Gaming and Leisure Properties (GLPI) Competitors

In the previous week, Agree Realty had 1 more articles in the media than Gaming and Leisure Properties. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Agree Realty and 14 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties. Agree Realty's average media sentiment score of 0.85 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.25 indicating that Agree Realty is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.8% of Agree Realty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Agree Realty's net margin of 28.84%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Agree Realty's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties currently has a consensus price target of $47.73, indicating a potential upside of 23.79%. Agree Realty has a consensus price target of $83.25, indicating a potential upside of 24.19%. Given Agree Realty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Agree Realty is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Agree Realty. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Agree Realty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agree Realty has a beta of 0.46, indicating that its stock price is 54% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Agree Realty pays an annual dividend of $3.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.8%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Agree Realty pays out 172.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years and Agree Realty has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Broadstone Net Lease's net margin of 30.61%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Broadstone Net Lease's return on equity.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Broadstone Net Lease. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Broadstone Net Lease, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Broadstone Net Lease presently has a consensus target price of $22.78, suggesting a potential upside of 21.51%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $47.73, suggesting a potential upside of 23.79%. Given Gaming and Leisure Properties' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Gaming and Leisure Properties is more favorable than Broadstone Net Lease.

89.1% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.0% of Broadstone Net Lease shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Broadstone Net Lease pays an annual dividend of $1.17 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.2%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Broadstone Net Lease pays out 153.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Broadstone Net Lease has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 8 more articles in the media than Broadstone Net Lease. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 6 mentions for Broadstone Net Lease. Broadstone Net Lease's average media sentiment score of 1.22 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.25 indicating that Broadstone Net Lease is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Broadstone Net Lease has a beta of 0.91, indicating that its share price is 9% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.65, indicating that its share price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Essential Properties Realty Trust has a beta of 0.85, suggesting that its stock price is 15% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 6 more articles in the media than Essential Properties Realty Trust. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 8 mentions for Essential Properties Realty Trust. Essential Properties Realty Trust's average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.25 indicating that Essential Properties Realty Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

97.0% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Essential Properties Realty Trust shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Essential Properties Realty Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.9%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Essential Properties Realty Trust pays out 99.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Essential Properties Realty Trust has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Essential Properties Realty Trust's net margin of 43.51%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Essential Properties Realty Trust's return on equity.

Essential Properties Realty Trust presently has a consensus target price of $35.75, suggesting a potential upside of 36.35%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $47.73, suggesting a potential upside of 23.79%. Given Essential Properties Realty Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Essential Properties Realty Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Essential Properties Realty Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Essential Properties Realty Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Four Corners Property Trust has a beta of 0.79, meaning that its stock price is 21% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gaming and Leisure Properties has a beta of 0.65, meaning that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has a net margin of 59.01% compared to Four Corners Property Trust's net margin of 38.70%. Gaming and Leisure Properties' return on equity of 19.17% beat Four Corners Property Trust's return on equity.

Four Corners Property Trust presently has a consensus target price of $27.90, suggesting a potential upside of 27.43%. Gaming and Leisure Properties has a consensus target price of $47.73, suggesting a potential upside of 23.79%. Given Four Corners Property Trust's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Four Corners Property Trust is more favorable than Gaming and Leisure Properties.

Gaming and Leisure Properties has higher revenue and earnings than Four Corners Property Trust. Gaming and Leisure Properties is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Four Corners Property Trust, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

98.7% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Four Corners Property Trust shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.1% of Gaming and Leisure Properties shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Gaming and Leisure Properties had 7 more articles in the media than Four Corners Property Trust. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for Gaming and Leisure Properties and 7 mentions for Four Corners Property Trust. Four Corners Property Trust's average media sentiment score of 0.89 beat Gaming and Leisure Properties' score of 0.25 indicating that Four Corners Property Trust is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Four Corners Property Trust pays an annual dividend of $1.47 per share and has a dividend yield of 6.7%. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays an annual dividend of $3.28 per share and has a dividend yield of 8.5%. Four Corners Property Trust pays out 132.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Gaming and Leisure Properties pays out 96.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Four Corners Property Trust has increased its dividend for 5 consecutive years and Gaming and Leisure Properties has increased its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Gaming and Leisure Properties is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.