Norwegian Cruise Line Competitors

Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) and Carnival Co. & (NYSE:CCL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &, as provided by MarketBeat.

Norwegian Cruise Line currently has a consensus price target of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Carnival Co. & has a consensus price target of $23.9667, indicating a potential downside of 18.20%. Given Carnival Co. &'s higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Carnival Co. & is more favorable than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Risk & Volatility

Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, suggesting that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carnival Co. & has a beta of 2.27, suggesting that its stock price is 127% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &'s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Carnival Co. & has higher revenue and earnings than Norwegian Cruise Line. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Carnival Co. &, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 55.2% of Carnival Co. & shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 24.0% of Carnival Co. & shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Carnival Co. & beats Norwegian Cruise Line on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) and Royal Caribbean Group (NYSE:RCL) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean Group's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Norwegian Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean Group, as provided by MarketBeat.

Norwegian Cruise Line currently has a consensus price target of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Royal Caribbean Group has a consensus price target of $74.3077, indicating a potential downside of 17.33%. Given Royal Caribbean Group's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Royal Caribbean Group is more favorable than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Risk & Volatility

Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, suggesting that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Royal Caribbean Group has a beta of 2.86, suggesting that its stock price is 186% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Royal Caribbean Group's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Royal Caribbean Group has higher revenue and earnings than Norwegian Cruise Line. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Royal Caribbean Group, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 59.1% of Royal Caribbean Group shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 13.1% of Royal Caribbean Group shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Royal Caribbean Group beats Norwegian Cruise Line on 12 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (NYSE:BIP) are both consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Profitability

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Norwegian Cruise Line and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, as provided by MarketBeat.

Norwegian Cruise Line currently has a consensus price target of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a consensus price target of $56.20, indicating a potential upside of 2.63%. Given Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Brookfield Infrastructure Partners is more favorable than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Risk & Volatility

Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, suggesting that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Brookfield Infrastructure Partners has a beta of 0.83, suggesting that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the S&P 500.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Brookfield Infrastructure Partners' gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Norwegian Cruise Line has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Brookfield Infrastructure Partners, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.2% of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

Brookfield Infrastructure Partners beats Norwegian Cruise Line on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) and Carnival Co. & (NYSE:CUK) are both mid-cap consumer discretionary companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, risk, valuation, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings and profitability.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 10.9% of Carnival Co. & shares are held by institutional investors. 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Carnival Co. & shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a summary of current ratings and recommmendations for Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &, as provided by MarketBeat.

Norwegian Cruise Line currently has a consensus price target of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Given Norwegian Cruise Line's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, research analysts plainly believe Norwegian Cruise Line is more favorable than Carnival Co. &.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &'s gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Carnival Co. & has higher revenue and earnings than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Profitability

This table compares Norwegian Cruise Line and Carnival Co. &'s net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Risk & Volatility

Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, suggesting that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Carnival Co. & has a beta of 2.3, suggesting that its stock price is 130% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Norwegian Cruise Line beats Carnival Co. & on 8 of the 13 factors compared between the two stocks.

Kirby (NYSE:KEX) and Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) are both mid-cap transportation companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, earnings, dividends, risk, profitability, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

90.3% of Kirby shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. 1.7% of Kirby shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations for Kirby and Norwegian Cruise Line, as reported by MarketBeat.com.

Kirby currently has a consensus target price of $55.6667, indicating a potential downside of 10.37%. Norwegian Cruise Line has a consensus target price of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Given Kirby's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe Kirby is more favorable than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Valuation & Earnings

This table compares Kirby and Norwegian Cruise Line's gross revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Norwegian Cruise Line has higher revenue and earnings than Kirby. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Kirby, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Profitability

This table compares Kirby and Norwegian Cruise Line's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Volatility and Risk

Kirby has a beta of 1.42, meaning that its stock price is 42% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, meaning that its stock price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Matson (NYSE:MATX) and Norwegian Cruise Line (NYSE:NCLH) are both mid-cap transportation companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their risk, profitability, earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

Profitability

This table compares Matson and Norwegian Cruise Line's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of recent recommendations and price targets for Matson and Norwegian Cruise Line, as reported by MarketBeat.

Matson presently has a consensus target price of $61.6667, indicating a potential downside of 15.88%. Norwegian Cruise Line has a consensus target price of $22.8462, indicating a potential downside of 25.19%. Given Matson's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Matson is more favorable than Norwegian Cruise Line.

Institutional & Insider Ownership

86.6% of Matson shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 50.5% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by institutional investors. 2.0% of Matson shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.3% of Norwegian Cruise Line shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Valuation and Earnings

This table compares Matson and Norwegian Cruise Line's revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Norwegian Cruise Line has higher revenue and earnings than Matson. Norwegian Cruise Line is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Matson, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Volatility and Risk

Matson has a beta of 0.99, meaning that its share price is 1% less volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Norwegian Cruise Line has a beta of 2.87, meaning that its share price is 187% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Summary

Matson beats Norwegian Cruise Line on 9 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.