Expion360 (XPON) Competitors

Flux Power has a beta of 1.72, meaning that its stock price is 72% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expion360 has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Flux Power had 1 more articles in the media than Expion360. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Flux Power and 0 mentions for Expion360. Flux Power's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Expion360'saverage media sentiment score.

Expion360 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Flux Power. Flux Power is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expion360, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flux Power has a net margin of -8.36% compared to Expion360's net margin of -64.61%. Flux Power's return on equity of 0.00% beat Expion360's return on equity.

38.0% of Flux Power shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Expion360 shares are held by institutional investors. 22.0% of Flux Power shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Expion360 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Energy Focus has a beta of 2.15, meaning that its stock price is 115% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expion360 has a beta of 0.54, meaning that its stock price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Energy Focus' average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Expion360'saverage media sentiment score.

Energy Focus has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Expion360. Energy Focus is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Expion360, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Energy Focus has a net margin of -28.85% compared to Expion360's net margin of -64.61%. Energy Focus' return on equity of -31.83% beat Expion360's return on equity.

3.7% of Energy Focus shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Expion360 shares are held by institutional investors. 39.9% of Energy Focus shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Expion360 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

8.2% of Dragonfly Energy shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Expion360 shares are held by institutional investors. 3.1% of Dragonfly Energy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Expion360 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Dragonfly Energy has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expion360 has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Dragonfly Energy currently has a consensus target price of $3.25, suggesting a potential upside of 55.50%. Given Dragonfly Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Dragonfly Energy is more favorable than Expion360.

In the previous week, Dragonfly Energy had 1 more articles in the media than Expion360. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for Dragonfly Energy and 0 mentions for Expion360. Dragonfly Energy's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled Expion360'saverage media sentiment score.

Expion360 has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Dragonfly Energy. Expion360 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dragonfly Energy, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Expion360 has a net margin of -64.61% compared to Dragonfly Energy's net margin of -119.29%. Dragonfly Energy's return on equity of 0.00% beat Expion360's return on equity.

1.9% of Laser Photonics shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.5% of Expion360 shares are held by institutional investors. 1.6% of Laser Photonics shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Expion360 shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Laser Photonics has a beta of 2.53, indicating that its share price is 153% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Expion360 has a beta of 0.54, indicating that its share price is 46% less volatile than the S&P 500.

In the previous week, Laser Photonics had 6 more articles in the media than Expion360. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Laser Photonics and 0 mentions for Expion360. Expion360's average media sentiment score of 0.00 beat Laser Photonics' score of -0.77 indicating that Expion360 is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Expion360 has higher revenue and earnings than Laser Photonics. Expion360 is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Laser Photonics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Laser Photonics has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Expion360's net margin of -64.61%. Laser Photonics' return on equity of 0.00% beat Expion360's return on equity.