Hooker Furnishings (HOFT) Competitors

In the previous week, Hooker Furnishings had 3 more articles in the media than Bassett Furniture Industries. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hooker Furnishings and 1 mentions for Bassett Furniture Industries. Bassett Furniture Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Hooker Furnishings' score of 0.66 indicating that Bassett Furniture Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Bassett Furniture Industries has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market.

Bassett Furniture Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Bassett Furniture Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Bassett Furniture Industries has a net margin of 1.61% compared to Hooker Furnishings' net margin of -8.84%. Bassett Furniture Industries' return on equity of 3.48% beat Hooker Furnishings' return on equity.

Hooker Furnishings pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Bassett Furniture Industries pays an annual dividend of $0.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.5%. Hooker Furnishings pays out -18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Bassett Furniture Industries pays out 129.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Hooker Furnishings has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and Bassett Furniture Industries has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

73.6% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.4% of Bassett Furniture Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 7.3% of Bassett Furniture Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Mohawk Industries has a beta of 1.2, indicating that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

Mohawk Industries has higher revenue and earnings than Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Mohawk Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Mohawk Industries had 3 more articles in the media than Hooker Furnishings. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for Mohawk Industries and 4 mentions for Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Mohawk Industries' score of 0.45 indicating that Hooker Furnishings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Mohawk Industries has a consensus price target of $123.33, indicating a potential upside of 17.58%. Given Mohawk Industries' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Mohawk Industries is more favorable than Hooker Furnishings.

73.6% of Hooker Furnishings shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 79.0% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hooker Furnishings shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 17.9% of Mohawk Industries shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Mohawk Industries has a net margin of 3.77% compared to Hooker Furnishings' net margin of -8.84%. Mohawk Industries' return on equity of 6.96% beat Hooker Furnishings' return on equity.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus price target of $39.00, indicating a potential upside of 6.46%. Given La-Z-Boy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Hooker Furnishings.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.26, suggesting that its stock price is 26% more volatile than the broader market.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 3.93% compared to Hooker Furnishings' net margin of -8.84%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 10.79% beat Hooker Furnishings' return on equity.

La-Z-Boy has higher revenue and earnings than Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La-Z-Boy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Hooker Furnishings had 1 more articles in the media than La-Z-Boy. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Hooker Furnishings and 3 mentions for La-Z-Boy. Hooker Furnishings' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat La-Z-Boy's score of 0.00 indicating that Hooker Furnishings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

73.6% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hooker Furnishings pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Hooker Furnishings pays out -18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. La-Z-Boy pays out 48.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hooker Furnishings has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years and La-Z-Boy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Hooker Furnishings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 0.74, meaning that its stock price is 26% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Leggett & Platt has a net margin of 5.69% compared to Hooker Furnishings' net margin of -8.84%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of 12.62% beat Hooker Furnishings' return on equity.

Leggett & Platt presently has a consensus target price of $11.33, suggesting a potential upside of 12.42%. Given Leggett & Platt's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Leggett & Platt is more favorable than Hooker Furnishings.

In the previous week, Leggett & Platt and Leggett & Platt both had 4 articles in the media. Hooker Furnishings' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Leggett & Platt's score of 0.59 indicating that Hooker Furnishings is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Leggett & Platt pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. Hooker Furnishings pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 3.6%. Leggett & Platt pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Hooker Furnishings pays out -18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hooker Furnishings has raised its dividend for 9 consecutive years. Hooker Furnishings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Leggett & Platt has higher revenue and earnings than Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Leggett & Platt, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

64.2% of Leggett & Platt shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.6% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Leggett & Platt shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.