Do analysts recommend WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 513.68%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Intrusion 2 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.75

Which has better valuation and earnings, WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 16.16 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Intrusion $6.21M 3.14 -$9.06M -$0.52 N/A

Is WATT or INTZ more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Intrusion -169.48% -129.84% -87.05%

Do analysts rate WATT or DVLT?

Datavault AI has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 715.88%. Given Datavault AI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Datavault AI is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Datavault AI 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Is WATT or DVLT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Datavault AI's net margin of -292.68%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Datavault AI's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Datavault AI -292.68% -64.71% -52.12%

Does the media prefer WATT or DVLT?

In the previous week, Datavault AI had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Datavault AI and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Datavault AI's score of 0.64 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Datavault AI 2 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend WATT or NNDM?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Nano Dimension 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is WATT or NNDM more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -22.07% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Nano Dimension -286.72% -22.07% -18.18%

Does the media prefer WATT or NNDM?

In the previous week, Nano Dimension had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Nano Dimension and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.28 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive Nano Dimension 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate WATT or ALMU?

Aeluma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.25%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Aeluma 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WATT or ALMU?

Aeluma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 16.16 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Aeluma $5.20M 57.85 -$3.02M -$0.35 N/A

Is WATT or ALMU more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -115.57%. Aeluma's return on equity of -12.03% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Aeluma -115.57% -12.03% -11.42%

Do analysts recommend TBCH or WATT?

Turtle Beach currently has a consensus price target of $16.80, suggesting a potential upside of 29.23%. Given Turtle Beach's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Turtle Beach is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Turtle Beach 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 4 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.43 Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TBCH or WATT?

Turtle Beach has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turtle Beach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Turtle Beach $298.19M 0.87 $15.73M $0.03 433.33 Energous $5.63M 16.16 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A

Is TBCH or WATT more profitable?

Turtle Beach has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Energous' net margin of -0.80%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 1.31% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Turtle Beach 0.40% 1.31% 0.61% Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46%

Does the media refer more to TBCH or WATT?

In the previous week, Turtle Beach had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Turtle Beach and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Turtle Beach's score of 0.21 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Turtle Beach 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energous 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Very Positive

Energous (WATT) Competitors

$16.54 +1.39 (+9.17%)

Closing price 07/21/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$16.60 +0.07 (+0.39%)

As of 05:48 AM Eastern

Compare

WATT vs. INTZ, DVLT, NNDM, ALMU, and TBCH

Should you buy Energous stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Energous with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Energous include Intrusion (INTZ), Datavault AI (DVLT), Nano Dimension (NNDM), Aeluma (ALMU), and Turtle Beach (TBCH).

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are related small-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	16.16	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Intrusion	$6.21M	3.14	-$9.06M	-$0.52	N/A

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Intrusion	-169.48%	-129.84%	-87.05%

Energous has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.66, indicating that its share price is 266% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Energous had 1 more articles in the media than Intrusion. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Energous and 0 mentions for Intrusion. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Intrusion's score of -0.50 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energous	Very Positive
Intrusion	Negative

4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 10.4% of Intrusion shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Intrusion has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 513.68%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Intrusion	2 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.75

Summary

Intrusion beats Energous on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Datavault AI?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Datavault AI (NASDAQ:DVLT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Energous has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Datavault AI has a beta of 0.31, meaning that its stock price is 69% less volatile than the broader market.

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Datavault AI. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Datavault AI, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	16.16	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Datavault AI	$39.09M	8.05	-$78.99M	-$0.92	N/A

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.7% of Datavault AI shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 7.7% of Datavault AI shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Datavault AI had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Datavault AI and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Datavault AI's score of 0.64 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Datavault AI	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Datavault AI's net margin of -292.68%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Datavault AI's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Datavault AI	-292.68%	-64.71%	-52.12%

Datavault AI has a consensus target price of $3.00, indicating a potential upside of 715.88%. Given Datavault AI's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Datavault AI is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Datavault AI	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Energous and Datavault AI tied by winning 8 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Nano Dimension?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Nano Dimension (NASDAQ:NNDM) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, earnings, media sentiment, valuation, risk and dividends.

In the previous week, Nano Dimension had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Nano Dimension and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Nano Dimension's score of 0.28 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive
Nano Dimension	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Nano Dimension's net margin of -286.72%. Nano Dimension's return on equity of -22.07% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Nano Dimension	-286.72%	-22.07%	-18.18%

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.9% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Nano Dimension shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energous has a beta of 1.54, indicating that its stock price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Nano Dimension has a beta of 1, indicating that its stock price has a similar volatility profile to the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Nano Dimension	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Nano Dimension. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Nano Dimension, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	16.16	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Nano Dimension	$102.44M	3.09	-$293.30M	-$0.44	N/A

Summary

Nano Dimension beats Energous on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Aeluma?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Aeluma (NASDAQ:ALMU) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk, profitability, dividends and earnings.

Aeluma has a consensus price target of $25.00, indicating a potential upside of 52.25%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Aeluma	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

In the previous week, Energous had 1 more articles in the media than Aeluma. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Energous and 0 mentions for Aeluma. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Aeluma's score of 0.57 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energous	Very Positive
Aeluma	Positive

Aeluma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	16.16	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Aeluma	$5.20M	57.85	-$3.02M	-$0.35	N/A

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -115.57%. Aeluma's return on equity of -12.03% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Aeluma	-115.57%	-12.03%	-11.42%

Energous has a beta of 1.54, suggesting that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aeluma has a beta of 3.88, suggesting that its share price is 288% more volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Aeluma shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Aeluma beats Energous on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Turtle Beach?

Turtle Beach (NASDAQ:TBCH) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap electronic equipment companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, earnings, dividends and institutional ownership.

Turtle Beach has a beta of 2.28, meaning that its share price is 128% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.54, meaning that its share price is 54% more volatile than the broader market.

Turtle Beach has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Turtle Beach, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Turtle Beach	$298.19M	0.87	$15.73M	$0.03	433.33
Energous	$5.63M	16.16	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A

In the previous week, Turtle Beach had 5 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Turtle Beach and 1 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 1.54 beat Turtle Beach's score of 0.21 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Turtle Beach	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energous	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Very Positive

Turtle Beach currently has a consensus price target of $16.80, suggesting a potential upside of 29.23%. Given Turtle Beach's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Turtle Beach is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Turtle Beach	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.43
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

67.0% of Turtle Beach shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.4% of Turtle Beach shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Turtle Beach has a net margin of 0.40% compared to Energous' net margin of -0.80%. Turtle Beach's return on equity of 1.31% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Turtle Beach	0.40%	1.31%	0.61%
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%

Summary

Turtle Beach beats Energous on 14 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energous News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WATT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WATT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energous	MACH Industry	Industrials Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$83.34M	$33.87B	$9.36B	$12.31B
Dividend Yield	N/A	0.99%	3.51%	9.67%
P/E Ratio	-4.03	27.28	26.93	24.18
Price / Sales	16.16	106.24	1,933.17	78.60
Price / Cash	N/A	24.29	27.31	59.37
Price / Book	2.91	5.31	4.43	6.25
Net Income	-$9.59M	$909.86M	$795.53M	$331.66M
7 Day Performance	-2.01%	-1.67%	0.05%	-1.33%
1 Month Performance	-35.87%	-13.64%	-0.58%	-1.75%
1 Year Performance	3.89%	44.82%	14.36%	18.04%

Energous Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WATT Energous	1.3394 of 5 stars	$16.54 +9.2%	N/A	+1.3%	$83.34M	$5.63M	N/A	50	Positive News
INTZ Intrusion	3.9082 of 5 stars	$0.93 -9.0%	$5.25 +465.5%	-58.1%	$21.13M	$7.09M	N/A	60	News Coverage Gap Down
DVLT Datavault AI	2.1229 of 5 stars	$0.39 +9.0%	$3.00 +677.0%	-52.1%	$330.33M	$39.09M	N/A	40	Gap Up
NNDM Nano Dimension	0.6432 of 5 stars	$1.50 +1.4%	N/A	-1.3%	$318.69M	$102.44M	N/A	340
ALMU Aeluma	1.6246 of 5 stars	$17.04 +5.1%	$25.33 +48.7%	-7.5%	$312.00M	$4.66M	N/A	11	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WATT) was last updated on 7/22/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energous (WATT) Competitors

WATT vs. INTZ, DVLT, NNDM, ALMU, and TBCH

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Datavault AI?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Nano Dimension?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Aeluma?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Turtle Beach?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WATT vs. The Competition

Energous Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Energous (WATT) Competitors

WATT vs. INTZ, DVLT, NNDM, ALMU, and TBCH

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Which has better valuation and earnings, WATT or INTZ?

Is WATT or INTZ more profitable?

Which has more volatility & risk, WATT or INTZ?

Does the media favor WATT or INTZ?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WATT or INTZ?

Do analysts recommend WATT or INTZ?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Datavault AI?

Which has more volatility & risk, WATT or DVLT?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, WATT or DVLT?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in WATT or DVLT?

Does the media prefer WATT or DVLT?

Is WATT or DVLT more profitable?

Do analysts rate WATT or DVLT?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Nano Dimension?

Does the media prefer WATT or NNDM?

Is WATT or NNDM more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WATT or NNDM?

Which has more volatility and risk, WATT or NNDM?

Do analysts recommend WATT or NNDM?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WATT or NNDM?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Aeluma?

Do analysts rate WATT or ALMU?

Does the media prefer WATT or ALMU?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, WATT or ALMU?

Is WATT or ALMU more profitable?

Which has more volatility and risk, WATT or ALMU?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WATT or ALMU?

Summary

How does Energous compare to Turtle Beach?

Which has more risk and volatility, TBCH or WATT?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, TBCH or WATT?

Does the media refer more to TBCH or WATT?

Do analysts recommend TBCH or WATT?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of TBCH or WATT?

Is TBCH or WATT more profitable?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WATT vs. The Competition

Energous Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools