Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

In the previous week, Agree Realty and Agree Realty both had 5 articles in the media. Agree Realty's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.82 indicating that Agree Realty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Agree Realty's net margin of 28.84%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Agree Realty's return on equity.

Agree Realty has a beta of 0.47, meaning that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its share price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

97.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Agree Realty. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agree Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Agree Realty pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.3%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Agree Realty pays out 172.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agree Realty has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Agree Realty currently has a consensus target price of $83.94, indicating a potential upside of 13.06%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $49.91, indicating a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Agree Realty.

97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.86, meaning that its stock price is 14% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 1 more articles in the media than Essential Properties Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 4 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.68 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.82 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.2%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 99.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Essential Properties Realty Trust currently has a consensus price target of $36.20, suggesting a potential upside of 17.49%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $49.91, suggesting a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Essential Properties Realty Trust.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 43.51%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 3 more articles in the media than Four Corners Property Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 2 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust. Four Corners Property Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.88 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.82 indicating that Four Corners Property Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 131.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust has raised its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 38.70%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Four Corners Property Trust presently has a consensus price target of $27.78, indicating a potential upside of 11.51%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $49.91, indicating a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Four Corners Property Trust.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Federal Realty Investment Trust pays an annual dividend of $4.52 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.8%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 7.8%. Federal Realty Investment Trust pays out 91.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Federal Realty Investment Trust has raised its dividend for 58 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years.

93.9% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Federal Realty Investment Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 2 more articles in the media than Federal Realty Investment Trust. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 3 mentions for Federal Realty Investment Trust. Federal Realty Investment Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.30 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.82 indicating that Federal Realty Investment Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Federal Realty Investment Trust presently has a consensus price target of $128.44, indicating a potential upside of 9.25%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus price target of $49.91, indicating a potential upside of 18.61%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Federal Realty Investment Trust.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Federal Realty Investment Trust's net margin of 32.67%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Federal Realty Investment Trust's return on equity.

Federal Realty Investment Trust has a beta of 0.93, meaning that its stock price is 7% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.66, meaning that its stock price is 34% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Federal Realty Investment Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Federal Realty Investment Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.