Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Agree Realty. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agree Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.71% compared to Agree Realty's net margin of 29.75%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.16% beat Agree Realty's return on equity.

Agree Realty has a beta of 0.4, indicating that its stock price is 60% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Agree Realty pays an annual dividend of $3.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.7%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Agree Realty pays out 167.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 100.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agree Realty has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Agree Realty. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 4 mentions for Agree Realty. Agree Realty's average media sentiment score of 1.12 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.49 indicating that Agree Realty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Agree Realty currently has a consensus target price of $79.85, suggesting a potential upside of 14.57%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Agree Realty.

97.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

74.7% of EPR Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.0% of EPR Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than EPR Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPR Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, EPR Properties had 5 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for EPR Properties and 10 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat EPR Properties' score of 0.37 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

EPR Properties has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its share price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.64, indicating that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

EPR Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.3%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. EPR Properties pays out 105.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 100.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EPR Properties has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.71% compared to EPR Properties' net margin of 38.83%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.16% beat EPR Properties' return on equity.

EPR Properties presently has a consensus price target of $65.50, suggesting a potential upside of 10.09%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than EPR Properties.

Essential Properties Realty Trust currently has a consensus target price of $32.46, suggesting a potential upside of 16.15%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Essential Properties Realty Trust.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.71% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 41.03%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.16% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 100.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.8, meaning that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 8 more articles in the media than Essential Properties Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 2 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.71 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.49 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its share price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.64, meaning that its share price is 36% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.71% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 37.53%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.16% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Four Corners Property Trust presently has a consensus price target of $26.45, suggesting a potential upside of 13.13%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $47.36, suggesting a potential upside of 20.59%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Four Corners Property Trust.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 5 more articles in the media than Four Corners Property Trust. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 5 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust. Four Corners Property Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.49 indicating that Four Corners Property Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.4%. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 139.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 100.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.