Flowco (FLOC) Competitors

Flowco has a net margin of 5.49% compared to JBT Marel's net margin of 4.32%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat JBT Marel's return on equity.

Flowco currently has a consensus price target of $29.40, suggesting a potential upside of 41.83%. JBT Marel has a consensus price target of $174.67, suggesting a potential upside of 19.17%. Given Flowco's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Flowco is more favorable than JBT Marel.

In the previous week, Flowco had 4 more articles in the media than JBT Marel. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Flowco and 1 mentions for JBT Marel. Flowco's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat JBT Marel's score of 0.00 indicating that Flowco is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. JBT Marel pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.3%. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. JBT Marel pays out 12.5% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

98.9% of JBT Marel shares are owned by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of JBT Marel shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

Flowco has higher earnings, but lower revenue than JBT Marel. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than JBT Marel, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, JBT Marel has a beta of 0.95, indicating that its stock price is 5% less volatile than the broader market.

ACM Research has a net margin of 9.48% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat ACM Research's return on equity.

ACM Research presently has a consensus target price of $127.50, suggesting a potential upside of 7.35%. Flowco has a consensus target price of $29.40, suggesting a potential upside of 41.83%. Given Flowco's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Flowco is more favorable than ACM Research.

In the previous week, ACM Research had 5 more articles in the media than Flowco. MarketBeat recorded 10 mentions for ACM Research and 5 mentions for Flowco. ACM Research's average media sentiment score of 1.02 beat Flowco's score of 0.32 indicating that ACM Research is being referred to more favorably in the media.

66.8% of ACM Research shares are held by institutional investors. 24.4% of ACM Research shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

ACM Research has a beta of 2.01, indicating that its share price is 101% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its share price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

ACM Research has higher revenue and earnings than Flowco. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ACM Research, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Weatherford International has higher revenue and earnings than Flowco. Weatherford International is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Flowco, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Flowco currently has a consensus target price of $29.40, indicating a potential upside of 41.83%. Weatherford International has a consensus target price of $108.22, indicating a potential upside of 33.67%. Given Flowco's higher probable upside, equities analysts plainly believe Flowco is more favorable than Weatherford International.

Weatherford International has a net margin of 9.49% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat Weatherford International's return on equity.

97.2% of Weatherford International shares are held by institutional investors. 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.6% of Weatherford International shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company will outperform the market over the long term.

In the previous week, Flowco and Flowco both had 5 articles in the media. Weatherford International's average media sentiment score of 0.80 beat Flowco's score of 0.32 indicating that Weatherford International is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Flowco has a beta of 0.83, meaning that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Weatherford International has a beta of 0.82, meaning that its stock price is 18% less volatile than the broader market.

Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. Weatherford International pays an annual dividend of $1.10 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.4%. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Weatherford International pays out 17.2% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

In the previous week, Flowco had 4 more articles in the media than ESAB. MarketBeat recorded 5 mentions for Flowco and 1 mentions for ESAB. Flowco's average media sentiment score of 0.32 beat ESAB's score of 0.00 indicating that Flowco is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

91.1% of ESAB shares are held by institutional investors. 7.2% of ESAB shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 69.8% of Flowco shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

ESAB has a beta of 1.19, indicating that its stock price is 19% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Flowco has a beta of 0.83, indicating that its stock price is 17% less volatile than the broader market.

ESAB pays an annual dividend of $0.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 0.4%. Flowco pays an annual dividend of $0.36 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. ESAB pays out 11.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Flowco pays out 30.8% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years. ESAB has increased its dividend for 3 consecutive years.

ESAB currently has a consensus price target of $138.38, indicating a potential upside of 43.83%. Flowco has a consensus price target of $29.40, indicating a potential upside of 41.83%. Given ESAB's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe ESAB is more favorable than Flowco.

ESAB has higher revenue and earnings than Flowco. Flowco is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than ESAB, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

ESAB has a net margin of 7.11% compared to Flowco's net margin of 5.49%. Flowco's return on equity of 48.49% beat ESAB's return on equity.