Go Pro

Icon Energy (ICON) Competitors

Icon Energy logo
$0.98 -0.03 (-2.48%)
As of 04:00 PM Eastern

ICON vs. KEX, MATX, CMBT, SBLK, and ZIM

Should you buy Icon Energy stock or one of its competitors? Icon Energy's main competitors and comparable companies include Kirby (KEX), Matson (MATX), CMB.TECH (CMBT), Star Bulk Carriers (SBLK), and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (ZIM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "marine transportation" industry.

How does Icon Energy compare to Kirby?

Kirby (NYSE:KEX) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both industrials companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and valuation.

Kirby has higher revenue and earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kirby, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Kirby$3.36B2.19$354.57M$6.5021.42
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A

96.2% of Kirby shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kirby shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Kirby has a net margin of 10.18% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Kirby's return on equity of 10.44% beat Icon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Kirby10.18% 10.44% 5.82%
Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A

In the previous week, Kirby had 9 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Kirby and 2 mentions for Icon Energy. Kirby's average media sentiment score of 1.50 beat Icon Energy's score of 1.45 indicating that Kirby is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Kirby Positive
Icon Energy Positive

Kirby has a beta of 0.84, indicating that its stock price is 16% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon Energy has a beta of 5.59, indicating that its stock price is 459% more volatile than the broader market.

Kirby presently has a consensus target price of $163.20, indicating a potential upside of 17.19%. Given Kirby's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kirby is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Kirby
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.86
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Summary

Kirby beats Icon Energy on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon Energy compare to Matson?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and Matson (NYSE:MATX) are both industrials companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Matson has higher revenue and earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A
Matson$3.34B1.98$444.80M$14.9614.81

Matson has a consensus price target of $232.33, suggesting a potential upside of 4.90%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Matson is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
Matson
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.20

84.8% of Matson shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.5% of Matson shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Icon Energy has a beta of 5.59, meaning that its stock price is 459% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Matson has a beta of 1.27, meaning that its stock price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Matson had 19 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 21 mentions for Matson and 2 mentions for Icon Energy. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Matson's score of 1.07 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy Positive
Matson Positive

Matson has a net margin of 13.41% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Matson's return on equity of 16.94% beat Icon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon EnergyN/A N/A N/A
Matson 13.41%16.94%10.01%

Summary

Matson beats Icon Energy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon Energy compare to CMB.TECH?

CMB.TECH (NYSE:CMBT) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
CMB.TECH
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

In the previous week, CMB.TECH had 3 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for CMB.TECH and 2 mentions for Icon Energy. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat CMB.TECH's score of 0.51 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
CMB.TECH Positive
Icon Energy Positive

CMB.TECH has higher revenue and earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CMB.TECH, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
CMB.TECH$1.67B2.11$160.70M$1.6910.43
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A

CMB.TECH has a net margin of 24.94% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. CMB.TECH's return on equity of 18.25% beat Icon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
CMB.TECH24.94% 18.25% 5.79%
Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A

CMB.TECH has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon Energy has a beta of 5.59, meaning that its share price is 459% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

CMB.TECH beats Icon Energy on 11 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon Energy compare to Star Bulk Carriers?

Star Bulk Carriers (NASDAQ:SBLK) and Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) are both industrials companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, institutional ownership, risk, dividends, media sentiment, valuation and earnings.

In the previous week, Star Bulk Carriers had 3 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Star Bulk Carriers and 2 mentions for Icon Energy. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat Star Bulk Carriers' score of 0.80 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Star Bulk Carriers Positive
Icon Energy Positive

Star Bulk Carriers has higher revenue and earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Star Bulk Carriers, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Star Bulk Carriers$1.04B3.22$84.17M$2.5511.60
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A

Star Bulk Carriers currently has a consensus price target of $31.50, suggesting a potential upside of 6.49%. Given Star Bulk Carriers' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Star Bulk Carriers is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Star Bulk Carriers
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.25
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00

Star Bulk Carriers has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Icon Energy has a beta of 5.59, meaning that its stock price is 459% more volatile than the broader market.

Star Bulk Carriers has a net margin of 23.87% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. Star Bulk Carriers' return on equity of 11.72% beat Icon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Star Bulk Carriers23.87% 11.72% 7.61%
Icon Energy N/A N/A N/A

33.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Star Bulk Carriers shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Star Bulk Carriers beats Icon Energy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Icon Energy compare to ZIM Integrated Shipping Services?

Icon Energy (NASDAQ:ICON) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services (NYSE:ZIM) are both industrials companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability and institutional ownership.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a net margin of 2.15% compared to Icon Energy's net margin of 0.00%. ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' return on equity of 1.11% beat Icon Energy's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Icon EnergyN/A N/A N/A
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services 2.15%1.11%0.41%

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a consensus price target of $19.33, indicating a potential downside of 29.98%. Given ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ZIM Integrated Shipping Services is more favorable than Icon Energy.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Icon Energy
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
0.00
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.25

21.4% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by institutional investors. 4.7% of Icon Energy shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of ZIM Integrated Shipping Services shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Icon Energy has a beta of 5.59, meaning that its share price is 459% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services has higher revenue and earnings than Icon Energy. Icon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ZIM Integrated Shipping Services, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Icon Energy$11.26M0.06-$4.20M-$23.98N/A
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services$6.90B0.48$479.20M$1.1524.01

In the previous week, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services had 13 more articles in the media than Icon Energy. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for ZIM Integrated Shipping Services and 2 mentions for Icon Energy. Icon Energy's average media sentiment score of 1.45 beat ZIM Integrated Shipping Services' score of 0.53 indicating that Icon Energy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Icon Energy Positive
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Positive

Summary

ZIM Integrated Shipping Services beats Icon Energy on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Icon Energy News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for ICON and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding ICON and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

ICON vs. The Competition

MetricIcon EnergyMarine Transportation IndustryIndustrials SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$700K$4.92B$10.64B$12.81B
Dividend YieldN/A3.47%97.24%11.02%
P/E Ratio-0.0413.2026.5524.12
Price / Sales0.0648.51366.4594.09
Price / CashN/A6.4024.4753.65
Price / Book0.021.124.486.20
Net Income-$4.20M$358.06M$611.08M$348.07M
7 Day Performance-2.48%1.46%-0.49%0.67%
1 Month Performance4.78%9.48%2.55%4.84%
1 Year Performance-91.00%38.84%10.78%16.83%

Icon Energy Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
ICON
Icon Energy
1.7413 of 5 stars
$0.99
-2.5%
N/A-91.1%$700K$11.26MN/AN/A
KEX
Kirby
4.2078 of 5 stars
$138.84
-0.6%
$163.20
+17.5%
+40.8%$7.33B$3.36B21.365,233
MATX
Matson
4.2323 of 5 stars
$218.75
+0.2%
$232.33
+6.2%
+113.9%$6.54B$3.34B14.624,170
CMBT
CMB.TECH
2.3141 of 5 stars
$17.85
+2.1%
N/A+110.0%$3.56B$1.95B10.562,752
SBLK
Star Bulk Carriers
2.9799 of 5 stars
$30.16
+0.1%
$31.50
+4.5%
+61.9%$3.42B$1.04B11.83180

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:ICON) was last updated on 8/26/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners