Energous Competitors

Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) and Casa Systems (NASDAQ:CASA) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, risk, profitability, dividends, valuation and earnings.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Energous and Casa Systems' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Energous has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Casa Systems. Casa Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of recent ratings for Energous and Casa Systems, as reported by MarketBeat.

Casa Systems has a consensus target price of $9.75, suggesting a potential upside of 30.70%. Given Casa Systems' higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Casa Systems is more favorable than Energous.

Volatility & Risk

Energous has a beta of 3.99, suggesting that its share price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Casa Systems has a beta of 1.2, suggesting that its share price is 20% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Energous and Casa Systems' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

10.5% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 68.3% of Casa Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 5.1% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 63.9% of Casa Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Casa Systems beats Energous on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Gilat Satellite Networks (NASDAQ:GILT) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and earnings.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

31.1% of Gilat Satellite Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 1.1% of Gilat Satellite Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Gilat Satellite Networks has a beta of 0.63, suggesting that its stock price is 37% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 3.99, suggesting that its stock price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Gilat Satellite Networks and Energous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Gilat Satellite Networks and Energous, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Gilat Satellite Networks and Energous' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gilat Satellite Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Energous.

Summary

Gilat Satellite Networks beats Energous on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

Sierra Wireless (NASDAQ:SWIR) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, risk, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Sierra Wireless and Energous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Sierra Wireless has a beta of 2.36, suggesting that its share price is 136% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 3.99, suggesting that its share price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and price targets for Sierra Wireless and Energous, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sierra Wireless presently has a consensus price target of $19.50, indicating a potential upside of 27.53%. Given Sierra Wireless' higher probable upside, research analysts clearly believe Sierra Wireless is more favorable than Energous.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

46.4% of Sierra Wireless shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Sierra Wireless shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Energous shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Sierra Wireless and Energous' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Sierra Wireless. Sierra Wireless is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Sierra Wireless beats Energous on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

CalAmp (NASDAQ:CAMP) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, risk and dividends.

Volatility and Risk

CalAmp has a beta of 2.48, indicating that its stock price is 148% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 3.99, indicating that its stock price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

74.1% of CalAmp shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 3.4% of CalAmp shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Energous shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent ratings and recommmendations for CalAmp and Energous, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

CalAmp currently has a consensus target price of $9.45, indicating a potential downside of 14.94%. Given CalAmp's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe CalAmp is more favorable than Energous.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares CalAmp and Energous' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Energous has lower revenue, but higher earnings than CalAmp. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than CalAmp, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares CalAmp and Energous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

CalAmp beats Energous on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Ceragon Networks (NASDAQ:CRNT) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, dividends, profitability, valuation, earnings and institutional ownership.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for Ceragon Networks and Energous, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Ceragon Networks currently has a consensus target price of $3.75, indicating a potential upside of 3.02%. Given Ceragon Networks' higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Ceragon Networks is more favorable than Energous.

Profitability

This table compares Ceragon Networks and Energous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Ceragon Networks and Energous' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Ceragon Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Ceragon Networks is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Energous, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility & Risk

Ceragon Networks has a beta of 2.03, suggesting that its share price is 103% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 3.99, suggesting that its share price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

9.7% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Energous shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.0% of Ceragon Networks shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Energous shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Ceragon Networks beats Energous on 9 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Aviat Networks (NASDAQ:AVNW) and Energous (NASDAQ:WATT) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and analyst recommendations.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Aviat Networks and Energous' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Aviat Networks has higher revenue and earnings than Energous. Energous is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Aviat Networks, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

56.0% of Aviat Networks shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.5% of Energous shares are held by institutional investors. 3.7% of Aviat Networks shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 5.1% of Energous shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent ratings for Aviat Networks and Energous, as provided by MarketBeat.

Aviat Networks presently has a consensus price target of $57.00, suggesting a potential upside of 8.08%. Given Aviat Networks' higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Aviat Networks is more favorable than Energous.

Profitability

This table compares Aviat Networks and Energous' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Aviat Networks has a beta of 2.08, indicating that its stock price is 108% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Energous has a beta of 3.99, indicating that its stock price is 299% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Aviat Networks beats Energous on 10 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.