Go Pro

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$7.84 -0.06 (-0.76%)
Closing price 09/2/2026 04:00 PM Eastern
Extended Trading
$7.90 +0.06 (+0.82%)
As of 04:08 AM Eastern
Extended trading is trading that happens on electronic markets outside of regular trading hours. This is a fair market value extended hours price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, XNDU, INFQ, DBD, and CRSR

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? Quantum Computing's main competitors and comparable companies include NVIDIA (NVDA), Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (XNDU), Infleqtion (INFQ), Diebold Nixdorf (DBD), and Corsair Gaming (CRSR). Companies are selected based on similarities in market, industry, and size. These companies are all part of the "technology" sector.

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their earnings, media sentiment, risk, valuation, profitability, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership and dividends.

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 407 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 434 mentions for NVIDIA and 27 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat NVIDIA's score of 0.68 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
NVIDIA
209 Very Positive mention(s)
56 Positive mention(s)
92 Neutral mention(s)
54 Negative mention(s)
8 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 3.9% of NVIDIA shares are owned by insiders. Comparatively, 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
NVIDIA$215.94B25.05$120.07B$7.9128.37
Quantum Computing$680K2,609.68-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

NVIDIA has a net margin of 63.66% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 96.04% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
NVIDIA63.66% 96.04% 71.00%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

NVIDIA has a beta of 2.22, indicating that its stock price is 122% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

NVIDIA presently has a consensus target price of $324.23, indicating a potential upside of 44.48%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 138.10%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
50 Buy rating(s)
2 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.98
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares?

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares (NASDAQ:XNDU) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, dividends, analyst recommendations, risk, institutional ownership, earnings, media sentiment and valuation.

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares$5.96M497.94-$125.37M-$0.42N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,609.68-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 19 more articles in the media than Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Quantum Computing and 8 mentions for Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' score of 0.07 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
0 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares has a beta of 14.84, indicating that its share price is 1,384% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting SharesN/A N/A N/A
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares presently has a consensus price target of $33.00, suggesting a potential upside of 231.99%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.10%. Given Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares' stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, equities research analysts clearly believe Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.60
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares on 8 of the 14 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Infleqtion?

Infleqtion (NYSE:INFQ) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both technology companies, but which is the better stock? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, risk, media sentiment, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, earnings and dividends.

Infleqtion currently has a consensus target price of $21.00, suggesting a potential upside of 66.10%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $18.67, suggesting a potential upside of 138.10%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Infleqtion.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Infleqtion
1 Sell rating(s)
1 Hold rating(s)
5 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.75
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 13 more articles in the media than Infleqtion. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Quantum Computing and 14 mentions for Infleqtion. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Infleqtion's score of 0.79 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Infleqtion
6 Very Positive mention(s)
3 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Quantum Computing
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Quantum Computing has higher revenue and earnings than Infleqtion. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Infleqtion, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
InfleqtionN/AN/A-$66.93M-$0.15N/A
Quantum Computing$680K2,609.68-$15.84M-$0.07N/A

Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Infleqtion's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
InfleqtionN/A -28.14% -13.99%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Infleqtion has a beta of 4.33, indicating that its share price is 333% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, indicating that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market.

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Infleqtion on 10 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Diebold Nixdorf?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Diebold Nixdorf (NYSE:DBD) are both technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their media sentiment, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership, risk, profitability, valuation and analyst recommendations.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 25 more articles in the media than Diebold Nixdorf. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Quantum Computing and 2 mentions for Diebold Nixdorf. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Diebold Nixdorf's score of 1.05 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Diebold Nixdorf
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Diebold Nixdorf has a net margin of 2.87% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Diebold Nixdorf's return on equity of 21.16% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Diebold Nixdorf 2.87%21.16%5.90%

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its share price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Diebold Nixdorf has a beta of 1.15, meaning that its share price is 15% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus target price of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 138.10%. Diebold Nixdorf has a consensus target price of $100.00, indicating a potential upside of 47.55%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, equities analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Diebold Nixdorf.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Diebold Nixdorf
0 Sell rating(s)
0 Hold rating(s)
2 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.33

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 97.0% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 1.1% of Diebold Nixdorf shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

Diebold Nixdorf has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Diebold Nixdorf, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,609.68-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Diebold Nixdorf$3.81B0.60$94.60M$3.0622.15

Summary

Diebold Nixdorf beats Quantum Computing on 10 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Corsair Gaming?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Corsair Gaming (NASDAQ:CRSR) are both small-cap technology companies, but which is the superior investment? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, valuation, media sentiment, risk, earnings, analyst recommendations, dividends and institutional ownership.

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.78, meaning that its stock price is 278% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Corsair Gaming has a beta of 1.88, meaning that its stock price is 88% more volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 25.7% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by institutional investors. 12.4% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 54.5% of Corsair Gaming shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, endowments and hedge funds believe a stock will outperform the market over the long term.

Corsair Gaming has a net margin of 2.36% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Corsair Gaming's return on equity of 13.10% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Corsair Gaming 2.36%13.10%6.88%

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $18.67, indicating a potential upside of 138.10%. Corsair Gaming has a consensus price target of $12.00, indicating a potential downside of 0.83%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, research analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Corsair Gaming.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Corsair Gaming
1 Sell rating(s)
3 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.56

Corsair Gaming has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Corsair Gaming, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K2,609.68-$15.84M-$0.07N/A
Corsair Gaming$1.47B0.89-$12.47M$0.3040.33

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 25 more articles in the media than Corsair Gaming. MarketBeat recorded 27 mentions for Quantum Computing and 2 mentions for Corsair Gaming. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 1.27 beat Corsair Gaming's score of 1.15 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
12 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
3 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Corsair Gaming
2 Very Positive mention(s)
0 Positive mention(s)
0 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Corsair Gaming beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingTechnology Hardware, Storage & Peripherals IndustryTechnology SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$1.79B$114.89B$29.34B$12.67B
Dividend YieldN/A1.71%2.73%8.56%
P/E Ratio-111.9828.6975.2725.23
Price / Sales2,609.6894.19587.78104.57
Price / CashN/A19.9448.2952.08
Price / BookN/A7.569.176.10
Net Income-$15.84M$3.57B$678.51M$348.86M
7 Day Performance-9.36%-2.70%-3.09%-1.90%
1 Month Performance-10.30%5.64%0.21%1.96%
1 Year Performance-46.12%92.97%185.53%15.30%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.8094 of 5 stars
$7.84
-0.8%
$18.67
+138.1%
-47.9%$1.79B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.8918 of 5 stars
$210.92
-1.0%
$308.46
+46.2%
+31.4%$5.10T$215.94B32.3042,000
XNDU
Xanadu Quantum Technologies Limited Class B Subordinate Voting Shares
3.7077 of 5 stars
$10.23
-3.7%
$33.00
+222.6%
N/A$3.05BN/AN/AN/A
INFQ
Infleqtion
3.9639 of 5 stars
$13.69
-1.0%
$21.00
+53.4%
N/A$2.99B$30.93MN/A2
DBD
Diebold Nixdorf
4.2373 of 5 stars
$68.20
+0.6%
$100.00
+46.6%
+13.7%$2.32B$3.81B22.2920,000

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 9/3/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners