PHX Minerals Competitors

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for PHX Minerals and ConocoPhillips, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. ConocoPhillips has a consensus price target of $51.5417, suggesting a potential downside of 11.65%. Given ConocoPhillips' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe ConocoPhillips is more favorable than PHX Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and ConocoPhillips' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

PHX Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. ConocoPhillips pays an annual dividend of $1.72 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.9%. PHX Minerals pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. ConocoPhillips pays out 47.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHX Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and ConocoPhillips has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. ConocoPhillips is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, ConocoPhillips has a beta of 1.85, indicating that its share price is 85% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 72.9% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.7% of ConocoPhillips shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and ConocoPhillips' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

ConocoPhillips has higher revenue and earnings than PHX Minerals. ConocoPhillips is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

ConocoPhillips beats PHX Minerals on 11 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and EOG Resources (NYSE:EOG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for PHX Minerals and EOG Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. EOG Resources has a consensus price target of $64.8696, suggesting a potential downside of 13.02%. Given EOG Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe EOG Resources is more favorable than PHX Minerals.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and EOG Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Dividends

PHX Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. EOG Resources pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 2.0%. PHX Minerals pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. EOG Resources pays out 30.1% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHX Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and EOG Resources has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. EOG Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Risk & Volatility

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, EOG Resources has a beta of 2.09, indicating that its share price is 109% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 87.7% of EOG Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.3% of EOG Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and EOG Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

EOG Resources has higher revenue and earnings than PHX Minerals. EOG Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Summary

EOG Resources beats PHX Minerals on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and Pioneer Natural Resources (NYSE:PXD) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk and profitability.

Earnings and Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and Pioneer Natural Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Pioneer Natural Resources has higher revenue and earnings than PHX Minerals. Pioneer Natural Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 89.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 0.9% of Pioneer Natural Resources shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

PHX Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Pioneer Natural Resources pays an annual dividend of $2.20 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.3%. PHX Minerals pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Pioneer Natural Resources pays out 26.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHX Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Pioneer Natural Resources has raised its dividend for 2 consecutive years. Pioneer Natural Resources is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Recommendations

This is a breakdown of current recommendations for PHX Minerals and Pioneer Natural Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. Pioneer Natural Resources has a consensus price target of $140.0435, suggesting a potential downside of 14.39%. Given Pioneer Natural Resources' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts clearly believe Pioneer Natural Resources is more favorable than PHX Minerals.

Risk & Volatility

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Pioneer Natural Resources has a beta of 1.92, indicating that its share price is 92% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and Pioneer Natural Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Pioneer Natural Resources beats PHX Minerals on 17 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and Devon Energy (NYSE:DVN) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and Devon Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

PHX Minerals has higher earnings, but lower revenue than Devon Energy. Devon Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 80.9% of Devon Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.6% of Devon Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

PHX Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Devon Energy pays an annual dividend of $0.44 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.7%. PHX Minerals pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Devon Energy pays out 31.9% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHX Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Devon Energy has raised its dividend for 3 consecutive years. Devon Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and longer track record of dividend growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PHX Minerals and Devon Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. Devon Energy has a consensus price target of $18.2143, suggesting a potential downside of 28.88%. Given Devon Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Devon Energy is more favorable than PHX Minerals.

Volatility & Risk

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Devon Energy has a beta of 3.46, meaning that its stock price is 246% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and Devon Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Devon Energy beats PHX Minerals on 12 of the 18 factors compared between the two stocks.

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and Diamondback Energy (NASDAQ:FANG) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and Diamondback Energy's gross revenue, earnings per share (EPS) and valuation.

Diamondback Energy has higher revenue and earnings than PHX Minerals. Diamondback Energy is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Insider & Institutional Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 92.1% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 0.5% of Diamondback Energy shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Dividends

PHX Minerals pays an annual dividend of $0.04 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.2%. Diamondback Energy pays an annual dividend of $1.50 per share and has a dividend yield of 1.8%. PHX Minerals pays out 80.0% of its earnings in the form of a dividend, suggesting it may not have sufficient earnings to cover its dividend payment in the future. Diamondback Energy pays out 21.6% of its earnings in the form of a dividend. PHX Minerals has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years and Diamondback Energy has raised its dividend for 1 consecutive years. Diamondback Energy is clearly the better dividend stock, given its higher yield and lower payout ratio.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PHX Minerals and Diamondback Energy, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. Diamondback Energy has a consensus price target of $66.0893, suggesting a potential downside of 22.49%. Given Diamondback Energy's stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Diamondback Energy is more favorable than PHX Minerals.

Volatility & Risk

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, meaning that its stock price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Diamondback Energy has a beta of 2.59, meaning that its stock price is 159% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and Diamondback Energy's net margins, return on equity and return on assets.

Summary

Diamondback Energy beats PHX Minerals on 14 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

PHX Minerals (NYSE:PHX) and Continental Resources (NYSE:CLR) are both oils/energy companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, risk, dividends, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and valuation.

Earnings & Valuation

This table compares PHX Minerals and Continental Resources' top-line revenue, earnings per share and valuation.

Continental Resources has higher revenue and earnings than PHX Minerals. Continental Resources is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than PHX Minerals, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

Institutional and Insider Ownership

86.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 14.8% of Continental Resources shares are held by institutional investors. 5.7% of PHX Minerals shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 79.6% of Continental Resources shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Analyst Ratings

This is a breakdown of current recommendations and price targets for PHX Minerals and Continental Resources, as reported by MarketBeat.

PHX Minerals currently has a consensus price target of $2.2250, suggesting a potential downside of 32.37%. Continental Resources has a consensus price target of $17.4250, suggesting a potential downside of 45.10%. Given PHX Minerals' stronger consensus rating and higher possible upside, equities analysts plainly believe PHX Minerals is more favorable than Continental Resources.

Volatility & Risk

PHX Minerals has a beta of 1.21, indicating that its share price is 21% more volatile than the S&P 500. Comparatively, Continental Resources has a beta of 3.37, indicating that its share price is 237% more volatile than the S&P 500.

Profitability

This table compares PHX Minerals and Continental Resources' net margins, return on equity and return on assets.