Go Pro

Icon (ICLR) Competitors

Icon logo
$162.05 +0.20 (+0.12%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$161.96 -0.09 (-0.06%)
As of 04:10 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

ICLR vs. CRL, IQV, A, WAT, and ILMN

Should you buy Icon stock or one of its competitors? Icon's main competitors and comparable companies include Charles River Laboratories International (CRL), IQVIA (IQV), Agilent Technologies (A), Waters (WAT), and Illumina (ILMN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "life sciences tools & services" industry.

How does Icon compare to Charles River Laboratories International?

Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) and Charles River Laboratories International (NYSE:CRL) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership and earnings.

Icon has higher revenue and earnings than Charles River Laboratories International. Charles River Laboratories International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon$8.25B1.50$229.34M$4.2637.85
Charles River Laboratories International$4.02B3.42-$144.34M-$4.85N/A

In the previous week, Charles River Laboratories International had 8 more articles in the media than Icon. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Charles River Laboratories International and 3 mentions for Icon. Icon's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Charles River Laboratories International's score of 0.91 indicating that Icon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Icon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Charles River Laboratories International
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Icon presently has a consensus target price of $172.40, suggesting a potential upside of 6.92%. Charles River Laboratories International has a consensus target price of $300.11, suggesting a potential upside of 4.32%. Given Icon's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Icon is more favorable than Charles River Laboratories International.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39
Charles River Laboratories International
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.82

Icon has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Charles River Laboratories International's net margin of -5.96%. Charles River Laboratories International's return on equity of 15.75% beat Icon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon3.99% 8.02% 4.56%
Charles River Laboratories International -5.96%15.75%6.51%

Icon has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Charles River Laboratories International has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

95.6% of Icon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Charles River Laboratories International shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of Icon shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Charles River Laboratories International shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Icon and Charles River Laboratories International tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon compare to IQVIA?

IQVIA (NYSE:IQV) and Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and media sentiment.

IQVIA has higher revenue and earnings than Icon. IQVIA is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
IQVIA$16.31B2.60$1.36B$8.0631.96
Icon$8.25B1.50$229.34M$4.2637.85

IQVIA has a beta of 1.17, indicating that its share price is 17% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market.

89.6% of IQVIA shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 95.6% of Icon shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of IQVIA shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 44.0% of Icon shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

IQVIA currently has a consensus price target of $264.31, suggesting a potential upside of 2.61%. Icon has a consensus price target of $172.40, suggesting a potential upside of 6.92%. Given Icon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Icon is more favorable than IQVIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
IQVIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
12 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.94
Icon
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39

In the previous week, IQVIA had 8 more articles in the media than Icon. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for IQVIA and 3 mentions for Icon. Icon's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat IQVIA's score of 0.45 indicating that Icon is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
IQVIA
3 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Icon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

IQVIA has a net margin of 8.10% compared to Icon's net margin of 3.99%. IQVIA's return on equity of 30.25% beat Icon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
IQVIA8.10% 30.25% 6.54%
Icon 3.99%8.02%4.56%

Summary

IQVIA beats Icon on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon compare to Agilent Technologies?

Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) and Agilent Technologies (NYSE:A) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk and valuation.

Icon has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Agilent Technologies has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

95.6% of Icon shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.0% of Icon shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Agilent Technologies had 9 more articles in the media than Icon. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Agilent Technologies and 3 mentions for Icon. Icon's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Agilent Technologies' score of 0.29 indicating that Icon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Icon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Agilent Technologies
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
10 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Agilent Technologies has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icon. Agilent Technologies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Icon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon$8.25B1.50$229.34M$4.2637.85
Agilent Technologies$6.95B6.80$1.30B$5.0832.97

Icon currently has a consensus target price of $172.40, indicating a potential upside of 6.92%. Agilent Technologies has a consensus target price of $170.33, indicating a potential upside of 1.69%. Given Icon's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Icon is more favorable than Agilent Technologies.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39
Agilent Technologies
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

Agilent Technologies has a net margin of 19.53% compared to Icon's net margin of 3.99%. Agilent Technologies' return on equity of 24.45% beat Icon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon3.99% 8.02% 4.56%
Agilent Technologies 19.53%24.45%13.09%

Summary

Agilent Technologies beats Icon on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon compare to Waters?

Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) and Waters (NYSE:WAT) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, risk, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Icon currently has a consensus price target of $172.40, suggesting a potential upside of 6.92%. Waters has a consensus price target of $437.10, suggesting a potential upside of 2.79%. Given Icon's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Icon is more favorable than Waters.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39
Waters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
3 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85

In the previous week, Waters had 10 more articles in the media than Icon. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Waters and 3 mentions for Icon. Icon's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Waters' score of 0.18 indicating that Icon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Icon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Waters
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
7 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Icon has a net margin of 3.99% compared to Waters' net margin of 3.58%. Waters' return on equity of 11.27% beat Icon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon3.99% 8.02% 4.56%
Waters 3.58%11.27%6.73%

95.6% of Icon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.0% of Waters shares are held by institutional investors. 44.0% of Icon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Waters shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Icon has a beta of 1.24, meaning that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Waters has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its stock price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Waters has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icon. Icon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Waters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon$8.25B1.50$229.34M$4.2637.85
Waters$3.17B13.20$642.63M$4.01106.04

Summary

Waters beats Icon on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon compare to Illumina?

Icon (NASDAQ:ICLR) and Illumina (NASDAQ:ILMN) are both large-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, dividends, analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment and earnings.

Illumina has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Icon. Icon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Illumina, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon$8.25B1.50$229.34M$4.2637.85
Illumina$4.34B9.32$850M$5.3650.01

In the previous week, Illumina had 5 more articles in the media than Icon. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Illumina and 3 mentions for Icon. Icon's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Illumina's score of 0.42 indicating that Icon is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Icon
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Illumina
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Illumina has a net margin of 18.36% compared to Icon's net margin of 3.99%. Illumina's return on equity of 29.84% beat Icon's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon3.99% 8.02% 4.56%
Illumina 18.36%29.84%12.17%

Icon has a beta of 1.24, suggesting that its stock price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Illumina has a beta of 1.41, suggesting that its stock price is 41% more volatile than the broader market.

Icon currently has a consensus target price of $172.40, indicating a potential upside of 6.92%. Illumina has a consensus target price of $214.69, indicating a potential downside of 19.91%. Given Icon's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Icon is more favorable than Illumina.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon
2 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
7 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.39
Illumina
2 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

95.6% of Icon shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.4% of Illumina shares are held by institutional investors. 44.0% of Icon shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.9% of Illumina shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Illumina beats Icon on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Icon News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ICLR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ICLR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ICLR vs. The Competition

MetricIconLife Sciences Tools & Services IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$12.41B$10.65B$7.10B$13.24B
Dividend YieldN/A1.45%2.53%15.88%
P/E Ratio38.0474.99274.3326.05
Price / Sales1.50108.61601.0689.40
Price / Cash10.0927.7677.3851.25
Price / Book1.356.8510.926.31
Net Income$229.34M$57.48B$3.50B$361.43M
7 Day Performance-5.97%2.61%-2.11%-1.67%
1 Month Performance1.38%7.66%-6.34%-3.94%
1 Year Performance-16.02%35.50%8.81%2.77%

Icon Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ICLR
Icon
3.3765 of 5 stars
$162.05
+0.1%
$172.40
+6.4%
-15.8%$12.41B$8.25B38.0440,100
CRL
Charles River Laboratories International
3.6208 of 5 stars
$279.70
+0.6%
$273.81
-2.1%
+68.1%$13.27B$4.02BN/A19,700
IQV
IQVIA
3.2784 of 5 stars
$270.69
+1.6%
$248.00
-8.4%
+27.7%$43.85B$16.31B33.5893,000
A
Agilent Technologies
4.2403 of 5 stars
$162.06
+3.6%
$170.33
+5.1%
+19.9%$44.11B$6.95B31.9018,100
WAT
Waters
2.5037 of 5 stars
$424.33
+0.6%
$434.60
+2.4%
+33.0%$41.42B$3.17B105.827,900

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ICLR) was last updated on 10/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners