Do analysts prefer WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 760.66%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Intrusion 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Which has better valuation and earnings, WATT or INTZ?

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 11.99 -$9.59M -$2.21 N/A Intrusion $5.79M 2.58 -$9.06M -$0.55 N/A

Is WATT or INTZ more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -191.24%. Energous' return on equity of -28.67% beat Intrusion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -76.37% -28.67% -24.91% Intrusion -191.24% -178.06% -99.59%

Does the media prefer WATT or INTZ?

In the previous week, Intrusion had 2 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Intrusion's score of 0.19 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Intrusion 1 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts prefer ALMU or WATT?

Aeluma currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 96.39%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Aeluma 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 3 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.80 Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has stronger earnings & valuation, ALMU or WATT?

Aeluma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Aeluma $4.46M 52.24 -$9.16M -$0.52 N/A Energous $5.63M 11.99 -$9.59M -$2.21 N/A

Is ALMU or WATT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -205.31%. Aeluma's return on equity of -18.14% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Aeluma -205.31% -18.14% -17.20% Energous -76.37% -28.67% -24.91%

Does the media favor ALMU or WATT?

In the previous week, Aeluma had 17 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Aeluma and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Aeluma's score of 0.11 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Aeluma 4 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 6 Neutral mention(s) 4 Negative mention(s) 1 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate WATT or GSIT?

GSI Technology has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.17%. Given GSI Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GSI Technology is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 GSI Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Is WATT or GSIT more profitable?

GSI Technology has a net margin of -62.90% compared to Energous' net margin of -76.37%. GSI Technology's return on equity of -21.39% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -76.37% -28.67% -24.91% GSI Technology -62.90% -21.39% -17.73%

Does the media refer more to WATT or GSIT?

In the previous week, GSI Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for GSI Technology and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat GSI Technology's score of 0.20 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive GSI Technology 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 4 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts rate WATT or QUIK?

QuickLogic has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 95.90%. Given QuickLogic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe QuickLogic is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 QuickLogic 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25

Is WATT or QUIK more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to QuickLogic's net margin of -80.18%. Energous' return on equity of -28.67% beat QuickLogic's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -76.37% -28.67% -24.91% QuickLogic -80.18% -45.22% -27.93%

Does the media prefer WATT or QUIK?

In the previous week, QuickLogic had 18 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for QuickLogic and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat QuickLogic's score of 0.30 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive QuickLogic 10 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Does the media favor VLN or WATT?

In the previous week, Valens Semiconductor and Valens Semiconductor both had 2 articles in the media. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Valens Semiconductor's score of 0.00 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Valens Semiconductor 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral Energous 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Energous (WATT) Competitors

$12.21 0.00 (0.00%)

Closing price 09/18/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$11.95 -0.26 (-2.15%)

As of 07:31 AM Eastern

Compare

WATT vs. INTZ, ALMU, GSIT, QUIK, and VLN

Should you buy Energous stock or one of its competitors? Energous's main competitors and comparable companies include Intrusion (INTZ), Aeluma (ALMU), GSI Technology (GSIT), QuickLogic (QUIK), and Valens Semiconductor (VLN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, risk, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment and earnings.

Energous has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Intrusion has a beta of -1.55, suggesting that its stock price is 255% less volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.4% of Intrusion shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 10.1% of Intrusion shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -191.24%. Energous' return on equity of -28.67% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-76.37%	-28.67%	-24.91%
Intrusion	-191.24%	-178.06%	-99.59%

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	11.99	-$9.59M	-$2.21	N/A
Intrusion	$5.79M	2.58	-$9.06M	-$0.55	N/A

In the previous week, Intrusion had 2 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Intrusion and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Intrusion's score of 0.19 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Intrusion	1 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Intrusion has a consensus price target of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 760.66%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Intrusion	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Summary

Intrusion beats Energous on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Aeluma?

Aeluma (NASDAQ:ALMU) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Aeluma had 17 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for Aeluma and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Aeluma's score of 0.11 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Aeluma	4 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	6 Neutral mention(s)	4 Negative mention(s)	1 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 14.7% of Aeluma shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Aeluma has a beta of 4.07, indicating that its share price is 307% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Aeluma currently has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 96.39%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Aeluma	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	3 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.80
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Aeluma has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Aeluma	$4.46M	52.24	-$9.16M	-$0.52	N/A
Energous	$5.63M	11.99	-$9.59M	-$2.21	N/A

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -205.31%. Aeluma's return on equity of -18.14% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Aeluma	-205.31%	-18.14%	-17.20%
Energous	-76.37%	-28.67%	-24.91%

Summary

Aeluma beats Energous on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to GSI Technology?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and GSI Technology (NASDAQ:GSIT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings and profitability.

GSI Technology has a consensus price target of $9.00, indicating a potential upside of 69.17%. Given GSI Technology's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe GSI Technology is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
GSI Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

Energous has a beta of 1.56, indicating that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GSI Technology has a beta of 2.1, indicating that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.2% of GSI Technology shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of GSI Technology shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GSI Technology. GSI Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	11.99	-$9.59M	-$2.21	N/A
GSI Technology	$25.15M	8.13	-$13.25M	-$0.46	N/A

GSI Technology has a net margin of -62.90% compared to Energous' net margin of -76.37%. GSI Technology's return on equity of -21.39% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-76.37%	-28.67%	-24.91%
GSI Technology	-62.90%	-21.39%	-17.73%

In the previous week, GSI Technology had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for GSI Technology and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat GSI Technology's score of 0.20 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
GSI Technology	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	4 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

GSI Technology beats Energous on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to QuickLogic?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and QuickLogic (NASDAQ:QUIK) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, risk, dividends, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, QuickLogic had 18 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 20 mentions for QuickLogic and 2 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat QuickLogic's score of 0.30 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
QuickLogic	10 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Energous has a net margin of -76.37% compared to QuickLogic's net margin of -80.18%. Energous' return on equity of -28.67% beat QuickLogic's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-76.37%	-28.67%	-24.91%
QuickLogic	-80.18%	-45.22%	-27.93%

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than QuickLogic. QuickLogic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	11.99	-$9.59M	-$2.21	N/A
QuickLogic	$13.77M	14.26	-$14.82M	-$0.77	N/A

Energous has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its share price is 56% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, QuickLogic has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the broader market.

QuickLogic has a consensus price target of $21.00, indicating a potential upside of 95.90%. Given QuickLogic's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe QuickLogic is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
QuickLogic	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 31.5% of QuickLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 3.2% of QuickLogic shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

QuickLogic beats Energous on 9 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Valens Semiconductor?

Valens Semiconductor (NYSE:VLN) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, earnings and dividends.

33.9% of Valens Semiconductor shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 58.9% of Valens Semiconductor shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Valens Semiconductor and Valens Semiconductor both had 2 articles in the media. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.59 beat Valens Semiconductor's score of 0.00 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Valens Semiconductor	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Energous	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Valens Semiconductor currently has a consensus price target of $4.00, suggesting a potential upside of 143.16%. Given Valens Semiconductor's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Valens Semiconductor is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Valens Semiconductor	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

Valens Semiconductor has a net margin of -45.23% compared to Energous' net margin of -76.37%. Energous' return on equity of -28.67% beat Valens Semiconductor's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Valens Semiconductor	-45.23%	-30.58%	-23.97%
Energous	-76.37%	-28.67%	-24.91%

Valens Semiconductor has a beta of 1.39, suggesting that its stock price is 39% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.56, suggesting that its stock price is 56% more volatile than the broader market.

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Valens Semiconductor. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Valens Semiconductor, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Valens Semiconductor	$71.70M	2.48	-$31.58M	-$0.32	N/A
Energous	$5.63M	11.99	-$9.59M	-$2.21	N/A

Summary

Valens Semiconductor beats Energous on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energous News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WATT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WATT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energous	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$67.52M	$112.02B	$30.17B	$12.94B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.65%	2.75%	12.80%
P/E Ratio	-5.52	80.12	77.36	25.40
Price / Sales	11.99	86.88	588.60	82.07
Price / Cash	N/A	62.32	46.90	34.74
Price / Book	2.15	10.49	7.80	6.32
Net Income	-$9.59M	$2.05B	$701.04M	$358.20M
7 Day Performance	11.10%	4.37%	0.09%	0.42%
1 Month Performance	-3.33%	-1.51%	-2.87%	-3.30%
1 Year Performance	60.03%	77.22%	176.54%	5.33%

Energous Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WATT Energous	0.2635 of 5 stars	$12.21 flat	N/A	+60.0%	$67.52M	$5.63M	N/A	27	News Coverage Gap Down
INTZ Intrusion	3.1303 of 5 stars	$0.80 -10.0%	$5.25 +555.6%	-68.7%	$21.81M	$7.09M	N/A	60	News Coverage Gap Up
ALMU Aeluma	2.2584 of 5 stars	$13.13 +4.7%	$25.00 +90.4%	-34.7%	$229.55M	$4.66M	N/A	14	Earnings Report Gap Down
GSIT GSI Technology	1.6899 of 5 stars	$4.90 -1.6%	$9.00 +83.7%	+45.4%	$191.39M	$25.12M	N/A	125
QUIK QuickLogic	2.2194 of 5 stars	$10.20 -1.3%	$21.00 +105.9%	+84.5%	$189.22M	$13.77M	N/A	51	Insider Trade

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WATT) was last updated on 9/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energous (WATT) Competitors