Go Pro

Birkenstock (BIRK) Competitors

Birkenstock logo
$33.90 +0.12 (+0.34%)
As of 02:28 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

BIRK vs. ONON, DECK, CROX, SHOO, and WWW

Should you buy Birkenstock stock or one of its competitors? Birkenstock's main competitors and comparable companies include ON (ONON), Deckers Outdoor (DECK), Crocs (CROX), Steven Madden (SHOO), and Wolverine World Wide (WWW). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "footwear" industry.

How does Birkenstock compare to ON?

ON (NYSE:ONON) and Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, institutional ownership, profitability, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, earnings, valuation and risk.

36.4% of ON shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Birkenstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 68.6% of ON shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Birkenstock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than ON. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ON, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
ON$3.64B4.93$245.87M$1.4719.11
Birkenstock$2.27B2.66$385.46M$2.1315.89

ON currently has a consensus price target of $48.57, suggesting a potential upside of 72.87%. Birkenstock has a consensus price target of $53.91, suggesting a potential upside of 59.28%. Given ON's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ON is more favorable than Birkenstock.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
ON
1 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.76
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72

Birkenstock has a net margin of 14.82% compared to ON's net margin of 12.09%. ON's return on equity of 22.92% beat Birkenstock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
ON12.09% 22.92% 13.33%
Birkenstock 14.82%13.36%7.21%

ON has a beta of 2.08, suggesting that its share price is 108% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birkenstock has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 1 more articles in the media than ON. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Birkenstock and 5 mentions for ON. Birkenstock's average media sentiment score of 0.46 beat ON's score of 0.32 indicating that Birkenstock is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
ON
2 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Birkenstock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Summary

ON beats Birkenstock on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birkenstock compare to Deckers Outdoor?

Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) and Deckers Outdoor (NYSE:DECK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment, valuation and profitability.

19.9% of Birkenstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.8% of Deckers Outdoor shares are held by institutional investors. 0.4% of Deckers Outdoor shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birkenstock presently has a consensus target price of $53.91, indicating a potential upside of 59.28%. Deckers Outdoor has a consensus target price of $117.16, indicating a potential upside of 39.50%. Given Birkenstock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birkenstock is more favorable than Deckers Outdoor.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72
Deckers Outdoor
2 Sell rating(s)
13 Hold rating(s)
9 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29

In the previous week, Deckers Outdoor had 18 more articles in the media than Birkenstock. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Deckers Outdoor and 6 mentions for Birkenstock. Deckers Outdoor's average media sentiment score of 1.46 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.46 indicating that Deckers Outdoor is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birkenstock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Deckers Outdoor
20 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Deckers Outdoor has a net margin of 18.54% compared to Birkenstock's net margin of 14.82%. Deckers Outdoor's return on equity of 41.51% beat Birkenstock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birkenstock14.82% 13.36% 7.21%
Deckers Outdoor 18.54%41.51%26.55%

Birkenstock has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Deckers Outdoor has a beta of 1.15, indicating that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Deckers Outdoor has higher revenue and earnings than Birkenstock. Deckers Outdoor is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birkenstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birkenstock$2.27B2.66$385.46M$2.1315.89
Deckers Outdoor$5.47B2.09$1.02B$7.0511.91

Summary

Deckers Outdoor beats Birkenstock on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birkenstock compare to Crocs?

Crocs (NASDAQ:CROX) and Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, profitability, institutional ownership, media sentiment, earnings, risk and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Crocs had 9 more articles in the media than Birkenstock. MarketBeat recorded 15 mentions for Crocs and 6 mentions for Birkenstock. Crocs' average media sentiment score of 1.39 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.46 indicating that Crocs is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Crocs
14 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
1 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Birkenstock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

93.4% of Crocs shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Birkenstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.1% of Crocs shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Birkenstock has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Crocs. Crocs is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birkenstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Crocs$4.04B1.38-$81.20M$11.5710.06
Birkenstock$2.27B2.66$385.46M$2.1315.89

Birkenstock has a net margin of 14.82% compared to Crocs' net margin of 14.64%. Crocs' return on equity of 47.75% beat Birkenstock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Crocs14.64% 47.75% 15.20%
Birkenstock 14.82%13.36%7.21%

Crocs has a beta of 1.52, meaning that its stock price is 52% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birkenstock has a beta of 1.28, meaning that its stock price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

Crocs presently has a consensus target price of $139.10, indicating a potential upside of 19.50%. Birkenstock has a consensus target price of $53.91, indicating a potential upside of 59.28%. Given Birkenstock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birkenstock is more favorable than Crocs.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Crocs
2 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.50
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72

Summary

Crocs beats Birkenstock on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birkenstock compare to Steven Madden?

Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) and Steven Madden (NASDAQ:SHOO) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their risk, valuation, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and profitability.

In the previous week, Birkenstock had 2 more articles in the media than Steven Madden. MarketBeat recorded 6 mentions for Birkenstock and 4 mentions for Steven Madden. Steven Madden's average media sentiment score of 0.60 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.46 indicating that Steven Madden is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Birkenstock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Steven Madden
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Birkenstock has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Steven Madden. Birkenstock is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Steven Madden, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Birkenstock$2.27B2.66$385.46M$2.1315.89
Steven Madden$2.74B1.12$44.66M$1.9921.14

Birkenstock has a net margin of 14.82% compared to Steven Madden's net margin of 5.23%. Steven Madden's return on equity of 13.85% beat Birkenstock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Birkenstock14.82% 13.36% 7.21%
Steven Madden 5.23%13.85%6.67%

19.9% of Birkenstock shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 99.9% of Steven Madden shares are held by institutional investors. 2.2% of Steven Madden shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birkenstock has a beta of 1.28, suggesting that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Steven Madden has a beta of 1.15, suggesting that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Birkenstock presently has a consensus price target of $53.91, indicating a potential upside of 59.28%. Steven Madden has a consensus price target of $49.75, indicating a potential upside of 18.25%. Given Birkenstock's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Birkenstock is more favorable than Steven Madden.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72
Steven Madden
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.44

Summary

Birkenstock beats Steven Madden on 10 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Birkenstock compare to Wolverine World Wide?

Wolverine World Wide (NYSE:WWW) and Birkenstock (NYSE:BIRK) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, valuation, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, media sentiment, profitability and earnings.

In the previous week, Wolverine World Wide and Wolverine World Wide both had 6 articles in the media. Wolverine World Wide's average media sentiment score of 1.47 beat Birkenstock's score of 0.46 indicating that Wolverine World Wide is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Wolverine World Wide
5 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Birkenstock
2 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Wolverine World Wide presently has a consensus target price of $23.11, suggesting a potential upside of 19.75%. Birkenstock has a consensus target price of $53.91, suggesting a potential upside of 59.28%. Given Birkenstock's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Birkenstock is more favorable than Wolverine World Wide.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Wolverine World Wide
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.45
Birkenstock
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
13 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.72

Wolverine World Wide has a beta of 1.72, indicating that its share price is 72% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Birkenstock has a beta of 1.28, indicating that its share price is 28% more volatile than the broader market.

90.3% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 19.9% of Birkenstock shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.5% of Wolverine World Wide shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Birkenstock has a net margin of 14.82% compared to Wolverine World Wide's net margin of 5.55%. Wolverine World Wide's return on equity of 28.50% beat Birkenstock's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Wolverine World Wide5.55% 28.50% 7.23%
Birkenstock 14.82%13.36%7.21%

Birkenstock has higher revenue and earnings than Wolverine World Wide. Wolverine World Wide is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Birkenstock, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Wolverine World Wide$1.95B0.81$95.80M$1.2914.96
Birkenstock$2.27B2.66$385.46M$2.1315.89

Summary

Birkenstock beats Wolverine World Wide on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Birkenstock News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for BIRK and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding BIRK and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

BIRK vs. The Competition

MetricBirkenstockTextiles, Apparel & Luxury Goods IndustryConsumer Discretionary SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$6.03B$10.78B$12.98B$23.61B
Dividend YieldN/A2.80%50.03%3.75%
P/E Ratio15.8823.5446.7929.39
Price / Sales2.669.5691.9716.88
Price / Cash12.67188.5128.7831.92
Price / Book1.853.515.767.62
Net Income$385.46M$462.82M$445.07M$1.07B
7 Day Performance-3.82%-2.45%-0.91%-0.50%
1 Month Performance-12.99%-6.28%-1.64%0.75%
1 Year Performance-31.88%9.84%-2.91%14.00%

Birkenstock Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
BIRK
Birkenstock
4.7484 of 5 stars
$33.91
+0.3%
$53.91
+59.0%
-33.0%$6.03B$2.27B15.898,400
ONON
ON
4.9966 of 5 stars
$28.67
-0.6%
$48.57
+69.4%
-38.0%$18.29B$3.64B19.503,963
DECK
Deckers Outdoor
4.2898 of 5 stars
$87.70
-0.1%
$117.16
+33.6%
-31.8%$11.94B$5.47B12.446,000
CROX
Crocs
4.4489 of 5 stars
$119.35
-2.4%
$139.10
+16.5%
+28.1%$5.72B$4.04B10.328,010
SHOO
Steven Madden
4.5542 of 5 stars
$43.05
-2.7%
$49.75
+15.6%
+42.7%$3.15B$2.74B21.636,300

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:BIRK) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners