Do analysts recommend WLDS or SCKT?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wearable Devices 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Socket Mobile 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WLDS or SCKT?

Wearable Devices has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Socket Mobile. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wearable Devices $650K 4.17 -$8.11M N/A N/A Socket Mobile $15.08M 0.52 -$14.38M -$1.79 N/A

Does the media prefer WLDS or SCKT?

In the previous week, Wearable Devices and Wearable Devices both had 4 articles in the media. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Socket Mobile's score of 0.11 indicating that Wearable Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wearable Devices 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Socket Mobile 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 1 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Do analysts recommend CIIT or WLDS?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Tianci International 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Wearable Devices 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CIIT or WLDS?

Tianci International has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Tianci International $11.93M 0.49 -$2.64M -$1.33 N/A Wearable Devices $650K 4.17 -$8.11M N/A N/A

Does the media favor CIIT or WLDS?

In the previous week, Tianci International and Tianci International both had 4 articles in the media. Tianci International's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.72 indicating that Tianci International is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Tianci International 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Wearable Devices 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate WLDS or HUBC?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wearable Devices 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Hub Cyber Security 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00

Which has better earnings and valuation, WLDS or HUBC?

Wearable Devices has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hub Cyber Security. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wearable Devices $650K 4.17 -$8.11M N/A N/A Hub Cyber Security $29.56M 0.00 -$39.76M N/A N/A

Is WLDS or HUBC more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Wearable Devices N/A N/A N/A Hub Cyber Security N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer WLDS or HUBC?

In the previous week, Hub Cyber Security had 9 more articles in the media than Wearable Devices. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Hub Cyber Security and 4 mentions for Wearable Devices. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Hub Cyber Security's score of 0.70 indicating that Wearable Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wearable Devices 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hub Cyber Security 5 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 3 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts rate WLDS or STK?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wearable Devices 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has better valuation & earnings, WLDS or STK?

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wearable Devices $650K 4.17 -$8.11M N/A N/A Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund $154.41M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is WLDS or STK more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Wearable Devices N/A N/A N/A Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund N/A N/A N/A

Do analysts prefer WLDS or EVLVW?

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score Wearable Devices 1 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 1.00 Evolv Technologies 0 Sell rating(s) 0 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 0.00

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, WLDS or EVLVW?

Evolv Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Wearable Devices $650K 4.17 -$8.11M N/A N/A Evolv Technologies $160.23M N/A N/A N/A N/A

Is WLDS or EVLVW more profitable?

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Wearable Devices N/A N/A N/A Evolv Technologies N/A N/A N/A

Does the media prefer WLDS or EVLVW?

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 2 more articles in the media than Evolv Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wearable Devices and 2 mentions for Evolv Technologies. Evolv Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.72 indicating that Evolv Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Wearable Devices 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Evolv Technologies 0 Very Positive mention(s) 0 Positive mention(s) 1 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

$0.77 -0.01 (-1.08%)

Closing price 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.81 +0.04 (+5.52%)

As of 07:49 PM Eastern

Compare

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

Should you buy Wearable Devices stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wearable Devices with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wearable Devices include Socket Mobile (SCKT), Tianci International (CIIT), Hub Cyber Security (HUBC), Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK), and Evolv Technologies (EVLVW). These companies are all part of the "computer hardware" industry.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Socket Mobile (NASDAQ:SCKT) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation, risk, earnings, profitability, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

Wearable Devices has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Socket Mobile's net margin of -96.43%. Wearable Devices' return on equity of 0.00% beat Socket Mobile's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Socket Mobile	-96.43%	-142.25%	-70.58%

Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.03, meaning that its share price is 203% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Socket Mobile has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 3.8% of Socket Mobile shares are owned by institutional investors. 54.8% of Socket Mobile shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Wearable Devices has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Socket Mobile.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.17	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Socket Mobile	$15.08M	0.52	-$14.38M	-$1.79	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Socket Mobile	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Wearable Devices and Wearable Devices both had 4 articles in the media. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Socket Mobile's score of 0.11 indicating that Wearable Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Socket Mobile	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	1 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Socket Mobile on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Tianci International (NASDAQ:CIIT) and Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations, valuation and media sentiment.

Tianci International has a beta of 0.75, meaning that its stock price is 25% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.03, meaning that its stock price is 203% more volatile than the broader market.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Tianci International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Tianci International has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Tianci International	$11.93M	0.49	-$2.64M	-$1.33	N/A
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.17	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Tianci International and Tianci International both had 4 articles in the media. Tianci International's average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.72 indicating that Tianci International is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Tianci International	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 56.5% of Tianci International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Wearable Devices has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tianci International's net margin of -26.01%. Wearable Devices' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tianci International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Tianci International	-26.01%	-96.90%	-91.80%
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Tianci International on 6 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Hub Cyber Security (NASDAQ:HUBC) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, media sentiment, institutional ownership, dividends, profitability and risk.

Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.03, meaning that its stock price is 203% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hub Cyber Security has a beta of -1.16, meaning that its stock price is 216% less volatile than the broader market.

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.7% of Hub Cyber Security shares are held by institutional investors. 6.7% of Hub Cyber Security shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Hub Cyber Security	N/A	N/A	N/A

Wearable Devices has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Hub Cyber Security.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.17	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Hub Cyber Security	$29.56M	0.00	-$39.76M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Hub Cyber Security	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Hub Cyber Security had 9 more articles in the media than Wearable Devices. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for Hub Cyber Security and 4 mentions for Wearable Devices. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Hub Cyber Security's score of 0.70 indicating that Wearable Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hub Cyber Security	5 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	3 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Wearable Devices and Hub Cyber Security tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (NYSE:STK) are both computer hardware companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, risk, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.03, meaning that its share price is 203% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 3.3, meaning that its share price is 230% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.17	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	$154.41M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wearable Devices and 3 mentions for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.72 beat Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's score of 0.64 indicating that Wearable Devices is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund on 4 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Evolv Technologies (NASDAQ:EVLVW) are both computer hardware companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, dividends, risk, valuation and profitability.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Evolv Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Evolv Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.17	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Evolv Technologies	$160.23M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Evolv Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 2 more articles in the media than Evolv Technologies. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Wearable Devices and 2 mentions for Evolv Technologies. Evolv Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.93 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.72 indicating that Evolv Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Evolv Technologies	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Evolv Technologies on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wearable Devices News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WLDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WLDS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Wearable Devices	Technology Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$2.74M	$3.96B	$6.59B	$11.95B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.14%	3.10%	5.61%
P/E Ratio	N/A	39.50	27.45	23.63
Price / Sales	4.17	45.36	398.34	104.27
Price / Cash	N/A	39.05	23.44	54.72
Price / Book	0.08	4.61	5.73	6.70
Net Income	-$8.11M	$31.68M	$202.45M	$337.26M
7 Day Performance	-10.23%	-5.61%	-1.77%	-1.41%
1 Month Performance	-25.48%	12.08%	5.74%	1.15%
1 Year Performance	-83.91%	16.99%	28.83%	22.61%

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WLDS Wearable Devices	0.6418 of 5 stars	$0.77 -1.1%	N/A	-83.6%	$2.74M	$650K	N/A	20	News Coverage Short Interest Decrease Gap Up
SCKT Socket Mobile	0.417 of 5 stars	$0.84 -2.0%	N/A	-26.4%	$7.09M	$15.08M	N/A	50	News Coverage Short Interest Increase Gap Up High Trading Volume
CIIT Tianci International	0.6431 of 5 stars	$1.20 +1.7%	N/A	N/A	$4.27M	$9.28M	N/A	N/A	Short Interest Decrease Gap Up Trading Halted High Trading Volume
HUBC Hub Cyber Security	1.6654 of 5 stars	$1.51 -14.2%	N/A	-100.0%	$110K	$29.56M	N/A	720	News Coverage Insider Trade Stock Split Short Interest Decrease Gap Down
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	N/A	$49.72 -3.7%	N/A	+69.7%	$0.00	$154.41M	N/A	N/A	News Coverage Short Interest Increase High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WLDS) was last updated on 6/10/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WLDS vs. The Competition

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Is WLDS or SCKT more profitable?

Which has more risk and volatility, WLDS or SCKT?

Do insiders and institutionals hold more shares of WLDS or SCKT?

Which has stronger valuation and earnings, WLDS or SCKT?

Do analysts recommend WLDS or SCKT?

Does the media prefer WLDS or SCKT?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Which has more risk & volatility, CIIT or WLDS?

Do analysts recommend CIIT or WLDS?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, CIIT or WLDS?

Does the media favor CIIT or WLDS?

Do insiders & institutionals believe in CIIT or WLDS?

Is CIIT or WLDS more profitable?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Which has more volatility & risk, WLDS or HUBC?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of WLDS or HUBC?

Is WLDS or HUBC more profitable?

Which has better earnings and valuation, WLDS or HUBC?

Do analysts rate WLDS or HUBC?

Does the media prefer WLDS or HUBC?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Which has more risk & volatility, WLDS or STK?

Which has better valuation & earnings, WLDS or STK?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of WLDS or STK?

Is WLDS or STK more profitable?

Do analysts rate WLDS or STK?

Does the media refer more to WLDS or STK?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Do analysts prefer WLDS or EVLVW?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, WLDS or EVLVW?

Is WLDS or EVLVW more profitable?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in WLDS or EVLVW?

Does the media prefer WLDS or EVLVW?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WLDS vs. The Competition

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools