Free Trial
→ Your book is inside (From Profits Run) (Ad)tc pixel Free GLPI Stock Alerts

Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

Gaming and Leisure Properties logo
$46.97 -0.46 (-0.97%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$47.00 +0.03 (+0.06%)
As of 06:15 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.
Compare

GLPI vs. REG, BNL, EPRT, FCPT, and FRT

Should you buy Gaming and Leisure Properties stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Gaming and Leisure Properties with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Gaming and Leisure Properties include Regency Centers (REG), Broadstone Net Lease (BNL), Essential Properties Realty Trust (EPRT), Four Corners Property Trust (FCPT), and Federal Realty Investment Trust (FRT). These companies are all part of the "finance" sector.

How does Gaming and Leisure Properties compare to Regency Centers?

Regency Centers (NASDAQ:REG) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, Regency Centers had 5 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Regency Centers and 6 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Regency Centers' score of 0.70 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Regency Centers
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gaming and Leisure Properties
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Regency Centers presently has a consensus target price of $82.07, indicating a potential upside of 6.10%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.77%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Regency Centers.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Regency Centers
0 Sell rating(s)
11 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.41
Gaming and Leisure Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Regency Centers has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Regency Centers. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Regency Centers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Regency Centers$1.55B9.12$527.46M$2.9026.67
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.59B8.35$825.11M$3.1514.91

96.1% of Regency Centers shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Regency Centers shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Regency Centers pays an annual dividend of $3.02 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Regency Centers pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Regency Centers has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Regency Centers' net margin of 34.47%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Regency Centers' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Regency Centers34.47% 7.99% 4.22%
Gaming and Leisure Properties 55.56%18.06%6.93%

Summary

Gaming and Leisure Properties beats Regency Centers on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming and Leisure Properties compare to Broadstone Net Lease?

Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) and Broadstone Net Lease (NYSE:BNL) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, dividends, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, profitability, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.0% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Broadstone Net Lease's net margin of 27.01%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming and Leisure Properties55.56% 18.06% 6.93%
Broadstone Net Lease 27.01%4.17%2.25%

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its stock price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.96, meaning that its stock price is 4% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 5 more articles in the media than Broadstone Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 1 mentions for Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Broadstone Net Lease's score of 0.00 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gaming and Leisure Properties
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Broadstone Net Lease
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.8%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 180.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Broadstone Net Lease has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties currently has a consensus price target of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.77%. Broadstone Net Lease has a consensus price target of $20.33, suggesting a potential upside of 0.54%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Broadstone Net Lease.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming and Leisure Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Broadstone Net Lease
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadstone Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.59B8.35$825.11M$3.1514.91
Broadstone Net Lease$454.14M8.52$96.50M$0.6531.11

Summary

Gaming and Leisure Properties beats Broadstone Net Lease on 13 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming and Leisure Properties compare to Essential Properties Realty Trust?

Essential Properties Realty Trust (NYSE:EPRT) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and valuation.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Essential Properties Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 3 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's score of 1.27 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Essential Properties Realty Trust
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gaming and Leisure Properties
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Essential Properties Realty Trust$561.22M11.81$253.01M$1.2724.13
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.59B8.35$825.11M$3.1514.91

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.91, suggesting that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, suggesting that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 43.46%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Essential Properties Realty Trust43.46% 6.30% 3.81%
Gaming and Leisure Properties 55.56%18.06%6.93%

Essential Properties Realty Trust presently has a consensus target price of $36.55, indicating a potential upside of 19.28%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.77%. Given Essential Properties Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Essential Properties Realty Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00
Gaming and Leisure Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.0%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 97.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Essential Properties Realty Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming and Leisure Properties compare to Four Corners Property Trust?

Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) and Four Corners Property Trust (NYSE:FCPT) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Gaming and Leisure Properties presently has a consensus target price of $52.50, suggesting a potential upside of 11.77%. Four Corners Property Trust has a consensus target price of $28.00, suggesting a potential upside of 12.17%. Given Four Corners Property Trust's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Four Corners Property Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Gaming and Leisure Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Four Corners Property Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, meaning that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 38.74%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Gaming and Leisure Properties55.56% 18.06% 6.93%
Four Corners Property Trust 38.74%7.38%4.06%

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.59B8.35$825.11M$3.1514.91
Four Corners Property Trust$294.13M9.31$112.36M$1.1222.29

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties and Gaming and Leisure Properties both had 6 articles in the media. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Four Corners Property Trust's score of 0.99 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Gaming and Leisure Properties
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Four Corners Property Trust
4 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 131.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Four Corners Property Trust has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gaming and Leisure Properties beats Four Corners Property Trust on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Gaming and Leisure Properties compare to Federal Realty Investment Trust?

Federal Realty Investment Trust (NYSE:FRT) and Gaming and Leisure Properties (NASDAQ:GLPI) are both large-cap finance companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, earnings, dividends, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability and institutional ownership.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Federal Realty Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Federal Realty Investment Trust$1.28B8.07$411.08M$5.7620.75
Gaming and Leisure Properties$1.59B8.35$825.11M$3.1514.91

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.92, indicating that its share price is 8% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.68, indicating that its share price is 32% less volatile than the broader market.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus target price of $120.14, indicating a potential upside of 0.53%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $52.50, indicating a potential upside of 11.77%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Federal Realty Investment Trust
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
8 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.63
Gaming and Leisure Properties
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 38.63%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Federal Realty Investment Trust38.63% 15.99% 5.67%
Gaming and Leisure Properties 55.56%18.06%6.93%

In the previous week, Federal Realty Investment Trust had 8 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust and 6 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's score of 0.61 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Federal Realty Investment Trust
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Gaming and Leisure Properties
5 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.6%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 78.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 99.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

Summary

Federal Realty Investment Trust and Gaming and Leisure Properties tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Gaming and Leisure Properties News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for GLPI and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding GLPI and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

GLPI vs. The Competition

Export
MetricGaming and Leisure PropertiesREIT IndustryFinance SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$13.31B$9.89B$13.55B$12.58B
Dividend Yield6.53%5.03%5.77%5.26%
P/E Ratio14.9146.9423.9926.28
Price / Sales8.355.23149.86114.71
Price / Cash11.7913.6419.8956.90
Price / Book2.642.112.167.33
Net Income$825.11M$227.95M$1.13B$337.06M
7 Day Performance-1.70%0.64%0.69%3.43%
1 Month Performance-2.13%3.85%1.11%7.24%
1 Year Performance1.67%11.85%12.33%37.97%

Gaming and Leisure Properties Competitors List

Export
CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
GLPI
Gaming and Leisure Properties
3.7109 of 5 stars		$46.97
-1.0%		$52.50
+11.8%		+2.5%$13.31B$1.59B14.9120
REG
Regency Centers
3.8448 of 5 stars		$77.33
+1.7%		$81.71
+5.7%		+9.6%$13.93B$1.55B26.67440
BNL
Broadstone Net Lease
1.8651 of 5 stars		$20.22
+1.6%		$20.33
+0.6%		+29.2%$3.81B$454.14M31.1070
EPRT
Essential Properties Realty Trust
4.4037 of 5 stars		$30.90
+2.3%		$36.55
+18.3%		-4.5%$6.53B$561.22M24.3340
FCPT
Four Corners Property Trust
4.4165 of 5 stars		$24.88
+1.7%		$28.00
+12.5%		-7.8%$2.69B$294.13M22.21540

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies
Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:GLPI) was last updated on 5/29/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners
The 1934 playbook
In 1934, a legal government maneuver transferred billions in wealth overnight. Most Americans never saw it com...
American Alternative | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX eyes a 1.75 trillion valuation - here's what to know
Elon Musk's team has quietly filed confidential paperwork with the SEC for what Bloomberg estimates could be a...
Brownstone Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
$30 stock to buy before Starlink goes public (WATCH NOW!)
In the next 3 minutes… James Altucher – legendary investor and venture capitalist… And someone who’s kno...
Paradigm Press | Sponsoredtc pixel
Trump's gold order: the announcement they won't put on the front page
On August 15, 1971, Nixon interrupted prime-time television and ended the gold standard in 15 minutes - no deb...
Reagan Gold Group | Sponsoredtc pixel
Your book attached
Your Download Link (Expiring) If you still haven't downloaded the free Simple Options Trading For Beginners...
Profits Run | Sponsoredtc pixel
My feud with Zohran Mamdani
Emmy-winning analyst releases his next big story Whitney Tilson shocked the nation on 60 Minutes when he ac...
Stansberry Research | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX just filed. The clock is ticking.
Reuters reports Elon Musk filed secretly. Barron's says it's being finalized behind closed doors. CNBC just re...
The Oxford Club | Sponsoredtc pixel
SpaceX will mint billionaires. You won't be one of them.
By the time a company goes public, 95% of profits have already been made. Insiders bought SpaceX at $20 billio...
Behind the Markets | Sponsoredtc pixel