Free Trial
Memorial Day Savings! Save $100 on MarketBeat All Access
Claim Your Discount
Claim MarketBeat All Access Sale Promotion

Quantum Computing (QUBT) Competitors

Quantum Computing logo
$11.31 +1.75 (+18.29%)
As of 02:13 PM Eastern
This is a fair market value price provided by Massive. Learn more.

QUBT vs. NVDA, DT, TTD, YMM, and SNAP

Should you buy Quantum Computing stock or one of its competitors? MarketBeat compares Quantum Computing with other companies and stocks that may be similar based on industry, sector, market capitalization, business model, investor interest, or shared news coverage. Companies and stocks commonly compared with Quantum Computing include NVIDIA (NVDA), Dynatrace (DT), Trade Desk (TTD), Full Truck Alliance (YMM), and Snap (SNAP).

How does Quantum Computing compare to NVIDIA?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and NVIDIA (NASDAQ:NVDA) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, earnings, media sentiment, profitability, dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations and institutional ownership.

NVIDIA has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than NVIDIA, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K3,752.92-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
NVIDIA$215.94B24.84$120.07B$4.9045.19

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, suggesting that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, NVIDIA has a beta of 2.25, suggesting that its share price is 125% more volatile than the broader market.

Quantum Computing presently has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 54.66%. NVIDIA has a consensus price target of $298.58, suggesting a potential upside of 34.83%. Given Quantum Computing's higher possible upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than NVIDIA.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
NVIDIA
0 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
48 Buy rating(s)
4 Strong Buy rating(s)
3.04

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 65.3% of NVIDIA shares are owned by institutional investors. 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 4.2% of NVIDIA shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, large money managers and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

NVIDIA has a net margin of 55.60% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. NVIDIA's return on equity of 97.37% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
NVIDIA 55.60%97.37%70.68%

In the previous week, NVIDIA had 494 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 510 mentions for NVIDIA and 16 mentions for Quantum Computing. NVIDIA's average media sentiment score of 0.75 beat Quantum Computing's score of 0.57 indicating that NVIDIA is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
NVIDIA
278 Very Positive mention(s)
62 Positive mention(s)
98 Neutral mention(s)
43 Negative mention(s)
11 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

NVIDIA beats Quantum Computing on 13 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Dynatrace?

Dynatrace (NYSE:DT) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, profitability, media sentiment, valuation, dividends, earnings, institutional ownership and analyst recommendations.

Dynatrace has a net margin of 8.06% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Dynatrace's return on equity of 10.37% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Dynatrace8.06% 10.37% 6.74%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Dynatrace has a beta of 0.7, indicating that its stock price is 30% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, indicating that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

94.3% of Dynatrace shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 0.6% of Dynatrace shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, large money managers and hedge funds believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

Dynatrace has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Dynatrace, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Dynatrace$2.02B5.76$162.67M$0.5472.19
Quantum Computing$680K3,752.92-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Dynatrace presently has a consensus target price of $46.50, indicating a potential upside of 19.28%. Quantum Computing has a consensus target price of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.66%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts clearly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Dynatrace.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Dynatrace
1 Sell rating(s)
6 Hold rating(s)
21 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.71
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

In the previous week, Dynatrace had 21 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 37 mentions for Dynatrace and 16 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Dynatrace's score of 0.27 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Dynatrace
9 Very Positive mention(s)
4 Positive mention(s)
13 Neutral mention(s)
7 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Dynatrace beats Quantum Computing on 11 of the 16 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Trade Desk?

Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) and Trade Desk (NASDAQ:TTD) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their media sentiment, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, earnings, profitability, risk and valuation.

Trade Desk has a net margin of 14.57% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Trade Desk's return on equity of 16.91% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Quantum ComputingN/A N/A N/A
Trade Desk 14.57%16.91%7.28%

Trade Desk has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Trade Desk, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Quantum Computing$680K3,752.92-$63.15M-$0.28N/A
Trade Desk$2.90B3.45$443.30M$0.8824.12

Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, suggesting that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Trade Desk has a beta of 1.1, suggesting that its share price is 10% more volatile than the broader market.

4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 67.8% of Trade Desk shares are held by institutional investors. 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by insiders. Comparatively, 11.4% of Trade Desk shares are held by insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that large money managers, hedge funds and endowments believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Trade Desk had 2 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 18 mentions for Trade Desk and 16 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Trade Desk's score of 0.38 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive
Trade Desk
4 Very Positive mention(s)
7 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
1 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral

Quantum Computing currently has a consensus price target of $17.50, suggesting a potential upside of 54.66%. Trade Desk has a consensus price target of $34.61, suggesting a potential upside of 63.03%. Given Trade Desk's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Trade Desk is more favorable than Quantum Computing.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Trade Desk
4 Sell rating(s)
21 Hold rating(s)
11 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.24

Summary

Trade Desk beats Quantum Computing on 12 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Full Truck Alliance?

Full Truck Alliance (NYSE:YMM) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer software companies, but which is the better business? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, analyst recommendations, earnings, media sentiment, dividends, profitability, institutional ownership and valuation.

Full Truck Alliance has higher revenue and earnings than Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Full Truck Alliance, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Full Truck Alliance$12.49B0.73$630.36M$0.6014.54
Quantum Computing$680K3,752.92-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Full Truck Alliance currently has a consensus price target of $11.41, indicating a potential upside of 30.80%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.66%. Given Quantum Computing's higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Full Truck Alliance.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Full Truck Alliance
0 Sell rating(s)
4 Hold rating(s)
3 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Full Truck Alliance has a net margin of 35.22% compared to Quantum Computing's net margin of 0.00%. Full Truck Alliance's return on equity of 11.33% beat Quantum Computing's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Full Truck Alliance35.22% 11.33% 10.31%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

Full Truck Alliance has a beta of 0.3, meaning that its share price is 70% less volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, meaning that its share price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

39.0% of Full Truck Alliance shares are held by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by institutional investors. 16.5% of Full Truck Alliance shares are held by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are held by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that hedge funds, endowments and large money managers believe a stock is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Quantum Computing had 10 more articles in the media than Full Truck Alliance. MarketBeat recorded 16 mentions for Quantum Computing and 6 mentions for Full Truck Alliance. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Full Truck Alliance's score of 0.14 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Full Truck Alliance
1 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
2 Neutral mention(s)
0 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Full Truck Alliance beats Quantum Computing on 8 of the 15 factors compared between the two stocks.

How does Quantum Computing compare to Snap?

Snap (NYSE:SNAP) and Quantum Computing (NASDAQ:QUBT) are both mid-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their profitability, earnings, analyst recommendations, valuation, institutional ownership, dividends, risk and media sentiment.

Snap has a beta of 1.05, indicating that its stock price is 5% more volatile than the broader market. Comparatively, Quantum Computing has a beta of 3.7, indicating that its stock price is 270% more volatile than the broader market.

Snap presently has a consensus price target of $7.91, indicating a potential upside of 35.25%. Quantum Computing has a consensus price target of $17.50, indicating a potential upside of 54.66%. Given Quantum Computing's stronger consensus rating and higher probable upside, analysts plainly believe Quantum Computing is more favorable than Snap.

Company Sell Ratings Hold Ratings Buy Ratings Strong Buy Ratings Rating Score
Snap
2 Sell rating(s)
22 Hold rating(s)
10 Buy rating(s)
1 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.29
Quantum Computing
1 Sell rating(s)
2 Hold rating(s)
4 Buy rating(s)
0 Strong Buy rating(s)
2.43

Quantum Computing has lower revenue, but higher earnings than Snap. Quantum Computing is trading at a lower price-to-earnings ratio than Snap, indicating that it is currently the more affordable of the two stocks.

CompanyGross RevenuePrice/Sales RatioNet IncomeEarnings Per SharePrice/Earnings Ratio
Snap$5.93B1.66-$460.49M-$0.24N/A
Quantum Computing$680K3,752.92-$63.15M-$0.28N/A

Quantum Computing has a net margin of 0.00% compared to Snap's net margin of -6.72%. Quantum Computing's return on equity of 0.00% beat Snap's return on equity.

Company Net Margins Return on Equity Return on Assets
Snap-6.72% -18.92% -5.44%
Quantum Computing N/A N/A N/A

47.5% of Snap shares are owned by institutional investors. Comparatively, 4.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by institutional investors. 22.7% of Snap shares are owned by company insiders. Comparatively, 19.3% of Quantum Computing shares are owned by company insiders. Strong institutional ownership is an indication that endowments, hedge funds and large money managers believe a company is poised for long-term growth.

In the previous week, Snap had 14 more articles in the media than Quantum Computing. MarketBeat recorded 30 mentions for Snap and 16 mentions for Quantum Computing. Quantum Computing's average media sentiment score of 0.57 beat Snap's score of 0.15 indicating that Quantum Computing is being referred to more favorably in the news media.

Company Very Positive Positive Neutral Negative Very Negative Overall Sentiment
Snap
13 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
4 Neutral mention(s)
3 Negative mention(s)
1 Very Negative mention(s)
Neutral
Quantum Computing
8 Very Positive mention(s)
1 Positive mention(s)
5 Neutral mention(s)
2 Negative mention(s)
0 Very Negative mention(s)
Positive

Summary

Quantum Computing beats Snap on 9 of the 17 factors compared between the two stocks.

Get Quantum Computing News Delivered to You Automatically

Sign up to receive the latest news and ratings for QUBT and its competitors with MarketBeat's FREE daily newsletter.

Subscribe Now
SMS is currently available in Australia, Belgium, Canada, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, New Zealand, the Netherlands, Singapore, South Africa, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States. By entering your phone number and clicking the sign-up button, you agree to receive periodic text messages from MarketBeat at the phone number you submitted, including texts that may be sent using an automatic telephone dialing system. Message and data rates may apply. Message frequency will vary. Messages will consist of stock alerts, news stories, and partner advertisements/offers. Consent is not a condition of the purchase of any goods or services. Text HELP for help/customer support. Unsubscribe at any time by replying "STOP" to any text message that you receive from MarketBeat or by visiting our mailing preferences page. Read our full terms of service and privacy policy.

New MarketBeat Followers Over Time

This chart shows the number of new MarketBeat users adding QUBT and its top 5 competitors to their watchlist. Each company is represented with a line over a 90 day period.
Skip Chart

Media Sentiment Over Time

This chart shows the average media sentiment of NASDAQ and its competitors over the past 90 days as caculated by MarketBeat. The averaged score is equivalent to the following: Very Negative Sentiment <= -1.5, Negative Sentiment > -1.5 and <= -0.5, Neutral Sentiment > -0.5 and < 0.5, Positive Sentiment >= 0.5 and < 1.5, and Very Positive Sentiment >= 1.5.
Skip Chart

QUBT vs. The Competition

MetricQuantum ComputingINTERNET SOFTWARE IndustryComputer SectorNASDAQ Exchange
Market Cap$2.56B$16.32B$38.56B$12.21B
Dividend YieldN/A4.98%3.22%5.36%
P/E Ratio-40.4762.54168.5625.32
Price / Sales3,752.9244.72626.5571.95
Price / CashN/A68.4146.5955.00
Price / BookN/A9.1310.286.97
Net Income-$63.15M$379.18M$1.06B$334.92M
7 Day Performance-3.42%0.67%-0.04%-0.98%
1 Month Performance20.39%-0.83%4.39%0.43%
1 Year Performance7.49%-5.90%167.06%33.61%

Quantum Computing Competitors List

CompanyMarketRankShare PriceAnalysts' Price Target1Y Price PerformanceMarket CapRevenueP/E RatioEmployee CountIndicator(s)
QUBT
Quantum Computing
2.8986 of 5 stars
$11.29
+18.1%
$17.50
+55.0%
-16.9%$2.55B$680KN/A30
NVDA
NVIDIA
4.981 of 5 stars
$226.96
+2.8%
$277.32
+22.2%
+66.3%$5.51T$215.94B46.2942,000
DT
Dynatrace
4.0608 of 5 stars
$33.75
-13.9%
$51.08
+51.3%
-25.3%$10.07B$1.70B55.335,200
TTD
Trade Desk
4.5708 of 5 stars
$20.49
-3.1%
$36.29
+77.2%
-72.7%$9.76B$2.90B23.293,843
YMM
Full Truck Alliance
4.9824 of 5 stars
$9.34
+6.2%
$11.41
+22.3%
-30.2%$9.73B$1.79B15.568,251

Related Companies and Tools


This page (NASDAQ:QUBT) was last updated on 5/21/2026 by MarketBeat.com Staff.
From Our Partners