Do analysts prefer WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 539.07%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Intrusion 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 23.34 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Intrusion $7.09M 2.36 -$9.06M -$0.52 N/A

Is WATT or INTZ more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Intrusion -169.48% -129.84% -87.05%

Does the media refer more to WATT or INTZ?

In the previous week, Intrusion had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Intrusion's score of 0.35 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Intrusion 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend WATT or MRAM?

Everspin Tech has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.19%. Given Everspin Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Everspin Tech is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Everspin Tech 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better earnings & valuation, WATT or MRAM?

Everspin Tech has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everspin Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 23.34 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Everspin Tech $55.20M 9.49 -$590K $0.01 2,234.00

Is WATT or MRAM more profitable?

Everspin Tech has a net margin of 0.50% compared to Energous' net margin of -0.80%. Everspin Tech's return on equity of 4.78% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Everspin Tech 0.50% 4.78% 3.93%

Does the media refer more to WATT or MRAM?

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Everspin Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Everspin Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Everspin Tech 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WATT or AIOT?

PowerFleet has a consensus target price of $9.67, indicating a potential upside of 120.70%. Given PowerFleet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 PowerFleet 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.40

Is WATT or AIOT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -4.63%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -1.33% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% PowerFleet -4.63% -1.33% -0.66%

Does the media refer more to WATT or AIOT?

In the previous week, PowerFleet had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerFleet and 2 mentions for Energous. PowerFleet's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that PowerFleet is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive PowerFleet 2 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WATT or CLFD?

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Clearfield 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 5 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.57

Which has preferable earnings and valuation, WATT or CLFD?

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 23.34 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Clearfield $150.13M 3.49 -$8.05M -$0.62 N/A

Is WATT or CLFD more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Clearfield -5.41% 1.03% 0.90%

Does the media refer more to WATT or CLFD?

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Clearfield 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts prefer WATT or VREX?

Varex Imaging has a consensus target price of $16.17, indicating a potential upside of 51.37%. Given Varex Imaging's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Varex Imaging is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Varex Imaging 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.60

Is WATT or VREX more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Varex Imaging's net margin of -9.64%. Varex Imaging's return on equity of 8.19% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Varex Imaging -9.64% 8.19% 3.63%

Does the media refer more to WATT or VREX?

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Varex Imaging's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Varex Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Varex Imaging 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energous (WATT) Competitors

$23.89 -0.16 (-0.67%)

Closing price 07/1/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$23.98 +0.09 (+0.36%)

As of 07/1/2026 06:24 PM Eastern

Compare

WATT vs. INTZ, MRAM, AIOT, CLFD, and VREX

Should you buy Energous stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energous with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energous include Intrusion (INTZ), Everspin Tech (MRAM), PowerFleet (AIOT), Clearfield (CLFD), and Varex Imaging (VREX).

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and earnings.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Intrusion	-169.48%	-129.84%	-87.05%

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	23.34	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Intrusion	$7.09M	2.36	-$9.06M	-$0.52	N/A

Energous has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, suggesting that its stock price is 266% less volatile than the broader market.

Intrusion has a consensus target price of $5.25, indicating a potential upside of 539.07%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Intrusion	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

In the previous week, Intrusion had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Intrusion's score of 0.35 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Intrusion	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Intrusion beats Energous on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Everspin Tech?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Everspin Tech (NASDAQ:MRAM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk and institutional ownership.

Everspin Tech has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Everspin Tech, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	23.34	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Everspin Tech	$55.20M	9.49	-$590K	$0.01	2,234.00

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Everspin Tech's average media sentiment score of 1.38 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Everspin Tech is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Everspin Tech	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energous has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Everspin Tech has a beta of 1.89, meaning that its stock price is 89% more volatile than the broader market.

Everspin Tech has a net margin of 0.50% compared to Energous' net margin of -0.80%. Everspin Tech's return on equity of 4.78% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Everspin Tech	0.50%	4.78%	3.93%

4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.7% of Everspin Tech shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Everspin Tech shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Everspin Tech has a consensus price target of $18.50, indicating a potential downside of 17.19%. Given Everspin Tech's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Everspin Tech is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Everspin Tech	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Everspin Tech beats Energous on 14 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to PowerFleet?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and PowerFleet (NASDAQ:AIOT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, earnings, profitability, dividends, risk, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, PowerFleet had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for PowerFleet and 2 mentions for Energous. PowerFleet's average media sentiment score of 1.15 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that PowerFleet is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
PowerFleet	2 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

PowerFleet has a consensus target price of $9.67, indicating a potential upside of 120.70%. Given PowerFleet's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe PowerFleet is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
PowerFleet	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.40

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to PowerFleet's net margin of -4.63%. PowerFleet's return on equity of -1.33% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
PowerFleet	-4.63%	-1.33%	-0.66%

Energous has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, PowerFleet has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 73.4% of PowerFleet shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of PowerFleet shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than PowerFleet. PowerFleet is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	23.34	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
PowerFleet	$443.78M	1.32	-$20.55M	-$0.16	N/A

Summary

PowerFleet beats Energous on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Clearfield?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Clearfield (NASDAQ:CLFD) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, earnings, profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Clearfield has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Clearfield is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	23.34	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Clearfield	$150.13M	3.49	-$8.05M	-$0.62	N/A

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 88.7% of Clearfield shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 17.8% of Clearfield shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Clearfield has a consensus price target of $43.75, indicating a potential upside of 13.64%. Given Clearfield's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Clearfield is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Clearfield	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	5 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.57

Energous has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Clearfield has a beta of 2.11, meaning that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Clearfield's average media sentiment score of 1.31 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Clearfield is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Clearfield	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Clearfield's net margin of -5.41%. Clearfield's return on equity of 1.03% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Clearfield	-5.41%	1.03%	0.90%

Summary

Clearfield beats Energous on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Varex Imaging?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Varex Imaging (NASDAQ:VREX) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and institutional ownership.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Varex Imaging's net margin of -9.64%. Varex Imaging's return on equity of 8.19% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Varex Imaging	-9.64%	8.19%	3.63%

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Varex Imaging. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Varex Imaging, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	23.34	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Varex Imaging	$844.60M	0.53	-$70.30M	-$2.00	N/A

Energous has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Varex Imaging has a beta of 0.9, indicating that its share price is 10% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energous and Energous both had 2 articles in the media. Varex Imaging's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Energous' score of 0.63 indicating that Varex Imaging is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Varex Imaging	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 4.6% of Varex Imaging shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Varex Imaging has a consensus target price of $16.17, indicating a potential upside of 51.37%. Given Varex Imaging's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Varex Imaging is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Varex Imaging	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.60

Summary

Varex Imaging beats Energous on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energous News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WATT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WATT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energous	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$132.30M	$38.48B	$9.80B	$12.59B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.89%	3.54%	6.15%
P/E Ratio	-5.83	29.59	25.08	25.27
Price / Sales	23.34	108.39	4,770.20	101.17
Price / Cash	N/A	27.72	27.74	59.26
Price / Book	4.21	5.86	4.64	6.62
Net Income	-$9.59M	$909.86M	$791.01M	$336.83M
7 Day Performance	-0.42%	-0.69%	0.56%	3.19%
1 Month Performance	-23.60%	-5.52%	-0.65%	0.86%
1 Year Performance	187.48%	83.56%	20.60%	27.51%

Energous Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WATT Energous	1.3312 of 5 stars	$23.89 -0.7%	N/A	+190.8%	$132.30M	$5.63M	N/A	50
INTZ Intrusion	2.8208 of 5 stars	$0.71 -0.2%	$5.25 +639.4%	-65.3%	$14.46M	$7.09M	N/A	60	News Coverage Gap Down
MRAM Everspin Tech	1.2753 of 5 stars	$22.55 -11.7%	$18.50 -18.0%	+240.5%	$528.80M	$55.20M	2,257.26	90	News Coverage Positive News Gap Down
AIOT PowerFleet	3.4795 of 5 stars	$3.85 -1.5%	$9.67 +151.1%	+1.2%	$516.60M	$443.78M	N/A	2,658	Positive News Buyback Announcement Gap Up
CLFD Clearfield	3.3235 of 5 stars	$37.16 -7.1%	$43.75 +17.7%	-10.5%	$505.00M	$150.13M	N/A	1,130	Gap Down

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WATT) was last updated on 7/2/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energous (WATT) Competitors