Free Trial

FactSet Research Systems (FDS) Competitors

FactSet Research Systems logo
$333.10 +1.39 (+0.42%)
Closing price 11/13/2026 03:59 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$333.09 -0.01 (0.00%)
As of 11/13/2026 07:30 PM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

FDS vs. ADP, MORN, TRI, VRSK, and ACN

Should you buy FactSet Research Systems stock or one of its competitors? FactSet Research Systems's main competitors and comparable companies include Automatic Data Processing (ADP), Morningstar (MORN), Thomson Reuters (TRI), Verisk Analytics (VRSK), and Accenture (ACN). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Automatic Data Processing?

Automatic Data Processing (NASDAQ:ADP) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their institutional ownership, dividends, earnings, risk, analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability and media sentiment.

Automatic Data Processing pays an annual dividend of $6.80 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.2%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Automatic Data Processing pays out 60.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Automatic Data Processing has increased its dividend for 49 consecutive years and FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years. Automatic Data Processing is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

80.0% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.2% of Automatic Data Processing shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Automatic Data Processing presently has a consensus target price of $285.00, suggesting a potential downside of 8.04%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus target price of $284.93, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. Given Automatic Data Processing's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Automatic Data Processing is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Automatic Data Processing
2 Sell rating(s)
9 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.07
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

In the previous week, Automatic Data Processing had 6 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 25 mentions for Automatic Data Processing and 19 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. Automatic Data Processing's average media sentiment score of 0.92 beat FactSet Research Systems' score of 0.63 indicating that Automatic Data Processing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Automatic Data Processing
13 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FactSet Research Systems
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 21.54% compared to Automatic Data Processing's net margin of 20.33%. Automatic Data Processing's return on equity of 77.01% beat FactSet Research Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Automatic Data Processing20.33% 77.01% 6.67%
FactSet Research Systems 21.54%31.66%15.73%

Automatic Data Processing has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Automatic Data Processing, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Automatic Data Processing$21.95B5.57$4.41B$11.2827.48
FactSet Research Systems$2.48B4.74$533.48M$14.5622.88

Automatic Data Processing has a beta of 0.77, indicating that its stock price is 23% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Automatic Data Processing beats FactSet Research Systems on 13 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Morningstar?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Morningstar (NASDAQ:MORN) are both finance companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their valuation, media sentiment, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings, dividends and risk.

In the previous week, Morningstar had 5 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 24 mentions for Morningstar and 19 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems' average media sentiment score of 0.63 beat Morningstar's score of 0.23 indicating that FactSet Research Systems is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Morningstar
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
6 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
2 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

FactSet Research Systems currently has a consensus target price of $284.93, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. Morningstar has a consensus target price of $235.67, suggesting a potential downside of 4.30%. Given Morningstar's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Morningstar is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Morningstar
0 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.67

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 21.54% compared to Morningstar's net margin of 17.00%. Morningstar's return on equity of 45.17% beat FactSet Research Systems' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems21.54% 31.66% 15.73%
Morningstar 17.00%45.17%12.52%

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Morningstar pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.8%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Morningstar pays out 17.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Morningstar has increased its dividend for 16 consecutive years. FactSet Research Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.69, meaning that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Morningstar has a beta of 0.91, meaning that its stock price is 9% less volatile than the broader market.

FactSet Research Systems has higher revenue and earnings than Morningstar. Morningstar is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FactSet Research Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.48B4.74$533.48M$14.5622.88
Morningstar$2.45B3.74$374.20M$11.4521.51

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 57.0% of Morningstar shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 38.8% of Morningstar shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Morningstar on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Thomson Reuters?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Thomson Reuters (NASDAQ:TRI) are related large-cap companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, media sentiment, dividends, analyst recommendations and earnings.

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 17.3% of Thomson Reuters shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Thomson Reuters pays an annual dividend of $2.62 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.4%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Thomson Reuters pays out 73.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

FactSet Research Systems currently has a consensus target price of $284.93, indicating a potential downside of 14.46%. Thomson Reuters has a consensus target price of $128.96, indicating a potential upside of 17.99%. Given Thomson Reuters' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Thomson Reuters is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Thomson Reuters
0 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.65

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Thomson Reuters has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 2 more articles in the media than Thomson Reuters. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 17 mentions for Thomson Reuters. Thomson Reuters' average media sentiment score of 0.73 beat FactSet Research Systems' score of 0.63 indicating that Thomson Reuters is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Thomson Reuters
5 Very Positive mention(s)
6 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Thomson Reuters has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Thomson Reuters, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.48B4.74$533.48M$14.5622.88
Thomson Reuters$7.48B6.34$1.50B$3.5830.53

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 21.54% compared to Thomson Reuters' net margin of 20.02%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 31.66% beat Thomson Reuters' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems21.54% 31.66% 15.73%
Thomson Reuters 20.02%15.72%9.94%

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Thomson Reuters on 10 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Verisk Analytics?

FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) and Verisk Analytics (NASDAQ:VRSK) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, media sentiment, earnings, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and valuation.

In the previous week, FactSet Research Systems had 13 more articles in the media than Verisk Analytics. MarketBeat recorded 19 mentions for FactSet Research Systems and 6 mentions for Verisk Analytics. Verisk Analytics' average media sentiment score of 0.70 beat FactSet Research Systems' score of 0.63 indicating that Verisk Analytics is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
FactSet Research Systems
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Verisk Analytics
1 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.69, suggesting that its stock price is 31% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Verisk Analytics has a beta of 0.65, suggesting that its stock price is 35% less volatile than the broader market.

FactSet Research Systems presently has a consensus target price of $284.93, indicating a potential downside of 14.46%. Verisk Analytics has a consensus target price of $225.86, indicating a potential upside of 8.68%. Given Verisk Analytics' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Verisk Analytics is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89
Verisk Analytics
0 Sell rating(s)
7 Hold rating(s)
6 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.57

FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Verisk Analytics pays an annual dividend of $2.00 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.0%. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Verisk Analytics pays out 30.3% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. FactSet Research Systems has raised its dividend for 27 consecutive years and Verisk Analytics has raised its dividend for 6 consecutive years. FactSet Research Systems is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Verisk Analytics has a net margin of 27.68% compared to FactSet Research Systems' net margin of 21.54%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 31.66% beat Verisk Analytics' return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
FactSet Research Systems21.54% 31.66% 15.73%
Verisk Analytics 27.68%-128.14%20.42%

Verisk Analytics has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. FactSet Research Systems is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Verisk Analytics, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
FactSet Research Systems$2.48B4.74$533.48M$14.5622.88
Verisk Analytics$3.07B8.68$908.30M$6.6031.49

91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 90.0% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by institutional investors. 0.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Verisk Analytics shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Summary

Verisk Analytics beats FactSet Research Systems on 12 of the 19 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does FactSet Research Systems compare to Accenture?

Accenture (NYSE:ACN) and FactSet Research Systems (NYSE:FDS) are related large-cap companies, but which is the superior investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their analyst recommendations, valuation, profitability, dividends, institutional ownership, media sentiment, risk and earnings.

Accenture pays an annual dividend of $6.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.7%. FactSet Research Systems pays an annual dividend of $4.64 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Accenture pays out 50.4% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. FactSet Research Systems pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Accenture has increased its dividend for 20 consecutive years and FactSet Research Systems has increased its dividend for 27 consecutive years.

FactSet Research Systems has a net margin of 21.54% compared to Accenture's net margin of 11.28%. FactSet Research Systems' return on equity of 31.66% beat Accenture's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Accenture11.28% 26.53% 12.58%
FactSet Research Systems 21.54%31.66%15.73%

75.1% of Accenture shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 91.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by institutional investors. 0.0% of Accenture shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.2% of FactSet Research Systems shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Accenture has a beta of 1.01, indicating that its share price is 1% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, FactSet Research Systems has a beta of 0.69, indicating that its share price is 31% less volatile than the broader market.

Accenture has higher revenue and earnings than FactSet Research Systems. Accenture is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than FactSet Research Systems, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Accenture$74.18B2.00$8.37B$13.5618.50
FactSet Research Systems$2.48B4.74$533.48M$14.5622.88

In the previous week, Accenture had 17 more articles in the media than FactSet Research Systems. MarketBeat recorded 36 mentions for Accenture and 19 mentions for FactSet Research Systems. Accenture's average media sentiment score of 0.87 beat FactSet Research Systems' score of 0.63 indicating that Accenture is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Accenture
22 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
8 Neutral mention(s)
4 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
FactSet Research Systems
4 Very Positive mention(s)
2 Positive mention(s)
9 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Accenture presently has a consensus target price of $221.07, suggesting a potential downside of 11.85%. FactSet Research Systems has a consensus target price of $284.93, suggesting a potential downside of 14.46%. Given Accenture's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Accenture is more favorable than FactSet Research Systems.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Accenture
0 Sell rating(s)
17 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.37
FactSet Research Systems
6 Sell rating(s)
10 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
1.89

Summary

FactSet Research Systems beats Accenture on 11 of the 20 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get FactSet Research Systems News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for FDS and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding FDS and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NYSE and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

FDS vs. The Competition

MetricFactSet Research SystemsCapital Markets IndustryFinance SectorNYSE Exchange
Market Cap$11.69B$5.36B$14.06B$23.48B
Dividend Yield1.40%5.56%4.92%3.78%
P/E Ratio22.8823.4419.7327.05
Price / Sales4.747.844.953.38
Price / Cash13.5229.6320.2315.51
Price / Book5.921.811.823.72
Net Income$533.48M$419.50M$1.33B$1.08B
7 Day Performance1.53%0.11%0.12%0.58%
1 Month Performance14.79%-1.17%0.11%1.11%
1 Year Performance21.73%-1.58%5.10%7.21%

FactSet Research Systems Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
FDS
FactSet Research Systems
2.4636 of 5 stars
$333.10
+0.4%
$284.93
-14.5%
+19.8%$11.69B$2.48B22.8812,444
ADP
Automatic Data Processing
4.2437 of 5 stars
$298.78
+1.7%
$285.00
-4.6%
+21.7%$113.08B$21.95B24.9267,000
MORN
Morningstar
2.633 of 5 stars
$238.73
+5.5%
$235.67
-1.3%
+15.1%$8.06B$2.45B17.2310,973
TRI
Thomson Reuters
4.7153 of 5 stars
$122.24
+3.4%
$127.99
+4.7%
-23.4%$50.31B$7.48B27.8427,100
VRSK
Verisk Analytics
4.1381 of 5 stars
$201.50
+2.6%
$224.79
+11.6%
-4.5%$24.70B$3.07B25.868,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NYSE:FDS) was last updated on 11/14/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners