Coherent (COHR) Competitors

Coherent has a net margin of 11.31% compared to Lumentum's net margin of -230.15%. Lumentum's return on equity of 26.34% beat Coherent's return on equity.

Lumentum has a beta of 1.53, meaning that its stock price is 53% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coherent has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Lumentum presently has a consensus target price of $1,053.83, suggesting a potential upside of 13.68%. Coherent has a consensus target price of $397.63, suggesting a potential upside of 30.42%. Given Coherent's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Coherent is more favorable than Lumentum.

Coherent has higher revenue and earnings than Lumentum. Lumentum is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coherent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

94.1% of Lumentum shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Coherent shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Lumentum shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Coherent shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Lumentum had 34 more articles in the media than Coherent. MarketBeat recorded 40 mentions for Lumentum and 6 mentions for Coherent. Lumentum's average media sentiment score of 0.79 beat Coherent's score of 0.05 indicating that Lumentum is being referred to more favorably in the media.

83.3% of Coherent shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 84.6% of Lam Research shares are held by institutional investors. 0.5% of Coherent shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of Lam Research shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Lam Research has a net margin of 31.27% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.31%. Lam Research's return on equity of 67.60% beat Coherent's return on equity.

Lam Research has higher revenue and earnings than Coherent. Lam Research is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coherent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Lam Research had 51 more articles in the media than Coherent. MarketBeat recorded 57 mentions for Lam Research and 6 mentions for Coherent. Lam Research's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Coherent's score of 0.05 indicating that Lam Research is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Coherent presently has a consensus price target of $397.63, indicating a potential upside of 30.42%. Lam Research has a consensus price target of $361.81, indicating a potential upside of 21.32%. Given Coherent's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Coherent is more favorable than Lam Research.

Coherent has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Lam Research has a beta of 1.85, suggesting that its share price is 85% more volatile than the broader market.

Coherent has a net margin of 11.31% compared to MKS's net margin of 10.15%. MKS's return on equity of 24.72% beat Coherent's return on equity.

MKS currently has a consensus price target of $382.86, suggesting a potential upside of 43.23%. Coherent has a consensus price target of $397.63, suggesting a potential upside of 30.42%. Given MKS's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe MKS is more favorable than Coherent.

In the previous week, MKS had 1 more articles in the media than Coherent. MarketBeat recorded 7 mentions for MKS and 6 mentions for Coherent. MKS's average media sentiment score of 1.44 beat Coherent's score of 0.05 indicating that MKS is being referred to more favorably in the media.

MKS has a beta of 1.98, suggesting that its stock price is 98% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coherent has a beta of 2.1, suggesting that its stock price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

99.8% of MKS shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Coherent shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of MKS shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Coherent shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Coherent has higher revenue and earnings than MKS. MKS is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Coherent, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marvell Technology currently has a consensus price target of $270.47, indicating a potential upside of 14.56%. Coherent has a consensus price target of $397.63, indicating a potential upside of 30.42%. Given Coherent's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Coherent is more favorable than Marvell Technology.

In the previous week, Marvell Technology had 74 more articles in the media than Coherent. MarketBeat recorded 80 mentions for Marvell Technology and 6 mentions for Coherent. Marvell Technology's average media sentiment score of 0.68 beat Coherent's score of 0.05 indicating that Marvell Technology is being referred to more favorably in the media.

83.5% of Marvell Technology shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 83.3% of Coherent shares are held by institutional investors. 0.1% of Marvell Technology shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Coherent shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Marvell Technology has a beta of 2.25, meaning that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Coherent has a beta of 2.1, meaning that its share price is 110% more volatile than the broader market.

Marvell Technology has higher revenue and earnings than Coherent. Coherent is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marvell Technology, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Marvell Technology has a net margin of 27.93% compared to Coherent's net margin of 11.31%. Marvell Technology's return on equity of 13.57% beat Coherent's return on equity.