Go Pro

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) Competitors

FactSet Research Systems logo
$263.66 +0.63 (+0.24%)
Closing price 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$263.33 -0.33 (-0.13%)
As of 04:02 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FDS vs. CCRN, MORN, VRSK, MCO, and SPGI

Should you buy FactSet Research Systems stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares FactSet Research Systems with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with FactSet Research Systems include Cross Country Healthcare (CCRN), Morningstar (MORN), Verisk Analytics (VRSK), Moody's (MCO), and S&P Global (SPGI).

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Cross Country Healthcare?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Cross Country Healthcare (NASDAQ:CCRN) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their valuation, dividends, earnings, analyst recommendations, profitability, media sentiment, institutional ownership and risk.

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Cross Country Healthcare has a beta of 0.45, indicating that its stock price is 55% less volatile than the broader market.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 23.21% compared to Cross Country Healthcare's net margin of -9.84%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 30.68% beat Cross Country Healthcare's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems23.21% 30.68% 15.43%
Cross Country Healthcare -9.84%-0.74%-0.54%

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 11 more articles in the media than Cross Country Healthcare. MarketBeat recorded 14 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 3 mentions for Cross Country Healthcare. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Cross Country Healthcare's score of 0.89 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Cross Country Healthcare
0 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FactSet Research Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Cross Country Healthcare. Cross Country Healthcare is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FactSet Research Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.44B3.85$597.04M$15.1817.37
Cross Country Healthcare$1.00B0.43-$94.85M-$3.05N/A

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 96.0% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 6.3% of Cross Country Healthcare shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FactSet Research Systems presently has a consensus target price of $253.00, suggesting a potential downside of 4.04%. Cross Country Healthcare has a consensus target price of $12.05, suggesting a potential downside of 9.06%. Given FactSet Research Systems' higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe FactSet Research Systems is more favorable than Cross Country Healthcare.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Cross Country Healthcare
1 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
0 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.90

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Cross Country Healthcare on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Morningstar?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Morningstar (NASDAQ:MORN) are both mid-cap finance companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

FactSet Research Systems presently has a consensus price target of $253.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.04%. Morningstar has a consensus price target of $227.33, indicating a potential upside of 17.76%. Given Morningstar's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Morningstar is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Morningstar
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

FactSet Research Systems has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Morningstar. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Morningstar, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.44B3.85$597.04M$15.1817.37
Morningstar$2.57B2.86$374.20M$10.5618.28

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its stock price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morningstar has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its stock price is 1% more volatile than the broader market.

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Morningstar pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morningstar pays out 18.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Morningstar has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. FactSet Research Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.0% of Morningstar shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of Morningstar shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 23.21% compared to Morningstar's net margin of 16.43%. Morningstar's return on equity of 36.82% beat FactSet Research Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems23.21% 30.68% 15.43%
Morningstar 16.43%36.82%12.41%

In the previous week, Morningstar had 16 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Morningstar and 14 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Morningstar's score of 0.93 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Morningstar
13 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

FactSet Research Systems and Morningstar tied by winning 10 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Verisk Analytics?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are related companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability, dividends, earnings and analyst recommendations.

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.72, indicating that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Verisk Analytics had 22 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Verisk Analytics and 14 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat Verisk Analytics' score of 0.95 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Verisk Analytics
17 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
11 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 28.24% compared to FactSet Research Systems' net margin of 23.21%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 30.68% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems23.21% 30.68% 15.43%
Verisk Analytics 28.24%-239.55%18.56%

FactSet Research Systems currently has a consensus target price of $253.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.04%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $236.27, indicating a potential upside of 20.96%. Given Verisk Analytics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Verisk Analytics
0 Sell rating(s)
8 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.53

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Verisk Analytics has increased its dividend for 6 consecutive years. FactSet Research Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.44B3.85$597.04M$15.1817.37
Verisk Analytics$3.14B8.16$908.30M$6.5130.00

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats FactSet Research Systems on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Moody's?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Moody's (NYSE:MCO) are both finance companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, risk, institutional ownership, profitability, valuation, earnings, media sentiment and analyst recommendations.

Moody's has a net margin of 34.25% compared to FactSet Research Systems' net margin of 23.21%. Moody's' return on equity of 80.35% beat FactSet Research Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems23.21% 30.68% 15.43%
Moody's 34.25%80.35%19.38%

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. Moody's pays an annual dividend of $4.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Moody's pays out 26.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Moody's has raised its dividend for 16 consecutive years. FactSet Research Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Moody's shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.1% of Moody's shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.72, suggesting that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Moody's has a beta of 1.34, suggesting that its share price is 34% more volatile than the broader market.

Moody's has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Moody's, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.44B3.85$597.04M$15.1817.37
Moody's$7.72B10.75$2.46B$15.7730.37

FactSet Research Systems presently has a consensus price target of $253.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.04%. Moody's has a consensus price target of $553.61, indicating a potential upside of 15.60%. Given Moody's' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Moody's is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83
Moody's
0 Sell rating(s)
5 Hold rating(s)
14 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.80

In the previous week, Moody's had 8 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 22 mentions for Moody's and 14 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. Moody's' average media sentiment score of 1.24 beat FactSet Research Systems' score of 1.01 indicating that Moody's is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Moody's
20 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Moody's beats FactSet Research Systems on 16 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to S&P Global?

S&P Global (NYSE:SPGI) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are both finance companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, media sentiment, dividends, risk, profitability, valuation and earnings.

S&P Global presently has a consensus price target of $523.59, indicating a potential upside of 27.01%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus price target of $253.00, indicating a potential downside of 4.04%. Given S&P Global's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe S&P Global is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
S&P Global
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
18 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.85
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
1 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.83

S&P Global has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than S&P Global, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
S&P Global$15.34B7.92$4.47B$16.3825.17
FactSet Research Systems$2.44B3.85$597.04M$15.1817.37

S&P Global has a beta of 1.08, meaning that its share price is 8% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.72, meaning that its share price is 28% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, S&P Global had 64 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 78 mentions for S&P Global and 14 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 1.01 beat S&P Global's score of 0.92 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
S&P Global
39 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
23 Neutral mention(s)
5 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FactSet Research Systems
9 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

S&P Global has a net margin of 31.37% compared to FactSet Research Systems' net margin of 23.21%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 30.68% beat S&P Global's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
S&P Global31.37% 17.74% 9.24%
FactSet Research Systems 23.21%30.68%15.43%

87.2% of S&P Global shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of S&P Global shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 1.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

S&P Global pays an annual dividend of $3.88 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.9%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. S&P Global pays out 23.7% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 30.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. S&P Global has increased its dividend for 53 consecutive years and FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

Summary

S&P Global beats FactSet Research Systems on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FactSet Research Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FDS vs. The Competition

MetricFactSet Research SystemsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$9.38B$5.47B$13.89B$23.69B
Dividend Yield1.63%7.52%5.96%4.19%
P/E Ratio17.3736.7328.4330.80
Price / Sales3.851,130.43468.83157.91
Price / Cash12.6984.8652.4531.18
Price / Book4.613.683.674.64
Net Income$597.04M$417.17M$1.31B$1.07B
7 Day Performance3.56%8.05%4.00%0.34%
1 Month Performance14.52%-0.70%0.46%1.27%
1 Year Performance-34.57%6.09%12.53%17.40%

FactSet Research Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FDS
FactSet Research Systems
4.0408 of 5 stars
$263.66
+0.2%
$253.00
-4.0%
-35.6%$9.38B$2.44B17.3712,800
CCRN
Cross Country Healthcare
2.5101 of 5 stars
$13.25
+0.1%
$12.05
-9.1%
N/A$427.74M$1.05BN/A6,784
MORN
Morningstar
4.5504 of 5 stars
$171.76
-0.4%
$227.33
+32.4%
-32.1%$6.56B$2.45B17.4910,973
VRSK
Verisk Analytics
4.7081 of 5 stars
$201.79
+0.6%
$234.87
+16.4%
-27.3%$26.29B$3.07B30.718,000
MCO
Moody's
4.5934 of 5 stars
$504.85
-1.2%
$550.58
+9.1%
-5.8%$89.25B$7.72B36.1916,076

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FDS) was last updated on 7/31/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners