Do analysts rate INTZ or WATT?

Intrusion presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 603.75%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Intrusion 1 Sell rating(s) 2 Hold rating(s) 1 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00 Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, INTZ or WATT?

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Intrusion $7.09M 2.39 -$9.06M -$0.52 N/A Energous $5.63M 18.33 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A

Is INTZ or WATT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Intrusion -169.48% -129.84% -87.05% Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46%

Do analysts prefer WATT or ALMU?

Aeluma has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.04%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 Aeluma 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 1 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.75

Which has higher earnings & valuation, WATT or ALMU?

Aeluma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Energous $5.63M 18.33 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A Aeluma $4.66M 69.64 -$3.02M -$0.35 N/A

Is WATT or ALMU more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -115.57%. Aeluma's return on equity of -12.03% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% Aeluma -115.57% -12.03% -11.42%

Do analysts prefer QUIK or WATT?

QuickLogic currently has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.31%. Given QuickLogic's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe QuickLogic is more favorable than Energous. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score QuickLogic 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 2 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.25 Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Is QUIK or WATT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to QuickLogic's net margin of -102.41%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat QuickLogic's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets QuickLogic -102.41% -48.97% -27.97% Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46%

Do analysts recommend WATT or GSIT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50 GSI Technology 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Is WATT or GSIT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to GSI Technology's net margin of -62.90%. GSI Technology's return on equity of -23.27% beat Energous' return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46% GSI Technology -62.90% -23.27% -19.11%

Do analysts prefer ATOM or WATT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Atomera 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Energous 1 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.50

Which has higher valuation and earnings, ATOM or WATT?

Energous has higher revenue and earnings than Atomera. Atomera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Atomera $60K 3,566.11 -$20.17M -$0.65 N/A Energous $5.63M 18.33 -$9.59M -$4.10 N/A

Is ATOM or WATT more profitable?

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Atomera's net margin of -9,742.17%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Atomera's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Atomera -9,742.17% -77.91% -70.64% Energous -0.80% -39.80% -33.46%

Energous (WATT) Competitors

$18.77 +0.22 (+1.18%)

As of 10:10 AM Eastern

Compare

WATT vs. INTZ, ALMU, QUIK, GSIT, and ATOM

Should you buy Energous stock or one of its competitors? Energous's main competitors and comparable companies include Intrusion (INTZ), Aeluma (ALMU), QuickLogic (QUIK), GSI Technology (GSIT), and Atomera (ATOM). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Energous compare to Intrusion?

Intrusion (NASDAQ:INTZ) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Intrusion's net margin of -169.48%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Intrusion's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Intrusion	-169.48%	-129.84%	-87.05%
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%

Intrusion presently has a consensus target price of $5.25, suggesting a potential upside of 603.75%. Given Intrusion's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Intrusion is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Intrusion	1 Sell rating(s)	2 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

19.4% of Intrusion shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 10.1% of Intrusion shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Intrusion has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Intrusion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Intrusion	$7.09M	2.39	-$9.06M	-$0.52	N/A
Energous	$5.63M	18.33	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A

In the previous week, Intrusion had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Intrusion and 0 mentions for Energous. Intrusion's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Energous' score of 0.00 indicating that Intrusion is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Intrusion	Neutral
Energous	Neutral

Intrusion has a beta of -1.57, meaning that its stock price is 257% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.58, meaning that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Intrusion beats Energous on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Aeluma?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Aeluma (NASDAQ:ALMU) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability, institutional ownership, valuation and earnings.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Aeluma's net margin of -115.57%. Aeluma's return on equity of -12.03% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
Aeluma	-115.57%	-12.03%	-11.42%

Aeluma has a consensus target price of $25.00, suggesting a potential upside of 41.04%. Given Aeluma's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Aeluma is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
Aeluma	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.75

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 14.7% of Aeluma shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Energous has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Aeluma has a beta of 4.19, suggesting that its share price is 319% more volatile than the broader market.

Aeluma has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Energous. Aeluma is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	18.33	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
Aeluma	$4.66M	69.64	-$3.02M	-$0.35	N/A

In the previous week, Aeluma had 1 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Aeluma and 0 mentions for Energous. Aeluma's average media sentiment score of 0.47 beat Energous' score of 0.00 indicating that Aeluma is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energous	Neutral
Aeluma	Neutral

Summary

Aeluma beats Energous on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to QuickLogic?

QuickLogic (NASDAQ:QUIK) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation and institutional ownership.

QuickLogic currently has a consensus target price of $22.00, indicating a potential upside of 57.31%. Given QuickLogic's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe QuickLogic is more favorable than Energous.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
QuickLogic	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	2 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.25
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, QuickLogic had 3 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for QuickLogic and 0 mentions for Energous. QuickLogic's average media sentiment score of 0.42 beat Energous' score of 0.00 indicating that QuickLogic is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
QuickLogic	Neutral
Energous	Neutral

31.5% of QuickLogic shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.2% of QuickLogic shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

QuickLogic has a beta of 1.24, indicating that its share price is 24% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to QuickLogic's net margin of -102.41%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat QuickLogic's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
QuickLogic	-102.41%	-48.97%	-27.97%
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than QuickLogic. QuickLogic is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
QuickLogic	$13.77M	18.51	-$14.82M	-$0.89	N/A
Energous	$5.63M	18.33	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A

Summary

QuickLogic beats Energous on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to GSI Technology?

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and GSI Technology (NASDAQ:GSIT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment and earnings.

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than GSI Technology. GSI Technology is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Energous	$5.63M	18.33	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A
GSI Technology	$25.12M	10.22	-$13.25M	-$0.46	N/A

4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 33.2% of GSI Technology shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 16.6% of GSI Technology shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energous has a beta of 1.58, indicating that its share price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, GSI Technology has a beta of 2.11, indicating that its share price is 111% more volatile than the broader market.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to GSI Technology's net margin of -62.90%. GSI Technology's return on equity of -23.27% beat Energous' return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%
GSI Technology	-62.90%	-23.27%	-19.11%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50
GSI Technology	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, GSI Technology's average media sentiment score of 1.00 beat Energous' score of 0.00 indicating that GSI Technology is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Energous	Neutral
GSI Technology	Positive

Summary

GSI Technology beats Energous on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Energous compare to Atomera?

Atomera (NASDAQ:ATOM) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, earnings and risk.

Energous has higher revenue and earnings than Atomera. Atomera is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Atomera	$60K	3,566.11	-$20.17M	-$0.65	N/A
Energous	$5.63M	18.33	-$9.59M	-$4.10	N/A

30.8% of Atomera shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.4% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 8.1% of Atomera shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Energous has a net margin of -0.80% compared to Atomera's net margin of -9,742.17%. Energous' return on equity of -39.80% beat Atomera's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Atomera	-9,742.17%	-77.91%	-70.64%
Energous	-0.80%	-39.80%	-33.46%

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Atomera	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Energous	1 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.50

In the previous week, Atomera had 8 more articles in the media than Energous. MarketBeat recorded 8 mentions for Atomera and 0 mentions for Energous. Energous' average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Atomera's score of -0.04 indicating that Energous is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Atomera	Neutral
Energous	Neutral

Atomera has a beta of 2.11, suggesting that its stock price is 111% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Energous beats Atomera on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Energous News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WATT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WATT vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Energous	Semiconductors & Semiconductor Equipment Industry	Technology Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$105.24M	$103.79B	$29.65B	$12.90B
Dividend Yield	N/A	1.50%	2.73%	10.06%
P/E Ratio	-4.67	85.60	74.91	24.78
Price / Sales	18.33	99.68	599.51	95.48
Price / Cash	N/A	69.41	50.51	37.42
Price / Book	3.30	11.25	8.19	6.45
Net Income	-$9.59M	$1.86B	$677.77M	$346.92M
7 Day Performance	5.14%	-0.21%	0.91%	0.93%
1 Month Performance	4.32%	-4.81%	0.30%	-0.64%
1 Year Performance	152.92%	123.16%	197.76%	22.23%

Energous Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WATT Energous	0.8915 of 5 stars	$18.77 +1.2%	N/A	+6,265.8%	$105.24M	$5.63M	N/A	50
INTZ Intrusion	3.7304 of 5 stars	$0.77 +0.5%	$5.25 +578.1%	-55.1%	$17.62M	$7.09M	N/A	60
ALMU Aeluma	1.6569 of 5 stars	$18.24 +9.4%	$25.00 +37.1%	-16.3%	$333.97M	$4.66M	N/A	11	Gap Up
QUIK QuickLogic	2.0341 of 5 stars	$14.65 +9.3%	$22.00 +50.2%	+133.6%	$267.07M	$13.77M	N/A	50	Gap Up
GSIT GSI Technology	0.4847 of 5 stars	$6.83 +12.5%	N/A	+101.2%	$262.07M	$25.12M	N/A	180	Gap Up

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WATT) was last updated on 8/11/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Energous (WATT) Competitors