S&P 500   3,811.15 (-0.48%)
DOW   30,932.37 (-1.50%)
QQQ   314.14 (+0.42%)
AAPL   121.26 (+0.22%)
MSFT   232.38 (+1.48%)
FB   257.62 (+1.15%)
GOOGL   2,021.91 (+0.30%)
AMZN   3,092.93 (+1.17%)
TSLA   675.50 (-0.99%)
NVDA   548.58 (+3.06%)
BABA   237.76 (-1.01%)
CGC   32.75 (-1.39%)
GE   12.54 (-1.72%)
MU   91.53 (+3.87%)
NIO   45.78 (-2.20%)
AMD   84.51 (+2.54%)
T   27.89 (-2.58%)
F   11.70 (-0.51%)
ACB   10.52 (-2.77%)
DIS   189.04 (-1.02%)
BA   212.01 (-2.05%)
NFLX   538.85 (-1.44%)
BAC   34.71 (-3.40%)
S&P 500   3,811.15 (-0.48%)
DOW   30,932.37 (-1.50%)
QQQ   314.14 (+0.42%)
AAPL   121.26 (+0.22%)
MSFT   232.38 (+1.48%)
FB   257.62 (+1.15%)
GOOGL   2,021.91 (+0.30%)
AMZN   3,092.93 (+1.17%)
TSLA   675.50 (-0.99%)
NVDA   548.58 (+3.06%)
BABA   237.76 (-1.01%)
CGC   32.75 (-1.39%)
GE   12.54 (-1.72%)
MU   91.53 (+3.87%)
NIO   45.78 (-2.20%)
AMD   84.51 (+2.54%)
T   27.89 (-2.58%)
F   11.70 (-0.51%)
ACB   10.52 (-2.77%)
DIS   189.04 (-1.02%)
BA   212.01 (-2.05%)
NFLX   538.85 (-1.44%)
BAC   34.71 (-3.40%)
S&P 500   3,811.15 (-0.48%)
DOW   30,932.37 (-1.50%)
QQQ   314.14 (+0.42%)
AAPL   121.26 (+0.22%)
MSFT   232.38 (+1.48%)
FB   257.62 (+1.15%)
GOOGL   2,021.91 (+0.30%)
AMZN   3,092.93 (+1.17%)
TSLA   675.50 (-0.99%)
NVDA   548.58 (+3.06%)
BABA   237.76 (-1.01%)
CGC   32.75 (-1.39%)
GE   12.54 (-1.72%)
MU   91.53 (+3.87%)
NIO   45.78 (-2.20%)
AMD   84.51 (+2.54%)
T   27.89 (-2.58%)
F   11.70 (-0.51%)
ACB   10.52 (-2.77%)
DIS   189.04 (-1.02%)
BA   212.01 (-2.05%)
NFLX   538.85 (-1.44%)
BAC   34.71 (-3.40%)
S&P 500   3,811.15 (-0.48%)
DOW   30,932.37 (-1.50%)
QQQ   314.14 (+0.42%)
AAPL   121.26 (+0.22%)
MSFT   232.38 (+1.48%)
FB   257.62 (+1.15%)
GOOGL   2,021.91 (+0.30%)
AMZN   3,092.93 (+1.17%)
TSLA   675.50 (-0.99%)
NVDA   548.58 (+3.06%)
BABA   237.76 (-1.01%)
CGC   32.75 (-1.39%)
GE   12.54 (-1.72%)
MU   91.53 (+3.87%)
NIO   45.78 (-2.20%)
AMD   84.51 (+2.54%)
T   27.89 (-2.58%)
F   11.70 (-0.51%)
ACB   10.52 (-2.77%)
DIS   189.04 (-1.02%)
BA   212.01 (-2.05%)
NFLX   538.85 (-1.44%)
BAC   34.71 (-3.40%)
Log in
NYSE:ELF

e.l.f. Beauty Competitors

$25.65
+0.43 (+1.70 %)
(As of 02/26/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$24.47
Now: $25.65
$26.02
50-Day Range
$21.76
MA: $23.42
$26.03
52-Week Range
$7.58
Now: $25.65
$26.47
Volume1.14 million shs
Average Volume1.13 million shs
Market Capitalization$1.31 billion
P/E Ratio135.01
Dividend YieldN/A
Beta2.02

Competitors

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) Vs. LANC, NOMD, FLO, LESL, FIZZ, and JOBS

Should you be buying ELF stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer staples" are considered alternatives and competitors to e.l.f. Beauty, including Lancaster Colony (LANC), Nomad Foods (NOMD), Flowers Foods (FLO), Leslie's (LESL), National Beverage (FIZZ), and 51job (JOBS).

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) and Lancaster Colony (NASDAQ:LANC) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, profitability, earnings, dividends, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 54.6% of Lancaster Colony shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 31.7% of Lancaster Colony shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for e.l.f. Beauty and Lancaster Colony, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67
Lancaster Colony00103.00

e.l.f. Beauty presently has a consensus target price of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. Given e.l.f. Beauty's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe e.l.f. Beauty is more favorable than Lancaster Colony.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Lancaster Colony's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07
Lancaster Colony$1.33 billion3.61$136.98 million$4.9335.43

Lancaster Colony has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. Lancaster Colony is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Lancaster Colony has a beta of 0.25, meaning that its stock price is 75% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Lancaster Colony's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%
Lancaster Colony9.90%16.90%13.24%

Summary

Lancaster Colony beats e.l.f. Beauty on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Nomad Foods (NYSE:NOMD) and e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and earnings.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings and target prices for Nomad Foods and e.l.f. Beauty, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Nomad Foods01802.89
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67

Nomad Foods currently has a consensus price target of $27.6250, indicating a potential upside of 16.96%. e.l.f. Beauty has a consensus price target of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. Given Nomad Foods' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Nomad Foods is more favorable than e.l.f. Beauty.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

67.8% of Nomad Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Profitability

This table compares Nomad Foods and e.l.f. Beauty's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Nomad Foods8.56%10.37%4.38%
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%

Risk and Volatility

Nomad Foods has a beta of 0.71, indicating that its share price is 29% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, indicating that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Nomad Foods and e.l.f. Beauty's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Nomad Foods$2.60 billion1.82$172.48 million$1.3817.12
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07

Nomad Foods has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. Nomad Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Nomad Foods beats e.l.f. Beauty on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) and Flowers Foods (NYSE:FLO) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for e.l.f. Beauty and Flowers Foods, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67
Flowers Foods04002.00

e.l.f. Beauty currently has a consensus target price of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. Flowers Foods has a consensus target price of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 10.34%. Given Flowers Foods' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Flowers Foods is more favorable than e.l.f. Beauty.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 64.5% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 8.2% of Flowers Foods shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Flowers Foods' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%
Flowers Foods2.30%19.41%7.65%

Volatility & Risk

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Flowers Foods has a beta of 0.34, meaning that its share price is 66% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Flowers Foods' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07
Flowers Foods$4.12 billion1.12$164.54 million$0.9622.66

Flowers Foods has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. Flowers Foods is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

e.l.f. Beauty beats Flowers Foods on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) and Leslie's (NASDAQ:LESL) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for e.l.f. Beauty and Leslie's, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67
Leslie's06602.50

e.l.f. Beauty currently has a consensus target price of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. Leslie's has a consensus target price of $26.2727, indicating a potential upside of 8.21%. Given Leslie's' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Leslie's is more favorable than e.l.f. Beauty.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Leslie's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%
Leslie'sN/AN/AN/A

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and Leslie's' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07
Leslie's$1.11 billion4.08$78.49 million$0.4257.81

Leslie's has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. Leslie's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

e.l.f. Beauty beats Leslie's on 8 of the 11 factors compared between the two stocks.

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) and National Beverage (NASDAQ:FIZZ) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, earnings, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current ratings and price targets for e.l.f. Beauty and National Beverage, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67
National Beverage31001.25

e.l.f. Beauty currently has a consensus target price of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. National Beverage has a consensus target price of $32.50, indicating a potential downside of 31.81%. Given e.l.f. Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe e.l.f. Beauty is more favorable than National Beverage.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 32.7% of National Beverage shares are owned by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 75.2% of National Beverage shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Profitability

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and National Beverage's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%
National Beverage15.34%33.20%23.86%

Volatility & Risk

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its share price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, National Beverage has a beta of 1.39, meaning that its share price is 39% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and National Beverage's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07
National Beverage$1.00 billion4.44$129.97 million$2.7817.14

National Beverage has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. National Beverage is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

e.l.f. Beauty (NYSE:ELF) and 51job (NASDAQ:JOBS) are both consumer staples companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, risk and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and 51job's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
e.l.f. Beauty$282.85 million4.65$17.88 million$0.4261.07
51job$574.57 million7.70$76.46 million$1.1557.04

51job has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. 51job is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current ratings and recommmendations for e.l.f. Beauty and 51job, as reported by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
e.l.f. Beauty03602.67
51job00103.00

e.l.f. Beauty presently has a consensus target price of $24.2222, indicating a potential downside of 5.57%. 51job has a consensus target price of $72.00, indicating a potential upside of 9.76%. Given 51job's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe 51job is more favorable than e.l.f. Beauty.

Profitability

This table compares e.l.f. Beauty and 51job's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
e.l.f. Beauty3.29%8.53%4.57%
51job27.33%8.72%6.78%

Risk and Volatility

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 2.02, meaning that its stock price is 102% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, 51job has a beta of 0.77, meaning that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

86.1% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 44.4% of 51job shares are held by institutional investors. 15.0% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

51job beats e.l.f. Beauty on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.


e.l.f. Beauty Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Lancaster Colony logo
LANC
Lancaster Colony
2.0$174.67+1.3%$4.81 billion$1.33 billion36.09Dividend Announcement
Nomad Foods logo
NOMD
Nomad Foods
1.8$23.62+3.4%$4.75 billion$2.60 billion19.68Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Flowers Foods logo
FLO
Flowers Foods
1.5$21.75+1.9%$4.60 billion$4.12 billion47.28Dividend Announcement
LESL
Leslie's
1.3$24.28+4.1%$4.54 billion$1.11 billion57.81
National Beverage logo
FIZZ
National Beverage
1.3$47.66+1.9%$4.45 billion$1.00 billion13.85Upcoming Earnings
51job logo
JOBS
51job
1.7$65.60+1.3%$4.42 billion$574.57 million30.94
Celsius logo
CELH
Celsius
1.5$59.53+3.8%$4.32 billion$75.15 million850.55
WD-40 logo
WDFC
WD-40
1.6$311.75+0.2%$4.27 billion$423.35 million70.85Analyst Report
News Coverage
The Hain Celestial Group logo
HAIN
The Hain Celestial Group
1.5$42.18+0.2%$4.21 billion$2.05 billion162.23
Hillenbrand logo
HI
Hillenbrand
2.2$46.46+0.1%$3.49 billion$2.52 billion-57.36
Sanderson Farms logo
SAFM
Sanderson Farms
1.9$152.50+0.2%$3.40 billion$3.56 billion121.03Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Unusual Options Activity
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
GO
Grocery Outlet
1.5$35.99+2.1%$3.39 billion$2.56 billion37.88Upcoming Earnings
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas logo
CCU
Compañía Cervecerías Unidas
1.4$17.30+1.7%$3.20 billion$2.41 billion25.44Analyst Upgrade
High Trading Volume
BRF logo
BRFS
BRF
1.5$3.90+10.0%$3.17 billion$8.13 billion12.58Upcoming Earnings
UTZ
Utz Brands
1.6$25.27+0.8%$3.05 billionN/A0.00Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
JW.B
John Wiley & Sons
0.6$54.04+0.0%$3.03 billion$1.83 billion-78.32Upcoming Earnings
J & J Snack Foods logo
JJSF
J & J Snack Foods
1.6$158.76+0.1%$3.01 billion$1.02 billion167.12
Medifast logo
MED
Medifast
2.3$252.99+0.7%$2.98 billion$713.67 million31.66Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
News Coverage
Energizer logo
ENR
Energizer
2.5$41.80+0.3%$2.86 billion$2.74 billion-26.46Analyst Downgrade
TreeHouse Foods logo
THS
TreeHouse Foods
1.2$50.02+2.8%$2.80 billion$4.29 billion-500.20
The Simply Good Foods logo
SMPL
The Simply Good Foods
1.8$29.17+0.6%$2.79 billion$816.64 million46.30
Nu Skin Enterprises logo
NUS
Nu Skin Enterprises
2.1$51.18+0.7%$2.60 billion$2.42 billion17.23
Coca-Cola Consolidated logo
COKE
Coca-Cola Consolidated
0.9$256.66+2.6%$2.41 billion$4.83 billion25.24
Inter Parfums logo
IPAR
Inter Parfums
1.4$73.17+1.1%$2.31 billion$713.51 million73.17Upcoming Earnings
Purple Innovation logo
PRPL
Purple Innovation
2.1$36.79+2.7%$2.26 billion$428.36 million-118.67Upcoming Earnings
News Coverage
Gap Down
Vector Group logo
VGR
Vector Group
1.6$13.65+2.3%$2.09 billion$1.90 billion31.02Earnings Announcement
News Coverage
Tootsie Roll Industries logo
TR
Tootsie Roll Industries
0.9$30.81+3.6%$2.04 billion$523.62 million35.27Dividend Cut
Industrias Bachoco logo
IBA
Industrias Bachoco
1.4$39.67+0.6%$1.98 billion$3.26 billion14.69
B&G Foods logo
BGS
B&G Foods
1.7$30.33+2.3%$1.95 billion$1.66 billion15.01Upcoming Earnings
Hostess Brands logo
TWNK
Hostess Brands
1.4$14.39+2.2%$1.88 billion$907.67 million28.78Earnings Announcement
High Trading Volume
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Edgewell Personal Care logo
EPC
Edgewell Personal Care
2.4$30.59+0.7%$1.66 billion$1.95 billion24.67Unusual Options Activity
Tupperware Brands logo
TUP
Tupperware Brands
1.0$30.57+0.3%$1.50 billion$1.80 billion95.53
United Natural Foods logo
UNFI
United Natural Foods
1.4$26.45+0.5%$1.48 billion$26.51 billion13.92Analyst Report
AVO
Mission Produce
1.6$20.96+2.5%$1.48 billionN/A0.00
Schweitzer-Mauduit International logo
SWM
Schweitzer-Mauduit International
1.7$46.70+1.8%$1.46 billion$1.02 billion16.56
TTCF
Tattooed Chef
0.7$19.93+0.4%$1.43 billionN/A0.00
SunOpta logo
STKL
SunOpta
1.3$15.54+3.7%$1.41 billion$1.19 billion-119.54Upcoming Earnings
Unusual Options Activity
FRG
Franchise Group
2.4$35.08+0.3%$1.41 billion$132.55 million0.00
Calavo Growers logo
CVGW
Calavo Growers
1.7$75.25+0.9%$1.33 billion$1.06 billion-96.47Analyst Report
News Coverage
UVV
Universal
1.5$50.82+0.3%$1.25 billion$1.91 billion22.49
VFF
Village Farms International
1.7$15.79+3.9%$1.23 billion$144.57 million-315.74News Coverage
Fresh Del Monte Produce logo
FDP
Fresh Del Monte Produce
1.3$25.74+2.3%$1.22 billion$4.49 billion53.63Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Unusual Options Activity
The Chefs' Warehouse logo
CHEF
The Chefs' Warehouse
1.2$31.14+1.7%$1.18 billion$1.59 billion-31.14
ARKO
Arko
2.1$9.27+1.0%$1.15 billionN/A0.00News Coverage
Meredith logo
MDP
Meredith
1.5$24.78+2.3%$1.13 billion$2.85 billion-2.69News Coverage
Matthews International logo
MATW
Matthews International
2.5$35.70+2.6%$1.13 billion$1.50 billion-12.75
MGP Ingredients logo
MGPI
MGP Ingredients
1.9$63.88+4.0%$1.08 billion$362.74 million26.18Earnings Announcement
Dividend Announcement
Analyst Downgrade
High Trading Volume
News Coverage
Gap Up
VITL
Vital Farms
1.0$27.12+0.1%$1.07 billionN/A0.00Upcoming Earnings
John B. Sanfilippo & Son logo
JBSS
John B. Sanfilippo & Son
1.5$86.46+1.1%$991.35 million$880.09 million18.43
Scholastic logo
SCHL
Scholastic
1.8$28.80+1.7%$987.87 million$1.49 billion-16.27
This page was last updated on 2/26/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff

Enter your email address below to receive a concise daily summary of analysts' upgrades, downgrades and new coverage with MarketBeat.com's FREE daily email newsletter.