iRobot (IRBT) Competitors

iRobot has a net margin of -38.16% compared to Helen of Troy's net margin of -50.33%. Helen of Troy's return on equity of 7.00% beat iRobot's return on equity.

77.4% of iRobot shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of iRobot shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Helen of Troy shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

iRobot has a beta of 1.1, indicating that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Helen of Troy has a beta of 1.29, indicating that its share price is 29% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Helen of Troy has a consensus price target of $24.00, indicating a potential upside of 0.42%. Given Helen of Troy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Helen of Troy is more favorable than iRobot.

iRobot has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Helen of Troy. Helen of Troy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iRobot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Helen of Troy had 4 more articles in the media than iRobot. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Helen of Troy and 0 mentions for iRobot. Helen of Troy's average media sentiment score of 0.28 beat iRobot's score of 0.00 indicating that Helen of Troy is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

In the previous week, NACCO Industries had 4 more articles in the media than iRobot. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for NACCO Industries and 0 mentions for iRobot. NACCO Industries' average media sentiment score of 0.96 beat iRobot's score of 0.00 indicating that NACCO Industries is being referred to more favorably in the media.

NACCO Industries has higher earnings, but lower revenue than iRobot. iRobot is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NACCO Industries, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

49.1% of NACCO Industries shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of iRobot shares are owned by institutional investors. 44.8% of NACCO Industries shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of iRobot shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NACCO Industries has a beta of 0.43, suggesting that its share price is 57% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, iRobot has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

NACCO Industries has a net margin of 6.34% compared to iRobot's net margin of -38.16%. NACCO Industries' return on equity of 4.19% beat iRobot's return on equity.

CVD Equipment has a net margin of -6.18% compared to iRobot's net margin of -38.16%. CVD Equipment's return on equity of -5.59% beat iRobot's return on equity.

In the previous week, CVD Equipment had 1 more articles in the media than iRobot. MarketBeat recorded 1 mentions for CVD Equipment and 0 mentions for iRobot. CVD Equipment's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled iRobot'saverage media sentiment score.

CVD Equipment has a beta of 1.35, meaning that its stock price is 35% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, iRobot has a beta of 1.1, meaning that its stock price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500.

CVD Equipment has higher earnings, but lower revenue than iRobot. CVD Equipment is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than iRobot, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

31.6% of CVD Equipment shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 77.4% of iRobot shares are held by institutional investors. 28.7% of CVD Equipment shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of iRobot shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

77.4% of iRobot shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 0.3% of WISeKey International shares are held by institutional investors. 0.6% of iRobot shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 33.5% of WISeKey International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

WISeKey International has a consensus target price of $10.50, indicating a potential upside of 48.73%. Given WISeKey International's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe WISeKey International is more favorable than iRobot.

WISeKey International has lower revenue, but higher earnings than iRobot.

In the previous week, WISeKey International had 5 more articles in the media than iRobot. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for WISeKey International and 0 mentions for iRobot. WISeKey International's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat iRobot's score of 0.00 indicating that WISeKey International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

WISeKey International has a net margin of 0.00% compared to iRobot's net margin of -38.16%. WISeKey International's return on equity of 0.00% beat iRobot's return on equity.

iRobot has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, WISeKey International has a beta of 1.42, suggesting that its share price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500.