Flowco (FLOC) Competitors

Flowco currently has a consensus price target of $29.40, suggesting a potential upside of 22.72%. Weatherford International has a consensus price target of $110.67, suggesting a potential upside of 12.91%. Given Flowco's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Flowco is more favorable than Weatherford International.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.1%. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.82, indicating that its share price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Flowco. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Weatherford International had 2 more articles in the media than Flowco. MarketBeat recorded 3 mentions for Weatherford International and 1 mentions for Flowco. Weatherford International's average media sentiment score of 1.09 beat Flowco's score of 0.00 indicating that Weatherford International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 2.1% of Weatherford International shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

98.5% of Gates Industrial shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 2.8% of Gates Industrial shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Gates Industrial has a net margin of 7.23% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat Gates Industrial's return on equity.

Gates Industrial has higher revenue and earnings than Flowco. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Gates Industrial, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Gates Industrial has a beta of 1.27, indicating that its share price is 27% more volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Gates Industrial had 3 more articles in the media than Flowco. MarketBeat recorded 4 mentions for Gates Industrial and 1 mentions for Flowco. Gates Industrial's average media sentiment score of 0.14 beat Flowco's score of 0.00 indicating that Gates Industrial is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Flowco presently has a consensus price target of $29.40, suggesting a potential upside of 22.72%. Gates Industrial has a consensus price target of $31.00, suggesting a potential upside of 22.42%. Given Flowco's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Flowco is more favorable than Gates Industrial.

98.9% of JBT Marel shares are held by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowco has a net margin of 5.49% compared to JBT Marel's net margin of 4.32%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.

Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JBT Marel pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

Flowco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JBT Marel. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Flowco and Flowco both had 1 articles in the media. Flowco's average media sentiment score of 0.00 equaled JBT Marel'saverage media sentiment score.

Flowco presently has a consensus target price of $29.40, indicating a potential upside of 22.72%. JBT Marel has a consensus target price of $174.67, indicating a potential upside of 46.25%. Given JBT Marel's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe JBT Marel is more favorable than Flowco.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JBT Marel has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowco currently has a consensus price target of $29.40, indicating a potential upside of 22.72%. Solaris Energy Infrastructure has a consensus price target of $80.00, indicating a potential upside of 16.99%. Given Flowco's higher probable upside, equities analysts clearly believe Flowco is more favorable than Solaris Energy Infrastructure.

Solaris Energy Infrastructure has a net margin of 6.69% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat Solaris Energy Infrastructure's return on equity.

In the previous week, Solaris Energy Infrastructure had 11 more articles in the media than Flowco. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Solaris Energy Infrastructure and 1 mentions for Flowco. Solaris Energy Infrastructure's average media sentiment score of 1.20 beat Flowco's score of 0.00 indicating that Solaris Energy Infrastructure is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Flowco has higher revenue and earnings than Solaris Energy Infrastructure. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Solaris Energy Infrastructure, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Solaris Energy Infrastructure has a beta of 1.19, meaning that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market.

Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.5%. Solaris Energy Infrastructure pays an annual dividend of $0.48 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.7%. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Solaris Energy Infrastructure pays out 53.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. Flowco is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

67.4% of Solaris Energy Infrastructure shares are held by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 20.2% of Solaris Energy Infrastructure shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.