NYSE:UAA

Under Armour Competitors

$22.98

-0.02 (-0.09 %)

(As of 04/12/2021 12:00 AM ET)

Add

Compare

Today's Range

$22.79

Now: $22.98▼

$23.20

50-Day Range

$21.46

MA: $22.64▼

$24.20

52-Week Range

$7.15

Now: $22.98▼

$24.39

Volume3.70 million shs

Average Volume5.68 million shs

Market Capitalization$10.46 billion

P/E RatioN/A

Dividend YieldN/A

Beta1.13

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) Vs. LEVI, COLM, GIL, GOOS, CRI, and GIII

Should you be buying UAA stock or one of its competitors? Companies in the industry of "apparel, finished products from fabrics & similar materials" are considered alternatives and competitors to Under Armour, including Levi Strauss & Co. (LEVI), Columbia Sportswear (COLM), Gildan Activewear (GIL), Canada Goose (GOOS), Carter's (CRI), and G-III Apparel Group (GIII).

Under Armour vs. Levi Strauss & Co. Stock

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and Levi Strauss & Co. (NYSE:LEVI) are both large-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Levi Strauss & Co.'s revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59
Levi Strauss & Co.	$5.76 billion	1.83	$394.61 million	$0.97	27.29

Levi Strauss & Co. has higher revenue and earnings than Under Armour. Levi Strauss & Co. is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Under Armour and Levi Strauss & Co., as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36
Levi Strauss & Co.	0	0	9	0	3.00

Under Armour currently has a consensus target price of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Levi Strauss & Co. has a consensus target price of $25.90, indicating a potential downside of 2.15%. Given Levi Strauss & Co.'s stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Levi Strauss & Co. is more favorable than Under Armour.

Risk & Volatility

Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Levi Strauss & Co. has a beta of 1.05, meaning that its share price is 5% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Levi Strauss & Co.'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%
Levi Strauss & Co.	-1.90%	7.10%	1.92%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 12.3% of Levi Strauss & Co. shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.5% of Levi Strauss & Co. shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Levi Strauss & Co. beats Under Armour on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour vs. Columbia Sportswear Stock

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and Columbia Sportswear (NASDAQ:COLM) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Columbia Sportswear's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59
Columbia Sportswear	$3.04 billion	2.33	$330.49 million	$4.72	22.62

Columbia Sportswear has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Columbia Sportswear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Under Armour and Columbia Sportswear, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36
Columbia Sportswear	0	5	6	0	2.55

Under Armour currently has a consensus target price of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Columbia Sportswear has a consensus target price of $105.8889, indicating a potential downside of 0.81%. Given Columbia Sportswear's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Columbia Sportswear is more favorable than Under Armour.

Risk & Volatility

Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Columbia Sportswear has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Columbia Sportswear's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%
Columbia Sportswear	4.97%	7.30%	4.61%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 40.6% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 41.2% of Columbia Sportswear shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Columbia Sportswear beats Under Armour on 11 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour vs. Gildan Activewear Stock

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and Gildan Activewear (NYSE:GIL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Gildan Activewear's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59
Gildan Activewear	$2.82 billion	2.33	$259.81 million	$1.66	20.00

Gildan Activewear has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Gildan Activewear is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Under Armour and Gildan Activewear, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36
Gildan Activewear	0	1	6	0	2.86

Under Armour currently has a consensus target price of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Gildan Activewear has a consensus target price of $28.1429, indicating a potential downside of 15.23%. Given Under Armour's higher probable upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Under Armour is more favorable than Gildan Activewear.

Risk & Volatility

Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Gildan Activewear has a beta of 1.57, meaning that its share price is 57% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Gildan Activewear's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%
Gildan Activewear	-13.34%	-2.69%	-1.31%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 76.0% of Gildan Activewear shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Gildan Activewear beats Under Armour on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour vs. Canada Goose Stock

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and Canada Goose (NYSE:GOOS) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Canada Goose's revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59
Canada Goose	$720.34 million	6.56	$114.05 million	$0.98	43.68

Canada Goose has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Canada Goose is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Under Armour and Canada Goose, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36
Canada Goose	3	4	10	0	2.41

Under Armour currently has a consensus target price of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Canada Goose has a consensus target price of $42.4559, indicating a potential downside of 0.83%. Given Canada Goose's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Canada Goose is more favorable than Under Armour.

Risk & Volatility

Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Canada Goose has a beta of 1.73, meaning that its share price is 73% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Canada Goose's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%
Canada Goose	10.27%	16.50%	6.74%

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 47.3% of Canada Goose shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Canada Goose beats Under Armour on 12 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour vs. Carter's Stock

Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) and Carter's (NYSE:CRI) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, dividends and risk.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Under Armour and Carter's, as provided by MarketBeat.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36
Carter's	0	3	6	0	2.67

Under Armour currently has a consensus target price of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Carter's has a consensus target price of $99.8889, indicating a potential upside of 3.99%. Given Carter's' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Carter's is more favorable than Under Armour.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 3.4% of Carter's shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Risk & Volatility

Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, meaning that its share price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carter's has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares Under Armour and Carter's' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%
Carter's	4.31%	25.31%	6.33%

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares Under Armour and Carter's' revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59
Carter's	$3.52 billion	1.20	$263.80 million	$6.46	14.87

Carter's has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Under Armour. Carter's is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

Carter's beats Under Armour on 9 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

Under Armour vs. G-III Apparel Group Stock

G-III Apparel Group (NASDAQ:GIII) and Under Armour (NYSE:UAA) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability and risk.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a summary of current ratings and target prices for G-III Apparel Group and Under Armour, as provided by MarketBeat.com.

	Sell Ratings	Hold Ratings	Buy Ratings	Strong Buy Ratings	Rating Score
G-III Apparel Group	1	5	3	0	2.22
Under Armour	2	13	9	1	2.36

G-III Apparel Group currently has a consensus price target of $26.7778, indicating a potential downside of 14.91%. Under Armour has a consensus price target of $21.20, indicating a potential downside of 7.75%. Given Under Armour's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Under Armour is more favorable than G-III Apparel Group.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

96.7% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 36.5% of Under Armour shares are owned by institutional investors. 9.5% of G-III Apparel Group shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 16.4% of Under Armour shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Volatility and Risk

G-III Apparel Group has a beta of 2.76, indicating that its stock price is 176% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Under Armour has a beta of 1.13, indicating that its stock price is 13% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares G-III Apparel Group and Under Armour's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

	Net Margins	Return on Equity	Return on Assets
G-III Apparel Group	1.50%	3.91%	1.97%
Under Armour	-16.60%	-7.96%	-2.69%

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares G-III Apparel Group and Under Armour's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

	Gross Revenue	Price/Sales Ratio	Net Income	Earnings Per Share	Price/Earnings Ratio
G-III Apparel Group	$3.16 billion	0.48	$143.84 million	$3.19	9.87
Under Armour	$5.27 billion	1.99	$92.14 million	$0.34	67.59

G-III Apparel Group has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Under Armour. G-III Apparel Group is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Under Armour, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

G-III Apparel Group beats Under Armour on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.