NYSE:WHR

Whirlpool Competitors

$236.99
+3.04 (+1.30 %)
(As of 04/9/2021 12:00 AM ET)
Add
Compare
Today's Range
$233.44
Now: $236.99
$237.23
50-Day Range
$186.72
MA: $208.77
$234.37
52-Week Range
$93.81
Now: $236.99
$237.23
Volume368,000 shs
Average Volume742,310 shs
Market Capitalization$14.88 billion
P/E Ratio18.16
Dividend Yield2.11%
Beta2.01

Competitors

Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) Vs. MAR, ROKU, LVS, LULU, EA, and DISCB

Should you be buying WHR stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the sector of "consumer discretionary" are considered alternatives and competitors to Whirlpool, including Marriott International (MAR), Roku (ROKU), Las Vegas Sands (LVS), Lululemon Athletica (LULU), Electronic Arts (EA), and Discovery (DISCB).

Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) and Marriott International (NASDAQ:MAR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability and valuation.

Profitability

This table compares Whirlpool and Marriott International's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%
Marriott International1.28%188.71%1.55%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

98.9% of Whirlpool shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.7% of Marriott International shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 12.8% of Marriott International shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk & Volatility

Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Marriott International has a beta of 1.83, meaning that its stock price is 83% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent recommendations and price targets for Whirlpool and Marriott International, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Whirlpool14202.14
Marriott International091002.53

Whirlpool presently has a consensus price target of $190.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.83%. Marriott International has a consensus price target of $123.4444, indicating a potential downside of 16.86%. Given Marriott International's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Marriott International is more favorable than Whirlpool.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Whirlpool and Marriott International's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81
Marriott International$20.97 billion2.30$1.27 billion$6.0024.75

Marriott International has higher revenue and earnings than Whirlpool. Whirlpool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Marriott International, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Marriott International beats Whirlpool on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Roku (NASDAQ:ROKU) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, earnings, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Roku and Whirlpool's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Roku-6.53%-11.15%-5.78%
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%

Volatility and Risk

Roku has a beta of 1.95, meaning that its share price is 95% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its share price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider and Institutional Ownership

64.2% of Roku shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Whirlpool shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Roku shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Roku and Whirlpool's top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Roku$1.13 billion42.51$-59,940,000.00($0.52)-718.58
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81

Whirlpool has higher revenue and earnings than Roku. Roku is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Whirlpool, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current recommendations and price targets for Roku and Whirlpool, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Roku171902.67
Whirlpool14202.14

Roku currently has a consensus target price of $386.5714, suggesting a potential upside of 3.46%. Whirlpool has a consensus target price of $190.00, suggesting a potential downside of 19.83%. Given Roku's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Roku is more favorable than Whirlpool.

Summary

Whirlpool beats Roku on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Las Vegas Sands (NYSE:LVS) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, risk, earnings, institutional ownership, valuation, dividends and profitability.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Whirlpool's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Las Vegas Sands$13.74 billion3.44$2.70 billion$3.2619.00
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81

Las Vegas Sands has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Whirlpool. Whirlpool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Las Vegas Sands, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings for Las Vegas Sands and Whirlpool, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Las Vegas Sands071102.61
Whirlpool14202.14

Las Vegas Sands currently has a consensus price target of $58.0938, indicating a potential downside of 6.21%. Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $190.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.83%. Given Las Vegas Sands' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Las Vegas Sands is more favorable than Whirlpool.

Profitability

This table compares Las Vegas Sands and Whirlpool's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Las Vegas Sands-12.67%-12.97%-3.03%
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%

Institutional & Insider Ownership

37.3% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Whirlpool shares are held by institutional investors. 10.8% of Las Vegas Sands shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility and Risk

Las Vegas Sands has a beta of 1.35, indicating that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, indicating that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Whirlpool beats Las Vegas Sands on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Lululemon Athletica (NASDAQ:LULU) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Lululemon Athletica and Whirlpool's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Lululemon Athletica$3.98 billion10.42$645.60 million$4.9364.53
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81

Whirlpool has higher revenue and earnings than Lululemon Athletica. Whirlpool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Lululemon Athletica, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Lululemon Athletica and Whirlpool, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Lululemon Athletica0102012.71
Whirlpool14202.14

Lululemon Athletica currently has a consensus price target of $385.3548, indicating a potential upside of 21.14%. Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $190.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.83%. Given Lululemon Athletica's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Lululemon Athletica is more favorable than Whirlpool.

Profitability

This table compares Lululemon Athletica and Whirlpool's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Lululemon Athletica13.69%28.89%16.88%
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

82.0% of Lululemon Athletica shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Whirlpool shares are held by institutional investors. 0.3% of Lululemon Athletica shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Lululemon Athletica has a beta of 1.22, suggesting that its stock price is 22% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Lululemon Athletica beats Whirlpool on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Electronic Arts (NASDAQ:EA) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares Electronic Arts and Whirlpool's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Electronic Arts$5.54 billion7.30$3.04 billion$4.7629.51
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81

Electronic Arts has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Whirlpool. Whirlpool is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Electronic Arts, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Dividends

Electronic Arts pays an annual dividend of $0.68 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.5%. Whirlpool pays an annual dividend of $5.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.1%. Electronic Arts pays out 14.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Whirlpool pays out 31.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Electronic Arts has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Whirlpool has raised its dividend for 8 consecutive years. Whirlpool is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Electronic Arts and Whirlpool, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Electronic Arts0121402.54
Whirlpool14202.14

Electronic Arts currently has a consensus price target of $153.3448, indicating a potential upside of 9.17%. Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $190.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.83%. Given Electronic Arts' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Electronic Arts is more favorable than Whirlpool.

Profitability

This table compares Electronic Arts and Whirlpool's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Electronic Arts23.51%17.85%12.11%
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

88.0% of Electronic Arts shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Whirlpool shares are held by institutional investors. 0.9% of Electronic Arts shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Risk and Volatility

Electronic Arts has a beta of 0.92, meaning that its stock price is 8% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, meaning that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Electronic Arts beats Whirlpool on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Discovery (NASDAQ:DISCB) and Whirlpool (NYSE:WHR) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Discovery and Whirlpool's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Gross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Discovery$11.14 billion3.37$2.07 billionN/AN/A
Whirlpool$20.42 billion0.73$1.18 billion$16.0014.81

Discovery has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Whirlpool.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of recent ratings for Discovery and Whirlpool, as provided by MarketBeat.

Sell RatingsHold RatingsBuy RatingsStrong Buy RatingsRating Score
Discovery0000N/A
Whirlpool14202.14

Whirlpool has a consensus price target of $190.00, indicating a potential downside of 19.83%. Given Whirlpool's higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Whirlpool is more favorable than Discovery.

Profitability

This table compares Discovery and Whirlpool's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Net MarginsReturn on EquityReturn on Assets
Discovery13.36%20.76%7.06%
Whirlpool4.42%22.08%4.68%

Insider and Institutional Ownership

0.0% of Discovery shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 98.9% of Whirlpool shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of Whirlpool shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Volatility & Risk

Discovery has a beta of 0.99, suggesting that its stock price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Whirlpool has a beta of 2.01, suggesting that its stock price is 101% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Whirlpool beats Discovery on 7 of the 12 factors compared between the two stocks.


Whirlpool Competitors List

Competitor NameCompetitor BTM RankCompetitor PriceCompetitor Price ChangeCompetitor Market CapCompetitor RevenueCompetitor P/E RatioCompetitor Indicator(s)
Marriott International logo
MAR
Marriott International
1.0$148.48+0.6%$48.17 billion$20.97 billion280.16
Roku logo
ROKU
Roku
1.2$373.66+0.3%$47.99 billion$1.13 billion-444.83
Las Vegas Sands logo
LVS
Las Vegas Sands
1.3$61.94+1.1%$47.31 billion$13.74 billion-62.57
Lululemon Athletica logo
LULU
Lululemon Athletica
1.9$318.12+1.7%$41.46 billion$3.98 billion74.68
Electronic Arts logo
EA
Electronic Arts
2.1$140.46+0.8%$40.40 billion$5.54 billion31.28Insider Selling
News Coverage
Discovery logo
DISCB
Discovery
0.4$77.00+6.6%$37.52 billion$11.14 billion37.38Gap Down
Peloton Interactive logo
PTON
Peloton Interactive
2.2$118.60+4.2%$34.93 billion$1.83 billion1,694.29Analyst Report
Gap Down
Hilton Worldwide logo
HLT
Hilton Worldwide
1.8$124.35+0.3%$34.52 billion$9.45 billion-107.20
V.F. logo
VFC
V.F.
2.4$84.94+2.2%$33.28 billion$10.49 billion-653.38
TAL Education Group logo
TAL
TAL Education Group
1.7$58.51+0.7%$33.17 billion$3.27 billion1,170.43Analyst Upgrade
Stock Split
ViacomCBS logo
VIACA
ViacomCBS
0.4$46.86+0.8%$29.03 billion$27.81 billion21.30
Liberty Broadband logo
LBRDK
Liberty Broadband
1.4$148.18+0.3%$28.94 billion$14.86 million120.47Analyst Report
Liberty Broadband logo
LBRDA
Liberty Broadband
1.8$143.54+0.2%$28.04 billion$14.86 million116.70
Carnival Co. & logo
CCL
Carnival Co. &
1.3$29.30+2.5%$27.32 billion$20.83 billion-2.85Earnings Announcement
Analyst Report
Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Sirius XM logo
SIRI
Sirius XM
1.7$6.35+0.6%$26.29 billion$7.79 billion27.61
ViacomCBS logo
VIAC
ViacomCBS
2.1$41.88+1.0%$25.95 billion$27.81 billion19.04Analyst Upgrade
New Oriental Education & Technology Group logo
EDU
New Oriental Education & Technology Group
2.3$14.71+0.4%$25.22 billion$3.58 billion6.21Gap Up
DraftKings logo
DKNG
DraftKings
1.5$62.31+1.9%$24.78 billionN/A0.00Gap Up
Rogers Communications logo
RCI
Rogers Communications
2.6$48.26+0.7%$24.37 billion$11.36 billion20.45
Royal Caribbean Group logo
RCL
Royal Caribbean Group
1.3$89.88+0.1%$22.88 billion$10.95 billion-4.56
FOX logo
FOXA
FOX
2.0$37.46+1.2%$22.12 billion$12.30 billion14.19
Trip.com Group logo
TCOM
Trip.com Group
1.1$37.21+3.6%$22.05 billion$5.13 billion-68.91
FOX logo
FOX
FOX
1.0$36.08+1.2%$21.31 billion$12.30 billion13.67
Take-Two Interactive Software logo
TTWO
Take-Two Interactive Software
1.5$184.02+0.2%$21.20 billion$3.09 billion44.56
MGM Resorts International logo
MGM
MGM Resorts International
1.8$41.77+0.9%$20.68 billion$12.90 billion14.92Analyst Revision
Discovery logo
DISCA
Discovery
1.6$42.00+0.3%$20.47 billion$11.14 billion20.39Analyst Report
Caesars Entertainment logo
CZR
Caesars Entertainment
1.4$96.33+0.2%$20.06 billion$2.53 billion-9.87Analyst Report
DISH Network logo
DISH
DISH Network
1.4$37.56+0.8%$19.76 billion$12.81 billion15.27
Warner Music Group logo
WMG
Warner Music Group
0.7$37.08+0.7%$18.91 billionN/A0.00
Live Nation Entertainment logo
LYV
Live Nation Entertainment
1.3$86.00+1.2%$18.75 billion$11.55 billion-12.39
Huazhu Group logo
HTHT
Huazhu Group
1.1$54.99+4.1%$17.62 billion$1.61 billion-48.66Gap Down
Discovery logo
DISCK
Discovery
1.2$35.74+0.1%$17.42 billion$11.14 billion17.35
Penn National Gaming logo
PENN
Penn National Gaming
1.7$104.12+2.5%$16.29 billion$5.30 billion-15.27
News logo
NWSA
News
1.6$26.68+0.1%$15.76 billion$9.01 billion-15.60News Coverage
Wynn Resorts logo
WYNN
Wynn Resorts
1.4$131.39+1.6%$15.19 billion$6.61 billion-12.57Analyst Upgrade
News Coverage
Liberty Global logo
LBTYA
Liberty Global
1.1$25.81+0.4%$14.90 billion$11.54 billion-7.87
Liberty Global logo
LBTYK
Liberty Global
1.2$25.71+1.1%$14.85 billion$11.54 billion-7.84
Pool logo
POOL
Pool
2.1$369.49+2.4%$14.84 billion$3.20 billion46.30Gap Up
iQIYI logo
IQ
iQIYI
1.5$16.80+2.6%$14.64 billion$4.12 billion-10.70
News logo
NWS
News
0.8$24.63+0.3%$14.55 billion$9.01 billion-14.40
Mohawk Industries logo
MHK
Mohawk Industries
1.8$202.93+2.2%$14.16 billion$9.97 billion27.39
Hasbro logo
HAS
Hasbro
2.2$95.24+1.0%$13.10 billion$4.72 billion33.30News Coverage
InterContinental Hotels Group logo
IHG
InterContinental Hotels Group
0.9$71.24+0.4%$13.05 billion$2.08 billion23.67Analyst Revision
News Coverage
Snap-on logo
SNA
Snap-on
2.3$235.59+0.5%$12.83 billion$3.73 billion22.02
Shaw Communications logo
SJR
Shaw Communications
2.0$26.80+0.4%$12.80 billion$3.79 billion27.07Upcoming Earnings
OZON
Ozon
0.7$60.73+4.6%$12.64 billionN/A0.00Gap Up
Vail Resorts logo
MTN
Vail Resorts
1.1$304.39+0.3%$12.25 billion$1.96 billion267.01
Zynga logo
ZNGA
Zynga
1.6$10.61+0.7%$11.49 billion$1.32 billion-353.67News Coverage
The Toro logo
TTC
The Toro
1.8$106.25+1.2%$11.43 billion$3.38 billion34.95
Cable One logo
CABO
Cable One
2.0$1,786.75+0.2%$10.78 billion$1.17 billion41.59News Coverage
This page was last updated on 4/12/2021 by MarketBeat.com Staff
MarketBeat - Stock Market News and Research Tools logo

MarketBeat empowers individual investors to make better trading decisions by providing real-time financial data and objective market analysis. Whether you’re looking for analyst ratings, corporate buybacks, dividends, earnings, economic reports, financials, insider trades, IPOs, SEC filings or stock splits, MarketBeat has the objective information you need to analyze any stock. Learn more.

MarketBeat is accredited by the Better Business Bureau

© American Consumer News, LLC dba MarketBeat® 2010-2021. All rights reserved.
326 E 8th St #105, Sioux Falls, SD 57103 | U.S. Based Support Team at [email protected] | (844) 978-6257
MarketBeat does not provide personalized financial advice and does not issue recommendations or offers to buy stock or sell any security. Learn more.

Our Accessibility Statement | Terms of Service | Do Not Sell My Information

© 2021 Market data provided is at least 10-minutes delayed and hosted by Barchart Solutions. Information is provided 'as-is' and solely for informational purposes, not for trading purposes or advice, and is delayed. To see all exchange delays and terms of use please see disclaimer. Fundamental company data provided by Zacks Investment Research. As a bonus to opt-ing into our email newsletters, you will also get a free subscription to the Liberty Through Wealth e-newsletter. You can opt out at any time.