Does the media favor SN or SWK?

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 4 more articles in the media than SharkNinja. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 13 mentions for SharkNinja. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SharkNinja 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Stanley Black & Decker 11 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Is SN or WHR more profitable?

SharkNinja has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 1.17%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Whirlpool's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets SharkNinja 10.06% 27.79% 14.19% Whirlpool 1.17% 4.18% 0.82%

Does the media prefer SN or WHR?

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 9 more articles in the media than Whirlpool. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 4 mentions for Whirlpool. SharkNinja's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Whirlpool's score of 0.17 indicating that SharkNinja is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SharkNinja 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Whirlpool 0 Very Positive mention(s) 2 Positive mention(s) 2 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Neutral

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CRCT or SN?

SharkNinja has higher revenue and earnings than Cricut. Cricut is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Cricut $708.78M 1.70 $76.71M $0.43 13.40 SharkNinja $6.40B 4.06 $701.37M $4.90 37.60

Is CRCT or SN more profitable?

Cricut has a net margin of 12.71% compared to SharkNinja's net margin of 10.06%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Cricut's return on equity. Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets Cricut 12.71% 24.57% 15.42% SharkNinja 10.06% 27.79% 14.19%

Does the media refer more to CRCT or SN?

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 10 more articles in the media than Cricut. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 3 mentions for Cricut. Cricut's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Cricut is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Cricut 1 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SharkNinja 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HELE or SN?

SharkNinja has higher revenue and earnings than Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks. Company Gross Revenue Price/Sales Ratio Net Income Earnings Per Share Price/Earnings Ratio Helen of Troy $1.79B 0.39 -$898.98M -$17.99 N/A SharkNinja $6.40B 4.06 $701.37M $4.90 37.60

Does the media prefer HELE or SN?

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 5 more articles in the media than Helen of Troy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 8 mentions for Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Helen of Troy is being referred to more favorably in the media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment Helen of Troy 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive SharkNinja 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

Do analysts recommend SN or HBB?

SharkNinja presently has a consensus price target of $188.59, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Given SharkNinja's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SharkNinja is more favorable than Hamilton Beach Brands. Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score SharkNinja 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 12 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.92 Hamilton Beach Brands 0 Sell rating(s) 1 Hold rating(s) 0 Buy rating(s) 0 Strong Buy rating(s) 2.00

Does the media favor SN or HBB?

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 12 more articles in the media than Hamilton Beach Brands. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 1 mentions for Hamilton Beach Brands. Hamilton Beach Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Hamilton Beach Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media. Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment SharkNinja 6 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 5 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive Hamilton Beach Brands 0 Very Positive mention(s) 1 Positive mention(s) 0 Neutral mention(s) 0 Negative mention(s) 0 Very Negative mention(s) Positive

SharkNinja (SN) Competitors

$184.25 -0.85 (-0.46%)

Closing price 08/14/2026 03:59 PM Eastern

Extended Trading

$186.50 +2.25 (+1.22%)

As of 08/14/2026 07:49 PM Eastern

Compare

SN vs. SWK, WHR, CRCT, HELE, and HBB

Should you buy SharkNinja stock or one of its competitors? SharkNinja's main competitors and comparable companies include Stanley Black & Decker (SWK), Whirlpool (WHR), Cricut (CRCT), Helen of Troy (HELE), and Hamilton Beach Brands (HBB). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "household appliances" industry.

How does SharkNinja compare to Stanley Black & Decker?

SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) and Stanley Black & Decker (NYSE:SWK) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, valuation, earnings, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and dividends.

SharkNinja has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Stanley Black & Decker. Stanley Black & Decker is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SharkNinja	$6.40B	4.06	$701.37M	$4.90	37.60
Stanley Black & Decker	$15.13B	1.02	$401.90M	$4.10	24.87

SharkNinja has a beta of 1.21, suggesting that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Stanley Black & Decker has a beta of 1.16, suggesting that its share price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

SharkNinja presently has a consensus price target of $188.59, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Stanley Black & Decker has a consensus price target of $91.56, indicating a potential downside of 10.20%. Given SharkNinja's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe SharkNinja is more favorable than Stanley Black & Decker.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SharkNinja	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Stanley Black & Decker	1 Sell rating(s)	6 Hold rating(s)	4 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.27

In the previous week, Stanley Black & Decker had 4 more articles in the media than SharkNinja. MarketBeat recorded 17 mentions for Stanley Black & Decker and 13 mentions for SharkNinja. Stanley Black & Decker's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Stanley Black & Decker is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SharkNinja	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Stanley Black & Decker	11 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

34.8% of SharkNinja shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.8% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by institutional investors. 40.8% of SharkNinja shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of Stanley Black & Decker shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

SharkNinja has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Stanley Black & Decker's net margin of 4.07%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Stanley Black & Decker's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SharkNinja	10.06%	27.79%	14.19%
Stanley Black & Decker	4.07%	8.78%	3.73%

Summary

SharkNinja beats Stanley Black & Decker on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SharkNinja compare to Whirlpool?

SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, dividends, media sentiment and institutional ownership.

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 9 more articles in the media than Whirlpool. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 4 mentions for Whirlpool. SharkNinja's average media sentiment score of 0.65 beat Whirlpool's score of 0.17 indicating that SharkNinja is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SharkNinja	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Whirlpool	0 Very Positive mention(s)	2 Positive mention(s)	2 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Neutral

SharkNinja has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 1.16, meaning that its stock price is 16% more volatile than the broader market.

SharkNinja has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Whirlpool. Whirlpool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SharkNinja	$6.40B	4.06	$701.37M	$4.90	37.60
Whirlpool	$15.52B	0.17	$318M	$2.92	14.13

SharkNinja has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Whirlpool's net margin of 1.17%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Whirlpool's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SharkNinja	10.06%	27.79%	14.19%
Whirlpool	1.17%	4.18%	0.82%

SharkNinja presently has a consensus target price of $188.59, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Whirlpool has a consensus target price of $46.88, indicating a potential upside of 13.60%. Given Whirlpool's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whirlpool is more favorable than SharkNinja.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SharkNinja	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Whirlpool	3 Sell rating(s)	7 Hold rating(s)	1 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.82

34.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.8% of Whirlpool shares are held by institutional investors. 40.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.0% of Whirlpool shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SharkNinja beats Whirlpool on 13 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SharkNinja compare to Cricut?

Cricut (NASDAQ:CRCT) and SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, risk, dividends, profitability, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 10 more articles in the media than Cricut. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 3 mentions for Cricut. Cricut's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Cricut is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Cricut	1 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SharkNinja	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Cricut has a net margin of 12.71% compared to SharkNinja's net margin of 10.06%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Cricut's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Cricut	12.71%	24.57%	15.42%
SharkNinja	10.06%	27.79%	14.19%

Cricut presently has a consensus price target of $3.82, suggesting a potential downside of 33.74%. SharkNinja has a consensus price target of $188.59, suggesting a potential upside of 2.35%. Given SharkNinja's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SharkNinja is more favorable than Cricut.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Cricut	4 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	1.67
SharkNinja	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

19.6% of Cricut shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 34.8% of SharkNinja shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.5% of Cricut shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.8% of SharkNinja shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

SharkNinja has higher revenue and earnings than Cricut. Cricut is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Cricut	$708.78M	1.70	$76.71M	$0.43	13.40
SharkNinja	$6.40B	4.06	$701.37M	$4.90	37.60

Cricut has a beta of 0.19, indicating that its share price is 81% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SharkNinja has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

SharkNinja beats Cricut on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SharkNinja compare to Helen of Troy?

Helen of Troy (NASDAQ:HELE) and SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, earnings, profitability, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership and dividends.

SharkNinja has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Helen of Troy's net margin of -22.70%. SharkNinja's return on equity of 27.79% beat Helen of Troy's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Helen of Troy	-22.70%	6.46%	2.47%
SharkNinja	10.06%	27.79%	14.19%

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 5 more articles in the media than Helen of Troy. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 8 mentions for Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy's average media sentiment score of 1.35 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Helen of Troy is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
Helen of Troy	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
SharkNinja	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

Helen of Troy has a beta of 1.31, indicating that its stock price is 31% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, SharkNinja has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market.

SharkNinja has higher revenue and earnings than Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Helen of Troy	$1.79B	0.39	-$898.98M	-$17.99	N/A
SharkNinja	$6.40B	4.06	$701.37M	$4.90	37.60

34.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by institutional investors. 0.7% of Helen of Troy shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 40.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Helen of Troy currently has a consensus price target of $26.50, indicating a potential downside of 12.31%. SharkNinja has a consensus price target of $188.59, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Given SharkNinja's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe SharkNinja is more favorable than Helen of Troy.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Helen of Troy	1 Sell rating(s)	3 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	1 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.20
SharkNinja	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92

Summary

SharkNinja beats Helen of Troy on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does SharkNinja compare to Hamilton Beach Brands?

SharkNinja (NYSE:SN) and Hamilton Beach Brands (NYSE:HBB) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, profitability, valuation, risk, earnings, media sentiment and dividends.

SharkNinja has higher revenue and earnings than Hamilton Beach Brands. Hamilton Beach Brands is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than SharkNinja, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Company	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
SharkNinja	$6.40B	4.06	$701.37M	$4.90	37.60
Hamilton Beach Brands	$606.85M	0.73	$26.45M	$4.25	7.79

SharkNinja has a net margin of 10.06% compared to Hamilton Beach Brands' net margin of 9.41%. Hamilton Beach Brands' return on equity of 30.70% beat SharkNinja's return on equity.

Company	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
SharkNinja	10.06%	27.79%	14.19%
Hamilton Beach Brands	9.41%	30.70%	14.62%

In the previous week, SharkNinja had 12 more articles in the media than Hamilton Beach Brands. MarketBeat recorded 13 mentions for SharkNinja and 1 mentions for Hamilton Beach Brands. Hamilton Beach Brands' average media sentiment score of 0.76 beat SharkNinja's score of 0.65 indicating that Hamilton Beach Brands is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company	Very Positive	Positive	Neutral	Negative	Very Negative	Overall Sentiment
SharkNinja	6 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	5 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive
Hamilton Beach Brands	0 Very Positive mention(s)	1 Positive mention(s)	0 Neutral mention(s)	0 Negative mention(s)	0 Very Negative mention(s)	Positive

SharkNinja has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Hamilton Beach Brands has a beta of 0.23, indicating that its stock price is 77% less volatile than the broader market.

SharkNinja presently has a consensus price target of $188.59, indicating a potential upside of 2.35%. Given SharkNinja's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe SharkNinja is more favorable than Hamilton Beach Brands.

Company	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
SharkNinja	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	12 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.92
Hamilton Beach Brands	0 Sell rating(s)	1 Hold rating(s)	0 Buy rating(s)	0 Strong Buy rating(s)	2.00

34.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.6% of Hamilton Beach Brands shares are held by institutional investors. 40.8% of SharkNinja shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 39.0% of Hamilton Beach Brands shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

SharkNinja beats Hamilton Beach Brands on 12 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get SharkNinja News Delivered to You Automatically

Subscribe Now

SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding SN and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.

SN vs. The Competition

Export

Metric	SharkNinja	Household Durables Industry	Consumer Discretionary Sector	NYSE Exchange
Market Cap	$25.96B	$5.49B	$13.16B	$24.27B
Dividend Yield	N/A	3.46%	54.81%	3.69%
P/E Ratio	37.60	30.27	47.00	30.85
Price / Sales	4.06	63.48	92.69	21.30
Price / Cash	30.47	9.73	19.24	20.48
Price / Book	9.72	3.80	4.48	4.95
Net Income	$701.37M	$273.19M	$445.74M	$1.07B
7 Day Performance	-0.62%	0.55%	0.10%	0.91%
1 Month Performance	19.22%	3.02%	1.38%	3.27%
1 Year Performance	54.68%	-1.95%	0.73%	19.10%

SharkNinja Competitors List

Export

Company	MarketRank	Share Price	Analysts' Price Target	1Y Price Performance	Market Cap	Revenue	P/E Ratio	Employee Count	Indicator(s)
SN SharkNinja	3.6373 of 5 stars	$184.25 -0.5%	$188.59 +2.4%	+54.7%	$25.96B	$6.40B	37.60	4,143
SWK Stanley Black & Decker	3.7195 of 5 stars	$102.59 -1.3%	$91.56 -10.8%	+37.6%	$15.69B	$15.13B	25.02	43,500
WHR Whirlpool	3.4338 of 5 stars	$42.11 -2.7%	$46.88 +11.3%	-53.3%	$2.82B	$15.52B	14.42	41,000	Gap Up
CRCT Cricut	2.0268 of 5 stars	$5.90 +1.0%	$3.82 -35.3%	+4.3%	$1.23B	$708.78M	13.72	830	High Trading Volume
HELE Helen of Troy	1.6363 of 5 stars	$29.21 -1.9%	$26.50 -9.3%	+31.0%	$693.41M	$1.79B	N/A	1,854

Related Companies and Tools

Related Companies

Top 10 Stock Comparisons

This page (NYSE:SN) was last updated on 8/17/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.

From Our Partners

Unlock superior investment research and tools.

Get MarketBeat All Access

In-depth profiles and analysis for 20,000 public companies.
Real-time analyst ratings, insider transactions, earnings data, and more.
Our daily ratings and market update email newsletter.

Sign In
Create Account

Your Email Address:

Your Password:

Forgot your password?

Your Email Address:

Choose a Password:

By creating a free account, you agree to our terms of service. This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

SharkNinja (SN) Competitors

SN vs. SWK, WHR, CRCT, HELE, and HBB

How does SharkNinja compare to Stanley Black & Decker?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Whirlpool?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Cricut?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Helen of Troy?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Hamilton Beach Brands?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SN vs. The Competition

SharkNinja Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools

About MarketBeat

MarketBeat Products

Popular Tools

Financial Calendars

Terms & Info

SharkNinja (SN) Competitors

SN vs. SWK, WHR, CRCT, HELE, and HBB

How does SharkNinja compare to Stanley Black & Decker?

Which has higher earnings and valuation, SN or SWK?

Which has more volatility and risk, SN or SWK?

Do analysts rate SN or SWK?

Does the media favor SN or SWK?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SN or SWK?

Is SN or SWK more profitable?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Whirlpool?

Does the media prefer SN or WHR?

Which has more volatility and risk, SN or WHR?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, SN or WHR?

Is SN or WHR more profitable?

Do analysts recommend SN or WHR?

Do institutionals & insiders hold more shares of SN or WHR?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Cricut?

Does the media refer more to CRCT or SN?

Is CRCT or SN more profitable?

Do analysts prefer CRCT or SN?

Do institutionals and insiders have more ownership in CRCT or SN?

Which has higher valuation & earnings, CRCT or SN?

Which has more risk & volatility, CRCT or SN?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Helen of Troy?

Is HELE or SN more profitable?

Does the media prefer HELE or SN?

Which has more risk and volatility, HELE or SN?

Which has stronger valuation & earnings, HELE or SN?

Do institutionals & insiders believe in HELE or SN?

Do analysts prefer HELE or SN?

Summary

How does SharkNinja compare to Hamilton Beach Brands?

Which has higher valuation and earnings, SN or HBB?

Is SN or HBB more profitable?

Does the media favor SN or HBB?

Which has more risk and volatility, SN or HBB?

Do analysts recommend SN or HBB?

Do institutionals and insiders hold more shares of SN or HBB?

Summary

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

Media Sentiment Over Time

SN vs. The Competition

SharkNinja Competitors List

Related Companies and Tools

MarketBeat All Access Features

Best-in-Class Portfolio Monitoring

Stock Ideas and Recommendations

Advanced Stock Screeners and Research Tools