Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.95, meaning that its share price is 5% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.7%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 180.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Broadstone Net Lease has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadstone Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 7 more articles in the media than Broadstone Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 2 mentions for Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties' average media sentiment score of 0.91 beat Broadstone Net Lease's score of -0.50 indicating that Gaming and Leisure Properties is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Broadstone Net Lease presently has a consensus price target of $20.56, indicating a potential downside of 0.05%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $52.20, indicating a potential upside of 17.07%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Broadstone Net Lease.

89.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.0% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Broadstone Net Lease's net margin of 27.01%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than EPR Properties. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than EPR Properties, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

EPR Properties has a beta of 1.03, indicating that its stock price is 3% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

EPR Properties currently has a consensus price target of $61.69, indicating a potential upside of 7.25%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $52.20, indicating a potential upside of 17.07%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than EPR Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to EPR Properties' net margin of 37.50%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat EPR Properties' return on equity.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 1 more articles in the media than EPR Properties. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 8 mentions for EPR Properties. EPR Properties' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.91 indicating that EPR Properties is being referred to more favorably in the media.

EPR Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.5%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. EPR Properties pays out 115.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EPR Properties has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

74.7% of EPR Properties shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of EPR Properties shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.24 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 97.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Essential Properties Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years.

Gaming and Leisure Properties currently has a consensus price target of $52.20, suggesting a potential upside of 17.07%. Essential Properties Realty Trust has a consensus price target of $36.41, suggesting a potential upside of 23.98%. Given Essential Properties Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.88, indicating that its share price is 12% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 43.46%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 4 more articles in the media than Essential Properties Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 5 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.55 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.91 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.0%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.4%. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 131.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 104.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.8, indicating that its stock price is 20% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, indicating that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Four Corners Property Trust. MarketBeat recorded 9 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 3 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust. Four Corners Property Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.98 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.91 indicating that Four Corners Property Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 55.56% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 38.74%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 18.06% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Four Corners Property Trust currently has a consensus price target of $28.13, indicating a potential upside of 14.96%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $52.20, indicating a potential upside of 17.07%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Four Corners Property Trust.