Go Pro

Hyperfine (HYPR) Competitors

Hyperfine logo
$0.99 +0.01 (+1.32%)
Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$0.98 -0.01 (-0.75%)
As of 05:02 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

HYPR vs. ELMD, CV, CARL, TMCI, and SGHT

Should you buy Hyperfine stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Hyperfine with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Hyperfine include Electromed (ELMD), CapsoVision (CV), Carlsmed (CARL), Treace Medical Concepts (TMCI), and Sight Sciences (SGHT). These companies are all part of the "medical equipment" industry.

How does Hyperfine compare to Electromed?

Electromed (NYSE:ELMD) and Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, risk, media sentiment, earnings, profitability and analyst recommendations.

40.8% of Electromed shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Hyperfine shares are held by institutional investors. 10.5% of Electromed shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Electromed has a beta of 0.5, suggesting that its share price is 50% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyperfine has a beta of 1.4, suggesting that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Electromed has a net margin of 11.34% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. Electromed's return on equity of 15.71% beat Hyperfine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Electromed11.34% 15.71% 13.37%
Hyperfine -226.88%-98.83%-67.09%

In the previous week, Electromed had 1 more articles in the media than Hyperfine. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Electromed and 1 mentions for Hyperfine. Hyperfine's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Electromed's score of -0.82 indicating that Hyperfine is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Electromed
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Negative
Hyperfine
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

Electromed currently has a consensus target price of $37.50, suggesting a potential downside of 7.45%. Hyperfine has a consensus target price of $1.78, suggesting a potential upside of 79.88%. Given Hyperfine's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than Electromed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Electromed
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Electromed has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperfine. Hyperfine is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electromed, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electromed$71.75M4.68$5.15M$1.1734.63
Hyperfine$11.40M8.63-$35.57M-$0.41N/A

Summary

Electromed beats Hyperfine on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperfine compare to CapsoVision?

Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) and CapsoVision (NASDAQ:CV) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, profitability, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Hyperfine had 1 more articles in the media than CapsoVision. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Hyperfine and 0 mentions for CapsoVision. Hyperfine's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat CapsoVision's score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperfine is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Overall Sentiment
Hyperfine Very Positive
CapsoVision Neutral

CapsoVision has a net margin of -198.87% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. CapsoVision's return on equity of 0.00% beat Hyperfine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperfine-226.88% -98.83% -67.09%
CapsoVision -198.87%N/A -136.03%

Hyperfine currently has a consensus target price of $1.78, suggesting a potential upside of 79.88%. CapsoVision has a consensus target price of $8.50, suggesting a potential upside of 21.08%. Given Hyperfine's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than CapsoVision.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
CapsoVision
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

15.0% of Hyperfine shares are owned by institutional investors. 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.3% of CapsoVision shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

CapsoVision has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperfine. CapsoVision is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyperfine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperfine$11.40M8.63-$35.57M-$0.41N/A
CapsoVision$13.55M25.88-$25.32M-$2.34N/A

Summary

Hyperfine beats CapsoVision on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperfine compare to Carlsmed?

Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) and Carlsmed (NASDAQ:CARL) are both small-cap medical equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, institutional ownership, valuation, earnings, dividends, media sentiment, risk and analyst recommendations.

Hyperfine currently has a consensus target price of $1.78, indicating a potential upside of 79.88%. Carlsmed has a consensus target price of $18.75, indicating a potential upside of 63.04%. Given Hyperfine's higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than Carlsmed.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Carlsmed
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50

Carlsmed has higher revenue and earnings than Hyperfine. Carlsmed is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyperfine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperfine$11.40M8.63-$35.57M-$0.41N/A
Carlsmed$50.51M6.19-$29.63M-$2.51N/A

In the previous week, Carlsmed had 1 more articles in the media than Hyperfine. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Carlsmed and 1 mentions for Hyperfine. Hyperfine's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Carlsmed's score of -0.12 indicating that Hyperfine is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hyperfine
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Carlsmed
0 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Carlsmed has a net margin of -57.76% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. Carlsmed's return on equity of -60.74% beat Hyperfine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperfine-226.88% -98.83% -67.09%
Carlsmed -57.76%-60.74%-29.84%

15.0% of Hyperfine shares are held by institutional investors. 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.9% of Carlsmed shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carlsmed beats Hyperfine on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperfine compare to Treace Medical Concepts?

Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) and Treace Medical Concepts (NASDAQ:TMCI) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, profitability and dividends.

Hyperfine has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Treace Medical Concepts. Treace Medical Concepts is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyperfine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Hyperfine$11.40M8.63-$35.57M-$0.41N/A
Treace Medical Concepts$212.69M1.29-$59M-$0.97N/A

Hyperfine has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its share price is 40% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Treace Medical Concepts has a beta of 1.37, indicating that its share price is 37% more volatile than the broader market.

Hyperfine presently has a consensus target price of $1.78, suggesting a potential upside of 79.88%. Treace Medical Concepts has a consensus target price of $4.97, suggesting a potential upside of 17.49%. Given Hyperfine's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than Treace Medical Concepts.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33
Treace Medical Concepts
2 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.86

15.0% of Hyperfine shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.1% of Treace Medical Concepts shares are held by institutional investors. 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 23.4% of Treace Medical Concepts shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Treace Medical Concepts had 5 more articles in the media than Hyperfine. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Treace Medical Concepts and 1 mentions for Hyperfine. Hyperfine's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Treace Medical Concepts' score of 0.83 indicating that Hyperfine is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Hyperfine
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive
Treace Medical Concepts
3 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Treace Medical Concepts has a net margin of -29.44% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. Treace Medical Concepts' return on equity of -67.04% beat Hyperfine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Hyperfine-226.88% -98.83% -67.09%
Treace Medical Concepts -29.44%-67.04%-30.28%

Summary

Hyperfine beats Treace Medical Concepts on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Hyperfine compare to Sight Sciences?

Sight Sciences (NASDAQ:SGHT) and Hyperfine (NASDAQ:HYPR) are both small-cap medical companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Sight Sciences presently has a consensus price target of $8.25, indicating a potential upside of 68.02%. Hyperfine has a consensus price target of $1.78, indicating a potential upside of 79.88%. Given Hyperfine's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Hyperfine is more favorable than Sight Sciences.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Sight Sciences
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44
Hyperfine
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.33

Hyperfine has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sight Sciences. Sight Sciences is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Hyperfine, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Sight Sciences$77.36M3.45-$38.43M-$0.71N/A
Hyperfine$11.40M8.63-$35.57M-$0.41N/A

In the previous week, Sight Sciences and Sight Sciences both had 1 articles in the media. Hyperfine's average media sentiment score of 1.94 beat Sight Sciences' score of 0.00 indicating that Hyperfine is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Sight Sciences
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Hyperfine
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Very Positive

55.5% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 15.0% of Hyperfine shares are owned by institutional investors. 30.4% of Sight Sciences shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 26.3% of Hyperfine shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Sight Sciences has a net margin of -46.83% compared to Hyperfine's net margin of -226.88%. Sight Sciences' return on equity of -52.34% beat Hyperfine's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Sight Sciences-46.83% -52.34% -28.49%
Hyperfine -226.88%-98.83%-67.09%

Sight Sciences has a beta of 2.38, indicating that its stock price is 138% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hyperfine has a beta of 1.4, indicating that its stock price is 40% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Sight Sciences beats Hyperfine on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Hyperfine News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for HYPR and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding HYPR and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

HYPR vs. The Competition

MetricHyperfineMED INSTRUMENTS IndustryMedical SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$98.42M$7.19B$6.81B$12.41B
Dividend YieldN/A1.32%2.67%9.39%
P/E Ratio-2.4249.8427.0024.19
Price / Sales8.6350.65517.8593.08
Price / CashN/A26.9126.6847.25
Price / Book2.366.9410.676.26
Net Income-$35.57M$162.27M$3.60B$331.76M
7 Day Performance-4.67%-1.21%-0.37%-1.10%
1 Month Performance-38.04%-2.30%1.80%-1.29%
1 Year Performance2.32%5.52%25.50%18.84%

Hyperfine Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
HYPR
Hyperfine
3.2999 of 5 stars
$0.99
+1.3%
$1.78
+79.9%
+6.3%$98.42M$11.40MN/A190
ELMD
Electromed
0.634 of 5 stars
$44.34
-3.6%
$37.50
-15.4%
+124.2%$367.14M$71.75M59.12160
CV
CapsoVision
1.6809 of 5 stars
$6.36
+2.3%
$8.50
+33.6%
+48.4%$317.75M$13.55MN/A90
CARL
Carlsmed
2.2964 of 5 stars
$10.80
-10.8%
$18.75
+73.6%
N/A$293.54M$50.51MN/A100
TMCI
Treace Medical Concepts
3.6363 of 5 stars
$4.44
-3.1%
$4.77
+7.4%
-25.1%$288.02M$212.69MN/A250

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:HYPR) was last updated on 7/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners