La-Z-Boy (LZB) Competitors

La-Z-Boy currently has a consensus price target of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given La-Z-Boy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Haverty Furniture Companies.

In the previous week, La-Z-Boy had 6 more articles in the media than Haverty Furniture Companies. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for La-Z-Boy and 2 mentions for Haverty Furniture Companies. Haverty Furniture Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.49 beat La-Z-Boy's score of 0.14 indicating that Haverty Furniture Companies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 4.80% compared to Haverty Furniture Companies' net margin of 2.64%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 11.97% beat Haverty Furniture Companies' return on equity.

La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Haverty Furniture Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.32 per share and has a dividend yield of 5.3%. La-Z-Boy pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Haverty Furniture Companies pays out 110.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. La-Z-Boy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Haverty Furniture Companies has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years.

99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.6% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by institutional investors. 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.4% of Haverty Furniture Companies shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

La-Z-Boy has higher revenue and earnings than Haverty Furniture Companies. La-Z-Boy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haverty Furniture Companies, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.25, meaning that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haverty Furniture Companies has a beta of 1.18, meaning that its share price is 18% more volatile than the broader market.

Leggett & Platt has a net margin of 5.69% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 4.80%. Leggett & Platt's return on equity of 12.62% beat La-Z-Boy's return on equity.

Leggett & Platt currently has a consensus target price of $11.33, suggesting a potential downside of 4.67%. La-Z-Boy has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given La-Z-Boy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Leggett & Platt.

Leggett & Platt pays an annual dividend of $0.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Leggett & Platt pays out 12.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. La-Z-Boy pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. La-Z-Boy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years. La-Z-Boy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Leggett & Platt has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its stock price is 29% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, La-Z-Boy had 4 more articles in the media than Leggett & Platt. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for La-Z-Boy and 4 mentions for Leggett & Platt. Leggett & Platt's average media sentiment score of 0.69 beat La-Z-Boy's score of 0.14 indicating that Leggett & Platt is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Leggett & Platt has higher revenue and earnings than La-Z-Boy. Leggett & Platt is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La-Z-Boy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

64.2% of Leggett & Platt shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.4% of Leggett & Platt shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

La-Z-Boy presently has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given La-Z-Boy's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Flexsteel Industries.

La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flexsteel Industries has a beta of 0.54, suggesting that its share price is 46% less volatile than the broader market.

La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Flexsteel Industries pays an annual dividend of $1.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. La-Z-Boy pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flexsteel Industries pays out 18.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. La-Z-Boy has raised its dividend for 4 consecutive years and Flexsteel Industries has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. La-Z-Boy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, La-Z-Boy had 7 more articles in the media than Flexsteel Industries. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for La-Z-Boy and 1 mentions for Flexsteel Industries. Flexsteel Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.99 beat La-Z-Boy's score of 0.14 indicating that Flexsteel Industries is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.3% of Flexsteel Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 11.2% of Flexsteel Industries shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Flexsteel Industries has a net margin of 6.79% compared to La-Z-Boy's net margin of 4.80%. Flexsteel Industries' return on equity of 16.10% beat La-Z-Boy's return on equity.

La-Z-Boy has higher revenue and earnings than Flexsteel Industries. Flexsteel Industries is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La-Z-Boy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, La-Z-Boy had 8 more articles in the media than Hooker Furnishings. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for La-Z-Boy and 0 mentions for Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings' average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat La-Z-Boy's score of 0.14 indicating that Hooker Furnishings is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Hooker Furnishings pays an annual dividend of $0.46 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. La-Z-Boy pays an annual dividend of $0.97 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. Hooker Furnishings pays out -21.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. La-Z-Boy pays out 39.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Hooker Furnishings has increased its dividend for 9 consecutive years and La-Z-Boy has increased its dividend for 4 consecutive years. Hooker Furnishings is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

La-Z-Boy has a consensus target price of $39.00, suggesting a potential downside of 2.02%. Given La-Z-Boy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe La-Z-Boy is more favorable than Hooker Furnishings.

La-Z-Boy has a net margin of 4.80% compared to Hooker Furnishings' net margin of -7.90%. La-Z-Boy's return on equity of 11.97% beat Hooker Furnishings' return on equity.

73.6% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.6% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by institutional investors. 2.7% of Hooker Furnishings shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.7% of La-Z-Boy shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Hooker Furnishings has a beta of 1.11, indicating that its stock price is 11% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, La-Z-Boy has a beta of 1.25, indicating that its stock price is 25% more volatile than the broader market.

La-Z-Boy has higher revenue and earnings than Hooker Furnishings. Hooker Furnishings is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than La-Z-Boy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.