Haleon (HLN) Competitors

Kenvue currently has a consensus price target of $19.27, indicating a potential upside of 0.40%. Given Kenvue's higher probable upside, research analysts plainly believe Kenvue is more favorable than Haleon.

Kenvue has a net margin of 10.76% compared to Haleon's net margin of 0.00%. Kenvue's return on equity of 21.22% beat Haleon's return on equity.

97.6% of Kenvue shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Haleon shares are owned by institutional investors. 1.6% of Kenvue shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Kenvue pays an annual dividend of $0.84 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.4%. Haleon pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Kenvue pays out 96.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Haleon pays out 64.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kenvue has increased its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Kenvue is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Haleon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kenvue. Kenvue is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haleon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, Kenvue had 3 more articles in the media than Haleon. MarketBeat recorded 11 mentions for Kenvue and 8 mentions for Haleon. Kenvue's average media sentiment score of 0.97 beat Haleon's score of 0.60 indicating that Kenvue is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Kenvue has a beta of 0.47, suggesting that its share price is 53% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haleon has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimberly-Clark has a beta of 0.26, meaning that its share price is 74% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haleon has a beta of 0.12, meaning that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

Kimberly-Clark presently has a consensus target price of $117.93, suggesting a potential upside of 6.83%. Given Kimberly-Clark's higher possible upside, equities research analysts plainly believe Kimberly-Clark is more favorable than Haleon.

Kimberly-Clark has a net margin of 11.79% compared to Haleon's net margin of 0.00%. Kimberly-Clark's return on equity of 143.92% beat Haleon's return on equity.

Haleon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Kimberly-Clark. Kimberly-Clark is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haleon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Kimberly-Clark pays an annual dividend of $5.12 per share and has a dividend yield of 4.6%. Haleon pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Kimberly-Clark pays out 87.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Haleon pays out 64.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Kimberly-Clark has increased its dividend for 54 consecutive years. Kimberly-Clark is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

In the previous week, Kimberly-Clark had 4 more articles in the media than Haleon. MarketBeat recorded 12 mentions for Kimberly-Clark and 8 mentions for Haleon. Kimberly-Clark's average media sentiment score of 1.08 beat Haleon's score of 0.60 indicating that Kimberly-Clark is being referred to more favorably in the media.

76.3% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Haleon shares are held by institutional investors. 0.8% of Kimberly-Clark shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Haleon has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Estee Lauder Companies' net margin of -1.67%. Estee Lauder Companies' return on equity of 20.66% beat Haleon's return on equity.

Estee Lauder Companies presently has a consensus target price of $96.95, suggesting a potential upside of 12.67%. Given Estee Lauder Companies' higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Estee Lauder Companies is more favorable than Haleon.

55.2% of Estee Lauder Companies shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Haleon shares are held by institutional investors. 13.1% of Estee Lauder Companies shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Estee Lauder Companies has a beta of 1.25, suggesting that its share price is 25% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haleon has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its share price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

In the previous week, Estee Lauder Companies and Estee Lauder Companies both had 8 articles in the media. Estee Lauder Companies' average media sentiment score of 0.95 beat Haleon's score of 0.60 indicating that Estee Lauder Companies is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Haleon has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Estee Lauder Companies. Estee Lauder Companies is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Haleon, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Estee Lauder Companies pays an annual dividend of $1.40 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.6%. Haleon pays an annual dividend of $0.25 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.6%. Estee Lauder Companies pays out -200.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Haleon pays out 64.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. Both companies have healthy payout ratios and should be able to cover their dividend payments with earnings for the next several years.

e.l.f. Beauty has a beta of 1.58, suggesting that its stock price is 58% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Haleon has a beta of 0.12, suggesting that its stock price is 88% less volatile than the broader market.

92.4% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 6.7% of Haleon shares are held by institutional investors. 3.5% of e.l.f. Beauty shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

e.l.f. Beauty has a net margin of 3.38% compared to Haleon's net margin of 0.00%. e.l.f. Beauty's return on equity of 14.07% beat Haleon's return on equity.

Haleon has higher revenue and earnings than e.l.f. Beauty. Haleon is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than e.l.f. Beauty, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

In the previous week, e.l.f. Beauty had 10 more articles in the media than Haleon. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for e.l.f. Beauty and 8 mentions for Haleon. e.l.f. Beauty's average media sentiment score of 1.25 beat Haleon's score of 0.60 indicating that e.l.f. Beauty is being referred to more favorably in the media.

e.l.f. Beauty presently has a consensus price target of $90.81, suggesting a potential downside of 0.83%. Given e.l.f. Beauty's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities research analysts clearly believe e.l.f. Beauty is more favorable than Haleon.