Free Trial

TELA Bio (TELA) Competitors

TELA Bio logo
$1.09 -0.05 (-4.39%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$1.08 -0.01 (-0.55%)
As of 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

TELA vs. PDEX, PROF, STIM, FOCL, and OWLT

Should you buy TELA Bio stock or one of its competitors? TELA Bio's main competitors and comparable companies include Pro-Dex (PDEX), Profound Medical (PROF), Neuronetics (STIM), FocalTherics (FOCL), and Owlet (OWLT). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "healthcare equipment" industry.

How does TELA Bio compare to Pro-Dex?

TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA) and Pro-Dex (NASDAQ:PDEX) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations and risk.

Pro-Dex has a net margin of 17.62% compared to TELA Bio's net margin of -51.53%. Pro-Dex's return on equity of 25.13% beat TELA Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TELA Bio-51.53% -1,320.81% -59.39%
Pro-Dex 17.62%25.13%16.02%

TELA Bio has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Pro-Dex has a beta of 0.04, meaning that its share price is 96% less volatile than the broader market.

TELA Bio presently has a consensus target price of $2.14, indicating a potential upside of 87.97%. Pro-Dex has a consensus target price of $74.00, indicating a potential upside of 13.15%. Given TELA Bio's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe TELA Bio is more favorable than Pro-Dex.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TELA Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Pro-Dex
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.00

94.4% of TELA Bio shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.3% of Pro-Dex shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of TELA Bio shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 45.9% of Pro-Dex shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Pro-Dex has lower revenue, but higher earnings than TELA Bio. TELA Bio is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Pro-Dex, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TELA Bio$80.28M0.64-$38.83M-$0.77N/A
Pro-Dex$77.55M2.70$13.66M$4.1315.84

In the previous week, TELA Bio had 8 more articles in the media than Pro-Dex. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TELA Bio and 0 mentions for Pro-Dex. Pro-Dex's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat TELA Bio's score of 0.54 indicating that Pro-Dex is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Overall Sentiment
TELA Bio Positive
Pro-Dex Positive

Summary

Pro-Dex beats TELA Bio on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TELA Bio compare to Profound Medical?

TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA) and Profound Medical (NASDAQ:PROF) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, profitability, dividends, risk and analyst recommendations.

TELA Bio currently has a consensus price target of $2.14, indicating a potential upside of 87.97%. Profound Medical has a consensus price target of $11.50, indicating a potential upside of 90.71%. Given Profound Medical's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Profound Medical is more favorable than TELA Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TELA Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Profound Medical
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

TELA Bio has a beta of 1.36, meaning that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Profound Medical has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its share price is 25% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, TELA Bio had 6 more articles in the media than Profound Medical. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TELA Bio and 2 mentions for Profound Medical. TELA Bio's average media sentiment score of 0.54 beat Profound Medical's score of 0.00 indicating that TELA Bio is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TELA Bio
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Profound Medical
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

TELA Bio has a net margin of -51.53% compared to Profound Medical's net margin of -171.57%. Profound Medical's return on equity of -63.03% beat TELA Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TELA Bio-51.53% -1,320.81% -59.39%
Profound Medical -171.57%-63.03%-51.24%

94.4% of TELA Bio shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.9% of Profound Medical shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of TELA Bio shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.5% of Profound Medical shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

TELA Bio has higher revenue and earnings than Profound Medical. Profound Medical is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELA Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TELA Bio$80.28M0.64-$38.83M-$0.77N/A
Profound Medical$16.10M13.69-$42.57M-$0.98N/A

Summary

TELA Bio beats Profound Medical on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TELA Bio compare to Neuronetics?

Neuronetics (NASDAQ:STIM) and TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, analyst recommendations, media sentiment, earnings, valuation, profitability and institutional ownership.

TELA Bio has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Neuronetics. Neuronetics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELA Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Neuronetics$155.10M1.08-$39M-$0.44N/A
TELA Bio$80.28M0.64-$38.83M-$0.77N/A

Neuronetics presently has a consensus price target of $4.67, suggesting a potential upside of 112.12%. TELA Bio has a consensus price target of $2.14, suggesting a potential upside of 87.97%. Given Neuronetics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Neuronetics is more favorable than TELA Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Neuronetics
1 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
TELA Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

In the previous week, TELA Bio had 8 more articles in the media than Neuronetics. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TELA Bio and 0 mentions for Neuronetics. Neuronetics' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat TELA Bio's score of 0.54 indicating that Neuronetics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Neuronetics Positive
TELA Bio Positive

Neuronetics has a net margin of -19.62% compared to TELA Bio's net margin of -51.53%. Neuronetics' return on equity of -125.11% beat TELA Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Neuronetics-19.62% -125.11% -22.15%
TELA Bio -51.53%-1,320.81%-59.39%

53.6% of Neuronetics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of TELA Bio shares are held by institutional investors. 8.4% of Neuronetics shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TELA Bio shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Neuronetics has a beta of 1.19, suggesting that its share price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TELA Bio has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its share price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Neuronetics beats TELA Bio on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TELA Bio compare to FocalTherics?

FocalTherics (NASDAQ:FOCL) and TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and valuation.

TELA Bio has a net margin of -51.53% compared to FocalTherics' net margin of -56.26%. FocalTherics' return on equity of -248.00% beat TELA Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FocalTherics-56.26% -248.00% -44.69%
TELA Bio -51.53%-1,320.81%-59.39%

62.7% of FocalTherics shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 94.4% of TELA Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. 10.1% of FocalTherics shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of TELA Bio shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FocalTherics has a beta of -0.06, suggesting that its stock price is 106% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, TELA Bio has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market.

FocalTherics currently has a consensus target price of $7.75, indicating a potential upside of 83.22%. TELA Bio has a consensus target price of $2.14, indicating a potential upside of 87.97%. Given TELA Bio's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe TELA Bio is more favorable than FocalTherics.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FocalTherics
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40
TELA Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

FocalTherics has higher earnings, but lower revenue than TELA Bio. FocalTherics is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELA Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FocalTherics$70.53M2.25-$29.25M-$1.03N/A
TELA Bio$80.28M0.64-$38.83M-$0.77N/A

In the previous week, TELA Bio had 7 more articles in the media than FocalTherics. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TELA Bio and 1 mentions for FocalTherics. FocalTherics' average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat TELA Bio's score of 0.54 indicating that FocalTherics is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FocalTherics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
TELA Bio
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

TELA Bio beats FocalTherics on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does TELA Bio compare to Owlet?

TELA Bio (NASDAQ:TELA) and Owlet (NYSE:OWLT) are both small-cap healthcare companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, media sentiment, dividends, earnings, valuation, profitability, risk and institutional ownership.

TELA Bio has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Owlet. Owlet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than TELA Bio, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
TELA Bio$80.28M0.64-$38.83M-$0.77N/A
Owlet$105.70M1.40-$39.68M-$0.75N/A

In the previous week, TELA Bio had 7 more articles in the media than Owlet. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for TELA Bio and 1 mentions for Owlet. Owlet's average media sentiment score of 1.97 beat TELA Bio's score of 0.54 indicating that Owlet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
TELA Bio
3 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Owlet
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

TELA Bio presently has a consensus price target of $2.14, suggesting a potential upside of 87.97%. Owlet has a consensus price target of $15.00, suggesting a potential upside of 195.86%. Given Owlet's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Owlet is more favorable than TELA Bio.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
TELA Bio
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Owlet
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.40

Owlet has a net margin of -8.61% compared to TELA Bio's net margin of -51.53%. Owlet's return on equity of -601.24% beat TELA Bio's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
TELA Bio-51.53% -1,320.81% -59.39%
Owlet -8.61%-601.24%-15.96%

TELA Bio has a beta of 1.36, suggesting that its stock price is 36% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Owlet has a beta of 1.91, suggesting that its stock price is 91% more volatile than the broader market.

94.4% of TELA Bio shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.6% of Owlet shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.1% of TELA Bio shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 36.2% of Owlet shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Owlet beats TELA Bio on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get TELA Bio News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for TELA and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding TELA and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

TELA vs. The Competition

MetricTELA BioHealthcare Equipment & Supplies IndustryHealthcare SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$51.46M$5.56B$7.19B$13.39B
Dividend YieldN/A1.78%2.53%18.16%
P/E Ratio-1.4225.18273.3626.35
Price / Sales0.6183.78591.8396.77
Price / CashN/A32.4579.4153.24
Price / Book6.815.9711.046.33
Net Income-$38.83M$146.97M$3.49B$381.26M
7 Day Performance-12.10%-0.73%-2.30%-0.61%
1 Month Performance32.68%-4.79%-7.05%-4.84%
1 Year Performance-28.05%1.14%5.64%1.12%

TELA Bio Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
TELA
TELA Bio
4.1584 of 5 stars
$1.09
-4.4%
$2.14
+96.6%
-26.9%$51.46M$80.28MN/A218
PDEX
Pro-Dex
3.5907 of 5 stars
$70.74
-1.2%
$74.00
+4.6%
+92.2%$226.29M$77.55M17.12206
PROF
Profound Medical
1.769 of 5 stars
$5.83
-1.5%
$11.50
+97.3%
+6.2%$213.01M$16.10MN/A162
STIM
Neuronetics
4.2782 of 5 stars
$2.40
-6.4%
$4.67
+94.9%
-22.8%$182.50M$149.16MN/A658
FOCL
FocalTherics
4.5911 of 5 stars
$4.61
+1.8%
$7.75
+68.1%
N/A$173.01M$70.53MN/A230

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:TELA) was last updated on 10/6/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners