trivago Competitors

Upwork (NASDAQ:UPWK) and trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations and dividends.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

60.3% of Upwork shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of trivago shares are held by institutional investors. 25.3% of Upwork shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for Upwork and trivago, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Upwork presently has a consensus target price of $60.75, suggesting a potential upside of 52.75%. trivago has a consensus target price of $2.6550, suggesting a potential downside of 29.76%. Given Upwork's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Upwork is more favorable than trivago.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Upwork and trivago's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

trivago has higher revenue and earnings than Upwork. Upwork is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Upwork has a beta of 2.15, indicating that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, trivago has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Upwork and trivago's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Upwork beats trivago on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) and Perspecta (NYSE:PRSP) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, risk, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings, profitability and dividends.

Risk & Volatility

trivago has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Perspecta has a beta of 1.46, indicating that its stock price is 46% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for trivago and Perspecta, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

trivago presently has a consensus price target of $2.6550, suggesting a potential downside of 29.76%. Perspecta has a consensus price target of $26.45, suggesting a potential downside of 9.85%. Given Perspecta's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Perspecta is more favorable than trivago.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

10.6% of trivago shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.2% of Perspecta shares are owned by institutional investors. 14.8% of Perspecta shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares trivago and Perspecta's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares trivago and Perspecta's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

trivago has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Perspecta. Perspecta is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Perspecta beats trivago on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Inovalon (NASDAQ:INOV) and trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership and risk.

Profitability

This table compares Inovalon and trivago's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

33.6% of Inovalon shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of trivago shares are owned by institutional investors. 49.6% of Inovalon shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Inovalon and trivago, as provided by MarketBeat.

Inovalon presently has a consensus price target of $28.4286, suggesting a potential downside of 5.55%. trivago has a consensus price target of $2.6550, suggesting a potential downside of 29.76%. Given Inovalon's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Inovalon is more favorable than trivago.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Inovalon and trivago's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

trivago has higher revenue and earnings than Inovalon. trivago is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Inovalon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Risk & Volatility

Inovalon has a beta of 0.64, suggesting that its stock price is 36% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, trivago has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Inovalon beats trivago on 11 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

CarGurus (NASDAQ:CARG) and trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) are both auto/tires/trucks companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares CarGurus and trivago's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

79.4% of CarGurus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of trivago shares are held by institutional investors. 24.4% of CarGurus shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

CarGurus has a beta of 1.99, suggesting that its share price is 99% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, trivago has a beta of 1.82, suggesting that its share price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for CarGurus and trivago, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CarGurus presently has a consensus price target of $33.70, indicating a potential upside of 17.79%. trivago has a consensus price target of $2.6550, indicating a potential downside of 29.76%. Given CarGurus' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe CarGurus is more favorable than trivago.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares CarGurus and trivago's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

CarGurus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than trivago. trivago is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CarGurus, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

CarGurus beats trivago on 13 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

LiveRamp (NYSE:RAMP) and trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) are both business services companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares LiveRamp and trivago's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

LiveRamp has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its share price is 28% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, trivago has a beta of 1.82, meaning that its share price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

97.1% of LiveRamp shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of trivago shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.3% of LiveRamp shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares LiveRamp and trivago's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

trivago has higher revenue and earnings than LiveRamp. LiveRamp is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for LiveRamp and trivago, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

LiveRamp currently has a consensus target price of $86.7778, suggesting a potential upside of 74.67%. trivago has a consensus target price of $2.6550, suggesting a potential downside of 29.76%. Given LiveRamp's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe LiveRamp is more favorable than trivago.

EVERTEC (NYSE:EVTC) and trivago (NASDAQ:TRVG) are both business services companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

80.2% of EVERTEC shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.6% of trivago shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of EVERTEC shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares EVERTEC and trivago's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

EVERTEC has higher earnings, but lower revenue than trivago. EVERTEC is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than trivago, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

EVERTEC has a beta of 1.14, indicating that its stock price is 14% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, trivago has a beta of 1.82, indicating that its stock price is 82% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares EVERTEC and trivago's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for EVERTEC and trivago, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

EVERTEC currently has a consensus price target of $41.6667, indicating a potential downside of 4.26%. trivago has a consensus price target of $2.6550, indicating a potential downside of 29.76%. Given EVERTEC's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe EVERTEC is more favorable than trivago.

Summary

EVERTEC beats trivago on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.