Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

$0.78 -0.10 (-10.97%)

Closing price 05/19/2026 04:00 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$0.78 +0.01 (+1.02%)

As of 05/19/2026 07:56 PM Eastern

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

Should you buy Wearable Devices stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Wearable Devices with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Wearable Devices include Socket Mobile (SCKT), Tianci International (CIIT), Hub Cyber Security (HUBC), Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (STK), and Evolv Technologies (EVLVW). These companies are all part of the "computer hardware" industry.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Socket Mobile (NASDAQ:SCKT) and Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, institutional ownership and media sentiment.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Socket Mobile	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Socket Mobile has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.15, suggesting that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Socket Mobile. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Wearable Devices and 1 mentions for Socket Mobile. Socket Mobile's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Wearable Devices'average media sentiment score.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Socket Mobile	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	1 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Wearable Devices has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Socket Mobile.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Socket Mobile	$15.08M	0.47	-$14.38M	-$1.79	N/A
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.21	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A

Wearable Devices has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Socket Mobile's net margin of -96.43%. Wearable Devices' return on equity of 0.00% beat Socket Mobile's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Socket Mobile	-96.43%	-142.25%	-70.58%
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A

3.8% of Socket Mobile shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 54.8% of Socket Mobile shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Socket Mobile on 7 of the 10 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Tianci International (NASDAQ:CIIT) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, valuation and risk.

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are held by institutional investors. 56.5% of Tianci International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Tianci International	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 2 more articles in the media than Tianci International. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Wearable Devices and 0 mentions for Tianci International. Wearable Devices' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Tianci International'saverage media sentiment score.

Company	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	Neutral
Tianci International	Neutral

Tianci International has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.21	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Tianci International	$9.28M	0.52	-$2.64M	-$1.33	N/A

Wearable Devices has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Tianci International's net margin of -26.01%. Wearable Devices' return on equity of 0.00% beat Tianci International's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Tianci International	-26.01%	-96.90%	-91.80%

Summary

Wearable Devices beats Tianci International on 6 of the 9 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Hub Cyber Security (NASDAQ:HUBC) and Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) are both small-cap computer hardware companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, valuation, institutional ownership, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations and dividends.

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Hub Cyber Security. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Wearable Devices and 1 mentions for Hub Cyber Security. Hub Cyber Security's average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.00 indicating that Hub Cyber Security is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Hub Cyber Security	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Hub Cyber Security	N/A	N/A	N/A
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A

Wearable Devices has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Hub Cyber Security.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Hub Cyber Security	$29.56M	0.01	-$39.76M	N/A	N/A
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.21	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Hub Cyber Security	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

Hub Cyber Security has a beta of -0.9, indicating that its stock price is 190% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.15, indicating that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the broader market.

4.7% of Hub Cyber Security shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are owned by institutional investors. 6.7% of Hub Cyber Security shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Hub Cyber Security and Wearable Devices tied by winning 4 of the 8 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund (NYSE:STK) and Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) are both computer hardware companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, earnings and risk.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	N/A	N/A	N/A
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00

0.2% of Wearable Devices shares are held by institutional investors. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has a beta of 3.3, meaning that its stock price is 230% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Wearable Devices has a beta of 3.15, meaning that its stock price is 215% more volatile than the broader market.

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	$154.41M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.21	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Wearable Devices had 1 more articles in the media than Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund. MarketBeat recorded 2 mentions for Wearable Devices and 1 mentions for Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund. Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund's average media sentiment score of 0.90 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.00 indicating that Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

Summary

Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund and Wearable Devices tied by winning 3 of the 6 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Wearable Devices (NASDAQ:WLDS) and Evolv Technologies (NASDAQ:EVLVW) are both computer hardware companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, risk, media sentiment, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability and earnings.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Wearable Devices	N/A	N/A	N/A
Evolv Technologies	N/A	N/A	N/A

In the previous week, Evolv Technologies had 3 more articles in the media than Wearable Devices. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Evolv Technologies and 2 mentions for Wearable Devices. Evolv Technologies' average media sentiment score of 0.66 beat Wearable Devices' score of 0.00 indicating that Evolv Technologies is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Wearable Devices	0 Very Positive mention(s)	0 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral
Evolv Technologies	2 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Evolv Technologies has higher revenue and earnings than Wearable Devices.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Wearable Devices	$650K	4.21	-$8.11M	N/A	N/A
Evolv Technologies	$160.23M	N/A	N/A	N/A	N/A

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Wearable Devices	1 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.00
Evolv Technologies	0 Sell rating(s)	0 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	0.00

Summary

Evolv Technologies beats Wearable Devices on 3 of the 5 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Wearable Devices News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding WLDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

WLDS vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	Wearable Devices	Technology Services Industry	Business Sector	NASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap	$3.07M	$3.70B	$6.49B	$12.23B
Dividend Yield	N/A	2.21%	3.15%	5.32%
P/E Ratio	N/A	46.95	29.17	25.05
Price / Sales	4.21	48.82	399.47	72.69
Price / Cash	N/A	38.11	22.70	54.25
Price / Book	0.08	5.20	6.75	6.83
Net Income	-$8.11M	$31.26M	$204.94M	$335.69M
7 Day Performance	-23.26%	-3.62%	-1.52%	-2.15%
1 Month Performance	-40.38%	-7.37%	-5.27%	-2.47%
1 Year Performance	-84.80%	24.88%	28.34%	27.13%

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
WLDS Wearable Devices	0.1461 of 5 stars	$0.78 -11.0%	N/A	-83.5%	$3.07M	$650K	N/A	20	Short Interest Increase Gap Down
SCKT Socket Mobile	0.4869 of 5 stars	$0.86 -2.7%	N/A	-27.5%	$7.27M	$15.08M	N/A	50	Gap Down
CIIT Tianci International	0.4596 of 5 stars	$1.35 -5.6%	N/A	N/A	$5.17M	$9.28M	N/A	N/A	Positive News Gap Down
HUBC Hub Cyber Security	1.0092 of 5 stars	$0.17 -10.6%	N/A	-100.0%	$230K	$29.56M	N/A	720	Positive News Gap Down
STK Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund	N/A	$51.18 -1.3%	N/A	+69.0%	$0.00	$154.41M	N/A	N/A	Positive News High Trading Volume

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NASDAQ:WLDS) was last updated on 5/20/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Get 30 Days of MarketBeat All Access for Free

Start Your 30-Day Trial

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WLDS vs. The Competition

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

Wearable Devices (WLDS) Competitors

WLDS vs. SCKT, CIIT, HUBC, STK, and EVLVW

How does Wearable Devices compare to Socket Mobile?

Do analysts prefer SCKT or WLDS?

Which has more volatility & risk, SCKT or WLDS?

Does the media favor SCKT or WLDS?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, SCKT or WLDS?

Is SCKT or WLDS more profitable?

Do institutionals & insiders have more ownership in SCKT or WLDS?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Tianci International?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in WLDS or CIIT?

Do analysts rate WLDS or CIIT?

Does the media favor WLDS or CIIT?

Which has preferable valuation and earnings, WLDS or CIIT?

Is WLDS or CIIT more profitable?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Hub Cyber Security?

Does the media prefer HUBC or WLDS?

Is HUBC or WLDS more profitable?

Which has better valuation & earnings, HUBC or WLDS?

Do analysts recommend HUBC or WLDS?

Which has more volatility & risk, HUBC or WLDS?

Do insiders and institutionals believe in HUBC or WLDS?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Columbia Seligman Premium Technology Growth Fund?

Is STK or WLDS more profitable?

Do analysts rate STK or WLDS?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in STK or WLDS?

Which has more volatility and risk, STK or WLDS?

Which has stronger earnings and valuation, STK or WLDS?

Does the media prefer STK or WLDS?

Summary

How does Wearable Devices compare to Evolv Technologies?

Is WLDS or EVLVW more profitable?

Do insiders & institutionals have more ownership in WLDS or EVLVW?

Does the media prefer WLDS or EVLVW?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, WLDS or EVLVW?

Do analysts recommend WLDS or EVLVW?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

WLDS vs. The Competition

Wearable Devices Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools