment score of 0.15 beat Danaos' score of 0.00 indicating that Safe Bulkers is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Safe Bulkers has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its share price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Danaos has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

Danaos has a net margin of 49.85% compared to Safe Bulkers' net margin of 13.99%. Danaos' return on equity of 13.18% beat Safe Bulkers' return on equity.

Safe Bulkers currently has a consensus target price of $6.00, suggesting a potential downside of 7.90%. Danaos has a consensus target price of $105.00, suggesting a potential downside of 18.69%. Given Safe Bulkers' higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Safe Bulkers is more favorable than Danaos.

Danaos has higher revenue and earnings than Safe Bulkers. Danaos is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Safe Bulkers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

21.7% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.0% of Danaos shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.3% of Safe Bulkers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 41.0% of Danaos shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Safe Bulkers pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.1%. Danaos pays an annual dividend of $3.60 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.8%. Safe Bulkers pays out 66.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Danaos pays out 12.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Danaos has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years.